Outrage in Israel as hostage ‘horror' videos emerge at decision time for Netanyahu's government
'Every day, my body becomes weaker and weaker,' the 24-year-old hostage adds, 'and time is running out.'
This is just one of the horrifying scenes recorded in the latest hostage videos released by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad at the weekend showing two of the surviving Israeli hostages, kidnapped on October 7, 2023, sharply deteriorating in captivity.
Broadcast of the disturbing images across Israeli and international media was approved by the traumatized hostage families, who told CNN they wanted the plight of their loved ones to be witnessed.
'Evyatar was a young, healthy man before he was abducted, even a bit chubby. Now he looks like a skeleton, a human skeleton, buried alive,' the captive's brother, Ilay David, told CNN in Tel Aviv.
The state of Rom Braslavski, still just 22, seems even more dire. In a video released by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group holding him, his emaciated body is shown writhing in pain on the floor of a makeshift Gaza prison as he tearfully pleads for relief.
'My foot doesn't look good and I can't walk to the bathroom. I've run out of food and water. I can't sleep, I can't live,' he sobs.
His own mother says her son's weak voice sounds like he's accepted he may never come out alive.
The videos come amid a worsening hunger crisis in Gaza, with a UN-backed food security agency warning this week that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in the territory. Health officials in Gaza say a further 13 people died from malnutrition over the weekend, including one child, bringing the total death toll from starvation since the conflict began in 2023 to at least 175.
Demonstrators take part in a protest to demand the immediate release of hostages held in Gaza since the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and to end the war, as a video released by Hamas of hostage Evyatar David is displayed, in Tel Aviv, Israel, on August 2.
Ammar Awad/Reuters
It all piles further pressure on the Israeli government, already facing growing international isolation over the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza, and now facing renewed calls for it to get the remaining 50 hostages back home from Gaza as soon as possible.
How best to do that is one of the key questions dividing Israeli opinion.
'The horror videos by Hamas stem from one goal – their attempt to pressure the State of Israel,' said Itmar Ben Gvir, the right-wing firebrand, in remarks made during a controversial visit at the weekend to the Al Aqsa Mosque compound in East Jerusalem, known to Jews as Temple Mount.
'It is from here that a message must be sent: to conquer the entire Gaza Strip, declare sovereignty over all of Gaza, eliminate every Hamas member, and encourage voluntary emigration. Only in this way will we bring back the hostages and win the war,' Ben Gvir added.
His calls to double down on Israel's already devastating military action in Gaza, and to essentially evict the local Palestinian population, might be dismissed as the ravings of a fringe radical.
But Ben Gvir is a senior minister in the Israeli government and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu depends on him and other Jewish nationalist hardliners, who are against any kind of deal with Hamas, to keep his fragile governing coalition in power.
Furthermore, Israeli media reports suggest Netanyahu may indeed be leaning towards stepping up military operations in Gaza.
In the past, many Israelis, including many hostage families, have accused Netanyahu of deliberately prolonging the Gaza conflict in order to preserve his governing coalition, accusing him of essentially sacrificing their loved ones to cling on to power.
But the latest hostage videos, showing emaciated captives in a, frankly, appalling state have provoked shock and outrage across Israel.
With hostage families convinced time is running out for their loved ones to be rescued or returned, enormous pressure has been placed on the Israeli government to strike a deal with Hamas before it is too late.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
10 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
The UN says Rwanda-backed rebels killed over 300 civilians in Congo in the past month - Africa
Rwanda-backed rebels killed at least 319 people over the past month in eastern Congo, the U.N. human rights chief said Wednesday, describing the toll as one of the largest documented in such attacks since the M23 rebels resurfaced in 2022. Citing firsthand accounts, U.N. human rights chief Volker Türk said in a statement that the rebels, backed by members of the Rwandan Defence Force, targeted four villages in North Kivu province's Rutshuru territory between July 9 and July 21. The continuing violence could threaten Qatar-led efforts to get Congo and the rebels to sign a permanent peace deal by the goal of Aug. 18. One of the deal's conditions is the protection of civilians and safe return of millions of people displaced by the conflict. There was no immediate comment from M23 or the Rwandan government. The M23 early this year seized two key cities in eastern Congo in a major escalation, with the help of neighbouring Rwandan forces. Congo has long been wracked by deadly conflict in its mineral-rich east, with more than 100 armed groups. The two sides, on July 19, signed a declaration of principles in Qatar to end the fighting and commit to a comprehensive peace agreement that would include the restoration of state authorities in key eastern cities controlled by the insurgents. The new U.N. statement said deadly attacks occurred in the days following that signing. 'I am appalled by the attacks on civilians by the M23 and other armed groups" despite the declaration, the U.N. human rights chief said, calling for an immediate end to attacks on civilians. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
12 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Hunger strike, rage grip West Bank village after Israeli settler kills prominent Palestinian activist - War on Gaza
Sixty women are on hunger strike in the occupied West Bank village of Umm al-Khair after 31-year-old teacher and prominent activist Odeh al-Hathaleen was shot dead by a settler during a raid backed by Israeli forces. His body remains withheld, and his village under siege. The events unfolded last week when a group of settlers, accompanied by army forces, raided Umm al-Khair in Masafer Yatta, uprooting trees and cutting water and electricity lines. When residents protested, they were met with brute force. Among those resisting was al-Hathaleen: an English teacher, father of three, and tireless advocate for his community who was recently featured in the Oscar-winning documentary, No Other Land. During a confrontation in which settlers drove a bulldozer through village land, al-Hathaleen was killed. Eyewitnesses say settler Yinon Levi—who had previously been under US sanctions lifted by the Trump administration—fired the fatal shot. Video footage appears to show Levi shooting wildly as villagers scream. Al-Hathaleen, standing in the village square near the community centre, collapsed. 'Returning home, he was on his way to help us when the bullet hit him,' his cousin, Alaa al-Hathaleen, told the BBC. 'The first shot missed. The second struck him in the heart.' After the shooting, Israeli forces stormed the village, seized his body, and arrested five young men, including a doctor who had tried to save him. A Jerusalem magistrate's court later released Levi. 'Even in death, they pursue us' For more than a week, Israeli authorities have withheld al-Hathaleen's remains. The family says they were offered strict conditions for his burial: transferring the body to Hebron or Yatta, but not allowing him to be laid to rest in his home village. Even if buried in Umm al-Khair, the proposed terms were harsh—no funeral, no mourning tent, and a midnight burial under heavy military presence, with no more than 15 attendees. In protest, 60 women from the village went on a hunger strike, demanding Israel release his body for a dignified burial. When the family attempted to erect a mourning tent, Israeli forces raided the village again. They dismantled the tent and forcibly removed mourners, activists, and journalists from the area. 'Even in death, they pursue us,'Alaa al-Hathaleen said. Dreams of annexation Anti-settlement activists say Levi has led attacks that displaced more than 300 Palestinians from four nearby hamlets since establishing a settlement outpost known as Meitarim Farm in 2021, as reported by the Associated Press (AP). In an interview last year, after the sanctions were imposed, Levi claimed the land was his and that he was defending it from 'encroachment' by Palestinians. While over 500,000 Israeli settlers in the occupiedWest Bank hold full citizenship rights, the territory's 3 million Palestinians live under military rule. The Palestinian Authority (PA) exercises limited autonomy in certain towns and cities. Rights groups say Israeli security forces frequently ignore settler violence or intervene on the settlers' side during confrontations with Palestinians. Umm al-Khair lies within Area C of the West Bank, under full Israeli control, and sits just below the Israeli settlement of Carmel. All Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967, are illegal under international law. The killing of al-Hathaleen is part of a broader pattern of violence against Palestinians, reflecting increasingly overt plans to annex West Bank land and impose new facts on the ground. In late July, the Israeli Knesset passed a non-binding resolution to apply Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank. Palestinians have expressed concern that the declaration could pave the way for accelerated settlement construction, demolitions, and forced displacement. Since the outbreak of the war on Gaza in October 2023, the Israeli military has conducted major operations across the West Bank, killing hundreds and displacing tens of thousands. In tandem, settler attacks on Palestinians have surged. Israeli settlersand soldiers have killed at least 1,010 Palestinians and injured over 7,000 in the occupied West Bank since the outset of the war on Gaza, according to local health authorities. Al-Hathaleen's killing prompted a wave of international condemnation. The French foreign ministry issued a statement urging the Israeli government to hold the perpetrator accountable and labelled settler violence 'a matter of terrorism'. 'A victim of a decades-long project to uproot Palestinians' Al-Hathaleen's death now marks a tragic coda to the story he helped tell in No Other Land, the Oscar-winning documentary that captured the daily struggle of Masafer Yatta's native Palestinian population to remain on their land in the face of escalating violence, forced displacement, and illegal settlement expansion. His presence in the film—calm, defiant, rooted—reflected a life shaped by resistance. In death, he has become a symbol of the very project the documentary sought to expose, sparking an outpouring of grief from family, international activists, and rights groups. In an interview with the BBC, No Other Land's Palestinian co-director, Basel Adra, said Odeh believed that a camera could expose what voices, trapped and silenced in this land, could not. 'Odeh was not merely killed by a settler's bullet,' added Israeli journalist and human rights activist Andrej Krasnowsky, a close friend to al-Hathleen. 'His death is the result of a decades-long project aimed at emptying this land of its people.' Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
16 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Tapes, transcripts, subpoenas, and legal twists: Trump's Epstein storm deepens again
Lordy, there are tapes. In the latest turn of the immortal scandal over Jeffrey Epstein, CNN first reported Tuesday that Donald Trump's administration has recorded conversations with Epstein's convicted sex trafficker accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell and is working on a transcript, which it may even release. The revelation about Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's conversations with Maxwell last month is certain to renew demands for transparency from sectors of the president's base that first whipped the Epstein storm into overdrive. And it comes as senior administration officials plan to meet at Vice President JD Vance's residence for dinner Wednesday to discuss how to better handle the Epstein case, CNN's team reported. Taking a step back, it's an extraordinary use of an administration's power for a top Justice Department official to spend two days talking to someone convicted of grooming, abusing and trafficking young girls for a figure as reviled as Epstein. The idea that officials would then consider releasing an account of the meeting to brazenly help a president escape a political scandal raises ethical, legal and political questions that reflect the unfathomable times in Trump's second term. But it's hard to see how releasing a transcript of the interview with Maxwell could end up making people less interested in the intrigue — which would be the ostensible purpose of the exercise. More likely, such a move would risk repeating the damaging cycle that has plunged the White House ever deeper into a political morass. Every time the administration takes a step designed to quell the scandal, all it succeeds in doing is raising expectations and brewing new conspiracy theories among MAGA activists obsessed with the case while widening public exposure to an episode that has blotted out the president's summer winning streak. Three senior administration officials told CNN that discussions are taking place about releasing the transcript of Maxwell's interviews with Blanche in Florida two weeks ago. That was before she was moved, without explanation, to a less draconian prison in Texas — a step that itself launched new speculation and suggestions that Trump was misusing presidential power to advance his personal interests. A final decision on next steps on a transcript has not been made, one of the officials said. But this news came on a day when the Epstein question broke the surface in Washington again — just when the White House hoped it was fading. News came Tuesday that the House Oversight Committee had issued a dozen subpoenas to the Justice Department and high-profile Democratic and Republican figures for files and information related to Epstein. And in the latest step of a complex dance with the administration, Maxwell's lawyers warned against the release of sealed grand jury transcripts about the Epstein case. They said the move — one way the DOJ is seeking to appease demands for transparency from the Trump base — would prejudice her due process interests as she petitions the Supreme Court to take up her appeal. 'Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not,' Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, wrote to the judge in a filing. The aphorism is factual. But Epstein's poisoned influence on politics has never been so alive, six years after he was found dead by suicide in his cell while awaiting trial on a catalogue of horrific charges of abusing young women and girls. Many of those victims on Tuesday questioned the motives of the Trump administration in its dealings with Maxwell and said that indications that she was being 'legitimized' had traumatized them all over again. They told the judge in the grand jury documents case that survivors supported transparency but said the 'safety, privacy and dignity' of victims must be protected. Why a Maxwell transcript might make the scandal even worse There's been intense speculation about the past friendship between Epstein and Trump, both New York and Florida celebrities, in the 1990s and the early 2000s, before the future president threw the disgraced financier out of his Mar-a-Lago club. Epstein 'stole' his employees, Trump told reporters last week. There's no evidence that Trump did anything legally wrong during his friendship with Epstein, and he has never been charged with any crimes related to their connection. This undated trial evidence image obtained December 8, 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, shows Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in Queen's log cabin at Balmoral. US District Court for the Southern District of New York The president, however, keeps refocusing attention on Epstein's case by refusing to rule out a pardon or commutation for Maxwell. Trump instead keeps noting that he has the power to ease the plight of someone who has a huge incentive to help him. 'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it. I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it,' Trump said in an interview with Newsmax, a conservative outlet, last week. It is unclear what Blanche and Maxwell spoke about. But the point of releasing a transcript might be to show Epstein knew multiple famous people and not just Trump. This might defuse concerns about the president's past relationship with him. But such a release might also be unfair to people who came across Epstein but who committed no crimes. There would be issues with Maxwell's credibility as a witness, given the nature of the conviction for which she is serving a 20-year prison sentence. People would ask what she got in return for her cooperation. Already, survivors of Epstein's abuse and the family of Virginia Giuffre, one of his most well-know victims, who took her life this year, have warned there should be no leniency. Trump insisted, as he answered a question from CNN's Kaitlan Collins on Tuesday, that he knew nothing about the contents of Blanche's talks with Maxwell. 'So, I know this. I didn't discuss it with him, but anything he talked about with her, or the fact that he did that — not unusual, number one, and most importantly, is something that would be totally above board,' the president said. But it is highly unusual for a deputy attorney general to meet with an imprisoned inmate convicted of child sex trafficking as a related scandal swirls around the president who appointed him. And Blanche is Trump's former personal lawyer. And in any case, any notion that a transcript would end the Epstein drama feels far-fetched. The document would need to be heavily redacted to avoid revealing sensitive details like the names of victims. But this would surely fuel fringe intriguers who argue that the government is involved in a massive cover-up. It's the nature of conspiracy theories that efforts to squelch them only spark new tributaries of unhinged speculation. This has already happened. Previous disclosures by Attorney General Pam Bondi of documents and details in the case only conjured claims of a deep state plot to hide the truth when the release fell far short of her promises to MAGA activists. House Oversight ensures this drama will run and run The House Oversight Committee's subpoena to the Justice Department calls for the provision to Congress of any Epstein files in its possession, with victims' names redacted. The GOP-led panel also wants communications between former Biden administration officials and the Justice Department related to the case. Departments of Justice often resist releasing sensitive documents to Congress: They often leak. But Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, who serves on the House Oversight Committee, told CNN's Jake Tapper on Tuesday the House would reinforce the demand for action in September, when Khanna is hoping for a vote on his bipartisan bill demanding the full release of information. 'I think soon you are going to see many victims speaking out themselves about how this is important for them, in terms of disclosure in terms of transparency,' Khanna said. The Republican-led panel additionally subpoenaed 10 individuals for closed-door depositions between August and mid-October. Those are: former Attorneys General Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales; former FBI Director James Comey; former special counsel and FBI Director Robert Mueller III; former Secretary of State and first lady Hillary Clinton; and former President Bill Clinton. But there are huge omissions on the list of subpoenas that raise doubts about whether it's really seeking full transparency. Like Trump, who was mentioned multiple times in the Epstein files, and his first-term Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, who handed Epstein a sweetheart plea deal in 2008. There are also no victims — people who have often been ignored in the current political uproar — on the subpoena list. Ryan Goodman, a New York University law professor, said the omission of Trump from the subpoenas was 'very glaring,' since a subpoena sent to former President Bill Clinton said Clinton could have information regarding Epstein that may be relevant to the investigation. The same is true of Trump. 'It only stands to reason that if you are looking around for the people that would provide information for the investigation, he (Trump) would be pretty close to the top of that list,' Goodman told CNN's Erin Burnett. The subpoenas likely mean months of negotiations and legal battles about the timing and scope of testimony. So the Epstein saga is here to stay. The inclusion of the names of high-profile Democrats and past Republican officials may be an attempt to spare Trump from being the only person tainted by association with Epstein. Maxwell's legal conundrum The warning by Maxwell's lawyers that grand jury testimony should not be released potentially puts their client in opposition to the Justice Department at a time when she has strong incentives to help the administration. The DOJ went to court to ask for the release of grand jury transcripts about Epstein and Maxwell, hoping to placate the MAGA base. The testimony, however, is thought to be only a fraction of investigative material the DOJ is holding. Some observers question whether officials really want grand jury documents released or whether they petitioned the judge only to create political cover. CNN Senior Legal Analyst Elie Honig explained that Maxwell's lawyers are protecting her interests in the event that Supreme Court accepts her appeal. Her lawyer would 'not want this grand jury material out there for the public,' he told CNN's Kasie Hunt. Taken together, Tuesday's developments mean Epstein drama will go on. And the history of tapes in American scandals — from Watergate onward — create evocative echoes. Audio and questions about its release, redaction and editing have been inseparable from lore about cover-ups and chicanery in Washington politics. That's why — amid a previous scandal — Comey replied, when asked whether there were recordings of his conversations with Trump: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes.'
