Yemen's Houthis threaten to target ships linked to firms dealing with Israeli ports
In a televised statement, the Houthis' military spokesperson warned that ships would be attacked if companies ignored their warnings, regardless of their destination.
"The Yemeni Armed Forces call on all countries, if they want to avoid this escalation, to pressure the enemy to halt its aggression and lift the blockade on the Gaza Strip," he added.
Since Israel's war in Gaza began in October 2023, the Iran-aligned Houthis have been attacking ships they deem as bound or linked to Israel in what they say are acts of solidarity with Palestinians.
In May, the U.S. announced a surprise deal with the Houthis where it agreed to stop a bombing campaign against them in return for an end to shipping attacks, though the Houthis said the deal did not include sparing Israel. (Reporting by Hatem Maher and Muhammad Al Gebaly; editing by Diane Craft and Marguerita Choy)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'
The United States on Monday lashed out at a United Nations conference promoting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict that was hosted by its close allies France and Saudi Arabia. The US State Department labelled the three-day event "unproductive and ill-timed", as well as a "publicity stunt" that would make finding peace harder. The diplomatic push is a "reward for terrorism", the statement said. The US deployed even harsher words against French President Emmanuel Macron, calling his decision to recognise a Palestinian state last week 'counterproductive', saying its Nato ally's decision 'undercuts our diplomatic efforts'. France is hoping that the UK will follow its lead. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters More than 200 British members of parliament voiced support for the idea on Friday, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer has resisted. Middle East Eye has revealed that the US pressured both the UK and France against recognising Palestine earlier this year. The conference kicked off on Monday in New York City, with participants reaffirming that there is "no alternative" to the conflict besides a two-state solution. France and Saudi Arabia's leadership of the event underscores how the US's unchecked support for Israel's war on Gaza is putting its diplomacy at odds with key partners. "Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. UN secretary general Antonio Guterres said at the meeting that "the two-state solution is farther than ever before", decrying Israel's "creeping annexation" of the occupied West Bank and "the wholesale destruction of Gaza". The meeting comes as Gaza descends into famine as a result of Israel's siege of the enclave. Hundreds of starving Palestinians have been killed trying to obtain food from the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation that is backed by the US and Israel. Deaths from famine and malnutrition have soared in recent days. US asked Saudi Arabia to send missile interceptors to Israel during Iran conflict. Riyadh refused Read More » US President Donald Trump was asked about the famine on Monday and did not dispute it. 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, you can't fake that.' 'Those children look very hungry,' he said. 'We have to get the kids fed.' But Trump has continued to fault Hamas for the crisis, claiming the group is stealing aid despite a US government assessment contradicting that accusation. More than two dozen of the US's allies - including countries traditionally close to Israel - have accused it of 'drip feeding' aid into Gaza. The Trump administration has clashed with Israel on several issues - including striking an independent ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen and condemning Israeli strikes on Syria - but has given it full backing for Israel to wage war on Gaza. Last week, Trump announced that the US was pulling out of ceasefire talks. He blamed Hamas for the impasse, a move analysts say was in keeping with more than two years of US messaging to provide cover to Israel for acts of genocide in Gaza, according to two major Israeli human rights groups and scores of western organisations. "It's widely understood that there are no real strategic objectives to fulfill militarily unless the ultimate goal is displacement," Michael Hanna, a Middle East expert at the International Crisis Group, told MEE previously. "In the meantime, it appears the US is willing to stand by as famine deepens throughout Gaza." Even as the US criticised the UN summit, its top participants tried to entice Trump back to talks. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud said Trump could be a "catalyst" to ending the war in Gaza and jump-starting the two-state solution. Trump has regularly said he wants to strike a normalisation deal with Saudi Arabia and Israel, building on the 2020 Abraham Accords, which he considers a signature foreign policy achievement. Riyadh says to achieve that goal, Israel would need to take irreversible steps towards the creation of a Palestinian state, with a ceasefire in Gaza the first precondition. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said publicly that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Beyond facilitating conditions for the recognition of a Palestinian state, the three days of meeting will focus on three other issues, including the reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and normalisation of relations with Israel by Arab states as part of a two-state solution.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US: Protesters descend on home of GHF's executive director
Several dozen protesters on Friday, calling attention to Israel's starvation of Palestinians in Gaza, made their way to the doorstep of the man running the scandal-plagued and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), demanding the organisation be dismantled. "GHF only aids ethnic cleansing," they chanted as they marched to the home of interim executive director John Acree in Vienna, Virginia, just a half-hour drive from Washington, DC. "Gaza needs medicine, food, and housing," they continued, according to a video shared by the Palestinian Youth Movement advocacy group, and posted to its Telegram account. Protesters draped in keffiyehs banged pots and pans as they gathered on the public sidewalk outside Acree's doorstep and laid out props showcasing GHF food parcels splattered in blood, symbolising more than 1,000 Palestinians - according to the United Nations - who have been gunned down by Israeli forces or American military contractors at four different aid distribution sites in Gaza. The irony was not lost on the crowd when, at one point, a woman opened the door of Acree's home, smiled, and waved at the protesters before picking up what appeared to be a food delivery drop-off. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Nearly 150 Palestinians have died as a direct result of starvation, Gaza health officials have said. The vast majority of them were young children, given that baby formula is banned by Israel from entering Gaza and is confiscated if brought in by volunteer doctors in their luggage. Rights groups as well as the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah have referred to the GHF sites as "death traps" after videos emerged of what appeared to be a kettling process, whereby military contractors from the US and UK funnelled thousands of Palestinians waiting for aid into narrow fencing that resembled a long cage under the scorching summer sun. As they moved to obtain what they described as meagre rations of rice, oil and pasta, the Israeli military would then open fire on them. Doctors in Gaza have recounted a pattern of gunshots to the groin in young men in particular. GHF began operations in May as the only entity approved by Israel to distribute aid inside Gaza. Israel imposed a total siege there in mid-March and blocked operations by the United Nations Relief Works Agency (Unrwa) and other aid groups such as Anera, despite their decades-long expertise, embedded infrastructure, and trust among locals. Even World Central Kitchen was barred from making hot meals for several months until its slow return on Friday. Despite a mounting death toll and gruesome testimony from survivors, the Trump administration approved $30m in funding for the GHF, even after a report from the now-defunct United States Agency for International Development (USAID) said the plan lacked basic details for an initiative of this scale. Who is John Acree? Acree's career has largely been spent at USAID or USAID-funded initiatives, according to his LinkedIn profile. 'A distraction': Unrwa says Israeli and GHF claims over UN aid delivery are baseless Read More » Since at least 1999, he has mostly worked from the Washington headquarters in project leadership and senior advisory roles, managing what he described as "development" programmes in Afghanistan and Iraq targeting internally displaced and high-risk populations. Acree also served as the point person for the US Department of Defence at USAID in Kabul, and repeatedly talked about building a "civilian-military partnership" with groups such as US special forces in the country. Until USAID was dismantled by President Donald Trump in March, Acree was the head of its regional disaster assistance programme in Costa Rica - a shift from most of his previous work in war zones where the US military was operating. Since May, he appears to be "on site" at GHF's headquarters in Tel Aviv, Israel. In a post he shared on LinkedIn in June, Acree said he accepted the position to be interim leader of GHF because "the needs on the ground would be staggering, and the operational environment would be among the most complex and constrained I've seen in my career". "I've worked in humanitarian emergencies for over two decades. I've seen what happens when systems break down under pressure," he wrote. "But I've also seen what becomes possible when organizations are willing to challenge the status quo - with focus, integrity, and an openness to doing things differently." That difference, however, may have caused far more harm than longstanding aid groups would be willing to risk or tolerate, given that a group of US Senate Democrats is now calling on Trump to defund the GHF. Aside from the $30m provided by the US government, GHF has never disclosed any of its funding sources, and its first executive director resigned before aid distribution even began. " GHF does not control the war," Acree wrote on his LinkedIn account in response to the criticism lobbed at the organisation. "We do not control the borders, the checkpoints, or the broader circumstances in which aid must flow. But we are working within those constraints".
The National
an hour ago
- The National
UK told to reconsider refusal to help Gaza family come to Britain
A judge has told the UK government to reconsider its decision not to support a Palestinian family's attempts to leave Gaza after they were told they could join a family member in Britain. The family of six, which includes two children under 10, were granted entry clearance to the UK in January, subject to them attending a visa application centre and providing biometric information. They need consular support to leave Gaza, which the Foreign Office refused to provide on several occasions, most recently on June 6. Their case came under the spotlight in February when it emerged the family had successfully applied to come to the UK through a scheme designed for Ukrainian refugees. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said at the time he wanted to close a 'loophole' that had allowed the Palestinian family the right to remain in the UK. The family's lawyers told the High Court in London this month that the decision not to provide support was unlawful and that the Foreign Office should be ordered to take 'all reasonable steps' to help them leave Gaza. The department defended the claim, with its lawyers telling the court that the decision was 'rational'. In a ruling on Monday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the decision would be sent back to the Foreign Office for reconsideration. 'The challenged decision of June 6, 2025 is flawed and cannot stand. It will have to be reconsidered,' he said. 'This does not mean that the Foreign Secretary is obliged to decide in the claimants' favour, just that he must think again.' In his ruling, the judge said the family's apartment block was destroyed in October 2023 after they were given a 10-minute warning from the Israeli military and they now live in a tent. He said they have 'very little food and no effective sanitation', and remain 'at constant risk of injury or death'. Three of the family members have been fired upon by Israeli forces close to an aid distribution site and one was hit by shrapnel from a tank shell but was unable to access proper medical treatment, said the judge. They applied to join a relative who lives in the UK in January last year but the Home Office refused their bid in May 2024. After appealing the decision, they were granted permission to enter the UK in January this year. But when it emerged the family had applied through a Ukrainian refugee scheme, the Prime Minister told the House of Commons the decision was wrong. Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said decision to allow them to come to the UK 'cannot be allowed to stand'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said the Home Office is due to appeal the decision to allow the family to enter the UK in January 2026. At the hearing this month, Tim Owen KC, for the family, told the court the decision to refuse consular assistance was 'reached by a process which was procedurally unfair' and 'constitutes a disproportionate interference' with their rights. Julian Milford KC, for the Foreign Office, said the decision was 'rational and lawful' and that consular support was 'only offered in exceptional circumstances'. Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled the decision did not interfere with the family's human rights and that entry clearance being granted 'did not in and of itself give rise to any obligation to provide consular assistance'. But he said the consequences of the decision were 'certainly grave' and that it was 'irrational'.
