Just 5 minutes a day of these exercises can sharpen your brain as you age
Researchers from the University of South Australia and the U.S.-based AdventHealth Research Institute found that as few as five minutes of moderate-to-vigorous exercise a day correlated to significantly better cognitive performance. The study, published in the British journal Age & Ageing in early April, examined data from hundreds of people 65 to 80 years old.
Researchers found that "huff-and-puff" movements, like running or lap swimming, were associated with better brain functions including information processing, focusing and multitasking and short-term memory. They also found that even a few minutes of moderate exercise like walking improves brain functions.
'Our key finding was that moving from doing zero minutes or very little moderate-to-vigorous physical activity to doing just five minutes a day — that's where the biggest gain in cognitive function was seen,' said the study's lead author, Maddison Mellow, a research associate at the University of South Australia.
The researchers distinguished between moderate and vigorous exercise by applying a simple test: whether subjects could still manage to speak full sentences after moving around. Vigorous exercise makes that impossible, said Audrey Collins, a postdoctoral research scientist at AdventHealth Research Institute and the paper's co-lead author.
The study observed 585 people, all in good health. Their physical activity was measured using accelerometers they wore on their wrists; the researchers tested cognitive functions using online and paper-based tests.
Worth noting: This study also found a 'strong relationship' between spending little to no time doing moderate to vigorous activity and poorer cognitive performance, Mellow said. One slightly surprising finding, she added, was that the cognitive performance gains from exercise don't extend to longer-term memory and visual-spatial functions like judging distances or sizes.
The study was novel in that it categorized how people divided their days into three behaviors: sleep, sedentary and active. And though getting enough quality sleep is important to brain health in midlife and beyond, the researchers said that when forced to choose between minutes spent sleeping and minutes spent exercising, reducing sleep time to spend more time moving resulted in better brain function.
'It didn't really matter, in this sample, where time was coming from, whether from sleep, sedentary behavior or light intensity physical activity,' Mellow said. 'So long as time was being increased in moderate vigorous activity, that's where the benefits were being shown for cognitive outcomes.'
With that in mind, what are some moderate or vigorous bursts of exercise for older adults to do every day? We consulted experts to give you five accessible options.
Two experts I spoke with each said the easiest way to clock those five daily minutes for brain health is by walking.
'Walking is No. 1, because that's the easiest,' said E. Todd Schroeder, professor of clinical physical therapy and the director of the Clinical Exercise Research Center at USC. Very sedentary older adults may want to start with simple flat-ground walking at their normal pace, Schroeder says.
If you're already a steady, regular walker, kick up the pace to elevate your heart rate into that all-important moderate category.
'A brisk walk is considered to be moderate activity,' said Rob Musci, an assistant professor of health and human sciences at Loyola Marymount University. On a scale of 1 to 10, moderate exercise is what you would consider being in the 4 to 6 range, Musci said.
To achieve a real huff-and-puff workout, walking or hiking briskly uphill is excellent, Schroeder said, because it also necessarily requires walking back down hill.
'That interval-type training is good,' he said, 'where your heart rate goes up for a time then comes back down.'
Swimming is a terrific way to get a full-body workout and raise your heart rate.
'It's easy on the joints,' Shroeder said. 'Even if you struggle with the technique of swimming, you can put on fins and get some at least moderate exercise.'
Cycling can be on a stationary bike or an outdoor bike, many of which are now battery-assisted, making pedaling up hills almost too easy. One reason I like old-fashioned outdoor bikes, sans batteries, is that they also train balance and require your brain to keep you safe.
Lifting weights is one of the best ways to maintain muscle strength as we age, Musci said. Try these simple exercises you can easily do at home in fewer than three minutes. They include:
Tossing a weighted ball from one hand to another (try it standing on one leg)
Squats holding a kettlebell, dumbbell, a bag of oranges or nothing at all
Weighted chest presses in boat pose
Gardening can be a great way to engage core muscles, encourage flexibility and practice fine motor skills. Even basic house cleaning, like scrubbing a bathtub or mopping a floor, can qualify as moderate exercise.
'Anything that gets your heart going is what we're looking for,' Musci said. 'You hear about all these high-end interventions, fitness programs and boot camps, but in reality, it's just movement.'
The most important thing, he said, is 'just getting off the couch.'
Von Zielbauer is the creator of Aging With Strength on Substack.
Sign up for The Wild newsletter to get weekly insider tips on the best of our beaches, trails, parks, deserts, forests and mountains.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Divers reveal images of 321-year-old shipwreck in remarkable condition off coast
A preserved shipwreck from 1703 was recently documented in stunning detail for the first time – with experts cautioning that it may not stay this way for very long. Researchers dove off the coast of Kent, England, to view the wreck of "The Northumberland" last summer. The Stuart-era ship was built in 1679 and sank during the Great Storm of 1703. (See the video at the top of this article.) The site was designated a Protected Wreck Site in 1981 — but it hasn't been seen so clearly until now. Officials revealed the results of the dive on July 31, sharing pictures of a shipwreck covered by marine sediment. The sands have aided the survival of the wreck, which is roughly 50 to 65 feet underwater. The dive was conducted by Historic England, British coastal contractor MSDS Marine and Dan Pascoe, the licensee of the wreck. Historic England told Fox News Digital that divers found an extensive hull structure, exposed deck planks and the wooden frame of the ship – which is "much more than previously thought." Among the finds were multiple wooden chests – some still containing musketballs – as well as one sealed chest with unknown contents. Researchers also came across seven iron cannons, along with copper cauldrons and rope. Experts cited shifting sands as the main threat to the wreck. Hefin Meara, a maritime archaeologist at Historic England, told Fox News Digital the sand on the coast of England is "highly dynamic." Only the most robust materials, such as anchors and iron cannons, tend to survive. "The Goodwin Sands provide an excellent environment for the preservation of organic material, such as ship timbers, rope and other objects," he said. "Once the sand cover migrates away from the wreck site, biological and physical processes can cause the wreck to deteriorate very quickly," he also said. "'The Northumberland' has so much potential to tell us more about the English Navy and ships of the period." He noted that archaeologists will continue focusing on surveying the site instead of removing the artifacts, which could jeopardize the integrity of the site. Pascoe noted that "The Northumberland" "has the potential to be one of the best-preserved wooden warships in the U.K." MSDS's Alison James emphasized the wealth of information that the wreck could provide about the Stuart era. "'The Northumberland' has so much potential to tell us more about the English Navy and ships of the period," she said. Many historic shipwrecks have been found and documented across the United Kingdom in recent years. In Feb. 2024, a teenager found an American Revolution warship on a Scottish beach. More recently, a former military pilot identified a 19th-century shipwreck in the English Channel.
Scientific American
5 hours ago
- Scientific American
's First Issue, the Solar System Grew by a Planet
In astronomy, 180 years is a very long time—maybe not for the goings-on in the universe but certainly for our understanding of it. When Scientific American published its very first issue 180 years ago this month, our view of the cosmos was substantively different. We had no idea of the scale of the universe or even if anything existed outside our Milky Way galaxy. We didn't know how stars were born, what powered them or where comets came from—or that supernovae were even a thing. Closer to home, astronomers were wildly guessing about how our solar system formed and how Earth's moon came to exist. Heck, we didn't even know how many planets were in the solar system! On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. To be fair, we still don't. But our understanding of our sun's family was still pretty sketchy in August 1845, and it was scarcely a year later that our solar system would grow by an entire planet. For all of antiquity, Saturn was the most distant planet known to humanity. It wasn't until 1781 that German-British astronomer William Herschel reported seeing a slowly moving 'comet' in the constellation Taurus as he scanned the skies with his telescope. It took two years before orbital calculations showed it was not a comet at all but instead a giant planet orbiting the sun beyond Saturn. Uranus, the first new planet ever discovered, was found by accident. Over the ensuing decades, though, astronomers saw that Uranus was misbehaving. Using the mathematical equations governing gravity and orbits, they calculated the shape of Uranus's orbit and used that to predict where the planet should be in the sky. Observations indicated that the actual position of Uranus significantly deviated from what was predicted, however. Sometimes it 'pulled ahead' of the calculated location, and sometimes it lagged behind. Many astronomers wondered these anomalies were caused by another planet lurking unseen beyond Uranus, which itself was, at best, barely visible to the naked eye; a planet farther out would be much dimmer and could have easily escaped detection. But where was it? The sky is huge when you're trying to search for a dim point of light over thousands of square degrees; remember, back then, skywatchers only had their telescopes and eyes. No cameras or detectors were available. Searching for a faint, distant world was like looking for a planetary needle in a cosmic haystack. The mathematics of orbital mechanics offered a shortcut, though. If you assumed a given orbit for the planet, then its position over time could be roughly calculated by its effect on Uranus. This sort of 'X marks the spot' calculation can be done in moments on today's computers, but in the mid-19th century it was done by hand, and the word 'tedious' hardly describes the scope of the work. Still, in the 1840s, independently of each other, two men attempted exactly this. John Couch Adams, a British mathematician and astronomer at the University of Cambridge, worked on the calculations in his spare time starting in 1843. He reported his findings to James Challis, director of the Cambridge Observatory at the time, and to England's Astronomer Royal George Biddell Airy, both of whom treated it chiefly as an interesting bit of math rather than a guide for finding a potential planet. In their defense, however, Adams's calculations were incomplete and not yet suitable to be put into action. At the same time, French astronomer Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier was also working on calculating the presumptive planet's position. He announced his results at a public meeting of the French Academy of Sciences on June 1, 1846. I'll note that Le Verrier only disclosed his calculated locations for the planet on the sky, not his estimates for its mass or orbit. Still, this was enough to cause a minor panic across the Channel when Le Verrier's news reached Cambridge, with Airy realizing the similarity to what Adams was working on. Because discovering the first new planet in 65 years was a matter of great scientific and national pride, Challis went to the telescope and began an urgent, earnest search. Like the calculations themselves, this was a tedious undertaking that involved scanning the sky and comparing what was seen with hand-drawn, not entirely accurate star maps. Making matters even worse, Adams had been working on new solutions to the planet's location and his calculations were flawed, so Challis was looking in the wrong part of the sky. On August 31, 1846, Le Verrier made another presentation to the academy, this time also reporting the putative new world's calculated mass and orbit. Three weeks later, assistant astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle at the Berlin Observatory read of Le Verrier's work. Assisted by a student named Heinrich Louis d'Arrest, Galle took to the observatory's 24-centimeter telescope on the evening of September 23 to look for the planet. Using better star maps than the British had, they sighted the world in the early morning hours of September 24, less than a degree from the position Le Verrier had predicted. As the story is told, Galle read off the coordinates of stars he saw through the eyepiece, and at one point d'Arrest excitedly shouted, 'That star is not on the map!' Thus, Neptune was discovered. Le Verrier is credited for the discovery work, though Adams, upon insistence from the British at the time, is generally also given co-credit. This is controversial because it's not clear just how accurate Adams's results were— see the article 'The Case of the Pilfered Planet,' by science historians William Sheehan, Nicholas Kollerstrom and Craig B. Waff, in the December 2004 issue of Scientific American for details. Still, while Uranus was found by chance, Neptune was found by math (with a helping hand from happenstance). Ironically, that night in September 1846 was not the first time it had ever been observed. Galileo took copious notes when, centuries earlier, he first turned his crude telescope to the sky; we now know he saw Neptune in 1612 and 1613 but mistook it for a star. (Too bad; had he figured it out, he would've been famous.) Neptune had been spotted many other times before as well but passed over for the same reasons. In a very cruel irony, records reveal that Challis himself saw Neptune twice in August 1846 but failed to notice its true nature. I've observed Neptune many times through my own small telescope; it's a wan aqua dot, barely discernable from a faint background star. Still, seeing it myself—knowing those photons took many hours to fly across billions of kilometers of space only to fall into my telescope and onto my retina—has been a thrill. Of course, I've had a huge advantage over Galle, with modern star maps and software that have told me exactly where to look, but that has only shone a spotlight on what an achievement the discovery was almost 180 years ago. And what of the 18 decades since? The universe is vastly larger than we then imagined in 1846, and we can now find Neptune-like planets orbiting other stars by the hundreds. We've also discovered thousands more objects orbiting the sun beyond Neptune, including Pluto. It's almost routine. As for Neptune itself, we've observed it with an array of space telescopes and even sent a space probe, Voyager 2, to fly past the enigmatic giant planet, allowing us to see its array of bizarre moons and weather patterns up close. Scientific American has been there along the way, too, with its first issue in August 1845 nearly coinciding with the discovery of the last known major planet of the solar system. Researchers have taken immense steps in unlocking even deeper secrets of the cosmos over the past 180 years, and during that time, this magazine has played a major role in informing the public about their findings. I'm proud to be a part of this long-running adventure.
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Simple, Noninvasive Eye Tracking May Flag Cognitive Decline
Naturalistic gaze patterns appear to be a simple, noninvasive, and reliable indicator of cognitive decline, new research suggested. Investigators found that gaze patterns during image viewing mirrored memory performance and distinguished healthy adults from those at risk for, or with, cognitive impairment. 'We are still in the early stages of establishing eye tracking as a marker of memory and cognitive status,' lead investigator Jordana S. Wynn, PhD, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, told Medscape Medical News . Although larger, more diverse, and longitudinal research validation is warranted, 'this work lays important groundwork by demonstrating that naturalistic eye movement patterns are meaningfully related to memory function,' she added. The study was published online on August 11 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Novel Research Because the fovea — a small, cone-dense region at the center of the retina — captures high-resolution detail only in the center of the visual field, the eyes must constantly move to sample the full environment. These movements provide a precise, noninvasive measure of how visual information is encoded and retrieved from memory. While prior research has linked certain gaze metrics to memory decline, it remains unclear how multivariate gaze patterns — considering multiple eye movement features together — relate to memory function. For the study, which researchers note is the first work to analyze how eye movements differ across a range of brain health and memory function levels, Wynn and colleagues assessed 106 individuals across five groups — young adults, healthy older adults, individuals at risk for significant cognitive decline, those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and those with amnesia. They hypothesized that changes in gaze patterns would correspond in a linear fashion to cognitive function from the healthiest participants to those with amnesia. The study included two experiments. In the first, participants viewed a series of 120 distinct images, each for 5 seconds, to assess 'idiosyncratic gaze similarity,' or the uniqueness of their viewing patterns. As expected, memory function declined across groups — from young adults to healthy older adults, then to the at-risk group, followed by individuals with MCI and those with amnesia, showing a 'meaningful linear relationship.' In the second experiment, investigators used the same set of images, presenting 60 images once and another 60 three times for 5 seconds each to measure 'repetitive gaze similarity.' This approach revealed whether participants consistently encoded the same image features each time on repeat viewings or if they updated their memory with different features, indicating stronger or more flexible memory encoding. The researchers found that the healthy young adult group encoded unique image features with each image presentation. In contrast, participants with decreased memory and/or hippocampal/medial temporal function tended to focus on the same features each time they saw the same image. These results confirm that memory decline is associated with reduced visual exploration, less effective updating of encoded representations over repeated exposures, and lower differentiation of the images. Exciting, but Not Surprising Wynn said she was not particularly surprised by the study findings. 'Our previous work in healthy populations provided evidence that the brain and cognitive systems supporting eye movements and memory are closely linked. In past experimental work, we found that certain gaze patterns were predictive of memory performance,' she said. Therefore, Wynn and colleagues postulated that memory decline from aging, disease, or injury would yield similar changes in eye movements. 'That our prediction was confirmed was certainly exciting, but not surprising,' she added. The investigators concluded that the results provide 'compelling evidence that naturalistic gaze patterns can serve as a sensitive marker of cognitive decline.' This research lays a foundation for future work using multivariate gaze metrics to diagnose and track memory and/or hippocampal/medial temporal lobe function, they added. It's too early to determine whether naturalistic eye movements could become a first-line screening tool for cognitive decline, Wynn said. 'The value of eye tracking compared to standard neuropsychological tests is that it is noninvasive, cost-effective, and perhaps most importantly, universal,' she noted. Nearly anyone — regardless of age, ability, or language — can view pictures on a screen, so creating a screening tool that doesn't rely on written or verbal responses would be particularly practical, Wynn said. It is still too early to know whether naturalistic eye movements could serve as a first-line screening tool for cognitive decline. Wynn noted that eye tracking is noninvasive, cost-effective, and broadly accessible — anyone, regardless of age, ability, or language, can view images on a screen. With further refinement, she said, these measures could provide a high-resolution way to monitor memory and brain function in clinical settings. Novel Insights Commenting on the research for Medscape Medical News , Mariam Aly, PhD, acting associate professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, said the study 'yields novel insights into how the way people move their eyes can contribute to, and reflect, memory impairments.' 'This elegant study uses sophisticated analyses to provide a comprehensive picture of how eye movement patterns differ across groups that span a continuum of memory abilities.' Importantly, these differences in eye movements were apparent even though participants had no explicit task, added Aly, who was not affiliated with the research. 'This means that assessment of eye movements during natural viewing of images has the potential to be developed into an important tool for detecting memory decline in clinical settings,' she said.
