logo
Former Linda fire chief seeks seat on Yuba board

Former Linda fire chief seeks seat on Yuba board

Yahoo31-05-2025
Retired Linda fire chief and U.S. Air Force veteran Rich Webb announced that he will run for Yuba County Board of Supervisors, District 1, representing the Linda and Edgewater communities.
'My entire adult life has revolved around service and giving back to this community I love,' Webb said. 'First through my service in the Air Force, then through 34 years as a local firefighter, and now as a volunteer for local service groups and organizations that support survivors of tragedy and our first responders.'
Webb's career began at 20 years old when he enlisted in the Air Force, where he trained as a firefighter and an emergency medical technician. After his active duty service, he became a civilian firefighter at Beale Air Force Base and volunteered for the Linda Fire District. He was awarded Yuba County Fireman of Year in 1986, nominated for the Department of Defense Civilian Firefighter of the Year in 1987, promoted to Linda fire captain in 1990 and appointed Linda fire chief in 2000. He served as chief for 20 years and retired in 2020.
Currently, Webb is the president of the Yuba Sutter Trauma Intervention Program, where he volunteers to provide support for survivors of tragedy in the region. He is the vice president of Marysville Kiwanis and has been a member for 17 years. Webb also volunteers for the Yuba-Sutter Food Bank and Adventist Health and Rideout, serves on the Yuba County Measure K Citizens' Oversight Committee, and as president of the Yuba County Community Services Commission, working to reduce poverty in the county.
Webb is seeking the board seat of current District 1 supervisor Andy Vasquez, as he is not seeking reelection. Vasquez, who has served on the board since 2009, has endorsed Webb.
'Rich's background in public safety, his decades of service to Yuba County, his professionalism and his calm, level-headed demeanor are unmatched, and make him the perfect candidate to lead us into the future,' Vasquez said.
Webb said that if he is elected as supervisor, he will continue to support business development and infrastructure improvements in Linda, prioritize county funds for public safety, work to decrease homelessness and transient activity, and 'strive to bring back a sense of community to Linda through neighborhood events and more activities for our youth and seniors.'
'Through decades of good planning and our amazing partnership with the Yuba Water Agency, Linda is thriving and Yuba County has the opportunity to become the top business, residential and tourism destination in the region,' Webb said. 'Now more than ever, it is critical that we elect leaders with a proven track record of leadership, professional success and giving back. I would be honored to continue to serve our community as your next supervisor.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I toured the first presidential aircraft, 'The Flying White House,' used by FDR and Harry Truman. Take a look inside.
I toured the first presidential aircraft, 'The Flying White House,' used by FDR and Harry Truman. Take a look inside.

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

I toured the first presidential aircraft, 'The Flying White House,' used by FDR and Harry Truman. Take a look inside.

The Douglas VC-54C Skymaster was the first plane built specifically for use by the US president. "The Flying White House" became better known by its nickname, the "Sacred Cow." It operated from 1944 to 1961 with an executive conference room and elevator for FDR's wheelchair. Compared to today's luxurious Air Force One jet, the "Sacred Cow" might not look like much, but it marked a significant milestone for air travel and the office of the US president. The Douglas VC-54C Skymaster, nicknamed the Sacred Cow, entered service in 1944 as the first aircraft built for the president of the United States. Officially named "The Flying White House," it featured an executive conference room with a bulletproof window and an elevator shaft for President Franklin D. Roosevelt to board the plane in his wheelchair. It's also regarded as the birthplace of the US Air Force. President Harry Truman signed the National Security Act of 1947 while on board, establishing the Air Force as an independent service. In August, I toured the Douglas VC-54C Skymaster at the National Museum of the US Air Force in Dayton, Ohio. It has been restored and opened to the public. Take a look inside. The Douglas VC-54C Skymaster was the first aircraft built specifically for use by the president of the United States. The first presidential plane was built at the order of General Henry "Hap" Arnold, one of the world's first military aviators who learned to fly from the Wright brothers, according to the US Air Force. Only one VC-54C plane was ever built using a fuselage from a C-54A and wings from a C-54B. President Franklin D. Roosevelt flew on the plane just one time — a visit to Crimea for the Yalta Conference in 1945 — before his death later that year. His successor, President Harry Truman, took more frequent trips. Nicknamed "Sacred Cow," the plane was retired in 1961 and arrived at the National Museum of the US Air Force in Dayton, Ohio, in 1983. The nickname "Sacred Cow" was a nod to "the high security surrounding the aircraft and its special status," according to a plaque at the museum." The Douglas VC-54C is now one of several presidential planes on display in the museum's William E. Boeing Presidential Gallery. My walk-through of the Sacred Cow began in the cockpit. The plane was powered by four Pratt and Whitney R-2000 engines, each with 1,450 horsepower. At top speed, it flew at 300 miles per hour. The radio room was located just behind the flight deck. The radio room featured a telephone that the president could use to communicate with staff on the ground. In the days before air traffic control, a navigator worked at the fold-out table to determine the plane's positioning and flight path. The galley featured an electric refrigerator, a rare luxury on planes in the 1940s. The galley, where crew members prepared meals, also featured a sink and stovetop. Extra fuel was kept in tanks in the cabin. The Sacred Cow kept fuel on board to minimize the number of refueling stops due to security concerns. I was surprised by how narrow the walkway was between the fuel tanks, about 19 inches, according to the museum. A small conference area featured two chairs, a table, and curtains. The cabin wasn't pressurized, so passengers had to wear oxygen masks when flying at high altitudes. Stacked above the conference room, a narrow bunk included a pillow, blanket, and seatbelt. The plane featured seven crew members and could hold 15 passengers. The executive conference room in the back of the plane functioned as the president's workspace. The square window behind the desk where the president sat was the only bulletproof window on board. The room was equipped with a phone and a folding desk with the presidential seal. A battery-powered elevator was built for Roosevelt to board the Sacred Cow in his wheelchair. The elevator shaft was located across from the executive conference room, allowing Roosevelt easy access to the space. Behind the executive conference room, more meeting spaces were built for the presidential staff. The Flying White House is a small plane packed with history, making for a fascinating exhibit. Staff at the National Museum of the US Air Force spent 10 years and 34,000 hours restoring the Sacred Cow to its former glory. The display provides a rare look inside an early presidential aircraft and shows how far Air Force One has come in under a century.

Democrats push their own version of no tax on tips
Democrats push their own version of no tax on tips

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats push their own version of no tax on tips

Aug. 19—President Donald Trump successfully got a no tax on tips policy through Congress in July, but Democrats are serving up their own version. Trump campaigned on the idea of not taxing tipped wages, a policy that was included in the large budget and tax bill Congress passed in July. Democrats, including New Mexico's Rep. Gabe Vasquez, are pushing their own version of no federal tax on tips with a bill that would also eliminate the separate tipped minimum wage, creating one federal minimum wage. Economic experts are skeptical of offering tax breaks that incentivize paying people with tips instead of basing tax breaks on income level. "In general, lowering taxes for lower income people, middle class and below, is a good idea," said Matías Fontenla, a professor of economics at the University of New Mexico. "I just don't understand why they would do just on tips and not for the general population." About 2% of U.S. workers were in tipped jobs in 2023, according to a study from The Budget Lab at Yale University. More than a third of tipped workers already had low enough income that they had no federal income tax in 2022. Taxes can serve as an incentive for employer or consumer behavior. Eliminating tax on tips could encourage employers in tip-based industries to lower salaries, with the justification that employees are benefiting from a tip tax break, according to Fontenla. "This creates an unnecessary, weird incentive that could potentially be nonoptimal, especially if they don't change the minimum wage," Fontenla said. He is in favor of one standard minimum wage. Both Trump's policy and the policy proposed in the Democrat-led TIPS Act offer tax relief in the form of a deduction, meaning federal taxes would still be withheld from employees' paychecks. Trump's no tax on tips policy expires in 2028 and offers a deduction for up to $25,000 in tipped income. The deduction phases out for people making over $150,000. The IRS plans to publish a list of occupations eligible for the tax deduction in October. On Monday, Vasquez donned an apron at the Barelas Coffee House, taking orders for coffee and burritos smothered in green chile under the guidance of one of the restaurant's servers. His hour as a waiter was meant to promote the TIPS Act. The bill would go further than Trump's policy by not including a cap on the deductible and eliminating the separate tipped minimum wage. The federal tipped minimum wage is $2.13, while regular federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour. New Mexico's tipped minimum wage is $3 an hour, while regular minimum wage in the state is $12 an hour. The legislation would also make no tax on tips permanent. "If we truly believe in service industry workers that help support our communities and our businesses, it should be permanent," Vasquez said. The deduction would phase out for people earning over $112,500 annually. One of the challenges of living on a tipped wage is fluctuating pay, said Alexis Campos, the server showing Vasquez the ropes. "It's just really random pay. So it's kind of hard to figure out how much you're going to make for the month for the bills," Campos said. "It could be $800, or you can make $1,000 or $400, so it really fluctuates."

Shelby and Story counties to pursue U.S. Supreme Court action on local pipeline ordinance case
Shelby and Story counties to pursue U.S. Supreme Court action on local pipeline ordinance case

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Shelby and Story counties to pursue U.S. Supreme Court action on local pipeline ordinance case

The Shelby County Board of Supervisors voted Aug. 19 to petition the county's case against Summit Carbon Solutions to the U.S. Supreme Court. (Photo by Cami Koons/Iowa Capital Dispatch) HARLAN – County supervisors in Shelby and Story counties voted Tuesday to pursue further legal action in their case against Summit Carbon Solutions pertaining to county-specific ordinances on hazardous liquid pipelines. A U.S. district judge and federal appeals judges have previously ruled on the case in favor of Summit and now the counties are seeking a review of the rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court, though a Summit filing holds the ordinances would still be preempted by state laws. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In Harlan, at the Shelby County Courthouse, landowners opposed to the pipeline gathered to thank the supervisors. Sherri Webb, an affected Shelby County landowner, said Iowans across the state look to Shelby County and say 'I wish you were our supervisors.' 'Thank you,' Webb said, noting that it's no small feat to decide to appear before the Supreme Court. 'No matter what, I'm behind you guys,' Webb said. Another landowner, Jan Norris who lives in Montgomery County and is a neighbor to the pipeline route, called the board a David standing up to a 'well-resourced and motivated' Goliath. 'Your constituents may not know how lucky they are, but I do,' Norris said. 'Because my board has chosen to play it safe and avoid the fight.' Norris and Webb have been active at their respective county supervisor meetings since they first learned of the Summit project several years ago. The pipeline would connect to biorefineries across the state and transport liquid carbon dioxide through Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota and to underground storage in North Dakota. The two said the actions of the Board of Supervisors are important for maintaining local control and working toward standards they believe will be safer and better for their properties. Norris said if the outcome of the case is reversed and in favor of the counties, it will benefit many Iowa counties, and other states impacted by the pipeline and similar projects. 'You guys are doing your job and you shouldn't be sued for doing your job,' Webb said. Cindy Hansen, who lives in Ankeny but owns affected land in Shelby County with her sister, said the supervisors have restored some of the hope in the state that she had lost from the actions of the Iowa Utilities Commission and state legislators. The Shelby County board said the cost of the lawsuits 'have mounted,' but have been covered by the county's insurer, ICAP, and by a fund the board created, shortly after it was sued by Summit in November 2022, that uses American Rescue Plan Act dollars to cover the costs. A copy of both counties' letter of engagement, obtained by Iowa Capital Dispatch, shows fees for the endeavor would be capped at $60,000. Mike Kolbe, one of the Shelby County board members, said the budget was a consideration in the decision, but with the fund and continued coverage from ICAP, Kolbe said the county can afford it 'with no cost to the taxpayers.' Bryce Schaben, the chair of the Shelby board, said the feedback he has received from his community showed there was only one way forward. 'Everything we've heard is to do what we did today,' Schaben said following the meeting. 'When you get that kind of support, it's an easy decision.' Schaben said if the Supreme Court follows the direction of the previous courts on the case, he will be confused. 'It's very confusing that the rulings don't want to make our counties safe,' Schaben said. 'That's what it comes down to.' Ordinances in both counties established setbacks and permitting requirements for the pipeline company to construct in the county. Summit argued, and a federal judge in the Southern District of Iowa ruled, the ordinances were preempted by federal pipeline safety standards. The counties appealed the case, and judges for the Eighth Circuit court of appeals concurred with the lower court, though one judge partially dissented on the case. Story County supervisors approved the decision as part of a consent agenda and did not discuss the decision to engage the D.C. law firm on the suit. Steve Kenkel, a former Shelby County supervisor who now serves as an adviser to the board on topics related to the pipeline, quoted Iowa Code where it directs county supervisors to 'protect and preserve the rights of their constituents.' 'That's what we're trying to do here,' Kenkel said. 'Without county zoning ordinances, the tools supervisors presently have in their tool box … will be tools of the past if this ruling is allowed to stand.' Both counties voted to engage Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick P.L.L.C. to petition the Supreme Court. Summit has sued several counties for similar county ordinance issues, including Emmet, Kossuth and Palo Alto counties. The later-filed cases have been paused while Shelby and Story counties' case was heard and then appealed. The two counties also petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit for an en banc rehearing of the case in July, which the court denied. The other affected counties have requested stays through this process again as Shelby and Story counties decided to take the case to the Supreme Court. Summit's legal team submitted a motion to lift the stay for these other counties, arguing that regardless of the outcome of the Supreme Court petition, the county ordinances would be preempted by state laws. 'Any county ordinance—including the one here—that attempts to impose additional permitting requirements, control pipeline routes, or regulate construction and operation is preempted by state law,' the motion said. The Summit motion for leave of stay in Kossuth County also said certiorari from the Supreme Court was 'unlikely in general' and 'particularly unlikely' in Shelby and Story counties' case. The motion holds that the Supreme Court could only review whether or not the ordinances were preempted by federal pipeline laws. Still in place, it argues, would be a piece of Iowa Code that gives the Iowa Utilities Commission the authority to set pipeline routes. This was noted in the ruling from the Eighth Circuit. Here, the judges explained that a county would be inconsistent with state law, and therefore preempted, if it denied a local zoning permit application from the pipeline company to build on a location that had been approved by the IUC. The appellate court decision notes some other states cede this power to local governments and might not be preempted as Iowa counties are. Kenkel argued Tuesday that if the Supreme Court did not act in the counties' favor, the IUC would not be able to route the pipeline based on safety considerations. These and permitting and setback regulations, he said, would instead be up to the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration's rules. State Auditor Rob Sand, a Democrat who is running for governor, stopped in Harlan Tuesday as part of his campaign tour across the state. Among the things he was asked by the bipartisan crowd at Milk & Honey restaurant downtown: How would he protect property rights from such projects? Sand said he does not support eminent domain for CO2 pipelines, 'period.' The comment was met with applause, especially considering some of the crowd had filed across the street to the restaurant after the board meeting. Sand said there are two main reasons why he feels this way. He said he is 'deeply skeptical' that a carbon capture pipeline can be considered a common carrier and if 'there is a true public purpose' to the project. 'You can be a supporter of agriculture in the state of Iowa and a supporter of ethanol, and say that the carbon capture pipeline ain't it,' Sand said. Sand said there are other options to sequester CO2 that have an established market. Sand said Gov. Kim Reynolds' lack of action, or public opinion on the issue has been her 'single biggest failure.' 'Never in the state of Iowa, if there's a tremendous issue with lots of people showing up at the state capitol every single year for the legislative session, will I let five years go by before I decide to maybe share my opinion, only after a bill gets passed,' Sand said. Reynolds, a Republican, is not seeking reelection. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store