What is the significance of Russia's claimed capture of Ukrainian town Chasiv Yar?
Following are key facts about Chasiv Yar, which Russians call Chasov Yar, and the long battle for its control which began in March/April 2024.
With a pre-war population of more than 12,000, Chasiv Yar (Quiet Ravine) sits in the industrial Donbas area in Ukraine's Donetsk region, one of four regions that Moscow claimed to have annexed in 2022, something Kyiv called an illegal land grab.
Dissected by a canal, the town's pre-war economy centred on a factory that produced reinforced concrete products and clay used in bricks.
Located on higher ground, it once served as a regrouping point and as a forward artillery base for the Ukrainian army.
It was regarded by the Russian military as one of Ukraine's best defended strongholds due to its geography, elevated position, terrain and factories and apartment blocks where Ukrainian forces were able to dig in.
Russia's capture of the town, if confirmed, would advance Moscow's grinding effort to encircle the "fortress city" of Kostiantynivka which it is trying to envelop in a pincer movement, and remove what had become an obstacle to its army's advance westwards across the rest of Donetsk.
Russian military analysts list Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka and Kostiantynivka as the "fortress cities" in Ukraine's east accessible from Chasiv Yar if Moscow's forces can get there, something Kyiv is determined to stop.
Russian analysts say their military will use Chasiv Yar as a base to target Ukrainian forces in northern Donetsk with artillery and drone fire and to try to hamper Ukrainian supply lines in the area. But holding ground and advancing northwards will not be easy, war blogger Rybar said.
Military analysts on both sides say the battle has been one of the longest of the war and one of the most grinding engagements with high but undisclosed casualties on both sides.
Russia's Defence Ministry said on Thursday its paratroopers had covered more than 20 km (12 miles) under Ukrainian artillery and drone fire in their push to take the town and had cleared more than 4,200 buildings and structures.
Reuters could not confirm that assertion.
Ukraine says its fierce and prolonged resistance in Chasiv Yar shows how it has been able to slow and inflict heavy casualties on a numerically-superior force, including with the help of its drone units.
Ukrainian analysts have downplayed Chasiv Yar's importance and suggested Russia taking it would be a Pyrrhic victory given the high price Kyiv has forced Moscow to pay for the town and how long it has been able to hold off Russian forces.
Some Russian analysts say that the town's capture would be a tactical victory rather than a strategic one.
Sergei Markov, a former Kremlin adviser, said the battle had gone on for so long that Chasiv Yar had lost its strategic importance.
"But the capture of the city has symbolic significance: this is how the war could continue for many years to come - slowly, slowly, the Russian army will advance," Markov wrote on Telegram.
Most of the town lies in ruins and pulverised after extensive shelling, air strikes and glide bomb and drone attacks by Russian forces.
Ukraine says a Russian strike on residential buildings in the town in 2022 killed at least 43 people. Russia says those killed were Ukrainian troops.
The mayor of the town left long ago and most of its inhabitants were evacuated as its utilities - power, gas and water - were destroyed. Only 304 residents remained in the area as of November last year, sheltering in basements, according to Serhii Chaus, the head of the town's Ukrainian military administration.
The Russian military said on Thursday that its forces had evacuated 65 civilians.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump orders two nuclear subs to be moved closer to Russia
Donald Trump says he has ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the "appropriate regions" in a row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. It comes after Mr Medvedev, who is now deputy chair of Russia 's Security Council, told the US president on Thursday to remember Moscow had Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort. On Friday, Mr Trump wrote on social media: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Speaking outside the White House later in the day, Mr Trump was asked about why he had moved the submarines and replied: "We had to do that. We just have to be careful. "A threat was made and we didn't think it was appropriate, so I have to be very careful. So I do that on the basis of safety for our people. A threat was made by a former president of Russia and we're going to protect our people." The spat between Mr Trump and Mr Medvedev came after the US president warned Russia on Tuesday it had "10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face tariffs, along with its oil buyers. Moscow has shown no sign that it will agree to Mr Trump's demands. Moscow correspondent @IvorBennett Normally it's Moscow rattling the nuclear sabres, but this time it's Washington in what marks a dramatic escalation in Donald Trump's war of words with the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. More importantly, it appears to signal a significant deterioration in his relationship with Vladimir Putin. The US president's patience with the Kremlin was already at its thinnest earlier this week, when he shrank his deadline for progress towards a peace deal from 50 days to 10. But Russia's lack of outward concern with this stricter ultimatum - which has swung from dismissive to (in Medvedev's case) insulting - seems to have flicked a switch. For this is the first time Trump's pressure on Moscow has amounted to anything more than words. We don't know where the subs are, or how far they had to move to get closer to Russia, but it's an act that sits several rungs higher than the usual verbal threats to impose sanctions. How will Russia respond? I'm not sure Vladimir Putin has ever caved to an ultimatum and I doubt he'll start now. But I don't think he'll want the situation to deteriorate further. So I suspect he'll make another offer to the US, that's dressed up as a concession, but in reality may prove to be anything but. It's a tactic that's worked before, but the stakes have suddenly got higher. On Thursday, Mr Medvedev reminded Mr Trump that Russia possessed a Soviet-era automated nuclear retaliatory system - or "dead hand". Mr Medvedev, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, was referring to a secretive semi-automated Soviet command system designed to launch Russia's missiles if its leadership was taken out in a decapitating strike. He made the remarks after Mr Trump told him to "watch his words" after Mr Medvedev said the US president's threat of hitting Russia and its oil buyers with punitive tariffs was "a game of ultimatums" and added that "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war" between Russia and the US. Mr Medvedev served as Russia's president from 2008 and 2012, when Mr Putin was barred from seeking a third consecutive term, but then stepped aside to let him run again. As deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, he has become known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since Moscow invaded Ukraine in 2022.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Putin offers no hint of concessions as he says he wants ‘stable' peace in Ukraine
Vladimir Putin has said he wants a 'lasting and stable peace' in Ukraine but given no indication that he is willing to make any concessions to achieve it, after a week in which Russian missiles and drones again caused death and destruction across Ukraine. 'We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries,' said Putin, speaking to journalists on Friday, a week before a new deadline imposed by Donald Trump for hostilities to cease. Trump has said if Russia and Ukraine do not come to an agreement to end the war by next Friday, 8 August, he will impose a package of economic sanctions on Russia. Before he took office, Trump had promised to end the war in 24 hours, but since he became president his repeated overtures to Putin have achieved minimal results. In recent weeks, Trump has markedly changed his rhetoric on the conflict, appearing less conciliatory to Putin and more amenable to enhanced support for Ukraine. He called Russia's continued attacks on civilian areas 'disgusting' on Thursday. Last month Trump said he was 'disappointed' with Putin. 'We'll have a great conversation. I'll say: 'That's good, I'll think we're close to getting it done,' and then he'll knock down a building in Kyiv,' he told the BBC. Seemingly referencing Trump's comments, Putin said on Friday: 'As for any disappointments on the part of anyone, all disappointments arise from inflated expectations. This is a well-known general rule.' The death toll from a series of Russian strikes on Kyiv in the early hours of Thursday rose sharply on Friday, to 31, after rescuers found more than a dozen bodies in the rubble of an apartment block that had collapsed after one of the strikes. There were five children among the dead, including a two-year-old, while 159 people were wounded in the attack, one of the worst to hit the Ukrainian capital in more than three years of full-scale war. Putin has periodically claimed to be interested in peace, but only on terms wholly unacceptable to Kyiv. Last week, the third round of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Istanbul, but broke up in less than an hour and have so far led to no agreements except on prisoner exchanges. Speaking to reporters at a meeting with his Belarusian counterpart, Alexander Lukashenko, in northern Russia, Putin said he hoped the peace talks would continue, and that they should be conducted 'without cameras and in a calm atmosphere'. Ukraine, however, says Russia has shown it is not serious about the talks by sending a low-level delegation led by Vladimir Medinsky, a former culture minister known for writing patriotic books about history. 'This level of delegation does not have the authority to negotiate, just to spew insults and announce demands,' said Mykhailo Podolyak, a Zelenskyy aide, in an interview in Kyiv. Zelenskyy has said he wants to meet Putin one-on-one, with either Trump or the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, as moderator. On Friday, he responded to Putin's claim of being interested in peace with another suggestion to meet. 'If this is a signal of serious readiness to end the war with dignity and establish a truly lasting peace, and not just an attempt to buy more time for the war and delay sanctions, then Ukraine once again confirms its readiness to meet at the leaders' level at any time,' Zelenskyy wrote on his Telegram channel.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Putin is more likely to start a nuclear war than many are prepared to admit
We've grown used to blood-curdling nuclear threats from Russia's leadership – but this time, Donald Trump has very publicly reacted to them by moving two nuclear-armed submarines closer to Russia. Russia has primarily used nuclear sabre-rattling as part of its information warfare to scare the West. Sadly, it has delivered results. Western states moved cautiously after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, in part because of the Kremlin's nuclear threats. Trump's submarine move is a direct response to social media posts by Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president. Many Russians believe that Medvedev is a heavy drinker, and some have suggested that some of his posts were written while drunk. His role within the Russian regime hierarchy is now as a snarling attack dog, hurling blood-curdling threats at the Kremlin's enemies. It is good that Trump is beginning to see through the Russian regime. He is clearly angry that his policy of appeasing the Kremlin hasn't worked – despite his extraordinary tactic of offering, over the heads of the Ukrainians, a peace deal that would have allowed Vladimir Putin to pay virtually no price for the appalling actions of his armies. It is perhaps not so good that Trump has made it clear that he is reacting directly to Medvedev's nuclear bluster. The Russian regime now knows that it is possible to goad the president into real-world actions if they can upset him enough online. They have spent years studying the president and their understanding of human motivation is deeply researched. There is a risk that nuclear policy – which historically has been agonised over by experts due to its extraordinary importance and the terrible risks of getting it wrong – is now part of high stakes 'trash talking' on social media. While the risk that Putin will order the use of nuclear weapons is small, it is not non-existent. Ever since the Russian leader began his political and military conflict with Ukraine back in 2005 to force it into eventual unification with Russia, he has escalated crises when he has failed to achieve his aims. The Russian leader did so in 2014 with the partial invasion of eastern Ukraine, and then in 2022 with the full invasion. Will he escalate again with nuclear weapons? There is a much-speculated-on secret nuclear theory in Russia called 'escalate to de-escalate', in which nuclear weapons are used to regain control of a conflict, forcing an enemy to surrender, or face annihilation. Confidential Russian papers have suggested that a first stage might involve a 'demonstration strike', perhaps a one-off strike on water. The second would be the targeting of a low-population site on land, potentially an abandoned town or city. The third would be a 'deterrence-demonstration' on a potential military target such as a transport hub. From there, nuclear use would escalate to multiple tactical nuclear strikes across a theatre of operations. Putin has already weakened the grounds for using nuclear weapons. Russia's 2014 Military Doctrine gives two main grounds for using nuclear weapons: either in response to their use by others or when the existence of the Russian Federation is threatened. A more recent 2020 document allowed for a nuclear strike if Russia is facing an imminent nuclear attack (so pre-empting a pre-emptive strike), or if Russia would lose control of its arsenal via, for example, multiple, conventional precision strikes. Both are inherently dangerous. Twice in the Cold War, junior officers of the then-Soviet Union refused to react when technology or their superiors told them to prepare nuclear weapons. Their brave actions saved the world from a potentially catastrophic escalation. Last year, Putin lowered Russia's nuclear weapon threshold again, decreeing that an attack on Russia with conventional missile systems might justify a nuclear response, although Ukraine's infamous Spider's Web attack on his bomber fleet this June did not result in a nuclear response. Ukrainians have long argued that Russia's threats are a bluff to hide a failing army weighed down by a million casualties. What can be done? There are no good options, and this crisis may get more dangerous yet. Putin's regime is bent on war – there is no simpler way to say it. He doesn't want peace. I have been in Kyiv this week discussing my book on Russia's new form of warfare and the city is under regular and, on occasions, prolonged missile attack. Putin has strung Trump along. The best bet for the West is for Ukraine – with allied support, especially in air defence to protect its resilient but suffering citizens – to fight Russia to a standstill and (hopefully) force a snarling Russian leader to end the war. Most of the alternatives don't bear thinking about.
