MCD vs. YUM: Which Restaurant Stock is Better Positioned Now?
McDonald's Corporation MCD and Yum! Brands, Inc. YUM are two global powerhouses in the quick-service restaurant industry. Both companies operate extensive international networks and primarily use a franchised business model. In recent years, both McDonald's and Yum! Brands have prioritized digital innovation and global expansion as key strategies to drive growth and enhance customer engagement.The broader restaurant industry continues to gain from higher menu pricing, average check growth and aggressive expansion. Both companies are also seeing positive momentum from strategic partnerships with third-party delivery services and ongoing digital transformation.That said, there are a few challenges that affect the companies. Elevated labor costs and persistent food inflation are squeezing margins. Additionally, inflation-driven menu price hikes are beginning to impact customer traffic in certain segments.Given the current mix of industry tailwinds and headwinds, which stock, McDonald's or Yum! Brands, offers the better value for investors today? Let us take a closer look to find out.
The company's strong record of innovation, leadership and adaptability continues to position it for success, even amid challenging market conditions. McDonald's is the world's largest chain of fast-food restaurants, with a presence in more than 100 countries. Its offerings have reached the billion-dollar brand status through sustained product innovation and geographic expansion.The company is also focusing on expansion efforts. McDonald's plans to open 2,200 restaurants globally in 2025. McDonald's expects to open 600 restaurants in the United States and international operated markets. MCD also plans to open more than 1,600 restaurants in the International Developmental Licensed segment, including 1,000 in China. It aims to open 50,000 restaurants by 2027.McDonald's is focused on menu innovation to drive growth, emphasizing its core billion-dollar brands and expanding affordable offerings. In 2025, it launched the McValue platform in the United States, and introduced everyday affordable price menus and value bundles in key international markets, including Canada. The company also debuted McCrispy Chicken Strips nationwide and is testing new beverages inspired by CosMc's. With McCrispy now in 70 markets and a new chicken item planned for 2026, McDonald's continues to strengthen its global chicken portfolio and value-driven menu strategy.Ever since the launch of the loyalty program in the United States, MCD has been able to transform its offerings across drive-thru, takeaway, delivery, curbside pick-up and dine-in. The company has already introduced a loyalty program in more than 60 markets, including the United States, Germany, Canada, the U.K., Australia and France.With increased digital adoption, the company is optimistic about its loyalty members' growth trend. Since the launch of its loyalty program, the total number of 90-day active users has reached more than 170 million. Furthermore, in 2024, the system-wide sales to loyalty members were about $30 billion. It anticipates reaching 90-day active users to 250 million with $45 billion in annual loyalty system-wide sales by the end of 2027.
YUM! Brands is gaining traction with its next-generation growth initiatives aimed at capturing evolving consumer preferences. YUM's 'easy operations' pillar is focused on streamlining restaurant operations and empowering team members. In the first quarter 2025, the company extended its Byte Restaurant Coach tool to an additional 5,000 stores. This digital platform supports consistent and scalable performance management through routine tools and training. Meanwhile, Taco Bell U.S. onboarded 1,500 more restaurants to the Byte Back of House platform, raising the total to 3,000 stores. This progress marks a step forward in developing a fully connected kitchen ecosystem aimed at enhancing efficiency and enabling data-driven operational decisions. YUM plans for full system-wide adoption in 2025.YUM! Brands reported steady progress in global development in the first quarter, with 751 store openings across 68 countries. KFC led the development effort, opening 528 units — the second-highest first-quarter total in the brand's history — driven by strong performance in key markets such as China, India, Japan and Thailand. With a global average payback period of less than five years, and even more attractive returns in China, Thailand and the Middle East, KFC continues to be a cornerstone of YUM's expansion strategy.Meanwhile, Pizza Hut added 198 stores in 34 markets, and Taco Bell posted 24 gross openings. Though Taco Bell's net unit growth was affected by strategic closures in Malaysia and China's Tier 2 cities, the brand remains on track to achieve 100 net international openings in 2025, with momentum strongest in the U.K., Spain and India.The company is also gaining from robust comps growth. In the first quarter of 2025, worldwide comps at Yum! Brands increased 3% year over year compared with a 1% rise in the previous quarter. The improvement was fueled by robust growth across multiple international markets, including a 13% comp increase in Korea, 8% in Africa and 6% in Canada, aided by localized innovation and value-led promotions.YUM aims to drive comp growth in 2025 through deeper market penetration and an expanded range of offerings like tenders, nuggets, twisters and sandwiches.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for McDonald's 2025 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 1.6% and 4.4%, respectively. Earnings estimates for 2025 have witnessed upward revisions of 0.2% in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Yum! Brands' 2025 sales implies a year-over-year increase of 6.8% and the same for EPS indicates a gain of 9.7%. Earnings estimates for 2025 have witnessed upward revisions of 0.3% in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The MCD stock has gained 7.6% in the year-to-date period compared with the industry and the S&P 500's 0.5% growth and 0.3% decline, respectively. Conversely, YUM shares have risen 7.4% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
MCD is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 24.69X, above its median of 23.72X over the last year. YUM's forward earnings multiple is 22.99X, slightly below its median of 22.68X over the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Yum! Brands appears slightly ahead of McDonald's at the moment due to its stronger expected earnings and sales growth trajectory, driven by aggressive global expansion, faster same-store sales growth across key international markets, and deeper digital integration in operations.
While McDonald's remains a solid performer with robust loyalty engagement and expansion plans, YUM's more dynamic international development, broader innovation pipeline and higher earnings momentum suggest that it is currently executing more effectively on growth opportunities.
Both YUM and MCD currently carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
List of Stores Closing in June
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Major retailers like Walgreens, Rite Aid, McDonald's CosMC, and TD Bank locations are all preparing to bid farewell to customers in June. Why It Matters Companies close store locations for many reasons. While shifts in consumer shopping behavior and lower demand can cause stores to close, corporations often choose to shutter underperforming locations. The retail sector faces several challenges in today's economy. Many shoppers have turned to online platforms, causing companies to reassess their brick-and-mortar presence. More than 2,500 store closures are planned across the United States this year, according to The Mirror. A Walgreens in San Francisco, California, as seen on April 30, 2025. A Walgreens in San Francisco, California, as seen on April 30, 2025. Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images What To Know Closures scheduled for this month include: All McDonald's CosMC locations 38 TD Bank locations 47 Rite Aid stores Walgreens locations McDonald's is closing all five of its CosMC locations after launching the small-format stores in 2023. These units specialized in beverages while offering limited food options. "What started as a belief that McDonald's had the right to win in the fast-growing beverage space quickly came to life as a multi-location, small-format, beverage-focused concept," McDonald's said. "It allowed us to test new, bold flavors and different technologies and processes – without impacting the existing McDonald's experience for customers and crew. By creating a learning lab – in a way that only McDonald's can – the CosMc's team was able to test and learn in real customer-facing environments, which allowed for greater agility and speed. Quick adds and edits to the menu based on feedback led to more focused choices for our fans as the test continued." The chain reported that same-store sales declined 3.6 percent in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. "CosMc is just another example of a failed experiment," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "I think they were trying to compete with the likes of Starbucks and Sonic with the beverage-focused drive-thru and drive-in concept, and it simply did not produce enough sales to justify a stand-alone location." TD Bank is closing 38 locations, with six of them slated for Massachusetts. Despite this, TD Bank opened two new locations in New York (Brighton Beach in Brooklyn and Jerome Avenue in the Bronx) and one store in Boston (Nubian Square). For Rite Aid, 47 stores have been identified across nine states to close as the company navigates a bankruptcy filing. Nearly all of the 1,240 stores will likely be listed for sale eventually, but customers can use gift cards or rewards until June 6. Walgreens will also be shuttering 1,200 underperforming stores across the span of three years. CEO Tim Wentworth previously said the drugstore chain had closed 2,000 stores over the last decade. "We are confident it will yield significant financial and consumer benefits over the long term," Wentworth said. The company reported a $3 billion loss in the last quarter of fiscal year 2024, an increase from the $180 million loss in the prior year. June closures include Salinas, California; Jacksonville and Miami, Florida; Chicago, Illinois; Pleasantville, New Jersey; New York City and Syracuse, New York; Durham and Raleigh, North Carolina; Garfield Heights and Reynoldsburg, Ohio; Bremerton, Washington. Several stores are also closing in West Virginia and Massachusetts. West Virginia Clendenin, Elk River Road N. – June 25 Follansbee, Main Street – June 11 Mullens, Moran Avenue – June 23 New Martinsville, 3rd Street – June 10 Oceana, Cook Parkway – June 26 Whitesville, Lewis Street – June 24 Massachusetts Brockton, Pleasant Street – June 23 Fall River, S. Main Street – June 26 Gloucester, Eastern Avenue – June 23 Springfield, Boston Road – June 24 Swansea, Wilbur Avenue – June 23 Webster, Main Street – June 24 Worcester, Grafton Street – June 25 "Walgreens kept adding retail locations for too long in the face of increased competition," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "Foot traffic has slowed for Walgreens as more big-box stores and online outlets added pharmacy services. Add to slower sales the evermore stringent regulations, decreased reimbursements, and increased cost of they can weather that storm for a while, the only survival plan is to close more retail locations." What People Are Saying Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "For some major retailers, 2025 is becoming a year of consolidation. Retail locations that have struggled in recent years to remain profitable due to rising costs and less demand are being shuttered, as companies focus their efforts on more successful stores. The hope is these closures will ultimately produce more fiscal and operational efficiency, but it will come at the cost of customers who favored these locations having fewer options." Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "These aren't random casualties; they're strategic amputations of unprofitable limbs to save the corporate $15+ minimum wages to supply chain inflation, all crushing their razor-thin margins. Combine this with the march of e-commerce and changing consumer habits post-pandemic, physical retail becomes a luxury many companies can no longer afford." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "From day one, CosMc's felt like a misstep, but let's not forget McDonald's isn't just a burger joint; it's a real estate empire. This was an unfortunate experiment that did not pan out the way they had hoped." What Happens Next Beene called the closures by many of the companies a "smart move." "We've seen many retailers face bankruptcy before finally scaling back. It's a good sign these retailers are being more proactive," Beene said. However, consumers should expect longer drives to pharmacies and fewer banking branches. "The companies making these cuts are trimming fat. Convenience now trumps proximity, and efficiency will beat ubiquity every time," Ryan said.
Forbes
20 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Creators Are Saying 'No' To Perpetual Usage Rights
Perpetual usage rights have become one of the most polarizing clauses in modern brand-creator contracts. For many content creators, these clauses spark immediate hesitation, even when attached to 'dream brand' partnerships. At a time when creators are being more intentional about how their work and likeness are used, perpetual usage is often a hard 'no' for many. But brands, especially those managing long-term campaigns and large creative investments, continue to push for these rights. Creators want to maintain control over their image and future partnerships, while brands want to ensure longevity and security in the content they invest in. This tension has led to more creators walking away from potential collaborations even when the brand is a perfect fit in every other way. Sadly, this is leading to more and more creators turning down partnerships while brands offer them to other creators who may not be as well-informed about topics like perpetual usage rights. As influencer marketing matures, the industry is hitting a wall. In more negotiations, perpetual usage rights are no longer accepted without thorough back-and-forth. For creators, there are several reasons why perpetual usage rights are seen as a hard no. First, perpetual use can restrict future brand deals, especially with competing companies in large brand categories such as clothing, beauty, home decor, etc. If, for example, a creator had a partnership including perpetual usage rights with a company like Maybelline, it may be difficult for them to be seen as 'open to work' from competing brands like Covergirl. Therefore, the creator may ultimately miss out on opportunities (and, in turn, income). Second, creators are increasingly aware of the ethical implications of associating with a brand indefinitely, especially if their values change over time. "My biggest fear with perpetual usage is if my stance on a brand or product changes," says Emily LeJeune (@all_of_emily), an Instagram creator. "As creators, we are also learning and growing... so perpetual is a hard no for me." Considering the changes in the world's climate over the last 5 years, many brands are revealing their true colors, and that may or may not be something a creator wants to be associated with perpetually. Third, there's the cost issue: pricing perpetual usage reasonably is nearly impossible. Because brands could potentially profit from the content for years (or decades), licensing should reflect that — often 3x to 5x the standard rate. However, most brands are unwilling to pay that premium, which leaves creators undervalued and legally bound to work that continues to generate brand ROI long after payment has cleared. As Instagram creator Harleny Vasquez (@yourevolvedmind) puts it: "My biggest fear? That my content will be used everywhere and I won't be compensated fairly." From the brand side, the logic is practical: long-term access to content provides security and flexibility. According to Faiq Shah, Marketing Manager at Blinked Media, "We require perpetual rights for core brand assets... but offer tiered licensing for secondary content." In this structure, perpetual rights are always paid at 2-3x standard rates and are clearly capped to specific formats or timelines. Brands want to protect their campaigns, ensure consistency across media, and avoid tracking down licenses every few months. For many, it's not about ownership — it's about operational efficiency. Ashley O'Neal, Founder at Summerside Creative Inc., adds that the demand is particularly common in hospitality. "We work exclusively with hotels, and we require perpetual use of all content that we do — even in exchange for hotel stays and food and beverage credits." For brands with high content turnover and limited budgets, perpetual usage provides a way to build a content library without the need for constant renegotiation. So where do we go from here? The future of creator-brand partnerships likely depends on compromise. Perpetual usage rights aren't going away, but they shouldn't be accepted without nuance. Instead, creators and brands can find a middle ground through time-bound licensing, tiered usage structures, and clear limitations on media formats and distribution. Creators like Ashton McGrady (@radiantlygolden) believe that respectful negotiation is the key to sustainable partnerships. "Pushing back (kindly and professionally) has actually helped me build trust and set expectations early... If a brand insists on perpetuity without flexibility or fair pay, it's often a red flag." At the end of the day, both sides want impactful content — but the terms should reflect the value and vulnerability creators bring to the table. A win-win is possible, but it starts with a conversation with flexibility on both sides.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Possible Bearish Signals With McDonald's Insiders Disposing Stock
In the last year, many McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) insiders sold a substantial stake in the company which may have sparked shareholders' attention. Knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more helpful when evaluating insider transactions, as insider selling can have various explanations. However, when multiple insiders sell stock over a specific duration, shareholders should take notice as that could possibly be a red flag. While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Over the last year, we can see that the biggest insider sale was by the Chairman President, Christopher Kempczinski, for US$5.5m worth of shares, at about US$300 per share. That means that even when the share price was below the current price of US$314, an insider wanted to cash in some shares. As a general rule we consider it to be discouraging when insiders are selling below the current price, because it suggests they were happy with a lower valuation. Please do note, however, that sellers may have a variety of reasons for selling, so we don't know for sure what they think of the stock price. We note that the biggest single sale was only 30% of Christopher Kempczinski's holding. McDonald's insiders didn't buy any shares over the last year. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date! Check out our latest analysis for McDonald's I will like McDonald's better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued and small cap stocks with considerable, recent, insider buying. Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at McDonald's. In total, EVP & President of McDonald's USA Joseph Erlinger sold US$883k worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. In light of this it's hard to argue that all the insiders think that the shares are a bargain. Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. I reckon it's a good sign if insiders own a significant number of shares in the company. McDonald's insiders own about US$145m worth of shares (which is 0.06% of the company). Most shareholders would be happy to see this sort of insider ownership, since it suggests that management incentives are well aligned with other shareholders. An insider hasn't bought McDonald's stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. And there weren't any purchases to give us comfort, over the last year. It is good to see high insider ownership, but the insider selling leaves us cautious. In addition to knowing about insider transactions going on, it's beneficial to identify the risks facing McDonald's. You'd be interested to know, that we found 1 warning sign for McDonald's and we suggest you have a look. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
