&w=3840&q=100)
Donald Trump's crypto dinner raises questions about personal profit
President Donald Trump rewarded top investors in one of his cryptocurrency projects with a swanky dinner on Thursday night, an event that showed the ascendance of an emerging financial industry and also the president's willingness to mix public office with personal profit.
Some 220 of the biggest investors in the $TRUMP meme coin were invited to Trump's luxury golf club in Northern Virginia, where they dined on filet mignon and halibut. According to participants' posts on social media, Trump spoke for about half an hour before dancing to the song YMCA.
Despite the White House insisting that Trump would be attending the event in his personal time, he stood behind a lectern with the presidential seal as he touted an industry that's generating profits for his family business.
After feeling unfairly targeted under President Joe Biden, the crypto industry has quickly become a powerful political force, donating huge sums to help Trump and friendly lawmakers. The U.S. Senate is advancing key pro-crypto legislation while bitcoin prices soar.
However, even some pro-Trump crypto enthusiasts worry that the president's personal involvement may be undermining their efforts to establish credibility and stability for the industry.
It's distasteful and an unnecessary distraction, said Nic Carter, a Trump supporter and partner at the crypto investment firm Castle Island Ventures, who said the president is hugging us to death with his private crypto businesses. We would much rather that he passes common sense legislation and leave it at that.
As the president uses crypto as a platform to make money for his brand in unprecedented ways, it's also creating an opportunity for potentially shadowy buyers to use the anonymity of the internet to buy access to the president. The lack of transparency was evident on a poster board at the dinner, where participants signed a ranking of top investors. Some used their real names; others used pseudonyms.
No media was allowed into the dinner, and the president was at his golf club for only about an hour. Protesters gathered outside the club holding signs that said stop crypto corruption and no corrupt fools.
Trump said the event was good, very good as he returned to the White House.
Concerns about Trump's crypto ventures predate Inauguration Day Three days before Trump took office on Jan. 20, he announced the creation of the $TRUMP meme coin at the fancy Crypto Ball held down the street from the White House. He described it as a way for his supporters to have fun.
Meme coins are the crypto sector's black sheep. They are often created as a joke, with no real utility and prone to extremely wild price swings that tend to enrich a small group of insiders at the expense of less sophisticated investors.
The president's meme coin is different, however, and has a clear utility: access to Trump. In addition to Thursday's dinner, the top 25 were invited to a private reception with the president, with the top four getting USD 100,000 crypto-themed and Trump-branded watches.
Trump's meme coin saw an initial spike in value, followed by a steep drop. Its creators, which include an entity controlled by the Trump Organization, have made hundreds of millions of dollars by collecting fees on trades.
First lady Melania Trump has her own meme coin, and Trump's sons, Eric and Don Jr. who are running the Trump Organization while their father is president announced they are partnering with an existing firm to create a crypto mining company.
The Trump family also holds about a 60% stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto project that provides yet another avenue where investors are buying in and enriching the president's relatives. World Liberty has launched its own stablecoin, USD1. The project got a boost recently when World Liberty announced an investment fund in the United Arab Emirates would be using USD 2 billion worth of USD1 to purchase a stake in Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange.
Stablecoins have values pegged to fixed assets like the U.S. dollar. Issuers profit by collecting the interest on the Treasury bonds and other assets used to back the stablecoins.
Crypto is now one of the most significant sources of the Trump family's wealth.
He's becoming a salesman-in-chief, said James Thurber, an American University professor emeritus who has long studied and taught about corruption around the world. It allows for huge conflicts of interest.
How Trump changed his mind on crypto I'm a big crypto fan, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One during last week's trip to the Middle East. I've been that from the beginning, right from the campaign.
That wasn't always true. During his first term, Trump posted in July 2019 that cryptocurrencies were not money and had value that was highly volatile and based on thin air.
Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade, he added then. Even after leaving office in 2021, Trump told Fox Business Network that bitcoin, the world's most popular cryptocurrency, seems like a scam.
Trump began to shift during a crypto event at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in May 2024, receiving assurances that industry backers would spend lavishly to get him reelected. Another major milestone came last June, when Trump attended a high-dollar fundraiser at the San Francisco home of David Sacks.
Those close to Trump, including his sons and billionaire Elon Musk, helped further push his embrace of the industry. Sacks is now the Trump administration's crypto czar, and many Cabinet members including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have long been enthusiastic crypto boosters.
I don't have faith in the dollar, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a 2023 interview. I'm bullish on bitcoin.
Trump + crypto: A political marriage of convenience Many top crypto backers were naturally wary of traditional politics, but gravitated toward Trump last year. They bristled at how Biden's Securities and Exchange Commission aggressively brought civil suits against several major crypto companies.
Since Trump took office, many such cases have been dropped or paused, including one alleging that Justin Sun, a China-born crypto entrepreneur, and his company engaged in market manipulation and paid celebrities for undisclosed promotions.
Sun, who once paid USD 6.2 million for a piece of art involving a banana taped to a wall, and then ate the banana, helped the Trumps start World Liberty Financial with an early USD 75 million investment.
Sun has disclosed on social media that he is the biggest holder of $TRUMP meme coins and is attending Thursday's dinner.
I'm excited to connect with everyone, talk crypto, and discuss the future of our industry, Sun said in advance.
He posted a video of Trump entering the private reception.
Did you get to see the helicopter? Trump said.
Yeah! Super cool, Sun responded.
Are Trump family profits hurting other crypto investors? Trump has signed executive orders promoting the industry, including calls to create a government bitcoin reserve. In March, Trump convened the first cryptocurrency summit at the White House.
But some of the industry's biggest names, often brash and outspoken, have kept mostly mum on Trump's meme coins and other projects.
It's not my place to really comment on President Trump's activity, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said at a recent public event.
Meanwhile, a top legislative priority for crypto-backers, a bill clarifying how digital assets are to be regulated, has advanced in the Senate. But some Democrats have tried to stall other pro-crypto legislation over the president's personal dealings and see the dinner as a particularly egregious case.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, said the gathering was in effect, putting a for sale' sign on the White House.
It's auctioning off access, Blumenthal said on a Thursday press call.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president is attending in his personal time. The White House has also said it has nothing to do with Trump's meme coin.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After Harvard and Columbia, Trump admin continues to target over 60 universities
As the Trump administration continues its crackdown on US universities and colleges, the president has signed a ban on foreign student visas for Harvard University. Donald Trump has signed into a place a six month ban on foreign student visas for Harvard University amid its row. Furthermore, the Trump admin has also targeted Columbia University and threatened to strip the fellow Ivy league college of its accreditation. ALSO READ | Trump suspends entry of international students studying at Harvard These efforts come as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on DEI-related initiatives across universities and its response to the pro-Palestinian protests that swept US campuses last year. With Harvard and Columbia in the spotlight, the US Education Department has opened over 104 investigations against universities and colleges across the 50 states. As per a report by Education Week, the Department of Education has opened at least 104 investigations against universities, school districts and colleges as of June 3. Of this, 70 have been against higher education systems such as Harvard, Columbia, Brown University and more. These 70 names also include the various out-of-state branches of universities. As per the Education Week report, 52 universities have been targeted for the DEI-initiatives, which Trump alleges promotes admissions based on race. The remaining have been targeted for their role in the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests. Universities and colleges across the US have been targeted for several reasons stated by the Trump administration such as antisemitism, race based programming, services for students with disabilities and disclosure of foreign contracts and gifts. Universities have also been targeted for their policies for transgender students, which as per the Trump administration, goes against the president's executive order which declaring only two genders. Universities such as Harvard, Columbia, Brown, Cornell, Northwestern, Pennsylvania and Princeton are among the list of higher education systems targeted by the Trump administration. (Based on notices issued by the US Education Department)
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Harvard student fires back in exclusive interview as Trump goes to war on foreign students
An exclusive interview with Fangzhou Jiang, Forbes 30 Under 30 honoree and Harvard Kennedy School student, on the Trump administration's aggressive visa revocations for Chinese students. Hear firsthand about the anxiety and uncertainty among Chinese students at Harvard, the impact on academic freedom, and the broader implications for US-China relations. Jiang shares insights on national security, community support, and why he co-founded Crimson Education. Don't miss this insightful discussion on America's shifting immigration policies and the future of international students in the US.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvard vs. Trump round two: US blocks foreign students over national security concerns
Trump blocks foreign students from entering Harvard over security concerns In a sweeping proclamation issued Wednesday evening, Trump barred the entry of foreign students under Harvard-hosted student and exchange visitor visas, citing national security concerns. The order, effective immediately, suspends new admissions under the F, M, and J visa categories, halting the arrival of students who were set to begin their academic journeys at Harvard. The proclamation also places current international students and researchers at the university under review, directing the U.S. Department of State to consider revoking existing visas on a case-by-case basis. The suspension is set to last for six months, with the possibility of an extension. The move comes on the heels of the Department of Homeland Security's earlier, failed attempt to decertify Harvard's ability to enrol international students — a decision that was blocked by a federal court after the university sued. Trump's proclamation appears to be a legal workaround, invoking presidential authority under Sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act — the same basis used for the travel bans upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court during his first term. A Policy with Far-Reaching Impact Harvard currently hosts more than 10,000 international students and scholars. The ban disrupts not just their mobility, but also their education, research, and career trajectories. While current students may remain temporarily, their visa status is now subject to review under the banner of "national interest." Unlike previous broad travel bans that targeted specific countries, this order is unique in singling out one academic institution. It accuses Harvard of failing to report disciplinary and criminal information regarding international students — despite the university stating that no such convictions exist for the past two years. The administration's rationale includes a mix of national security concerns, allegations of ties to the Chinese government, and accusations that Harvard has hosted individuals affiliated with the Chinese military. In a supporting fact sheet, the administration pointed to over $150 million in foreign funding since 2020, rising campus crime rates, and support for diversity and inclusion policies as further justification. Shifting Sentiments Among Global Students This proclamation has introduced fresh instability for students who once saw American education as a sure investment in their futures. Many who had secured admission to Harvard are now left in limbo, unable to enter the U.S. and uncertain whether they'll be able to pursue their degrees at all. The ban is likely to accelerate a trend already in motion — international students exploring alternative destinations such as Germany, Ireland, Australia, and Asian countries, where policies have remained relatively stable and welcoming. Institutions in those regions may now benefit from an outflow of highly qualified students deterred by U.S. restrictions. For generations, the United States has been the top destination for international students seeking academic excellence, innovation, and global opportunities. From Ivy League campuses to cutting-edge research labs, American institutions have drawn the best minds from across the world. But the latest move by the U.S. President Donald Trump has cast a shadow over that reputation. With rising visa restrictions and unpredictable policy shifts, many are questioning whether the U.S. remains a reliable choice for higher education. Beyond Harvard: A Larger Pattern? While the immediate order targets Harvard, it raises concerns that similar actions could extend to other American universities, especially those receiving significant foreign funding or engaged in global partnerships. The precedent set by targeting a specific institution based on political grievances introduces a degree of unpredictability previously unseen in U.S. higher education policy. International students — once seen as cultural ambassadors and economic contributors — now face a climate where geopolitical narratives can redefine their eligibility overnight. Even institutions with strong global reputations are no longer immune from federal scrutiny or political backlash. The Long-Term Cost to U.S. Education International students are integral to American universities, contributing billions of dollars annually to the economy, diversifying campuses, and driving innovation in STEM and business fields. Policies that restrict their participation may erode the global standing of U.S. education, damage institutional competitiveness, and discourage future applicants. As the world watches Harvard's next legal move — and the outcome of any new court challenges — many students are quietly shifting their aspirations elsewhere. In an increasingly uncertain environment, academic excellence alone may no longer be enough to outweigh the risks of studying in the United States. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
