Watch: Donald Trump praises ‘good English' of Liberian president, prompting criticism across Africa
Mitchell McCluskey
and
Larry Madowo
, CNN
US President Donald Trump praised Liberian President Joseph Boakai for his strong grasp of the English language, but the African leader was educated in Liberia, where English is the official language.
As he hosted five African leaders at the White House, Trump asked Boakai: "Such good English, it's beautiful. Where did you learn to speak so beautifully?"
Boakai informed Trump of his place of education, prompting Trump to express his curiosity.
"That's very interesting," he said, "I have people at this table who can't speak nearly as well."
Liberia was founded in 1822 by the American Colonisation Society whose goal was to resettle freed slaves in Africa.
The country declared independence from the American Colonisation Society in 1847, and a variety of languages are spoken in the country today, with English being the official language.
Liberian President Joseph Boakai, second from right, attends a lunch with other African leaders hosted by US President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, DC, on July 9.
Photo:
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters via CNN Newsource
Several Liberians voiced their offence over Trump's comment to Boakai, given the US president's past remarks on African countries and the colonial legacy left by the US organisation in Liberia.
"I felt insulted because our country is an English-speaking country," Liberian youth advocate Archie Tamel Harris told CNN.
"For him to ask that question, I don't see it as a compliment. I feel that the US president and people in the west still see Africans as people in villages who are not educated."
A Liberian diplomat who asked not to be named told CNN that they felt the comment "was not appropriate".
The diplomat added that "it was a bit condescending to an African president who's from an English-speaking nation".
South African politician Veronica Mente questioned on X: "what stops [Boakai] from standing up and leav[ing]?"
The White House Press Office defended Trump's statement on Wednesday (US Time).
"I was in the meeting and everyone was deeply appreciative of the President's time and effort.
"The continent of Africa has never had such a friend in the White House as they do in President Trump," Trump administration's senior advisor for Africa Massad Boulos said in a statement to CNN.
White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said Trump's comment was a "heartfelt compliment" and that "reporters should recognise that President Trump has already done more to restore global stability and uplift countries in Africa and around the world than Joe Biden did in four years."
Liberia's Foreign Minister Sara Beysolow Nyanti told CNN "there was no offence" from the Liberian president's perspective and that "many people do not understand the linguistic borders or linguistic demography of the African continent."
"What President Trump heard distinctly was the American influence on our English in Liberia, and the Liberian president is not offended by that," Nyanti said.
"We know that English has different accents and forms, and so him picking up the distinct intonation that has its roots in American English for us was just recognising a familiar English version," she continued.
Trump has previously applauded the English language abilities of other leaders during diplomatic meetings.
During a press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump complimented his "good English" and asked if it was as good as his German.
Merz laughed and noted that he tried to "understand almost everything" and said he made an effort "to speak as good as I can".
The US president has centred the English language as part of this "America First" platform.
During a 2015 presidential debate, Trump asserted that the US was "a country where we speak English".
In March, he signed an executive order making English the official language of the US.
Trump has previously landed in hot water for things he has said about the African nations. In 2018, the president referred to migrants from African countries and other nations as coming from "shithole countries".
In May, he
lectured South African President Cyril Ramaphosa
on false claims that White South African farmers were the victims of a genocide.
Trump struck a different tone on Wednesday (US Time) as he met with the leaders of Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal, praising their countries as "all very vibrant places with very valuable land, great minerals, great oil deposits, and wonderful people".
In turn, he was met with approval from the African leaders, who heaped praise on the president as they urged him to invest in their countries and develop their plentiful natural resources.
Boakai even remarked that Liberia "(believes) in the policy of making America great again".
- CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump claims crime 'out of control' despite opposing stats
Washington DC correspondent Todd Zwillich spoke to Lisa Owen about Donald Trump ordering hundreds of National Guard troops into Washington DC to tackle what he called a 'public safety emergency'. The president said crime is 'out of control' and that 'violent gangs' have taken over the capital. But the stats on crime rates show quite a different story. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Donald Trump signs order to extend China tariff truce by 90 days: US media
US President Donald Trump has signed an order delaying higher tariffs on Chinese goods for 90 days. Photo / Jim Watson, AFP Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. US President Donald Trump has signed an order delaying higher tariffs on Chinese goods for 90 days. Photo / Jim Watson, AFP US President Donald Trump reportedly signed an order delaying the reimposition of higher tariffs on Chinese goods on Monday, hours before a trade truce between Washington and Beijing was due to expire. The halt on steeper tariffs will be in place for another 90 days, the Wall Street Journal and CNBC reported, citing Trump administration officials. The White House did not respond to queries on the matter. While the United States and China slapped escalating tariffs on each other's products this year, reaching prohibitive triple-digit levels and snarling trade, both countries in May agreed to temporarily lower them. But their 90-day halt of steeper levies was due to expire on Tuesday. Asked about the deadline earlier on Monday, Trump said: 'We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi [Jinping] and myself.'
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Two reasons Trump calling in troops in DC is so extraordinary
By Aaron Blake , CNN Donald Trump at a press conference at the White House announcing the deployment of the National Guard in Washington DC and the federalization of the Metropolitan Police Department to combat crime in the city. To his left is US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Photo: NurPhoto via AFP Analysis - For years, it has seemed as if President Donald Trump really wanted to deploy the military on US soil and was just looking for the right opportunities to do it. It's escalating - and in a way that reinforces how extraordinary and fraught Trump's gambit is. He announced on Monday (local time) that he is placing the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and is deploying the National Guard to deal with crime in the city. The former is unprecedented, while the latter - deploying the guard - has a handful of precedents in DC and other cities. But as with Trump's first mobilization of the troops this year, two months ago amid protests in Los Angeles, he's stretching the bounds of presidential action for a situation that doesn't appear on par with past deployments. And this move is likely to add to fears - including among some former Trump administration officials - that the president is crossing a line on militarizing the homeland and politicizing troop deployments. Trump's stated rationale is that crime in DC is "out of control." He and his allies have seized on a brutal recent assault of a former staffer for the Department of Government Efficiency. As plenty have noted, though, DC violent crime is actually down in recent years. It spiked in 2023, but has been declining since then. The most recent data from the Metropolitan Police Department show violent crime is down 26 percent so far this year from 2024. The data also show violent crime this year has been lower than at any point in at least six years, the Washington Post reported. In other words, it's lower than at the tail end of Trump's first term. None of which means crime isn't a problem in DC or isn't high, relative to lots of other places. (In a Washington Post-Schar School poll this spring, crime, violence and guns were at the top of the list when DC residents were asked to name the biggest problem facing the district, although the share naming crime as a major problem was down significantly since 2022.) But things had already apparently been moving in the right direction without federal intervention, which makes Trump's decision appear more arbitrary. If this move is warranted today, why wasn't it late in his first term? From there, it's a question of whether the problem fits with the extraordinary remedy Trump is putting forward - and whether it represents a troubling precedent. People protest Donald Trump's federalization of DC police and deployment of National Guard troops, in Washington DC on 11 on August, 2025. Photo: NurPhoto via AFP Top officials in Trump's first term worried about his penchant for calling in the troops - something they have said they talked him out of - because of its overtones of getting the military involved in domestic politics and its potential to inflame situations. Some of these same officials have said Trump has fascist tendencies. The situations where Trump has called in the guard are unlikely to tamp down those fears. Presidents have done this before, but almost always to deal with large-scale disturbances like riots. A backgrounder issued by the National Guard in 2020 said state militia and the guard worked to quell race riots and labour strikes in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. But for 90 years between 1867 and 1957, no president federalized them. In the years that followed, a succession of presidents federalized the guard to deal with ugly scenes during the Civil Rights era. Then it was called in to deal with race riots in Detroit (1967) and after the Rev Martin Luther King Jr's assassination (1968). Before Trump called the Guard in to deal with racial justice protests in DC in 2020, the last example had been the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles in 1992. In other words, Trump is calling in the guard for a very different purpose even from the rare instances in which this has been done before. Trump's decision to call in the guard in Los Angeles two months ago would seem more in line with that history, but it too was unusual. The violence amid the president's controversial immigration raids didn't seem to be nearly as serious or widespread as Trump claimed or at all comparable to the Rodney King riots. And it was the first time in 60 years that a president had called in the troops without a request from a governor. (A trial this week is set to determine whether Trump exceeded his authority.) All of which reinforces how Trump is indeed breaking new ground. The second reason this is so fraught is that it doesn't really seem to be something Americans are asking for - and could be something they are quite sceptical of. Trump in June didn't just deploy the guard to deal with the Los Angeles protests; he also sent in Marines. Those Marines were only there to protect federal property, but it raised the prospect of an even more heavy-handed crackdown. Some polls showed a split verdict, but a Washington Post-Schar School poll showed Americans paying close attention to the Los Angeles situation opposed sending the guard and the Marines 54-37 percent. And weeks later, a Quinnipiac University poll showed voters disapproved of sending in the Guard 55-43 percent and disapproved of sending in the Marines 60-37 percent. (Independents disapproved of the latter more than 2-to-1.) Going back to 2020, CNN polling showed Americans said 60-36 percent that it would be inappropriate for a president to "deploy the US military in response to protests in the United States." So, Trump's proposition is a dicey one. And it's not just that the president has taken these extraordinary steps; he's repeatedly suggested they could be a part of a new ratcheted-up role for the military in policing the country. "I can inform the rest of the country that when they do it, if they do it, they're going to be met with equal or greater force than we met right here," he said amid the mobilization in Los Angeles, referring to protesters getting violent. On Monday, he left open the possibility of deploying active-duty troops in DC - ie not just the guard - although he said he didn't think that would be necessary. And he said he could take a similar approach to cities like Chicago and New York. "Then I'm going to look at New York, in a little while. Let's do this. Let's do this together. Let's see. It's going to go pretty quickly," Trump said. "And if we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster." Trump has threatened these things before. He's now following through in ways that seem designed to test our tolerance for a very different kind of country. - CNN
