Federal government blocks cleanup funds as city officials scramble to contain toxic water crisis: 'There are known health effects'
Fayetteville's water has been contaminated with PFAS for years. One of the notable causes is the Chemours Fayetteville Works plant, which dumped the chemicals into the Cape Fear River.
The Public Works Commission was supposed to receive $60 million in federal funding to install a new filtration system to address the contamination. That funding would have come through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and included a low-interest loan with partial principal forgiveness from the state Division of Water Infrastructure.
However, in March, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 14154, pausing disbursement of funds from the BIL and Inflation Reduction Act.
Now, the Fayetteville PWC has no way to fund the vital infrastructure upgrade except through rate hikes to residents, who are already having their rates raised by almost 11% over the next two years.
"These funds are needed to construct the granular activated carbon filtration system that we're working on," said Chris Davis, chair of the PWC board, during a recent city council meeting, per WRAL. "If the federal funding support goes away, it's apparent that PWC's only option is to look at rates."
PFAS, also called "forever chemicals," are a class of chemicals used in a variety of products, including many with nonstick, stain-resistant, and water-resistant properties. PFOA and PFOS are two examples of PFAS. They are called forever chemicals because they don't break down, even over a prolonged period of time.
"These are a class of compounds that persist," said Ralph Mead, a PFAS researcher from the University of North Carolina Wilmington, per WRAL News. "They don't break down. They build up in your body over time. And the ones we know the most about, there are known health effects."
Those effects include cancer, liver damage, immune system damage, and developmental problems.
While the funding may be on hold, officials say the PWC operations are not affected. There is some uncertainty about whether the filtration system will be in place to comply with new federal limits that go into effect in 2029, but it appears the project will go forward.
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Jean Zhuang, a staff attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, questioned the legality of the executive order that halted the funds. It's possible it could be overturned if a legal challenge moves forward.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ex-surgeon general slams RFK Jr.'s vaccine cuts: 'People are going to die'
President Donald Trump's former surgeon general, Dr. Jerome Adams, has a stark warning about the potential ramifications of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. canceling funding for mRNA vaccine development. "People are going to die because we're cutting short funding for this technology," Adams said in a CBS interview Aug. 10. Adams served from 2017 through the end of Trump's first term, when the administration helped develop mRNA vaccines to combat COVID-19 through Operation Warp Speed. Adams described the initiative as Trump's greatest achievement "bar none" and said it's concerning that his administration is turning away from the mRNA technology. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, is used in the two most common COVID-19 vaccines licensed in the United States. Adams, citing other experts, said it would've taken 18 to 24 months longer to develop the vaccines without the technology. "By the most conservative estimates, at least 2 million lives were saved," Adams said. "Many people say that up to 20 million lives were saved because of the vaccines." In a video posted on X Aug. 5, Kennedy said the decision to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development will impact 22 projects worth nearly $500 million at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, which helps companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats. Kennedy called the vaccine technology "ineffective," which Adams said is "simply not true." Kennedy is a long-time vaccine skeptic who has been making sweeping changes to reshape vaccines, food, and medicine policies as the nation's top public health official. Adams also faulted Kennedy's response to the Aug. 8 shooting at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention headquarters in Atlanta that claimed the life of a police officer, saying his rhetoric about vaccines was "fanning the flames that lead to situations like we saw at the CDC." Authorities identified Georgia resident Patrick Joseph White, 30, as the shooter. White's neighbor, Nancy Hoalst, told the New York Times that White believed vaccines had hurt him. "We have to understand people are listening," Adams said of Kennedy's rhetoric. "And when you call the CDC a cesspool... when you make claims that have been proven false time and time again about safety and efficacy of vaccines, that can cause unintended consequences." The Department of Health and Human Services didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about Adams' remarks. Kennedy said in an email to HHS staff Aug. 9 that the shooting "is a reminder of the very human challenges public servants sometimes face — even in places dedicated to healing and progress." "But it also reinforces the importance of the work you do every day," he added. Contributing: Adrianna Rodriguez and Ken Alltucker, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Ex-Surgeon General Jerome Adams criticizes vaccine funding decision
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Furious MAGA Voter's Post Breaking Down The "Ridiculous" Cost Of Their Diabetes Medicine Due To Donald Trump's Tariffs Is Going Viral
A Facebook post written by a self-proclaimed MAGA voter who says she and her partner can no longer afford their imported medications due to Donald Trump's tariffs is going viral. At the start of the post, the MAGA voter expressed her anger with President Trump and his ongoing tariff war that has increased the prices of imported goods in the US. She said, "He should take his tariffs and shove them up his ass!" She then broke down the cost of her and her partner's medications in the US, which amounts to over $500 for each of them with Medicare. She said they'd been buying their medications from Canada or the UK to save money.... But that changed when the Canadian company purportedly increased its prices by $80-100 per month to offset Trump's tariffs. "I voted for Trump, I truly wish I had not making America Great Again, but he sure is making it more expensive," she wrote. In response to the posts, people had a range of opinions, with some defending President Trump... "You can't blame the president for the high drug pricing," one person commented on the original post. "It is not Trumps fault you cannot figure this out," another wrote. While others blamed the original poster for her voting decisions... "If you cannot afford your medications, why would you vote for any Republican ever??? The Democratic platform has been lowered costs for healthcare FOR DECADES," one user questioned. "I wish I had more sympathy. That went away in Nov. They are getting exactly what they voted told them this time was different," another person wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.


Buzz Feed
19 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
MAGA Voter Regrets Vote Due To Rising Medication Prices
A Facebook post written by a self-proclaimed MAGA voter who says she and her partner can no longer afford their imported medications due to Donald Trump's tariffs is going viral. At the start of the post, the MAGA voter expressed her anger with President Trump and his ongoing tariff war that has increased the prices of imported goods in the US. She said, "He should take his tariffs and shove them up his ass!" She then broke down the cost of her and her partner's medications in the US, which amounts to over $500 for each of them with Medicare. She said they'd been buying their medications from Canada or the UK to save money.... But that changed when the Canadian company purportedly increased its prices by $80-100 per month to offset Trump's tariffs. "I voted for Trump, I truly wish I had not making America Great Again, but he sure is making it more expensive," she wrote. In response to the posts, people had a range of opinions, with some defending President Trump... "You can't blame the president for the high drug pricing," one person commented on the original post. "It is not Trumps fault you cannot figure this out," another wrote. While others blamed the original poster for her voting decisions... "If you cannot afford your medications, why would you vote for any Republican ever??? The Democratic platform has been lowered costs for healthcare FOR DECADES," one user questioned. "I wish I had more sympathy. That went away in Nov. They are getting exactly what they voted told them this time was different," another person wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.