Harvey Weinstein accuser blames surprise reveal of her long-lost journal for disgraced producer walking on sex assault charge at NYC retrial
A former Polish model who accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault blamed the surprise revelation of her decade-old journal – and her sister's betrayal – for jurors not finding him guilty of the rap this week.
Kaja Sokola, 39, admitted feeling deeply hurt over a dramatic showdown on the stand when she learned that her sister had given her long-lost, private Alcoholics Anonymous recovery journal to Weinstein's defense attorneys.
'I don't think there would be a verdict like that if my sister didn't give that journal,' she told The Post Friday.
The lawyers used the journal – which mentioned two people who sexually assaulted Sokola, but not Weinstein – to sow doubt over her accusations that the Tinseltown terror forcibly performed oral sex on her at a Tribeca hotel in 2006, days shy of her 20th birthday.
'They were trying to use the dirtiest tactics that they can,' she said.
But Sokola said she was still very happy the jury at Weinstein's bombshell Manhattan retrial convicted him on another woman's accusations because it ensures the perv producer likely will spend the rest of his life in prison.
The squabbling jurors on Wednesday found Weinstein, 73, guilty of a criminal sex act charge for allegedly assaulting Miriam 'Mimi' Haley, a former TV production assistant.
But they acquitted the disgraced sex fiend on the same charge connected to Sokola's accusations, which she had detailed in tear-filled testimony last month.
Jurors also couldn't reach a verdict on a rape count stemming from a third victim, Jessica Mann, leading to a mistrial on that charge.
Sokola said the outcome regarding her charge didn't matter so long as Weinstein was held accountable for his predatory behavior.
'I'm not bitter,' she said, but added, 'I was surprised.'
The psychotherapist's path to the witness stand came after an appeals court overturned Weinstein's conviction in his watershed 2020 Manhattan trial, in which Haley and Mann had testified, but not Sokola.
Prosecutors brought Haley and Mann back for the retrial, and also asked Sokola to testify — which she said was a difficult decision for her to make.
'It is easy to forget we have this strength – it is not gone, it is there,' she told The Post.
Sokola testified that Weinstein assaulted her three times, starting when she was just 16 in 2002.
But during cross-examination Weinstein's lawyers confronted her with the journal, which they said had been given to them by her sister, who testified earlier in the trial for the prosecution.
It included entries on 'rape' and 'forced sex' about other people who had allegedly sexually abused Sokola, but that only mentioned the Hollywood producer once.
Sokola contended she wrote about Weinstein's alleged rape in other diaries she no longer has access to — and felt blindsided by her sister's apparent collaboration with the producer's defense.
'She manipulated the situation and chose this one workbook,' the former model said.
Weinstein's attorney Arthur Aidala didn't return a call for comment.
Sokola, despite her painful experience, said she would not discourage survivors of sexual assault from coming forward.
'Don't stay alone with that, it's the most important thing,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine brings back officers in emotional prisoner exchange on 14 June
Ukraine brought back another group of prisoners of war from Russian captivity on 14 June 2025, most of them officers, as part of exchanges under the Istanbul agreements. Complex negotiations on the next stages of the exchange are ongoing. Source: Major Andrii Yusov, Deputy Head of the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War and a representative of Defence Intelligence of Ukraine, in comments to Ukrainska Pravda and on air during the national 27/7 newscast; videos from the Coordination Headquarters; Defence Minister Rustem Umierov on Facebook; State Border Guard Service Quote from Yusov: "A distinctive feature of today's stage of the exchange is that it combines two categories agreed upon in Istanbul: the seriously ill and severely wounded, and young defenders aged 25 and under. Most of those brought back today are Ukrainian officers. It's no secret that throughout the full-scale invasion, getting officers back has been a particularly difficult task. The emotions of the families today, some of whom have waited for over three years, are difficult to put into words, and this is inspiring. The work will continue." Details: Yusov emphasised that for security reasons, the Coordination Headquarters is not disclosing the number of prisoners of war released until the major exchange under the Istanbul agreements is complete, as negotiations are ongoing. He noted that the week's repatriation efforts have been dogged by information attacks, pressure on the negotiating team and prisoners' families, and Russian misinformation. "Nevertheless, Ukraine is holding firm, the negotiating group is working, and we are bringing our people home," Yusov added. More details: Yusov confirmed that repatriation measures also took place on Saturday 14 June, and he refuted Russian propaganda claims that Ukraine has been refusing to collect the bodies of its fallen soldiers. He stated that the process is ongoing. Regarding the duration of the large-scale exchange, Yusov did not provide a specific timeline, saying: "This week has been very intense, and I think the coming days are going to be no less stressful." Background: The Istanbul agreements reached on 2 June 2025 include an all-for-all exchange of severely wounded and young soldiers (aged 18-25) and a 6,000-for-6,000 repatriation of fallen soldiers' bodies. Previous exchanges this week have brought back Mariupol defenders and other seriously injured captives. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kenyan blogger's wife seeks answers after his death in police custody
By Aaron Ross NAIROBI (Reuters) -When the policemen came for Albert Ojwang - the Kenyan blogger whose death in custody sparked protests this week and prompted a rare acknowledgement of police brutality by the president - his wife initially thought he would be safe. Unlike the dozens of political activists abducted by suspected security agents over the last year, the 31-year-old schoolteacher was taken to a police station and officers shared their phone numbers with his family. "When they came, they were so soft. They were not violent," said Nevnine Onyango, who was present when the officers arrived, accusing her husband of insulting their "boss". "So that is what gave me even more confidence." The next morning, a family member called with the news that Ojwang, the father of their three-year-old son, was dead. In the week since, the blogger's death has become a lightning rod in a nation just one year removed from mass youth-led protests that were fuelled, in part, by disgust at pervasive police violence. Hundreds protested in the capital Nairobi this week, with vehicles set ablaze and the police firing teargas. Demonstrators cited Ojwang's death as evidence that nothing had changed one year after more than 60 people were killed in demonstrations initially sparked by proposed tax hikes. Ojwang was arrested in Homa Bay, in western Kenya, as part of an investigation triggered by a formal complaint from the deputy chief of the national police force, Eliud Lagat, according to the Independent Policing Oversight Authority, Kenya's government-funded police watchdog. Lagat had stated he had been the target of alleged false and malicious information published on X, IPOA said. Kenya's police chief initially implied that Ojwang had died by suicide but later apologised after an autopsy found that his wounds - including a head injury, neck compression and soft tissue damage - pointed to assault as the cause of death. President William Ruto said on Wednesday that Ojwang had died "at the hands of the police", which he said was "heartbreaking and unacceptable". Three people have so far been arrested in the case: the policeman in charge of the police station in Nairobi where Ojwang was found dead, a police constable and a closed-circuit television technician at the station. Reuters was not able to reach Lagat for comment, and a police spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. In the past, the police have called examples of abuse isolated incidents. SUPPOSED TO PROTECT, NOT HARM It is not clear what Ojwang posted that got the attention of the police. His social media accounts no longer appear to be active. According to IPOA, which is investigating his death, Lagat's complaint triggered a probe that led to the arrest of another blogger. Interrogations of that blogger identified Ojwang as a person of interest, IPOA said. And so, last Saturday at lunchtime, police officers arrived at Ojwang's house on motorcycles and told him "there are some remarks that he had made about their boss, that the boss is corrupt", his wife Onyango said. They did not identify their boss. They first took Ojwang to the local police station before telling his family they would transfer him to Nairobi, nearly 300 km (185 miles) away, she said. She last heard from him at around 9 p.m. (1800 GMT) the Saturday of his arrest when he called her from Nairobi's Central Police Station. She said he sounded worried and asked if she would be able to come to Nairobi. Onyango is now hoping for answers - and accountability - from IPOA's investigation. "We always see these things on television, and it actually reached my door," she said of police abuses. "These people are supposed to protect us. They're not supposed to harm us."
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein Accuser Kaja Sokola: ‘The Devastating Part Was Not the Trial Itself — It Was the Betrayal of My Sister'
Kaja Sokola spent five intense days testifying in Harvey Weinstein's New York retrial. Her testimony covered two alleged instances of sexual assault: one in 2002, when she was 16, and another at a Tribeca hotel in 2006. On June 11, a New York jury acquitted Weinstein of sexually assaulting Sokola. But for the former Polish model–turned–psychotherapist, neither the testimony nor the verdict was the hardest part of Weinstein's months-long retrial in New York. More from Variety Harvey Weinstein Judge Declares Mistrial on Rape Charge Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of Sexual Assault After Tensions Explode on New York Jury Amanda Seyfried Grossed Out She Invited 'Dictator' Harvey Weinstein to Past Sundance Premiere: 'It's Just the Way It Was - We All Needed Him' 'The devastating part was not the trial itself — it was the betrayal of my sister,' Sokola told Variety. 'I truly don't understand how she could — how anyone could do something like that.' On her fourth day on the stand, the defense confronted her with a private journal in which she documented people who had sexually assaulted her — but did not include Weinstein. The journal, which Sokola said was part of a 'workbook for addiction treatment,' was provided to the defense by her older sister, Ewa. 'Please don't read that,' she said on the witness stand. 'This is my personal things.' The former producer was mentioned in an entry referring to 'Harvey W,' where Sokola wrote that he was 'promising help' but 'nothing came of it.' The defense used the journal to argue that Sokola had fabricated her assault allegation. Sokola told Variety that she had written about Weinstein's abuse in other diaries, but those were not read for the jury. 'My sister chose to bring this one thing from Poland that said what it said,' she said. 'This felt very unjust and very hurtful… These kinds of tactics are just showing how dirty of a game it is for them.' Sokola said her relationship with her sister has been strained over the years. 'My sister was trying to do a lot of harmful things to me in the past,' she said. 'A lot of this was correlated with money, so we didn't have — let's say — the best relationship ever.' Michael Cibella, Weinstein's attorney who questioned Sokola, told Variety that he is 'not aware of any other journals that have any allegations of abuse against Weinstein.' 'We had this journal which had allegations of sexual abuse against four other people, and in that same writing, talked about Harvey Weinstein having made promises that he didn't keep,' Cibella said. 'Nothing about sexual abuse whatsoever against Harvey Weinstein.' Ewa Sokola testified for the prosecution in the case. She corroborated that she and Kaja had a lunch meeting with Weinstein at a Tribeca hotel in 2006. At one point during the meal, Kaja and Weinstein took an elevator upstairs together while Ewa remained at the table. When Kaja returned by herself, the sisters left the hotel. Ewa recalled that Kaja appeared to be under 'extreme tension' after her time alone with Weinstein, though the two went on as if it were a 'regular day.' During cross-examination, when the defense asked whether Kaja had ever said anything negative about Weinstein before 2017, Ewa said no. 'She was proud of knowing him,' she told the courtroom. In the defense's closing argument, Arthur Aidala — another one of Weinstein's attorneys — mentioned Ewa to the jury again, arguing that she ultimately became a defense witness after her testimony. 'She was supporting our theory of the case,' Aidala said. 'That everything was fine with her sister.' Over the phone, Cibella commended Ewa for her testimony. 'She told the whole story — not just one part of the story that helped the prosecutor.' Kaja Sokola, meanwhile, has a theory about how her sister connected with the defense. She said that her sister's friend — an attorney Ewa's known for roughly 20 years — works for Aidala's firm, which she believes 'speaks a lot.' 'It's very sad and unfortunate when you see families being broken up because of these kinds of reasons,' she said. Sokola also said that her sister's lawyer friend had visited her at the New York apartment she lived in back in 2006. 'He knew that I had known Harvey for a long time, and that I was scared of him for a very long time.' 'I'm familiar with the attorney that she is referring to, and he does not work at Arthur Aidala's firm,' Cibella replied when asked about Kaja's claims. 'But we are familiar with that attorney, and it is someone that [Ewa's] had a friendship with for quite some time.' Kaja Sokola did not testify at Weinstein's 2020 trial. However, after an appeals court overturned his rape and sexual assault convictions — sending the case back for retrial — prosecutors added a new sexual assault charge in September 2024 based on the allegations by a then-anonymous Kaja. Her identity was revealed to the public months later, during opening statements of Weinstein's retrial in late April. 'He looked miserable, and he looked like a sick, old man,' Sokola told Variety of seeing Weinstein in the courtroom. 'Part of me felt sorry for him, because this man has messed up his life. He has done things that are crimes and, right now, he's paying the price for it. It didn't feel like seeing the Harvey that I knew from years ago.' In her testimony, Sokola described two alleged sexual assaults by Weinstein in 2002 and 2006. The defense, however, repeatedly argued during the trial that Kaja never met Weinstein in 2002, pointing to a lack of evidence — such as writings or photographs — showing the two together that year. 'Harvey did not meet this woman when she was 16 years old,' Cibella reasserted to Variety. 'He did not know her in 2002 and adamantly has denied that. And the jury, by their verdict, they didn't believe her — and she was not credible.' Sokola's attorney, Lindsay Goldbrum, said that an individual who was friends with her before the 2006 incident could have testified that Kaja had known Weinstein prior to that time as well. 'Unfortunately, because of criminal procedure laws and rules regarding hearsay, they were not able to call her as a witness, even though she was willing to testify on Kaja's behalf. And so that's one of the unfortunate pieces of the criminal justice system, is that juries don't ever get to hear the entire story,' Goldbrum said. 'The fact that there may not have been physical written evidence of the fact that Harvey Weinstein assaulted Kaja in 2002 doesn't mean it didn't happen. This event was an in-person interaction between two individuals from 23 years ago. Do we really expect there to be a mountain of written and photographic evidence? No, I think that many of us have interactions on a daily basis that there would be no written record of, and so I don't think it's indicative of anything.' Although Weinstein was acquitted of the charge related to Sokola, he was convicted of one count of committing a criminal sexual act in the first degree, based on allegations by former TV production assistant Miriam Haley. The judge declared a mistrial in the rape case involving Jessica Mann. 'I was hoping for something else, but it still didn't change the whole scenario for me — because the whole point is to put this man in jail,' Sokola said. 'It's not my story. I'm not on trial. It's not about me. It's about him and him being accountable for what he did.' Outside the courthouse, following the declaration of a mistrial on Weinstein's remaining count, Aidala referenced Sokola, who had made a statement the previous day about the initial partial verdict. He criticized her response, saying she 'took some kind of a victory lap after 12 jurors said, 'We don't believe you.'' Aidala also claimed that Sokola's case had received the jury's 'fastest and quickest verdict,' citing conversations with several jurors. 'It just shows you how really bastardized the whole MeToo movement has become now,' Aidala said. 'She comes here and says, 'It's a great victory,' when 12 people told her, 'You lied.'' Goldbrum described Aidala's comments as 'interesting,' noting that they were 'not consistent' with what their team had heard about the jury's deliberations regarding Kaja. 'I think that he has an incentive to say what he has to say about Kaja, as Harvey Weinstein's attorney,' Goldbrum said. 'I also think that he is distorting what is truly the jury's verdict, which is not that they don't believe her. It's not that they think she lied. The standard is truth beyond a reasonable doubt. It's not she's lying or she's telling the truth. It is whether or not there is reasonable that is the hardest standard to meet — the hardest threshold to cross — and that is the way it is for a reason, right?' Weinstein now faces up to 25 years in prison following his conviction in Haley's case. Prosecutors have said they are prepared to retry him on the rape charge, which carries a potential sentence of up to four years. Sokola had a message for Weinstein and his legal team: 'I want to tell them that we won. We won. Don't try to split women apart and tear them down individually, because that's what they were trying to do in the courthouse throughout the trial — and it did not succeed.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar
