University of Bristol VC interview: ‘We plan two-way student exchange between UK and Mumbai campus'
In an email interview with indianexpress.com, Professor Evelyn Welch, vice chancellor and president of the University of Bristol, explains why the university has chosen Mumbai for its new campus, the scholarships and courses it plans to offer, and how student exchange programmes will be facilitated.
Evelyn Welch: We have recognised that the world is a global place and that we need to engage globally. India is our very first overseas campus, and we chose Mumbai because it's an amazing city with remarkable opportunities that very much mirror those that we already have in Bristol. So, we see these as mirror enterprise campuses and students will be able to have very similar and yet distinctively different experiences of an exciting curriculum based around business, science and technology. We're opening our enterprise campus just by the train station in Bristol in 2026, and our enterprise campus in Mumbai will open at the same time.
Evelyn Welch: We'll be offering a range of programmes spanning some of the areas that Bristol is excellent in, around data science, economics, immersive arts and also some engineering disciplines. We will be gradually expanding our programme into areas including business, management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and immersive technologies.
Evelyn Welch: The degrees we're devising are based on those offered in Bristol, but they will be distinctive and will be adapted for the Indian context using Indian examples and ensuring, above all, that the employability, internships, and relationships with industry are specific to what employers in India are looking for.
Evelyn Welch: We'll start by offering a limited number of undergraduate and postgraduate programmes. We do have ambitions to host PhD students on our Mumbai Enterprise campus, not just trained locally, but also opening up collaborations with major Indian universities and mobility to visit India from Bristol. We'll start off in the first year with undergraduate and postgraduate programmes, but aim to build a vibrant hub for all types of learning and academic exchange.
Evelyn Welch: It will be a hybrid of the two. So, we will hire local faculty, hopefully global faculty, that we'll be bringing to Mumbai to specialise and teach, and research at our Mumbai Enterprise campus. They'll be complemented by the expertise that we have in Bristol, with current UK-based staff travelling to India to teach as part of our award-winning degree programmes.
Evelyn Welch: It's absolutely core to our mission that the academic standards and quality are consistent and of the highest quality across both campuses. This will be assured through a range of our regular monitoring, but also deep connectivity between the teaching that takes place in Mumbai and the teaching that takes place in Bristol itself. Campus leadership in Mumbai will report to the University leadership in Bristol, thereby creating a direct connection to quality assurance and the highest level of coordination, too.
Evelyn Welch: We are just starting the new Mumbai campus, whereas the campus in Bristol has been going for 150 years. Inevitably, this means the infrastructure will be different. However, the support systems and mentoring here in Mumbai will take advantage of the relatively small cohort and the innovative approaches that we will be able to take, above all, to employability and industry relationships.
Over time, we expect to have strong research partnerships as well as education partnerships. These will build on our existing strong research partnerships with organisations like the Indian Institutes of Technology, for example.
Evelyn Welch: Yes. It is a key part of our ambition to create opportunities for students from our Mumbai campus to spend short periods, semesters, or entire years at Bristol, and for our Bristol students to reciprocate by visiting Mumbai. We see this as being a global dialogue for Bristol and an opportunity to really further the opportunities that we're able to afford our student base both in Bristol and in Mumbai and that will be complemented by a range of extracurricular activities and a personal support programme, which will be tailored towards the particular needs of those students studying in India.
Evelyn Welch: Unfortunately not. It's a question of where the student is fully resident for their time studying, but they will of course, have access to our excellent careers support, all of the networks of our global alumni body for the university, and be able to actively participate in the networks that the university has.
Evelyn Welch: One of the main drivers of our ambition for the Mumbai Enterprise Campus, similarly to Temple Quarter in Bristol, is widening participation in a world-class education. The fees for programmes taught in Mumbai will be balanced to reflect the in-country pricing of higher education in India, and that they are being taught in a global hub like Mumbai.
We're also complementing this with a significant commitment towards scholarships, extending our award-winning Think Big Scholarship Programme to our Mumbai Enterprise Campus to ensure that Bristol education can remain affordable and accessible to as many students as possible.
Evelyn Welch: We're excited to be joining other UK universities in collaboration with some of the great universities that already exist in India. We view deep local partnership as the foundation on which we are establishing our new campus. We also see the intersection of innovation with world-class capacity in technology, like immersive arts and AI, sitting side-by-side with our recognised leadership in civic engagement – a real distinguishing feature of Bristol.
This is certified international recognition according to various global and domestic rankings: we are the highest-ranked UK institution to gain approval for an opening in 2026. We are ranked 51st globally and 8th in the UK by the QS World Universities Rankings, rising steadily over the last five years. We are a world-leading institution with 150 years of excellence in education and research, and we hope to bring that sense of competitive quality, not just amongst foreign institutions operating in India, but amongst our Indian partners as well.
Evelyn Welch: Our impetus for setting up a campus in India is a strong sense of the world as a place where global relationships really matter. We want to ensure that our students, whether they are in the UK or in India, have those global networks, and that's what is driving us today.
Evelyn Welch: We have approximately 800 students from India studying with us at a mix of undergraduate and postgraduate taught levels. The majority study at a postgraduate taught level with us, which is reflective of the UK higher education system as a whole.
Popular subjects include those across our business school, across economics and finance, as well as those wishing to study with our world-leading experts in engineering. We also know that there is good Indian demand for other courses and subjects, like those planned for the Mumbai Enterprise Campus, which cannot be met in Bristol only, or who face barriers to travel; bringing these opportunities directly to them is a key driver of our ambition with the campus.
Evelyn Welch: Indian students, like students from wherever they arrive, sometimes lack confidence and don't realise how many skills they already have and how to deepen their skills. They're often exceptional at mathematics, engineering and at problem solving like other students from around the globe. What they need to do is to develop those human skills of listening, understanding and appreciating the views of others.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump's 50% tariffs on India! which sectors will impact? study says ‘estimated impact of…'
U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a 50% tariff on Indian goods, which will take effect from August 7. This move raised major concerns about its potential impact on the Indian economy. However, there's some good news a new report suggests the impact will be minimal. According to a study by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI), the tariff is expected to affect India's GDP by only 0.19%, which is almost negligible. Out of India's total exports worth $86.5 billion, only $8.1 billion around 1.87% will be affected by this move. Trump Tariffs: What PHDCCI Study Says? The paper, released by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI), also recommends a series of measures to mitigate the impact of US tariffs. 'Our analysis indicates that there will be an estimated impact of only 1.87 per cent on India's total global merchandise exports and a negligible 0.19 per cent on India's GDP as a result of a 25 per cent tariff announced by the US on India,' said Hemant Jain, President, PHDCCI. The study said the total potential export impact is estimated at USD 8.1 billion based on 2024-25 merchandise exports of USD 86.5 billion (1.87 per cent of India's total global export). Which Sectors Will Impact By Trump Tariffs? Among other sectors, the study said the levies would impact engineering goods (USD 1.8 billion), gems and jewellery (USD 932 million), and ready-made garments (USD 500 million). In the wake of the US tariffs, the industry body has recommended several measures, including increasing market penetration, product development and market diversification. It suggested that stakeholders should negotiate bundled-pricing deals (textiles plus accessories) to absorb some tariff cost and maintain shelf-price competitiveness. 'Leverage Indian diaspora networks (trade fairs, cultural events) to boost volume with existing buyers under current product portfolios,' it said. PHDCCI also made a strong case for investments in joint ventures with US firms to produce tariff-sensitive goods on-shore, thereby converting exports into high-value services and intellectual property (IP) licensing. (With Inputs From PTI)
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Decoding China, the lessons for a vulnerable India
The exodus of over 300 Chinese engineers from Foxconn's pivotal iPhone 17 manufacturing facilities in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka — a recent move ostensibly executed under corporate directive — is far more than an administrative recalibration. It is a meticulously calibrated stratagem, designed to arrest India's burgeoning manufacturing ambitions and to perpetuate a 'unipolar Asia' under Beijing's overarching economic hegemony. A geo-economic move This calculated withdrawal is not simply a logistical reshuffling. It is a subtle, yet potent, geo-economic manoeuvre by a rival apprehensive of a rising India. The recall of these highly specialised technicians, possessed of invaluable expertise in establishing sophisticated production lines, optimising operational efficiencies, and troubleshooting the labyrinthine complexities of modern manufacturing, represents a deliberate impediment to the crucial transfer of technology. Such knowledge is the bedrock upon which India seeks to construct its edifice of advanced electronics manufacturing, and its withholding strikes at the very heart of India's aspirational ascent. In addition, China has leveraged its dominance in rare earth production and processing by restricting exports of rare earths (which include elements such as gallium, germanium, graphite), and rare earth magnets, which are crucial for electric vehicles and electronics, to India. China has also imposed curbs on the export of other critical minerals that are vital for various high-tech industries. There have also been informal trade restrictions on the export of capital equipment from China to India, including high-end manufacturing equipment for electronics assembly and other sectors, heavy-duty boring machines and solar equipment, severely impacting India's ability to set up and expand its own manufacturing facilities. The broader implication of these actions, particularly the recall of engineers and restrictions on specialised equipment, is a deliberate attempt to limit the transfer of advanced manufacturing technology and know-how to India. This aims to keep India dependent on Chinese inputs and prevent it from developing a truly self-reliant high-value manufacturing base. Crucially, many of these restrictions are not formalised bans but are implemented through verbal instructions and administrative delays. This makes them harder to directly challenge but equally effective in disrupting supply chains, increasing costs, and creating uncertainty for Indian manufacturers. In essence, China's strategy is multi-pronged, leveraging its control over crucial raw materials, manufacturing equipment, and even human capital to impede India's manufacturing ascent, especially in the high-stakes electronics and emerging technology sectors. These actions, when viewed through the prism of Beijing's anxieties concerning India's emergence as a potentially formidable manufacturing competitor in an era of 'friend-shoring' by the West, align perfectly with its broader strategic calculus. China's economic success is increasingly predicated upon maintaining robust export revenues. Consequently, any nation daring to challenge its pre-eminence in global manufacturing, particularly in high-value sectors such as electronics, is inevitably perceived not merely as a competitor but also as an existential threat. The withdrawal of these engineers, therefore, constitutes a potent stratagem to disrupt India's trajectory and safeguard China's long-entrenched export market share and economic primacy in the region and beyond. India's ambition to transform itself into a globally competitive manufacturing hub is seen in Beijing as a direct challenge to China's long-term stability. The reality in China Consider the demographic exigencies currently confronting China: an ageing and progressively shrinking populace, an unfortunate legacy of the protracted one-child policy, coupled with a palpable erosion of wealth occasioned by an enduring property crisis — even as local satraps exceed production targets in their zeal to impress Beijing. This widening structural imbalance between an excessive production capacity and faltering domestic consumption increasingly compels China to lean heavily on export revenues to underwrite its fiscal outlays and maintain a semblance of economic progress. As its social welfare and pension liabilities burgeon exponentially, the Chinese government finds itself under mounting fiscal duress. Any reduction of export revenues would directly impinge upon Beijing's capacity to fund critical domains such as domestic security and military expenditure, potentially precipitating an undesirable degree of social instability. China's formidable trade surplus, now on the cusp of a trillion dollars, is not solely a testament to its industrial prowess but also a stark manifestation of weak internal consumption and persistent industrial overcapacity. The People's Bank of China's repeated interest rate reductions on savings accounts have largely failed to ignite internal demand. This chronic overcapacity, therefore, constrains Chinese enterprises to aggressively depress prices and inundate international markets in a desperate bid to remain solvent — a strategy that has, perhaps ironically, severely eroded profitability across a plethora of sectors. As a result, China's determined endeavours to stymie competition are not merely a reflection of simple geopolitical rivalry. Rather, they are an undeniable reflection of profound domestic compulsions. Should India, by dint of astute policy and diligent execution, succeed in getting its house in order and convincingly demonstrate the potential to compete comprehensively in the global manufacturing landscape, Beijing is highly likely to escalate its countermeasures. These could range from the insidious pressures of economic coercion to outright military posturing, all in a relentless quest to safeguard its core economic interests and, by extension, its internal stability. However, the news of the U.S. raising India's tariffs to 50%, even while China enjoys a 90-day exemption from punitive tariffs despite buying more Russian oil and gas than India does, makes India less of a threat to China. While India has been seen as a key partner in western efforts to diversify supply chains away from China, the imposition of the new U.S. tariffs serves as a reminder that all alignments carry their own fragilities, and underscores the need for India to build true strategic autonomy. The Indian Prime Minister's forthcoming visit to Beijing comes against this complex backdrop. An appraisal of India's strengths, shadows China's industrial pre-eminence is not fortuitous or trivial; it is a systemic dominance that spans critical and emerging sectors, from the esoteric realms of Artificial Intelligence and quantum computing to the cutting-edge frontiers of 6G telecommunications and electric vehicles. We need to understand that China does not merely export goods; it orchestrates and largely controls global supply chains in these advanced technologies. Even its overcapacity, otherwise a sign of economic infirmity, is being deftly weaponised as a strategic instrument for price suppression and audacious market capture. The aggressive pricing strategies employed by behemoths such as BYD in the electric vehicle segment are a quintessential illustration: by flooding global markets with irresistibly priced goods, China effectively stifles nascent competition and inexorably solidifies its global market share. This is economic statecraft in action. In stark contrast, India's manufacturing ecosystem, despite its vibrant aspirations, remains undeniably nascent. The cherished dream of transforming into a global 'manufacturing hub' frequently founders upon a litany of formidable hurdles, including persistent infrastructure lacunae and the pervasive sclerosis of bureaucratic red tape. We remain regrettably reliant on imports for a pantheon of crucial components — ranging from sophisticated chips and engines to semiconductors and sensors — even for the foundational 'screwdriver technology' indispensable for basic assembly. This profound reliance on external sources underscores the considerable ground India must traverse to genuinely metamorphose into a self-sufficient manufacturing powerhouse. 'Make in India' still needs help from outside India. From Beijing's vantage point, China has nothing to worry about yet; its actions against India are an effort to neutralise potential 'noise' within its immediate periphery while it assiduously scales up its economic and political corridors with key strategic partners across the sprawling geographies of Pakistan,the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Africa, and Latin America. India's narrative of offering an alternative to the Chinese behemoth falters on our own dependence. If India genuinely harbours the ambition to 'compete' on the global stage, it needs a laser-like focus on its own foundational development. That is what China's behaviour has taught India: The onus is on us Indians. Shashi Tharoor is a former Under-Secretary General of the United Nations, a fourth-term Member of Parliament (Congress), Lok Sabha, for Thiruvananthapuram, Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs, and the Sahitya Akademi Award-winning author of 27 books, including 'Pax Indica: India and the World of the 21st Century' (2012)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Gen Z in India less attentive to digital ads than millennials: Report
India's Gen Z population, estimated at 377 million and projected to have $2 trillion in spending power by 2035, shows lower interest and attention for advertising on traditional digital platforms compared to millennials, according to a report titled Attention Advantage. Gen Z — typically referring to those born between 1996 and 2010 — pays about 34 per cent less attention to advertisements on social media platforms compared to millennials. Similarly, Gen Z pays about 10 per cent less attention to digital video advertisements, the joint report by Snapchat, WPP Media, and audience attention-measurement firm Lumen Research found. The study surveyed 3,000 Indian respondents. 'People generally are very good at paying a limited amount of attention to advertising,' said Amit Chaubey, head of marketing science, Asia-Pacific, Snap Inc., in an interview with Business Standard. 'This becomes even starker with Gen Z. Today, Gen Z are better at avoiding advertising than any other generation.' In 2024, users in India spent an average of five hours a day on mobile screens, with nearly 70 per cent of that time devoted to social media, gaming, and video consumption, according to the FICCI–EY report released earlier this year. With India's digital reach growing rapidly, brands and advertisers face mounting pressure to capture and retain user attention in a fragmented digital space. With Gen Z making up 70 per cent of Snapchat's audience, Chaubey said the report indicated that immersive full-screen mobile video and augmented reality (AR) formats significantly increased attention from this cohort. The report also found that a 5 per cent increase in audience attention can lead to up to twice the gains in brand perception. Mike Follett, chief executive officer, Lumen Research, said immersive experiences tend to resonate more with Gen Z as they feel more relatable and authentic. 'Our research identifies the winning formulas on platforms like Snapchat, where the immersive nature of the experience drives attention levels that are twice as high as on traditional platforms. The pinnacle of this is AR, where formats like Lenses create such a compelling, voluntary experience that they are over twice as effective at capturing meaningful attention,' Follett said. Amin Lakhani, president, client solutions, WPP Media South Asia, noted that clients increasingly demand accountability and clear returns on their digital advertising investments amid multiple content formats vying for consumer attention. 'But there is an increasing gap we are seeing. As consumers are exposed to huge volumes of content, it causes significant clutter. Through this report, we are trying to leverage technology, research, and planning sciences to find that sweet spot, enabling us to engage with consumers far more effectively,' he said.
