logo
Key Takeaways From Summit of G-7 Leaders in Canada

Key Takeaways From Summit of G-7 Leaders in Canada

Bloomberg17-06-2025
Below are the key takeaways from our blog coverage of the Group of Seven leaders' summit in Kananaskis, Canada. For more, click here for our TOPLive blog.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's Latest Boast Breaks Math Brains Across The Internet
Donald Trump's Latest Boast Breaks Math Brains Across The Internet

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump's Latest Boast Breaks Math Brains Across The Internet

Donald Trump's math on cutting drug prices didn't add up. Again. The president this weekend repeated his worthwhile promise to get pharma companies to lower the cost of medications for Americans, who often have to pay much more for certain drugs than people abroad. But the actual amount of the 'tremendous drop' in cost that Trump boasted about had critics scratching their heads. 'You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%,' said Trump, 'I don't mean 50%. I mean 14, 1,500%,' he added. But as many people on social media pointed out, that would mean all drugs are essentially free. Also, drug prices haven't actually reduced yet, despite Trump's pressure on pharmaceutical companies. Trump appeared to acknowledge that when he later said, 'We'll be dropping drug prices by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400% and 500% but not just 50% or 25% which normally would be a lot because the rest of the world pays much less for the identical drug.' Reality is 'eroding before our eyes,' said one critic. Others agreed. Related... Ex-Prosecutor Says Probe Into Jack Smith Is Actually 'Last Thing' Trump Should Want Kamala Harris Stuns Colbert With Candid Admission: 'To Hear You Say That… Is Harrowing' Watch MAGA Brains Break When Jordan Klepper Talks About Trump And Epstein

As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate
As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate

OTTAWA — Some premiers say they want to have more local control over the immigration system — but experts say what the system really needs is a national conversation on immigration reform that shores up public support. "Most of the existing policies have been formulated on the fly without any evidence or serious impact evaluations of what the various classes of immigrants are, how they're performing economically and otherwise," said Michael Trebilcock, a retired academic and co-author of two books on immigration policy. "So it's basically research-free." As the premiers and territorial leaders were wrapping up their three-day meeting in Huntsville, Ont., late last month, they called for an increase to economic immigration levels to fill local labour gaps and said they would use their constitutional powers to seize more control over immigration and issue work permits. Ontario Premier Doug Ford later walked back his vow to issue work permits to asylum seekers. "Do I want the whole immigration system on the shoulder of the province? No. Would I like to be treated the same way as Quebec? Yes, and so would every other province and territory," Ford said last Monday. Quebec has its own distinct immigration system through an agreement with the federal government. The province is able to choose who can immigrate to Quebec based on its own criteria, with French language skills being a significant factor. David Piccini, Ontario's immigration minister, said last Monday that the province also wants to see more financial support from Ottawa to help pay for social services strained by a high number of asylum seekers landing in Ontario. Ninette Kelley, a former United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees official and a former member of Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board, said that provincial control over immigration has grown significantly over the last two decades. "They know what their provinces need today, and they want to make sure they get the labour in that is required to meet those demands," she said. "But at the same time, there's been absolutely no evaluation that I can see of how those programs are implemented or what effect they're having." Trebilcock said the premiers' concerns need to be taken seriously because increased immigration boosts demand for health care and other provincial services. He said that it's "disturbing" to see Canadians' support for immigration decline in multiple public opinion polls. He said current immigration policies lack broad support and he believes a comprehensive, public review is needed to rebuild that support through evidence-based policies. "What we see at present is often piecemeal, on-the-fly changes in reaction to particular concerns that have surfaced in the media ... international students, temporary foreign workers," he said. Kelley said that, instead of a multi-year exercise like a national inquiry, a top-to-bottom immigration system review could be conducted quickly with "the right people at the table." Saskatchewan Immigration Minister Jim Reiter told The Canadian Press that he and the other subnational immigration ministers have told Ottawa they want to be seen more as partners in immigration, not stakeholders. "We need more influence in the decision-making of this because so much of the economic stream needs to be targeted depending on the specific needs of each province," Reiter said. The federal government last year slashed the number of slots in the Provincial Nominee Program from 110,000 to 55,000 as part of broader efforts to rein in immigration. The program allows provinces and territories to nominate individuals for permanent residence based on their skills and ability to contribute to the economy. Each province and territory has its own set of program streams targeting different types of immigrants based on factors like skills or business experience. Reiter said provincial immigration ministers want to see the Provincial Nominee Program return to its previous levels. He said that while he understands the need to reduce the number of temporary visas, that shouldn't come at the expense of economic immigrants. "We've had to restrict (the Saskatchewan Immigrant Nominee Program) down to three streams now to a large degree because we just don't have enough spots anymore," Reiter said. Reiter said that of the 3,600 spots Saskatchewan has for its immigrant nominee program, three-quarters have to go to temporary workers, so the province is prioritizing nominees who work in health care and skilled trades. "We've got the largest potash mine in the world being built ... just outside of Saskatoon and that company, BHP, every time we meet with them they raise the issue that skilled trades are an issue. So this is having a detrimental effect on economic growth," he said. Trebilcock said that if provinces are focused on using immigration to strengthen their local labour markets, steps could be taken to make it easier to recognize immigrants' foreign credentials in fields like law and medicine. With federal immigration decisions having provincial consequences, Kelley said, running an effective immigration system requires close collaboration between all levels of government. "So that speaks to the need for really tight co-operation between the federal government and the provincial government and municipalities, both in the setting of levels and in the housing and medical policies that are currently in place so that we can accommodate those who we're letting in," she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 4, 2025. David Baxter, The Canadian Press

Democrats flee Texas to ‘stop Trump's redistricting power grab'
Democrats flee Texas to ‘stop Trump's redistricting power grab'

News24

time44 minutes ago

  • News24

Democrats flee Texas to ‘stop Trump's redistricting power grab'

Texas Republicans are pushing a redistricting plan championed by Donald Trump. Democrat representatives in the state left to deny the Republicans a quorum. Republican Governor Greg Abbott threatened to remove members who did not return. Democratic lawmakers in Texas said on Sunday they were leaving the state to deny Republicans the quorum needed to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts, a move Republicans are seeking to protect their narrow US House majority in next year's midterm elections. US President Donald Trump has championed the redistricting plan, telling reporters he expects the effort to yield as many as five additional House Republicans. Republicans hold a narrow 220-212 majority in the House of Representatives, with three Democratic-held seats vacant after members' deaths. In a video shot in front of an airport, Democratic Representative James Talarico said the redistricting plan amounted to 'rigging' the 2026 elections. 'If you're seeing this video, my Democratic colleagues and I have just left our beloved state to break quorum and stop Trump's redistricting power grab,' Talarico said in the video posted on X on Sunday. Several other Texas Democrats said on X they were headed to Illinois, whose governor is Democrat JB Pritzker. My Democratic colleagues and I just left the state of Texas to break quorum and stop Trump's redistricting power grab. Trump is trying to rig the midterm elections right before our eyes. But first he'll have to come through us. It's time to fight back. — James Talarico (@jamestalarico) August 3, 2025 Republican Governor Greg Abbott said in a statement late on Sunday that any Democrat House member who did not return would be removed from the Texas House. 'Democrats hatched a deliberate plan not to show up for work, for the specific purpose of abdicating the duties of their office and thwarting the chamber's business,' the Governor said in his statement, adding that leaving amounted to an abandonment of the office. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the US Census but the Texas map was passed just four years ago by the Republican-dominated legislature. While mid-cycle redistricting occasionally takes place, it is usually prompted by a change in power at the legislature. Republicans have pursued redistricting in a special legislative session that will also address funding for flood prevention in the wake of the deadly 4 July flash flooding that killed more than 130. Under the current lines, Republicans control 25 seats, nearly two-thirds of the districts in a state that went for Trump last year by a 56% to 42% margin. Redistricting experts have said the plan could backfire if Republicans try to squeeze too many seats out of what is already considered a significantly skewed map.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store