Trump backs off his push to fire Fed's Powell
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter.
President Donald Trump said Tuesday he has 'no intention' of firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
'Never did,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'The press runs away with things.'
Trump's comments Tuesday may seem at odds with a post he made last week on Truth Social, expressing that Powell's 'termination cannot come fast enough!'
'The [European Central Bank] is expected to cut interest rates for the 7th time, and yet, 'Too Late' Jerome Powell of the Fed, who is always TOO LATE AND WRONG, yesterday issued a report which was another, and typical, complete 'mess!'' Trump wrote. 'Oil prices are down, groceries (even eggs!) are down, and the USA is getting RICH ON TARIFFS. Too Late should have lowered Interest Rates, like the ECB, long ago, but he should certainly lower them now.'
Trump doubled down Monday, asserting, in another post, that there is 'virtually no inflation … but there can be a SLOWING of the economy unless Mr. Too Late, a major loser, lowers interest rates, NOW.'
Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told reporters Friday that Trump was studying whether he's able to fire Powell.
'Not permitted under the law,' Powell said in November, after Trump's reelection, in response to a reporter's question on the subject.
The seven members of the Fed's Board of Governors can only be removed 'for cause,' according to the Federal Reserve Act. That typically is interpreted as malfeasance, dereliction of duty or other serious misconduct. A 1930s Supreme Court ruling commonly referred to as Humphrey's Executor also backs that up.
The Justice Department, however, is seeking to overturn that standard as part of its argument pertaining to Trump's move to fire the top brass at several independent agencies over policy disagreements.
'The [Supreme Court] has a route available to it if it wants to distinguish the Fed,' former Fed Gov. Dan Tarullo, told The New York Times.
Despite the turnabout in his comments, Trump reiterated some criticism of Powell on Tuesday.
'I would like to see him be a little more active in terms of his idea to lower interest rates … and would like to see our chairman be early or on time, as opposed to late,' Trump said. 'If he doesn't, is it the end? No. It's not.'
Markets rebounded in the wake of the Tuesday comments.
Futures tracking the S&P 500 increased 2.5%, while those for the Nasdaq index jumped 2.7% on Wednesday.
'Clearly other folks have talked to [Trump] and explained that [firing Powell] would have caused huge volatility,' Dec Mullarkey, managing director at fund manager SLC Management, told the Financial Times.
Mullarkey credited Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, whom he said 'recognizes that the integrity of markets has to be maintained.'
'This shows there are some guardrails around this president,' Mullarkey said.
Mark Spindel, an investment manager who co-wrote a history of Fed independence, added Trump 'got the hint.'
'Firing Jay would be a catastrophic own goal,' Spindel told The Wall Street Journal.
David Wilcox, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, stressed the importance of keeping the Fed's independence.
'This is an existentially threatening moment for the institution,' Wilcox told The New York Times. 'We may be on the cusp of throwing away an asset that has taken decades to accumulate.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade
Breaches have become too costly for companies not to invest in top-tier protection. Cybersecurity comes in several flavors, offering a range of choices for investors. The five stocks below offer broad industry exposure -- and should thrive over time. 10 stocks we like better than Palo Alto Networks › Security has become mission-critical to companies in an increasingly digital and technology-driven world. The consequences of failure are costly. An annual report by International Business Machines estimates that the typical breach can cost companies $4.9 million in damages. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that cybersecurity is a hot topic in the stock market. Research from Roots Analysis estimates that the global cybersecurity market will grow from $215 billion last year to $697 billion by 2035, representing an 11.3% annualized growth rate over the next decade. But don't look to the antivirus programs your parents used on their computers in the late 1990s. Today, a new crop of next-generation security companies is taking over the field. Here are five cybersecurity stocks to consider buying and holding for the next decade. A highly connected world creates security vulnerabilities. That's where Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ: PANW) comes in. The company specializes in firewall technology, which acts like a security guard on a network, monitoring what is trying to get in, and stopping suspicious actors. The company has expanded into cloud security and integrated artificial intelligence (AI), a common theme on this list, to improve its protection. It is one of the largest dedicated cybersecurity companies and is driving growth by transitioning its business model from selling specific solutions tailored to individual customer needs to a platform strategy. Analysts estimate that Palo Alto Networks will continue to grow its earnings by an average of 20% annually over the long term, as spending across the broader security market increases. It's hard to discuss cutting-edge security without including CrowdStrike Holdings (NASDAQ: CRWD). The company has garnered recognition for its endpoint security, which protects connected devices (endpoints) in a network, such as laptops or smart devices. It has expanded to become a comprehensive security platform with enhanced capabilities, sold to customers as product modules. Cross-selling has driven staggering growth for CrowdStrike. Today, nearly a quarter of its customers use at least eight product modules. And with just $4.4 billion in annual recurring revenue, there is still ample room for growth. The company's success has fetched a lofty price-to-sales ratio (P/S) of 28, but it could be worth nibbling on and adding more aggressively on dips. CrowdStrike is on its way to becoming a substantial business. The internet runs on massive content delivery networks (CDN), and Cloudflare (NYSE: NET) is one of the largest. Beyond powering the internet, it helps secure it by mitigating distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) threats, a type of cyberattack where malicious traffic floods a site, slowing it or crashing it altogether. The company has over 250,000 paying customers, and its network is a great distribution tool for products and services. Its global CDN coverage also makes it a player in edge computing, where companies bring computing resources out of centralized cloud centers to localized locations to improve performance and speed. Think upcoming opportunities like autonomous vehicles and robotics, where secure, fast connections will be crucial for the technology to work at scale. Security technology often flags potential threats that a human analyst then reviews and assesses. SentinelOne (NYSE: S) uses AI to detect and deter cyberthreats autonomously. As a direct competitor to CrowdStrike, it also specializes in endpoint security and has received praise for its high-level technology capabilities. SentinelOne is smaller than its archrival and isn't yet profitable. However, it benefits from the same big-picture growth trends as the others on this list, and its P/S of 6.7 makes it arguably the bargain among this group. Sometimes, you don't need to be the biggest to be successful. The stock could have tremendous long-term upside from here. Cybersecurity isn't among the things investors associate with Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), but make no mistake, the technology giant is a colossal presence in the industry. It builds security products and services into its Windows operating software, protecting millions of Windows computers and devices worldwide. Microsoft is involved with various technology end markets, so this is far more than a cybersecurity investment. The company's exposure to AI, cloud computing, and enterprise software -- as well as Windows and Microsoft 365 productivity software -- makes it a well-rounded bet on the broader technology sector. That's worth holding as an anchor for a growth-focused portfolio. Before you buy stock in Palo Alto Networks, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palo Alto Networks wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, International Business Machines, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends Palo Alto Networks and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump
Elon Musk went into damage-control mode early Wednesday as he tried to mend fences with President Donald Trump after their spectacular falling-out last week. And his critics are mocking his public show of fealty on his own platform. Musk spent some $291 million during the 2024 election cycle, most notably to help Trump, according to and became a constant presence by his side. Once in office, Trump put Musk in charge of the 'DOGE' initiative to cut government spending. But Musk left his role, attacked Trump's signature 'big beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination,' and went scorched-earth against his one-time ally in a series of posts on X last week. Musk wrote that Trump won't release the files of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein because the president is named in them, shared a post in support of impeaching Trump and replacing him with Vice President JD Vance, and floated the creation of a third political party. Trump in turn threatened repercussions for Musk's businesses and warned him of 'serious consequences' if he backed Democrats for office. But Musk blinked on Wednesday. He wrote that he regretted some of his posts about Trump and said some of them 'went too far.' He also deleted many of those messages. His critics fired back:
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Scofflaw Strongman
DONALD TRUMP SAYS HIS LATEST VENTURE into dictatorship—deploying the National Guard and Marines against American citizens, over the opposition of state and local officials—is about safeguarding the rule of law. 'If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, we'll be very, very strong in terms of law and order,' Trump told reporters on Sunday, as protests escalated in Los Angeles against his deportations. 'It's about law and order.' Don't believe it. Trump is using the Guard and the military to enforce his will, not the law. The evidence of his insincerity is what he did four years ago: When rioters were on his side, he didn't call in the Guard. He embraced the criminals, pardoned them, and purged the law enforcement officials who prosecuted them. He's a despot and a scofflaw. In the Los Angeles uprising, Trump—like every authoritarian before him—claims to be saving his country from chaos. 'Violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents,' he declared on Sunday afternoon. 'These lawless riots only strengthen our resolve.' A few hours later, he called for 'bringing in the troops . . . RIGHT NOW!!! Don't let these thugs get away with this.' And on Monday afternoon, he ridiculed any suggestion that the protesters were peaceful. 'Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction,' he wrote, 'tells you all you have to know.' Insurrectionist mobs. Lawless riots. Videos of violence. We've heard such alarming descriptions before. And on January 6, 2021, we saw how little Trump cared about them. Share AT 1:21 P.M. THAT DAY, AS TRUMP returned to the White House after instructing his supporters to march on the Capitol, he was told twice by a member of his staff, 'They're rioting down at the Capitol.' The exact moment of this encounter was captured in a photograph. Trump replied, 'All right, let's go see.' He went to his dining room and watched on TV as the riot proceeded. For the next hour, TV networks aired videos of the violence and destruction. Like this week's videos from Los Angeles, they told the president all he needed to know. But Trump did nothing. Toward the end of that hour—somewhere between 2:13 and 2:24 pm, according to the final report of the House January 6th Committee—Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, informed White House Counsel Pat Cipollone that Trump 'doesn't want to do anything' about the ongoing assault. A few minutes later, Cipollone was heard to tell Meadows, 'They're literally calling for the Vice President to be F'ing hung.' And Meadows was heard to reply, 'You heard him, Pat. He thinks Mike [Pence] deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.' Meanwhile, in a phone call, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy warned Trump that the rioters 'literally just came through my office windows, and my staff are running for cover. I mean, they're running for their lives. You need to call them [the assailants] off.' Trump responded by rebuking McCarthy: 'Well, Kevin, I guess they're just more upset about the election theft than you are.' These conversations took place as Fox News, which Trump was watching, reported that police had been injured and that rioters inside the Capitol were 'feet from the House chamber.' On the screen, according to the House committee report, Fox 'was showing video of the chaos and attack, with tear gas filling the air in the Capitol Rotunda.' Throughout the afternoon, Trump's aides, family, and friends implored him to tell the rioters to go home. He refused. Not until 4:17 p.m., nearly three hours after being informed about the riot, did he comply. Join now TRUMP NOW CLAIMS that he told the rioters to be peaceful and that he offered ten thousand National Guard troops to protect the Capitol. The first claim is misleading. The second is a lie. The House report shows that before and during the assault, Trump resisted entreaties to call for peace. On January 6th, a text message to one of his top aides, Hope Hicks, said Trump 'should tweet something about Being NON-violent.' Hicks wrote back: 'I suggested it several times Monday and Tuesday and he refused.' At one point in his incendiary speech that morning, Trump did ask his followers to march to the Capitol 'peacefully.' But that phrase, according to the House report, was 'scripted for him by his White House speechwriters.' The main theme of the speech was to 'fight like hell.' Another Trump aide, Sarah Matthews, told the committee that once the riot was underway, Trump resisted pleas to call for peace. He did use the term 'peaceful' in a tweet at 2:38 p.m., but only grudgingly. Trump's press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, told Matthews that Trump 'did not want to include any sort of mention of peace in that tweet.' Trump's other January 6th story, about the National Guard, is also a sham. His acting defense secretary, his Army secretary, and his chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff all testified that he never ordered the Guard to deploy that day. He never even spoke to these officials. Instead, during the riot, he used his phone to press members of Congress to do what the mob wanted: overturn the election. It's true that before the attack, Trump talked about the possibility of needing guardsmen. But it was never about protecting the Capitol. It was, in Meadows's words, to 'protect pro Trump people' from anti-Trump protesters. In short, everything Trump decries in Los Angeles happened on January 6th, and more. A violent, insurrectionist mob swarmed and attacked police. And instead of bringing in the Guard 'RIGHT NOW,' Trump watched the assault, encouraged the mob, and waited to see whether it would keep him in power. In fact, when he returned to office this year, Trump pardoned nearly everyone who had pleaded guilty to or had been convicted of assaulting police on January 6th. He said the insurrectionists were right: 'They were protesting a crooked election.' He purged the prosecutors who had handled those cases. And in a speech at the Department of Justice, he boasted that he had 'removed the senior FBI officials' who, in his words, had persecuted the 'J6 hostages.' Share NOW, AS HE DEPLOYS THE MILITARY against protesters in an American city, Trump invokes 'law and order' as a bogus excuse. And he vows to go further. On Monday, he announced a policy of escalation against protesters. 'If they spit, we will hit,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'This is a statement from the President of the United States. . . . The Insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of the National Guardsmen/women, and others. . . . IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before.' On Tuesday, speaking to troops at Fort Bragg, Trump said he was seizing control of the National Guard and ending the tradition of consulting governors. 'We will use every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore law and order right away,' he declared. 'We're not going to wait . . . for a governor that's never going to call.' And in remarks in the Oval Office, Trump said his policy of escalating state violence would apply to anyone who protests the military parade on June 14, his birthday. 'If there's any protester [who] wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' he warned. 'For those people that want to protest. . . . They will be met with very heavy force.' This is not a man defending the rule of law. This is a man continuing the project he began in his first term and tried to complete on January 6th: replacing the rule of law with himself. Share The Bulwark