Revive Kochi Metropolitan Transport Authority by November 1, says Kerala HC
It also must be provided with adequate number of personnel, including expert members. The benefits from the effective functioning of the authority for Kochi cannot be understated, since it can help reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions. It can also integrate bus, metro and ferry systems, augment last-mile connectivity and help rationalise the fare in public transport vehicles apart from readying a parking policy, said a Bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji while considering a public interest litigation filed by Richard Rajesh Kumar and Arjun P. Bhaskar.
These would in turn provide better access to mobility options for residents and tourists, while boosting economic growth and urban renewal. The KMTA would thus help make an effective change in the urban transport system in the region. By creating a Metropolitan Transport Authority (MTA) for Kochi, but letting it remain on paper, the object of providing a sustainable and planned urban transport system for residents of Kochi is being nullified.
KMTA Act
The KMTA Act that was notified in 2019 provides for the creation of an MTA for each urban mobility area in Kerala. Their duties include forming a comprehensive mobility plan (CMP) that provides for a safe, sustainable, efficient and coordinated urban transport systems. There cannot be any doubt that considering the functions of the authority, a city like Kochi must have a robust public transport system. But since its formation, no meetings were held, neither was an Urban Transport Fund set up. In addition, ₹17.40 lakh that the government sanctioned for the MTA was not utilised so far, the court observed.
It further directed the CEO of KMTA to submit a proposal to the government about its infrastructure needs and also to ready an Urban Transport Fund.
The petitioners had submitted that the 'inaction' on the part of the State was violative of the Kerala Metropolitan Transport Authority Act and caused injustice to commuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
3 hours ago
- The Wire
‘Manipur Violence Was Not Spontaneous, But Planned and Ethnically Targeted': PUCL Report
New Delhi: The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) on August 20 released the Independent People's Tribunal on the Ongoing Ethnic Conflict in Manipur at the Press Club of India, New Delhi. The 694-page report, authored under the chairmanship of former Supreme Court judge Justice Kurian Joseph, delivers the conclusion: 'The violence which erupted on May 3, 2023, was not spontaneous but planned, ethnically targeted, and facilitated by state failures.' Wide representation The Tribunal was set up by PUCL in 2024 with a jury of eminent figures chosen deliberately from outside Manipur to ensure neutrality. Alongside Justice Kurian Joseph, the jury included Justice K. Kannan, Justice Anjana Prakash, former bureaucrats M.G. Devasahayam and Swaraj Bir Singh, academics such as Uma Chakravarti and Virginius Xaxa, human rights defenders like Manjula Pradeep and Henri Tiphagne, and journalist-author Aakar Patel. Over 150 survivors gave oral testimony, while thousands more submitted accounts in writing or through group discussions. 'The voices we heard,' the jury wrote, 'paint a picture of systemic impunity and targeted brutality.' The report records that more than 60,000 internally displaced people 'remain in camps with no end in sight, even after 27 months of violence.' Fault lines and flashpoints The report identified long-standing ethnic divisions, socio-political marginalisation, and land disputes as the soil in which the violence was sown. These were aggravated by 'systematic hate campaigns and political rhetoric' that amplified mistrust between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities. A major trigger was the March 27, 2023 order of the Manipur high court recommending Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for the Meiteis. The directive sparked fears among tribal groups – particularly Kukis and Nagas - that their constitutional protections would be eroded, the report said. 'The judgment acted as a catalyst,' the report noted, 'setting off state-wide protests on May 3, which quickly descended into targeted violence.' The report also dismantled two dominant narratives: that Kukis were 'illegal immigrants' from Myanmar, and that they were driving poppy cultivation. 'Both claims were found to be exaggerated and politically weaponised,' the report said, 'serving to demonise the community.' Brutality and complicity Survivor testimonies provided some of the report's most searing insights, "We saw killings, mutilations, disrobing of women, and sexual violence on a large scale". Women testified that police often failed to help them, and in some instances, 'handed them over to mobs.' Hate propaganda played a central role. 'Social media was flooded with incendiary content, while partisan print media coverage deepened divisions,' the report stated. One survivor told the jury: 'We knew the violence was coming; the government did nothing to stop it.' The collapse of relief measures worsened suffering. Camps lacked basic sanitation, food, and medical facilities. Hospitals were attacked, staff fled, and patients were denied treatment on communal lines. The report noted 'serious mental health consequences – trauma, PTSD, and depression – with no institutional interventions in place.' Collapse of constitutional mechanisms The report's findings on law and order were particularly severe – 'FIRs were selectively filed, investigations delayed, and security forces accused of active complicity.' It criticised the state government for failing to create impartial Special Investigation Teams. Even interventions by the Supreme Court were described as inadequate. 'The Gita Mittal Committee and limited CBI probes were narrow in scope, poorly resourced, and lacked follow-up,' the report observed. Both state and central governments were indicted for 'enabling impunity and worsening ethnic divides.' Recommendations for justice and peace The report further outlined a comprehensive roadmap to restore accountability and rebuild trust in Manipur. It called for a permanent bench of the high court in the hill districts to ensure equal access to justice and the creation of an independent Special Investigation Team to probe thousands of pending cases, including those involving security forces. It urged strict prosecution of hate speech and propaganda that fuelled the violence, while also advocating a restorative justice framework with reparations, acknowledgment of harm, and survivor reintegration. Strengthened relief measures and sustained community dialogue were stressed as essential to healing deep ethnic divides. 'The people of Manipur deserve more than piecemeal measures,' the report declared. 'Without a systemic response, peace cannot return.' Justice Kurian Joseph told The Wire: 'Justice and accountability are non-negotiable if democracy and peace are to return to the state.' A warning for the future Two years since Manipur was engulfed in violence, the report's findings remain bleak. Survivors have consistently testified that 'the state either allowed the violence to happen or actively enabled it.' The report ends with a stark warning: 'if accountability is not enforced and impunity allowed to persist, Manipur could become a dangerous precedent; a template for future instances of state complicity in ethnic violence.' This article went live on August twenty-first, two thousand twenty five, at fifty minutes past three in the afternoon.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
High court sets aside Haryana police officer's retirement order, says 3-month notice mandatory
The Punjab and Haryana High Court Thursday quashed a Haryana government order retiring a police officer at the age of 55 years, after finding that the state had failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of serving a three-month notice under the Punjab Police Rules (PPR) before such an action. Justice Jagmohan Bansal, while allowing the petition filed by Rawat Singh, observed that the impugned order dated July 31 was not issued in accordance with law and granted the government liberty to pass a fresh order if it wished to do so in compliance with the prescribed rules. 'The instant petition is allowed. The impugned order is hereby set aside with liberty to pass fresh order, if any, in accordance with law,' the judge said in his order pronounced in court. The petitioner had moved the court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of the July 31 order that directed his retirement with effect from August 14. Highlighting the procedural lapse, Justice Bansal noted in an earlier order that the petition involved 'the setting aside of order dated 31.07.2025 (Annexure P-15) whereby he has been ordered to retire at the age of 55 years.' Counsel for the petitioner, Advocate Shalender Mohan, argued that as per Rule 9.18(1)(c) of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, which apply to Haryana, the competent authority is required to give three months' notice before passing an order of compulsory retirement on attaining the age of 55. 'The impugned notice has been issued on 31.07.2025 and petitioner has been ordered to retire w.e.f. 14.08.2025, thus, there is non-compliance of requirement of three months' notice,' the counsel submitted, asserting that the petitioner had a good service record and could not be made to retire prematurely without following due process. On August 13, the high court stayed the operation of the retirement order and called for the original file from the state. The matter came up for final hearing on Thursday, when Additional Advocate General Ashok Kumar Khubbar, appearing for the Haryana government, conceded the procedural lapse. The law officer told the court that 'the impugned notice was not issued in accordance with law' and sought permission for the state to issue a fresh order in compliance with legal requirements. The court accepted the state's statement and disposed of the petition while keeping the door open for the government to act afresh under the rules. This was the third round of litigation between the parties. The earlier writ petitions had been disposed of after the government withdrew its impugned orders. In its July 31 order, the state had withdrawn an earlier notice dated May 27 and directed the officer's retirement, which triggered the latest petition.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Karnataka HC directs creation of platform to map state-wide ownership of land, flag forest status
The Karnataka High Court recently ruled that a Geographic Information System Platform must be created to map all land parcels in the state. This observation was made in the context of petitions filed by landowners whose land status is disputed by the Forest Department. The order was passed on Monday by a bench consisting of Justice Suraj Govindaraj and has now been made publicly available. The court had observed that the current lack of interoperability between different databases could mean that while a legal title to land might be without issues in one database, in another department's database, major legal issues to that title might be revealed. The court said there would have to be a Geographic Information System-based platform that would work as a digital map of land parcels in the state, with demarcation of forest lands according to gazette notifications, aided by satellite imagery. This system would be connected to other databases such as those of the Revenue Department, Urban Planning Authority, etc, with each piece of land having a Unique Land Parcel Identification Number. This would create a 'digital identity' for land parcels that would be time-stamped and QR code-enabled. If any land parcels fall within a notified forest boundary, a conflict alert ought to be automatically generated and registration of the sale deed prevented. The court also stated that there ought to be a publicly accessible portal through which anyone could view a colour-coded report on land parcels, which would include information on ownership history, any litigation the land is involved in, and warnings if the land falls within a forest boundary or other similar issues. The bench stated, 'This transparency mechanism would serve as a powerful deterrent to fraud, enabling citizens to perform their own due diligence and effectively acting as a 'fraud alert' for every future buyer. By allowing the public to easily verify land status, it would address the core issue of a lack of information, which results in misinformation that leads to fraudulent transactions.' The court also directed the creation of an Inter-Departmental Land Dispute Resolution Cell (IDLDRC) with officials from the forest, revenue, and urban planning departments to deal with issues of inter-departmental conflict in terms of record-keeping. A high-level committee is also to be set up to implement the court's directives in phases.
