Kielland families welcome Norway rig deaths compensation
Families of British workers killed in an oil rig disaster 45 years ago have welcomed the Norwegian government's decision to pay them compensation.More than 120 people died, including 22 Brits, when the Alexander Kielland floating platform capsized in the Norwegian North Sea oil fields on 27 March 1980.Several relatives were in Oslo to see the Norwegian parliament, the Storting, agree by a narrow margin to pay compensation to survivors and the families of the deceased.Laura Fleming, whose father was one of those killed, said the agreement was long overdue recognition of the Norwegian state's failings.
Ms Fleming, from Durham, previously said there were unanswered questions about the disaster, which killed her father Michael and five of his compatriots from the Cumbrian village of Cleator Moor.The compensation motion had been opposed by the government but passed through the Storting by 53 votes to 51.
Ms Fleming, who was six when her 37-year-old dad died, said: "It's only right the Norwegian government have eventually done the right thing and agreed to pay a tiny amount of their wealth to the people that unwillingly and unwittingly sacrificed their lives."This feels likes a weight has been lifted of our shoulders."She praised the Kielland Network, a campaign group set up by survivors and families of the deceased to call for justice."People have given years of their lives to this cause and we are very grateful for the work that has been done," Ms Fleming said.
Among the 40 members of the Kielland Network who attended the vote in central Oslo, there was a great deal of sadness that the group's founder, Kian Reme, was not there with them.Mr Reme, whose brother Rolf was killed in the disaster, died in 2024 from cancer."He was the reason we got this far," Ms Fleming said, adding: "He was a man with strength of fight but also full of peace and forgiveness."He'd be so happy if he were here, but I'm sure he's up there proudly looking down at what everyone has continued to achieve."
Tara Pender, who lives near Nottingham, was with Ms Fleming in Oslo to see the vote pass.Ms Pender, who was 13 when her 41-year-old father PJ Pender was killed, also paid tribute to Mr Reme."It's such a shame Kian is not here," she said, adding: "He was amazing and worked tirelessly on this for so many years."She said the result was "very bittersweet" as many relatives and survivors had died before they got the recognition of failings from the Norwegian government they had craved."It's just been such a long time coming," Ms Pender said.She said she had spoken to several other British families of the deceased in the aftermath of the vote and they were "all delighted".
The four-year-old platform was being used as accommodation for the nearby Edda rig in the Ekofisk oil field about 200 miles (320km) off the coast from Stavanger, Norway, when one of its legs broke off during a storm.A 1981 Norwegian inquiry attributed the disaster to a crack in one of the braces caused during its construction in France, but the manufacturers said it had not been maintained or anchored properly by its operators.Some people received compensation at the time from the company which ran the oil rig, Phillips Petroleum, but campaigners said the Norwegian state should also accept responsibility.
A University of Stavanger study published in 2025 said families and the 89 survivors were let down by official investigations, while a 2021 review by the Norwegian auditor general found "highly reprehensible" failures to hold any of the companies involved in the disaster to account, or to support families and survivors.The Norwegian government apologised and funded the study to assess the impact on those affected.The government has opposed the compensation proposal put forward by a coalition of opposition parties but it passed by two votes, with further details now to be determined.
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The sanctions are not about hurting Israel but capitulating to sectarian politics
Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich shame Israel. It disgraces the country that they serve in its cabinet, and their presence in the government demonstrates that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu puts his own career above the needs of his own people. All of which has nothing to do with the British government, which has no business deciding who should and should not be in the government of foreign nations. We gave up ordering the colonials around when we stopped running the Empire. The sanctions against Ben-Gvir and Smotrich will have precisely zero impact on Israel. For one thing, it's a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy: I doubt either of them have the least desire to visit a country with a Government that so brazenly panders to the anti-Israel brigade. Because it is obvious what this is about. The statement announcing the sanctions was jointly signed by Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway – four of the most obsessively anti-Israel nations on earth under their current governments. Last week, for example, Australia banned an Israeli tech entrepreneur, Hillel Fuld, from entry over his supposed 'Islamophobia rhetoric' – in reality, exposing Hamas' Islamist supporters – and, in a deeply Orwellian accusation, for denying media reports of alleged Israeli war crimes. All today's statement needed was the signatures of Spain and Ireland for the full set. Labour has spent its first year in office pandering to its anti-Israel MPs, with a mix of dangerous and performative gestures that expose the shallowness of its foreign policy. Restoring funding to Unrwa, despite the allegations that some of its employees took part in the October 7 massacre; banning the export of some arms to Israel; backing the ICC arrest warrants against Netanyahu and the former Israeli defence minister, Yoav Gallant; now this. But it is not even Labour's own MPs that this gesture is really aimed at. Rather it is the potential supporters of the next cadre of so-called 'Independent Gaza' MPs. Labour is scared witless by the rise of sectarian politics in its constituencies. There are 37 constituencies with a Muslim population over 20 per cent, and in a further 73 seats the Muslim population is between 10 and 20 per cent. Labour's vote fell by over 14 per cent last year from 2019 in those constituencies where the Muslim population was above 15 per cent. This is a huge problem for Labour. It is not Israel that the party is most concerned will notice the sanctions, but Muslim voters in Britain. As for the sanctions themselves: the hypocrisy is mind-blowing. Qatar funds and houses Hamas. But we do not sanction Qatar. We beg for its money. But then hypocrisy and cant define this Government.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Ministers should apologise to oil and gas workers who have lost jobs, Tories say
The Government should apologise to oil and gas workers who have lost their jobs since Labour came to power, the Conservatives have said. Shadow energy minister Andrew Bowie said job losses and closures had already taken place as part of the planned switch to more environmentally friendly energy sources. He said 3,000 had already been cut since Labour came to power. He referred to a variety of projected job loss figures, including the Robert Gordon University in Scotland predicting 400 jobs would go every fortnight. Meanwhile energy minister Sarah Jones said oil and gas 'were not the jobs of the future'. Mr Bowie said: '(Offshore Energies UK) predicting 42,000 job losses unless there is significant policy change. 'The Just Transition Commission warning 120,000 jobs may go by 2030, and no prospect of a just transition because the supply-chain are just upping sticks and moving overseas.' If borne out figures produced by the university, based in Aberdeen – a city long linked to the oil and gas industry – would be the equivalent to job losses from the Grangemouth refinery closing every two weeks. Ms Jones replied: 'The North Sea will continue to play an important role for years to come, which is why we are keeping open existing fields for their lifetime. 'The truth is, this is a declining base, and (Mr Bowie) knows this. This is not where the jobs of the future are going to be. The jobs of the future are in the clean energy transition, which we are investing in at pace.' Ministers were also asked by MPs about the future of the Rosebank oil and gas field near the Shetland Islands, off the north-east coast of Scotland. The consent to develop it was declared unlawful by the courts in November 2024. Energy minister Michael Shanks said his department planned to publish guidance on emissions potentially created by Rosebank. Mr Bowie asked: 'In the dim and distant past in 2023, the secretary of state described the Rosebank oil field as a colossal waste of taxpayer money and climate vandalism. Does he still agree?' Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'As with any application, there's a process my department will go through and we'll look through any applications in a fair and objective way.' Conservative MP for Gordon and Buchan in Aberdeenshire, Harriet Cross asked why the Government had not met Cabinet Office targets to respond to a consultation on the guidance for emissions from offshore oil and gas projects. The Government says a response should be published within 12 weeks, but it is now 22 weeks since it closed on January 8. Ms Cross said: 'When will the department publish the guidance? Because it is causing delays to projects in the North Sea today.' Ms Shanks replied: 'It's a very complex issue as I'm sure she'll understand. We will publish the response and indeed the process that will now be able to be put into place as soon as possible, and then developers that wish to reapply will be able to do so.' Labour MP Brian Leishman (Alloa and Grangemouth), who has been a vocal critic of the Government's response to Grangemouth's closure asked if the Government would take an ownership stake in any green energy infrastructure. Referring to the Acorn carbon capture and storage scheme north of the border, Mr Leishman said: 'Acorn would go some way to reindustrialising areas of Scotland and that is much needed. 'And I welcomed the Government committing £200 million from the national wealth fund for future industry at Grangemouth in my constituency.' He continued: 'In order to avoid us again being in a precarious position of private capital of foreign government ownership dictating our future energy industries, does the Government plan on taking any ownership stake in the industries that are going to be coming at Grangemouth?' Energy minister Sarah Jones replied: 'We have lost thousands of jobs under the previous government whether it's in ceramics, whether it's in chemicals, whether it's in steel. 'And the previous government saw foundational industries really through the rear-view mirror, but we know they're going to forge our future and that's why we're rushing to get to clean energy by 2030, so we can bring those prices down.'
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Survivors of Ireland's mother and baby homes risk losing UK benefits over compensation
Survivors of Ireland's mother and baby homes are being 're-traumatised' by the prospect of losing benefits in the UK if they accept compensation from the Irish state, Westminster has been told. The warning comes amid a campaign backed by representatives of almost every political party in the UK and figures including Steve Coogan, who starred in Philomena, a film about the mother and baby homes scandal. More than 100 MPs and peers from across the political spectrum – including both Sinn Féin and Unionist MPs – have now signed a letter in support of the campaign led by the Labour MP Liam Conlon, ahead of a parliamentary debate on Tuesday calling for a change in the law. Ireland has begun the process of confronting one of the most painful chapters in its history by offering compensation to thousands of unmarried mothers who were shunned by society and hidden away in the church-run mother and baby homes. However, up to 13,000 of those survivors who are living in Britain risk losing access to essential means-tested benefits if they accept the compensation, which can range from €5,000 to €125,000 depending on the length of time people were resident. 'Sadly, for thousands of survivors in Britain, what was meant to be a token of acknowledgment and apology from the Irish Government has instead become an additional burden,' the letter states. At present, any compensation accepted through the Irish government's mother and baby institutions payment scheme by survivors living in Britain is considered as a recipient's savings. It can therefore disqualify them from means-tested benefits, including universal credit or pension credit, and affects eligibility for social care. The letter adds: 'This complicated and stressful situation is putting undue pressure on survivors who are currently making applications to the payment scheme, forcing them to revisit their most traumatic experiences as they weigh up the cost of accepting compensation.' The proposed solution, which is being called Philomena's Law, is to implement an 'indefinite capital disregard' – a legal mechanism that ensures compensation is not counted as savings for the purpose of benefits eligibility. Conlon said this model had been used for survivors of the 7/7 and Manchester bombings, as well as the Windrush scandal. 'Beyond ensuring that survivors are not forced to choose between compensation and vital benefits, our campaign has also been about shining a light on the mother and baby institutions payment scheme itself,' he said. 'Takeup is incredibly low in Britain and we want to ensure that every eligible survivor knows about it and feels empowered to apply.' The bill is named after Philomena Lee, whose story of forced separation from and later search for her lost son inspired the Oscar-nominated film starring Coogan and Judi Dench. 'As one of the people who suffered unimaginable abuse within a mother and baby home, I know that, while financial redress doesn't fix everything for families like mine, it represents a measure of accountability for what happened,' said Lee. The Irish government's redress scheme was introduced after an inquiry detailed the horrific experiences of about 56,000 women and about 57,000 children who were placed or born in homes, mostly run by nuns, between 1922 and 1998. In its report published in January 2021, it discovered an alarming number of deaths of babies in the homes and documented the cruelty and neglect suffered. Many women were forced to take part in work and separated from their babies, who were fostered or adopted. A DWP spokesperson said: 'Our thoughts are with the people impacted by this historic scandal. We are currently examining how compensation payments could impact benefit entitlement and will update in due course.'
