Fuel levy hike about to hit: Will you survive the squeeze?
General levy for petrol and diesel will be increased to R4.01 per litre and R3.85 per litre, respectively.
Tough times are ahead for South Africans, as the fuel levy increase takes effect on Wednesday, 4 June.
Many would believe that the fuel levy hike will impact only those who own cars; however, it will affect everyone, as businesses may need to increase the prices of products and services to offset the costs incurred by the hike.
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced the increase in his third budget speech in May. General levy for petrol and diesel will be increased to R4.01 per litre and R3.85 per litre, respectively. However, the EFF has approached the Western Cape High Court in an attempt to interdict this increase.
This is the first time in three years that the minister announced the increase. In previous budget speeches, he had reserved the right to increase the fuel levy, as he did not want to burden South Africans who were already struggling to cope with the high cost of living.
ALSO READ: VAT reversal overshadowed by fuel levy hike
Why increase the fuel levy?
Godongwana's decision to increase the fuel levy comes after his decision to increase the Value Added Tax (VAT) was met with criticism and was sent back to the drawing board to find an alternative that would not significantly harm consumers' wallets.
VAT was supposed to increase by 0.5% this year and by another 0.5% next year. This meant that everyone would be directly impacted, as every product and service was set to increase in price. However, the government would be able to collect the necessary revenue.
When it comes to the fuel levy hike, not everyone is directly impacted. However, everyone will be squeezed sooner or later. The Treasury estimates that it will generate an additional less than R4 billion, which is significantly lower than the revenue estimated from the now-withdrawn VAT increase.
How will the fuel levy hike impact consumers?
Professor Bonke Dumisa, an independent economic analyst, told The Citizen that if the EFF's court challenge fails, the fuel levy hike will result in inflationary pressures.
'The logistics sector will pass on the increased fuel prices to the end-users, which in turn will have the same negative effects as the implementation of the earlier proposed 2% VAT increase or the later proposed 0.5% VAT increase this tax year and another 0.5% VAT increase next tax year.'
Fuel levy is a tax charged on every litre of fuel sold, with a portion going to the government and another to the Road Accident Fund (RAF levy) to compensate victims of motor vehicle accidents.
It amounts to 18% of the retail price, while the RAF levy is about 10%.
ALSO READ: Godongwana punished taxpayers in Budget 3.0 despite calls not to
Is the increase really bad?
Professor Waldo Krugell, an economist at the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at the North-West University (NWU), told The Citizen the impact of the fuel levy hike will not be that bad.
'It appears that the impact will be mitigated by a lower basic fuel price. The relatively low crude oil price and a stronger rand-dollar exchange rate are helping to keep the pump price stable and maybe even a bit lower again this month.'
Based on current over-recovery trends, consumers should consider themselves lucky if petrol sees a marginal decrease of 3 cents per litre in June.
There is even the possibility that the fuel levy increase could result in a small hike in petrol prices if the rand weakens or global oil prices rise further this week.
Legal battle
The EFF previously successfully opposed the VAT increase in court, and it is hoping for the same result in the court case.
In the paper filed, the party outlined that the fuel levy increase will harm the poorest in South Africa and undermine economic growth.
'We took this action after repeated efforts to caution the minister and appeal to his conscience failed. We wrote to the Minister, urging him to consider the impact of this increase on the poor and working-class people of South Africa, especially during a time when the cost-of-living crisis is deepening.
'We also reminded him that, just like the VAT increase, raising the fuel levy without introducing a proper Money Bill is unlawful and undermines parliamentary oversight,' the EFF said.
NOW READ: Budget 3.0: Fuel levy replaced VAT hike but is it the better option?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘No justification for tampering with the constitution': MK party and DA slug it out over no-confidence motion limits
Have motions of no confidence become political weapons? The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party has rejected a proposal by the Democratic Alliance (DA) to amend the Constitution of South Africa, making it difficult to bring numerous motions of no confidence against the executive in all three spheres of government. The DA believes that over the years, motions of no confidence have been used for political point scoring, destabilising the work of governance and threatening the consistency of service delivery. The City of Johannesburg has been a victim of such motions of no confidence abuses. While not all mayors in this City were removed through motions of confidence, the city has elected more than eight mayors since 2016. How many motions of no confidence are enough? On Wednesday, MK party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said that the amendment would make it difficult to hold the executive accountable. This proposal constitutes a direct challenge to parliamentary oversight and represents a desperate attempt to shield the executive from scrutiny and accountability. 'It is a reactionary and democratic manoeuvre disguised as reform. Under the guise of creating stability, the amendment would tie parliament's hands for 12 months at a time, even in the face of ethical collapse, public outrage, or constitutional violations. 'This effectively grants political immunity to underperforming or compromised leaders,' he said. DA not prepared to withdraw Ndhlela said there are existing parliamentary rules that already allow the speaker of the National Assembly or presiding officers to reject frivolous or repetitive motions. He said there is 'no justification for tampering with the constitution' to solve 'a problem that doesn't exist'. 'The MK party rejects this amendment in its entirety. It is redundant, regressive, dishonest, unnecessary and dangerous. 'Parliament's power to hold the executive accountable must be expanded, not neutered. We call on the DA to withdraw this embarrassing and authoritarian stunt before further damaging what remains of its credibility,' he said. Speaking to The Citizen, DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp said the party is proposing two bills related to this matter. 'We cannot allow the kind of instability that we have seen in municipalities,' he said. Aucamp said the party will not withdraw the proposed bills. ALSO READ: Zuma point man touted to replace Shivambu as MK party SG Analyst weighs in Meanwhile, Theo Neethling, a political analyst from the University of the Free State (UFS), told The Citizen that limiting motions of no confidence in legislatures would reduce political grandstanding and make the submission of a motion of no confidence more meaningful. 'Personally, I would support restrictions on these motions only once every 12 months to the date of the last motion. The reason is that this could help reduce political grandstanding and reduce institutional instability,' he said. However, Neethling said he was not sure if other parties would support the DA's proposal. Former Minister of Co-operative Governance Thembi Nkadimeng had proposed a set of reforms aimed at stabilising coalition government while she was in office. This included introducing a cooling-off period after a motion of no confidence vote in councils. NOW READ: Did Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla's faction dribble Shivambu out of power?
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Tensions flare as university questioned over hiring more foreign nationals than coloured South Africans
Patriotic Alliance Member of Parliament Ashley Sauls grilled the leadership of Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University during a parliamentary questioning the university's employment practices, especially concerning foreign nationals and the marginalisation of coloured South Africans. Image: Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Instagram Patriotic Alliance Member of Parliament Ashley Sauls grilled the leadership of Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU) during a parliamentary briefing before the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, questioning the university's employment practices, especially concerning foreign nationals and the marginalisation of coloured South Africans. Central to the exchange was Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Enimos Manyawi, who was asked to clarify his citizenship and national allegiance. 'Chair, I do not renounce my Zimbabwean citizenship. I'm proud of my dual citizenship of both Zimbabwe and South Africa. I still hold my Zimbabwean ID. I did not renounce it. Zimbabwe also allows me to be a naturalised South African, and I've naturalised as a South African.' Pressed by Sauls to affirm his national identity, Manyawi explained: 'I consider myself to be South African. I travel in South African passport. I'm naturalised as a South African my adult life, my working life, was spent in South Africa. My children were born in South Africa.' Sauls challenged this position, saying: 'What you should say, CFO, is that I am Zimbabwean, because it sounds like you are denying that you're Zimbabwean. You must be proud to say, 'I am Zimbabwean and I'm a naturalised citizen of South Africa.' As such, I'm Zimbabwean and hold dual citizenship in South Africa and Zimbabwe, but I am Zimbabwean. The Zimbabweans are watching you, and are you now saying you are no longer Zimbabwean? You must be proud, you must say, I'm Zimbabwean.' When asked whether it was correct for the Zimbabwean government to prioritise jobs for citizens born in Zimbabwe, Manyawi said: 'Yes, it's correct for the Zimbabwean government to prioritise jobs for Zimbabweans, it's correct.' The exchange then moved to job prioritisation in South Africa. Sauls asked: 'How do you view South African citizens that are saying that jobs that they voted for is occupied by foreign nationals or permanent residents? How do you feel about that? Honourable member, I take it that the context is now different, it has moved from my situation to that of foreign nationals and permanent residents. Am I getting it correctly?' 'You're correct. I do agree with that sentiment. However, the context is, we are a university. When we employ people at a university, we may also, from an internationalisation perspective, consider foreign students, which is something that universities must strive to build. And also the international flavour in terms of the employees that we take on,'' Manyawi said. Sauls then directed his questions to Dr Johan van Heerden, Chairperson of the Human Resource Council committee, asking: 'Are you happy that out of 1,893, only 111 are white South Africans?' Van Heerden said: 'I'm happy that the statistics accurately reflect the demographics, primarily of the country and that of the region.' Attention then shifted to Ordette Ramsingh, Senior Director of Human Resources, who confirmed that she's classified as a coloured: 'I'm classified as a coloured South African,'' she said. Sauls highlighted a glaring disparity: 'Now, to the both of you, out of 1,893 total, there are only seven coloured South Africans nationals, foreign nationals, not permanent residents, foreign nationals, are 10 in total, 10. They are more than coloureds in total at the university. Agreed?' Ramsingh attempted to justify this by saying: 'Our employment equity plan works on the basis of natural attrition. So it's not working on the basis that we basically get rid of people in order to get the representation figures right. It works on the basis of natural attrition, and you will know natural attrition, especially in a South African university sector where our turnover is something like 2.7%. ''You just don't get the opportunity to very robustly and aggressively increase the numbers where they may be lacking. That category of employee [foreign nationals] is based on a contract. They're not permanent employees.' Sauls, visibly frustrated, responded: 'Are you listening to yourself now? Yes, I am listening to myself. You have seven coloured South Africans in total. You have on contract, it's still employment. Somebody's going home with money. You have 10 foreign nationals, more than coloured South Africans born here. ''Foreign nationals, based on the conversation we're having here, there's permanent residents, there's naturalised citizens. Now you have foreign nationals that doesn't have permanent residents. They don't have naturalised citizenship. ''You have more of them employed at the university and less coloured South Africans born here. How do you justify that? Do you understand what I'm saying? Coloured South Africans are being marginalised in this country. There is no justification. I overlook the whole permanent resident thing. I overlook the whole naturalised citizen thing. You cannot explain away.' Sauls then directly challenged Ramsingh's reasoning: 'You are basically saying more foreign national supplies than colours. Your stat says. I'm saying that. It's impossible. I will show you the statistics any time. ''And I'm going to challenge that officially. There are hundreds of coloured South Africans looking for jobs in this country. And for you to employ more foreign nationals and the law doesn't allow you to do so and you are justifying it and you're from the race group. I'm extremely disappointed.' [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel IOL Politics
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Gareth Cliff mocks Fikile's intelligence in shady post
Gareth Cliff has continued his longstanding social media feud with Fikile Mbalula with another shady post. The former shock jock and the politician have often butt heads over their views on trending South African topics. On his X account, Gareth Cliff joined many South Africans who reacted to Floyd Shivambu's resignation from the MK Party. The Secretary-General was forced to leave his post after he bragged about visiting fugitive Shepherd Bushiri at his home in Malawi. Fikile Mbalula – who also has a much-publicised feud with Floyd – threw shade at his political nemesis. Fikile tweeted: 'Zuma uSleg, they made Floyd draft the constitution to only use the same constitution to remove him'. Floyd clapped back: 'Like he decisively used the Constitution to take the 'mighty' ANC to 40% and left you begging for cooperation with the white minority.' He added: 'I respect and will forever respect President Zuma'. Weighing into the fiery face-off, Gareth Cliff responded: 'Floyd is smarter than Fikile.' He cheekily posted a proverb referring to Fikile: 'In the land of the blind, the one-eyed is king.' Over the years, Fikile Mbalula and Gareth Cliff have often taken shots at each other on the X platform [formerly Twitter]. In 2014, Fikile gave the Cliff Central founder a tongue-lashing after he questioned why the late Orlando Pirates goalkeeper Senzo Meyiwa was given a state funeral. Fikile clapped back: 'Who paid for Verwoerd's funeral? And who paid for PW Botha's funeral? It is the state, did they deserve it?… We never asked because we respect the dead. In 2016, the then Minister of Sport threw shade at Gareth Cliff's axing from talent show, Idols South Africa , after the latter seemingly defended convicted racist Penny Sparrow. 'M-Net should tell him to jump over his surname', he posted and deleted. Last year, Gareth Cliff shamed Fikile for driving a multi-million rand G-Wagon during the ANC's election drive in underprivileged areas. Reposting a clip of the ANC Secretary-General, the Gareth tweeted: 'This is like when John Kerry flies in a private jet and criticizes rich people for their carbon footprint; or when every other hypocrite tells you to do as they say, not as they do. 'Fikile loves a G-Wagon and couldn't say no, even though this one was lent to him by a crook. He added: 'These venal, grasping parvenus are always caught trying to become the crass rich people they hate, but we're expected to pretend it's not obvious. 'Tsek'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
