
Survey to start for 1st new nuclear reactor since Fukushima disaster
Currently, the No. 3 unit is the only reactor in operation at the Mihama station in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture, while the other two units are set to be decommissioned.
No new reactor has been built in Japan since the building of the No. 3 unit at Hokkaido Electric Power Co.'s Tomari plant. The unit began operation in 2009.
"We will conduct (the survey) while explaining to and seeking the cooperation of local residents," Kansai Electric President Nozomu Mori said at a press conference in Osaka.
A senior official of Kansai Electric also visited the Fukui prefectural office, where he met Fukui Vice Gov. Yasuhiro Nakamura, who urged the utility to "carefully explain" its plan to local residents.
The town of Mihama welcomed the decision, with an assembly member and urging that the reactor be built as soon as possible.
Yuki Sakimoto, a managing director at a construction company in Mihama, said that while his firm does not receive orders related to nuclear power plants, he sees benefits to hosting one, including improvements in road infrastructure.
"Since there are no other industries, (the town would) financially collapse without a nuclear power plant," Sakimoto said.
Meanwhile, town assembly member Takeshi Komoto said it is "unthinkable to build a new" reactor while issues such as nuclear waste remain unresolved.
In 2010, Kansai Electric announced a plan to replace an aging reactor at the power station and started a survey, but the process was halted due to the nuclear disaster triggered by a massive earthquake and tsunami that devastated northeastern Japan the following year.
Public sentiment turned sour over the use of nuclear power as a national source of energy following the disaster, prompting the government to repeatedly say it was not considering building new reactors or replacing existing ones.
But with demand for electricity in Japan expected to increase in the future, the government and power industry have been discussing the need for a new or expanded facility to ensure a stable power supply.
The government signaled a return to nuclear energy in its revised basic energy plan released in February.
Due to the strict safety standards introduced by the Nuclear Regulation Authority following the 2011 Fukushima disaster, the planned survey will likely have to begin from scratch. If the site is deemed suitable, Kansai Electric will need to draw up a basic design and submit it to regulators for approval before commencing construction work.
The government is promoting the replacement of aging reactors with next-generation models that are deemed safer. Kansai Electric is collaborating with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. and others to develop an advanced light-water reactor that is designed to be more resilient to natural disasters and terrorist attacks.
© KYODO
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asahi Shimbun
15 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Time to call it a day on policy of dependence on nuclear energy
The three reactors of the Mihama nuclear plant operated by Kansai Electric Power Co. (Asahi Shimbun file photo) Having experienced a major nuclear accident, should Japan continue to depend on nuclear energy for decades to come? A grim future lies in store if fundamental issues such as safety measures and processing of radioactive waste, along with a detailed examination of social costs, are placed to the side and construction of a new nuclear plant is allowed to proceed. Unbridled promotion of nuclear energy must not be allowed. Kansai Electric Power Co. has announced it will conduct research into constructing an advanced reactor at its Mihama nuclear plant in Fukui Prefecture. This is the first solid plan for a new nuclear plant in Japan since the catastrophic triple meltdown at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant in 2011. If construction goes ahead, the new facility will likely operate for decades. In 2022, the government reversed course on nuclear energy and called for maximum usage. It emphasized the benefits of nuclear energy, citing moves toward a carbon-neutral future and the need for a stable energy supply. The government worked with the major utilities to create an environment to allow for future construction. But many doubts remain. Kansai Electric depends on nuclear energy for close to half of its electric power generation while the ratio taken up by solar and wind power is minimal. The cost of renewable energy has come down, which represents another plus for energy self-sufficiency. Having pledged to promote investment in green energy, Kansai Electric must redouble its efforts in that regard. Its plan highlights an issue that cannot be dealt with by a single company. Kansai Electric's nuclear plants are concentrated along the coast of Wakasa Bay, which experts say poses significant risks in the event of an accident. The Fukui prefectural government has requested that the interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel that will be needed be built outside the prefecture, but no candidate site has emerged. The government's nuclear fuel recycling program has proved to be a major disappointment and there is no indication of how final processing of nuclear waste will be accomplished. There are also strong concerns about profitability. In recent years, there have been several examples in the West of construction costs for nuclear plants ballooning way over initial estimates. The government has a system to provide utilities with stable revenue so it can recover its investment in such mammoth projects. It also plans to provide more support if construction costs exceed initial estimates. The funds for that will be tacked onto electric bills, meaning consumers will shoulder the risks on behalf of the plant operator. Such generous support will require a greater financial burden by the public. Kansai Electric and the government have a shared responsibility to squarely respond to these and other concerns and offer measures to resolve them. One reason given by the government and the electric power industry for promoting nuclear energy is the expected increase in electricity demand due to the construction of data centers for cyberspace. But experts differ considerably in their forecasts. Competition to develop energy-conserving technology has also intensified. The switch in nuclear energy policy came within a few months of discussions within a forum dominated by proponents of nuclear energy. Any such discussions must be held in an open setting as this issue affects everyone. Since the nuclear disaster 14 years ago, The Asahi Shimbun has campaigned for a society that does not depend on nuclear energy, even if it takes many years. That would mean gradually stopping operations of the older nuclear plants and not constructing new ones. The push for energy-saving measures and renewable energy sources must be thoroughly expanded while keeping an eye on a carbon-neutral future and stable energy supply. The future course of the nation must not be mistaken. --The Asahi Shimbun, July 23


Yomiuri Shimbun
18 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
KEPCO's Plan to Construct New Nuclear Reactor: A Step Forward from ‘Post-2011 Earthquake' Policy
After being frozen for many years following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, movement has begun toward the construction of new nuclear reactors. The hope is that Kansai Electric Power Co. will steadily proceed with the plan while carefully gaining the understanding of the public. KEPCO has announced that it will resume a geological survey on the premises of its Mihama nuclear power plant in the town of Mihama, Fukui Prefecture, in preparation for the construction of a new nuclear reactor. The company started the survey in 2010, but it was suspended following the accident at Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc.'s Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant in 2011. Since the earthquake, there has been strong caution about the use of nuclear power plants. The last nuclear reactor that was newly built in Japan was the No. 3 reactor at Hokkaido Electric Power Co.'s Tomari nuclear power plant, which went into operation in 2009. In recent years, household budgets have been suffering from rising electricity bills due to higher energy prices caused mainly by Russia's aggression against Ukraine and instability in the Middle East. The public has become more aware of energy security, and understanding of the need for nuclear power generation that is compatible with decarbonization has grown. KEPCO may have now clearly expressed its intention to build a new nuclear reactor in light of these changes. KEPCO envisions that the surveying will take around several years. After that, it plans to submit its construction plan to the Nuclear Regulation Authority. It could take about 20 years from the survey to the construction of a new reactor being completed, the company said. Concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants are deep-rooted. KEPCO should continue to make meticulous efforts to gain the understanding of local communities. The Mihama nuclear power plant has three reactors. KEPCO has decided to decommission the No. 1 and No. 2 reactors, and the No. 3 reactor is currently in operation. KEPCO said it will consider constructing an 'advanced light-water reactor,' a next-generation nuclear reactor that is said to be very safe and to generate power very efficiently. KEPCO must thoroughly explain the safety of the new technology. After the Great East Japan Earthquake, the government stated that 'dependency on nuclear power generation will be lowered to the extent possible.' However, former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida approved the construction of new nuclear reactors in 2022, changing that policy drastically. Behind this policy shift is the recognition that it is essential to promote the development of data centers for artificial intelligence, which use vast amounts of electricity, in order to strengthen international competitiveness amid the advancement of digitalization. The government has also attached importance to supporting the manufacturing industry through this inexpensive electric power source and reducing the burden on household budgets. In its Strategic Energy Plan, which was approved at a Cabinet meeting in February this year, the government has indicated its policy to raise the ratio of nuclear power in electric power sources from 8.5% in fiscal 2023 to about 20% in fiscal 2040. This is equivalent to the electricity produced by about 30 nuclear reactors. There are currently 33 nuclear reactors in Japan, 14 of which have resumed their operations. Although it is possible for a nuclear reactor to operate for more than 60 years under certain conditions, the stable supply of electricity will be threatened if new reactors are not built. Other electric power companies, such as Kyushu Electric Power Co., will also need to move forward with considering the construction of new reactors. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, July 23, 2025)


The Mainichi
a day ago
- The Mainichi
Survey to start for 1st new nuclear reactor since Fukushima disaster
OSAKA (Kyodo) -- Kansai Electric Power Co. said Tuesday that it plans to begin a geological survey to replace a nuclear reactor on the premises of its Mihama nuclear power plant on the Sea of Japan coast, in what would be the first new reactor since the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Currently, the No. 3 unit is the only reactor in operation at the Mihama station in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture, while the other two units are set to be decommissioned. No new reactor has been built in Japan since the building of the No. 3 unit at Hokkaido Electric Power Co.'s Tomari plant. The unit began operation in 2009. "We will conduct (the survey) while explaining to and seeking the cooperation of local residents," Kansai Electric President Nozomu Mori said at a press conference in Osaka. A senior official of Kansai Electric also visited the Fukui prefectural office, where he met Fukui Vice Gov. Yasuhiro Nakamura, who urged the utility to "carefully explain" its plan to local residents. The town of Mihama welcomed the decision, with an assembly member and urging that the reactor be built as soon as possible. Yuki Sakimoto, a managing director at a construction company in Mihama, said that while his firm does not receive orders related to nuclear power plants, he sees benefits to hosting one, including improvements in road infrastructure. "Since there are no other industries, (the town would) financially collapse without a nuclear power plant," Sakimoto said. Meanwhile, town assembly member Takeshi Komoto said it is "unthinkable to build a new" reactor while issues such as nuclear waste remain unresolved. In 2010, Kansai Electric announced a plan to replace an aging reactor at the power station and started a survey, but the process was halted due to the nuclear disaster triggered by a massive earthquake and tsunami that devastated northeastern Japan the following year. Public sentiment turned sour over the use of nuclear power as a national source of energy following the disaster, prompting the government to repeatedly say it was not considering building new reactors or replacing existing ones. But with demand for electricity in Japan expected to increase in the future, the government and power industry have been discussing the need for a new or expanded facility to ensure a stable power supply. The government signaled a return to nuclear energy in its revised basic energy plan released in February. Due to the strict safety standards introduced by the Nuclear Regulation Authority following the 2011 Fukushima disaster, the planned survey will likely have to begin from scratch. If the site is deemed suitable, Kansai Electric will need to draw up a basic design and submit it to regulators for approval before commencing construction work. The government is promoting the replacement of aging reactors with next-generation models that are deemed safer. Kansai Electric is collaborating with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. and others to develop an advanced light-water reactor that is designed to be more resilient to natural disasters and terrorist attacks.