logo
Judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia's release from jail as ICE blocked from immediately deporting him

Judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia's release from jail as ICE blocked from immediately deporting him

Yahoo4 days ago
The federal judge overseeing Kilmar Abrego Garcia's criminal case on smuggling charges has ordered his release from jail before trial, finding that prosecutors failed to show 'any evidence' that his history or arguments against him warrant ongoing detention.
That order arrived moments after another federal judge overseeing his wrongful deportation case blocked Donald Trump's administration from immediately arresting and deporting him after he is released from jail.
But he won't be released just yet. Attorneys for Abrego Garcia asked a magistrate judge for a 30-day pause on any order for his release so they can 'evaluate options' as they brace for immigration officers to arrest and remove him a second time.
The judge granted that request Wednesday.
Federal prosecutors have sought to bring his criminal case to trial as soon as possible, brushing up against demands from immigration officials who told the courts they plan to arrest and deport him before a trial even begins. Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty, and a trial is set to begin January 27, 2026.
Abrego Garcia's high-profile wrongful removal case has been at the center of Trump's anti-immigration agenda, dovetailing with the administration's defiance of court orders and open hostility to the judges ruling against them.
The Trump administration spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back into the country after admitting he was wrongfully deported to a Salvadoran prison in March. Yet he was abruptly flown back to the U.S. last month to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee.
In recent court hearings in two different states, lawyers for the Department of Justice said they would only move forward with his criminal prosecution if he remains in custody while awaiting trial.
On Wednesday, Tennessee District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw said the government 'fails to show by a preponderance of the evidence — let alone clear and convincing evidence — that Abrego is such a danger to others or the community that such concerns cannot be mitigated by conditions of release.'
'At bottom,' the judge wrote, 'the Government fails to provide any evidence that there is something in Abrego's history, or his exhibited characteristics, that warrants detention.'
Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis, meanwhile, has blocked Immigration and Customs Enforcement from immediately detaining Abrego Garcia once he is no longer in federal custody.
She also ordered ICE to give him 72 hours' notice if officials decide to deport Abrego Garcia to a so-called 'third country,' or anywhere other than his native El Salvador.
The administration has 'done little to assure the Court that absent intervention, Abrego Garcia's due process rights will be protected,' Xinis wrote.
'Defendants' defiance and foot-dragging are, to be sure, the subject of a separate sanctions motion,' she noted in her ruling.
'Defendants returned Abrego Garcia much the same way they had removed him — in secret and with no advance notice,' she added. 'Accordingly, the Court shares Plaintiffs' ongoing concern that, absent meaningful safeguards, Defendants may once again remove Abrego Garcia from the United States without having restored him to the status quo ante and without due process.'
Abrego Garcia was 16 years old when he fled gang violence in El Salvador in 2011 and illegally entered the U.S. Now 29, he was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both U.S. citizens, and two children from a previous marriage, when ICE agents arrested him in March.
He was jailed inside El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center for several weeks before he was moved to a smaller jail in the country.
Government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error, and several federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns, and Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed the Trump administration had 'illegally' defied that order.
Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States, characterizing him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member.
Emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show that administration officials and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines, causing major headaches for the White House.
A two-count indictment in Tennessee accuses Abrego Garcia of participating in a years-long conspiracy to illegally move undocumented immigrants from Texas to other parts of the country. He faces one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens.
But in their request to keep him in jail before trial, federal prosecutors also claim he is a member of transnational gang MS-13 and 'personally participated in violent crime, including murder.'
Prosecutors also claim he 'abused' women and trafficked children, firearms and narcotic, and there is also an ongoing investigation into 'solicitation of child pornography.'
Abrego Garcia is not facing any charges on those allegations, and Judge Crenshaw argues that the government failed to link those allegations to evidence that implicates Abrego Garcia.
The judge also said that to buy the government's argument that he is a member of MS-13, he would 'have to make so many inferences from the Government's proffered evidence in its favor that such conclusion would border on fanciful.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme
Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme

President Donald Trump has promised to revive the coal industry, and the Energy Department is serving notice that it's ready to move forward. The tweet on the Energy Department's official X feed shows a piece of coal and a Wendy Williams phrase that's become a meme: Trump has long promoted coal and other fossil fuels, and he has a grudge against most forms of clean energy. He famously despises windmills, but also isn't fond of solar ― nor does he like green-powered vehicles such as electric cars, despite briefly promoting former friend Elon Musk's Tesla vehicles at a White House event this year before the two fell out. Trump has also declared a national emergency to fast-track new energy production ― specifically nuclear, oil, gas, and coal. He seems to favor coal in particular, signing multiple executive orders to help the industry since taking office. Critics fired some clean burns back at the agency:

Trump hits Canada with 35 per cent tariffs
Trump hits Canada with 35 per cent tariffs

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump hits Canada with 35 per cent tariffs

WASHINGTON — Canada has been hit with 35 per cent tariffs after U.S. President Donald Trump followed through on his threat to increase duties if Ottawa didn't agree to a trade deal. The White House said the tariffs would not affect goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Prime Minister Mark Carney had tempered expectations of an agreement by Friday, saying Ottawa would only take the right deal for Canada. On Thursday, Trump gave Mexico a 90-day extension on trade negotiations but did not announce a similar offer for Canada. Trump's 50 per cent copper tariffs also came into effect just after midnight, but this latest duty exempts the raw input material. The copper tariffs are being added to a growing list of U.S. sectoral duties, which include duties on automobiles, steel and aluminum. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield
Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield

WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump has increased tariffs on Canada to a staggering 35 per cent but a critical carveout is likely to shield most goods from the devastating duties. The White House has said the tariffs won't be applied to goods that are compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, also known as CUSMA. Here's what that means for Canadian companies: What is CUSMA compliance? CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Companies can claim preferential treatment under CUSMA if they meet its rules of origin. While it is different depending on the product, generally it requires a specific amount of the goods be made of products or with labour originating from Canada, Mexico or the United States. About 80 to 90 per cent of Canadian goods might be able to comply with CUSMA's rules of origin, said Michael Dobner, the national leader of economics and policy practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada. Not all exporters have filed the necessary paperwork to avoid the duties. There's been an increase in businesses claiming preferential treatment under CUSMA but it's not clear exactly how much of Canadian exports are currently compliant. Are any industries more at risk? Dobner said there's no specific industry that he expects to be hit the hardest. Certain companies may not be able to source input materials from North America to make their product. That means they would not be able to apply for preferential treatment under CUSMA and will face the 35 per cent tariff. But Dobner said "it's the minority of the exports of Canada to the U.S." What's the impact on small and medium-sized businesses? Small and medium-sized businesses may have not applied for CUSMA preferential status before Trump's tariffs because the process can be burdensome for enterprises of that size. Some small and medium-sized businesses might not meet CUSMA rules of origin requirements and don't have the financial flexibility to change their inputs to North American products. Dan Kelly, president and CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, said many of these businesses were absorbing some or all of the costs associated with Trump's tariffs under the assumption that there would a resolution coming. Kelly said some small and medium-sized businesses facing the 35 per cent tariff may have to stop selling into the United States. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store