Raid of Swiss banking blog sets bad precedent, media group says
ZURICH, June 18 (Reuters) - Press freedom group Reporters Without Borders on Wednesday criticized a raid this month against a prominent Swiss banking blog, saying it set a dangerous precedent for critical journalism in Switzerland.
Zurich-based blog Inside Paradeplatz this week said police searched its offices and the home of its founder, confiscating a laptop, a mobile phone and documents in a raid over articles in 2016 about an ex-boss of bank Raiffeisen Switzerland.
Prosecutors for the canton of Zurich said the evidence was linked to criminal proceedings into whether the blog violated a provision in banking secrecy laws which the government previously said had never been used to charge journalists.
"The banking act has now been used against the media for the first time," Reporters Without Borders Switzerland told Reuters via email. "We see this as a dangerous precedent that further reinforces the already existing chilling effect of the law."
The Zurich prosecutors' office said it had acted in accordance with the law and that the legislation's impact on press freedoms was a matter for politicians.
An amendment to the Swiss banking act that has been in force since 2015 criminalises disclosure of confidential information passed on by bank employees or other insiders.
"Swiss media have to think very carefully about whether and how they report on stories based on leaked bank data - even if, as in this case, there is a clear public interest in publishing," Reporters Without Borders said, noting that journalists risked prison sentences of up to three years.
Former Raiffeisen CEO Pierin Vincenz was convicted of fraud in 2022 before a court overturned the ruling last year and referred the case back to prosecutors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Parents SHOULD be fined for taking children on holiday during term time says LEE BOYCE - here's three ideas to help families have a cheaper break
For a while, there has been a war brewing at the school gates. It involves parents who feel they can only afford a holiday with children if they do it during term time and the Government and councils, which can fine them for doing just that. Last year, nearly half a million school holiday fines were dished out in England, according to the Department for Education. That was up 24 per cent on the previous year and has tripled within a decade. Last August, these fines became even stronger. The minimum fine for parents who take their children out of school in term time without permission went up to £80 per parent and failure to pay within 21 days doubled to £160. With the increase in numbers fined and the cost comes angst from parents, who let's face it, do deserve a break. Now, the situation is set to be debated in Parliament. That's because a petition urging the right for parents to remove kids from school for 10 days has amassed nearly 200,000 signatures. The petition reads: 'We're seeking reform to the punitive policy for term time leave that disproportionately impacts families that are already under immense pressure and criminalises parents that we think are making choices in the best interests of their families. No family should face criminal convictions.' It then adds: 'We are calling for reform of legislation on taking children out of school urgently.' That amount of time, in my opinion, is extreme. It'll also fail to garner sympathy from the generation above who will say: we never had this problem in our day. Although ask many of today's parents and they will definitely remember their own parents taking them out of school on the odd occasion. But growing numbers of families say the cost of a holiday during the summer peak is a problem. I know the pain. With a daughter in year one of primary school, I was braced for pricier holidays – but have been taken aback by just how much more expensive trips are. As someone, who before children would push for a March break and a September one, the difference in cost is astonishing. However, it is a simple case of supply and demand – that's how the world of money and services work. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has previously vowed to tackle the 'epidemic of school absence'. Some of the problem involves persistent absence, child mental health issues, unofficial home schooling, but a large chunk is linked to holidays. This in turn is connected to schools being shut during the Covid pandemic, with teacher strikes soon after. The former head of Ofsted, Amanda Spielman, saying the social contract between parents and schools was broken. And in its response to the petition, the Government said: 'We are determined to break down barriers to opportunity by supporting every child to achieve and thrive at school, working with parents and protecting children's right to education. On holidays in particular, we understand that some parents wish to avoid peak periods. 'However, the school year is structured in such a way as to provide plenty of time throughout the year for holidays outside of term-time, and schools also have considerable flexibility to plan term dates themselves, and hold inset days and other occasional days at less busy times of the year.' A recent survey suggested more than half of families are prepared to take child out of school during term time to save money, despite the risk of a fine. Many just absorb any potential fine to the cost of the trip, and still argue they save money. That's certainly the vibe I get from many parents at my daughter's school and from family members and friends. My personal viewpoint is that holidays are vitally important for families to properly bond, have quality time together and also, typically, children learn from them. Not everything is taught in a classroom. That might be picking up some of the local lingo, getting confident in the swimming pool, visiting historical sites, making friendships with other children and even playing games like Uno with plenty of laughter and happiness with parents, who are often juggling work commitments, and don't always give their children every oodle of attention required. So then you might be surprised to learn I refuse to take my daughter out of school during term time. That's because ultimately, I don't think it sets a good example for life; that you can simply take time off when you want. It's also not great for teachers who are then responsible for your child to play catch-up. I do understand though the need for a holiday and not paying over the odds. But there is also an element where parents should take responsibility and plan. For example, we're heading to Centre Parcs this Friday for a long weekend. Have we had to remortgage? No. We saw there were two inset days in the school calendar more than a year ago, and booked at a very good price well in advance at a place where our children can try new experiences and activities. We also set a reminder for when flights to Barbados were available for the October 2025 half-term, booked a hotel on with free cancellation and managed to get the entire trip for the week, in a 4* hotel with interconnecting rooms for £4,000 for four of us a year in advance. That would be nearly double if booked now. Three ideas to fix school holidays It's clear something needs to change to help appease parents, keep headteachers calm and stop the truancy - and I fully understand not all families can afford a £4,000 holiday. Here's three potential options: 1. Give each child two sabbaticals during their primary school life, and two in secondary school. Parents must book it with at least three months' notice and take with them any learning materials from the teacher to keep children them on track. 2. Reduce the summer holidays by a week and let parents bolt it on to October, February or May half-term dates as they see fit. This will help smooth out demand and give parents the option to go away, cheaper, without the guilt and need to manipulate the system. 3. The Government starts a scheme where families are given a free return train ticket to use in any of the breaks from school to anywhere they choose in Britain once a year. This would help boost the UK economy with more people choosing to holiday at home, be greener and give our children more of a flavour of the beautiful spots that are on our doorstep, but have been overlooked for somewhere more exotic because of price. How would you solve the problem of children being taken out of school during term time? Get in touch: editor@
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police arrest man accused of pressuring US teen to kill himself online
German authorities have arrested a 20-year-old man suspected of a disturbing online campaign of child abuse, which included allegedly coercing a 13-year-old American boy to kill himself on livestream. The German-Iranian national was taken into custody on Tuesday at his parents' apartment in Hamburg. He faces suspicion of engaging in an online campaign of cybergrooming and virtual sexual abuse of children. His name has not been released in line with German privacy regulations. Prosecutors have yet to decide whether to bring formal charges. He denied wrongdoing in a closed-doors appearance before a judge, authorities said. 'The acts exceed human imagination,' Hamburg Attorney General Jörg Fröhlich said at a news conference Wednesday, German news agency dpa reported. The man is accused of perpetrating a complex international cybergrooming operation as a member of '764,' which the FBI describes as a violent online network that exploits minors virtually to coerce them into acts of self-harm and sexual abuse. The man is suspected of committing 120 crimes against eight victims, ages 11 to 15, who were from Germany, England, Canada and the U.S. Another of the victims, a 14-year-old Canadian girl, attempted to take her own life. Authorities have not released the names of any of the alleged victims. In the case of the 13-year-old American boy, German police and prosecutors said the suspect used another underaged victim to pressure the teen. The violations occurred over the internet between 2021, when the suspect was 16 years old, and 2023, police said. Through his online pseudonym, 'White Tiger," he preyed on desperate children in online forums, including those discussing suicide, dpa reported. Investigators believe he exploited their vulnerabilities, forcing them to create pornographic and violent recordings. 'These are depths that are difficult to bear,' Hamburg police chief Falk Schnabel said during the news conference. The man made recordings of the acts to keep as trophies, investigators said, and used them as leverage against the victims by threatening to publish them unless the children committed even more self-harm on camera. Police said Wednesday they want publicity about the case to help prevent future online abuse. 'We hope that word of the arrest will spread within the community and that this will act as an internal deterrent,' Fröhlich said. If you are experiencing feelings of distress, or are struggling to cope, you can speak to the Samaritans, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@ or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest you are based in the USA, and you or someone you know needs mental health assistance right now, call or text 988, or visit to access online chat from the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. This is a free, confidential crisis hotline that is available to everyone 24 hours a day, seven days a you are in another country, you can go to to find a helpline near you
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Housing target of 41,000 ‘not realistic', housing minister says
A target of 41,000 new builds is 'not realistic', Housing Minister James Browne has said. Mr Browne has admitted previously that meeting the 2025 target would be 'extremely challenging' and that all predictions are trending around 34,000. Advertisement Speaking on Newstalk on Thursday, he said he was committed to enacting a 'step change' in the housing department and would clear 'the dead wood out of the way so that homes can get delivered'. 'I think the challenge we have this year is we're coming off a much lower base from last year than was expected,' he said of the housing targets. 'We had hoped for much higher figures last year. 'I think, looking at all of the different predictions, which are fairly consistent, I think 41,000 is not realistic for this year. Advertisement 'We will wait to see how the year works out. I don't particularly like getting into predictions. 'My position as minister is to maximise supply, maximise the delivery of new homes and, irrespective of what the housing numbers will be this year, I'm making a step change so we can get that housing supply up, because we need to get from 30,000 onto 50,000, onto 60,000 houses. '40,000 houses is nowhere near enough.' The last Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael coalition built more than 130,000 homes between 2020 and 2024 while the current coalition has set a target of in excess of 300,000 new homes between 2025 and 2030. Advertisement The target for this year is 41,000 new builds, despite the fact the Government missed its target of 33,450 last year and also missed its new build social housing target by 1,429 last year. The Central Bank has also projected the Government will miss its own housing targets by a wide margin for the next three years – and on Thursday revised its prediction down further, predicting 32,500 new builds by the end of 2025. The Government is being pressured again over the housing crisis after announcing a swathe of new rent and housing measures. This includes the introduction of rent caps nationwide of 2% or to inflation, whichever is lower. Advertisement This will apply to around a fifth of tenancies not already covered, but has been criticised for allowing rents to 'reset' to the market rate when renters voluntarily leave a tenancy. New six-year minimum tenancies on offer from March next year have been criticised for allowing landlords to 'reset' rents every six years. The Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael government, supported by several independents, has insisted boosting supply is the best way to encourage affordability while opposition parties argue more state-owned homes and regulation is needed.
