
Court overturns ex-Citi trader Hayes' criminal conviction for interest rate rigging
The UK Supreme Court unanimously allowed Hayes' appeal, overturning his 2015 conviction of eight counts of conspiracy to defraud by manipulating Libor, a now-defunct benchmark interest rate.
The court said there had been 'ample evidence' for a jury to reasonably conclude Hayes had conspired with others to manipulate Libor submissions – much of it coming from Hayes' own interviews with Britain's Serious Fraud Office, which brought the charges against him.
But the jury 10 years ago was misdirected by the judge, the court said, and that 'undermined the fairness of the trial.'
Supreme Court judge George Leggatt said Hayes was entitled to present his defense against allegations that he conspired to submit false information, including his insistence that he acted honestly, and to have those claims fairly considered by the jury.
'He was deprived of that opportunity by directions which were legally inaccurate and unfair,' the court said, adding that his convictions were 'therefore unsafe and cannot stand.'
Hayes had initially received a 14-year prison sentence, later reduced to 11 years on appeal. He served five and a half years before being released on license in 2021.
A former star Citigroup and UBS trader, Hayes became the face of the global Libor scandal and challenged his conviction during three days of hearings at the UK Supreme Court along with Carlo Palombo, 46, a former Barclays trader who was found guilty in 2019 of skewing Libor's euro equivalent, Euribor.
The court also quashed Palombo's conviction. He was given a four-year sentence in 2019.
The SFO said that after considering the judgment it would not be in the public interest for it to seek a retrial.
Hayes and Palombo had argued that their convictions depended on a definition of Libor and Euribor that assumes there is an absolute legal bar on a bank's commercial interests being taken into account when setting rates.
The Libor rate, phased out in 2023, was designed to reflect banks' short-term funding costs and based on daily estimates from a group of banks as to how much they would expect to pay to borrow funds from each other for a range of currencies and periods.
Hayes' challenge at the Supreme Court followed a landmark US court decision in 2022 that overturned the Libor rigging convictions of two former Deutsche Bank traders.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why Does Anyone Think Trump Will Uphold His End of a Bargain With Columbia?
In 1672, Charles II unilaterally suspended repayment of 1.2 million pounds to London's private bankers. Having run up this debt, and unable to finance a flotilla of ships to fight the Dutch, Charles became neither the first nor the last absolute monarch to break his word. James II, his sibling successor, went further, claiming royal prerogative to bypass laws and purge Protestant judges, generals and functionaries. The solemn oaths he made at his coronation, to respect Parliament and the Church of England, wound up being worth not very much. James ruled for less than four years, deserting after the Glorious Revolution began the era of parliamentary supremacy. Parliament would approve only those loans it would be willing to pay back with taxes, enabling deals with creditors now willing to lend. By restraining the monarch's power, it enabled the crown to make deals it couldn't otherwise get. In economic history, we teach the 1688 creation of parliamentary supremacy as a solution to what economists call 'commitment problems.' In the absence of a third party sufficiently strong to make sure all sides stick to their promises, the powerful can renege on the powerless. The powerless, seeing this, wisely choose to not contract with the powerful. Absolutist rulers are victims of their own lack of restraints; a sovereign who is too powerful cannot get inexpensive credit, because nothing stops the ruler from defaulting on any bond. President Trump, by smashing checks on his authority, has wound up undermining his own ability to make credible deals, including the one just reached with Columbia University, where I teach. The entities that have been striking deals with Mr. Trump, my own employer included, have not learned the lessons of the Glorious Revolution. Trade negotiators from longtime partner countries, government contractors, law firms, federal employees, permanent residents, the Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, even the Transportation Security Administration labor union are all experiencing contractual vertigo, finding out that the administration will not honor previous agreements. The first Trump administration renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement to get the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, but Mr. Trump has imposed tariffs on Mexico and Canada in violation of even that agreement. Parties thinking they can wheedle their way into a bargain with a capricious administration are bringing intuitions from the world of private deals, backstopped by the rule of law, into the very different realm of political bargains with absolutism-adjacent executive branches. I understand the desire for a deal. My colleagues and I have eagerly clicked on every news story hinting that Columbia's leaders might have secured the hundreds of millions of dollars the Trump administration has frozen or cut. Our community has borne devastating cuts, with researchers and administrative staff members laid off and participants in medical research losing access to treatment midcourse. On top of that, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has detained a number of our students, and there have been endless leaks, doxxing attacks, campus lockdowns and computer hacks. All of this manifests as a never-ending stream of anxiety — financial, physical, moral — that narrows whatever intellectual horizons the research university is supposed to foster. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hockey Canada Trial Verdict Expected Tomorrow for Former Devils McLeod and Foote
Tomorrow, July 24, 2025, the results of the Hockey Canada trial will be announced. The trial involves two former New Jersey Devils players, Michael McLeod and Cal Foote, along with three other members of Canada's 2018 World Junior Hockey Team. The five players, McLeod, Carter Hart, Foote, Dillon Dubé, and Alex Formenton, have been on trial since 2022 and are set to receive the judge's verdict on Thursday regarding the sexual assault case they are allegedly involved in. Trial Recap A woman, identified as E.M., accused eight members of the 2018 Hockey Canada World Junior team of sexually assaulting her after a fundraising gala in London, Ontario. A relative of the victim reported the incident to London police in 2018, prompting an investigation. However, the case was initially closed without charges. The case resurfaced in 2022 when the woman sued Hockey Canada for $3.55 million in damages. The organization quickly settled, but the settlement triggered a deeper investigation into Hockey Canada, revealing two secret funds used to pay settlements related to sexual assault and abuse. Following the discovery, police charged five members of the 2018 team with sexual assault. All five players pleaded not guilty, with McLeod also facing a separate count of being a party to the offense. The trial began in 2022 and has gone on for three years. Out of all of the players, Carter Hart was the only defendant to testify in his own defense. None of the five players have appeared in an NHL game since stepping away from their teams in 2022. After three years of legal proceedings, including a mistrial and the dismissal of the second jury, the verdict will now be rendered by Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia. Seven years after the alleged incident, the players will finally learn if they are found guilty or not guilty. What Could This Mean? At the time the charges were filed, McLeod was a power forward for the Devils, having played six seasons with the team after being drafted 12th overall in 2016. Known for his size and skill, he appeared in 45 games during the 2021-22 season before stepping away due to the trial. Foote, a two-way defenseman, joined the Devils for the 2023-24 season but spent most of that year with the Utica Comets. Since then, both players have taken their careers overseas, Foote with MHk 32 Liptovský Mikuláš in Slovakia's Extraliga and McLeod with Avangard Omsk in the KHL. It's unlikely either will ever return to the Devils, though that decision may ultimately rest with the NHL. If the players are found not guilty, NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman will determine whether they are allowed to return to the league. At the 2024 All-Star Weekend, Bettman told "There is a serious judicial process that looks like it's unfolding and we didn't, while we were doing our investigation, want to interfere with what the London Police Service was doing and we're not going to do anything to interfere or influence the judicial proceedings. We're all going to have to see how that plays out, and we will then be in a position to respond appropriately, which we will do." As of last season, Bettman had not ruled out the possibility of the accused players returning to the NHL. That discussion, however, can only begin once the verdict is delivered. The two former Devils have already moved their careers overseas, as they await the news that will be released tomorrow, seven years after the alleged incident. Photo Credit: © David Kirouac-Imagn Images
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Treasuries fall as haven appeal wanes on US-Japan trade deal
The yield on US 10-year debt was two basis points higher at 4.36% Wednesday morning in New York, halting a week-long slide. Treasuries were poised to snap five days of gains Wednesday as demand for havens waned after the US inked a trade deal with Japan. The yield on US 10-year debt was two basis points higher at 4.36% Wednesday morning in New York, halting a week-long slide. Germany's benchmark borrowing costs rose one basis point to 2.60% while UK equivalents were up four basis points at 4.61%. Hopes that the US will reach other trade deals ahead of its self-imposed Aug 1 deadline are mounting. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent sounded positive on the prospect in an interview on Bloomberg TV, saying talks with the EU are going better and negotiations are back on track with China. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said that Japan's pledge of hundreds of billions in US investments 'could be' a model for the EU. Traders will also be mindful of a US$13 billion ($16.6 billion) offering of US 20-year securities later amid the sensitivity of long-maturity debt globally to growing fiscal concerns. A sale of 40-year Japanese bonds earlier saw the lowest bid-to-cover ratio since 2011 and the 10-year yield rose to the highest since 2008. On Tuesday, Bessent shored up support for US Federal Reserve (US Fed) Chair Jerome Powell, who has come under fire from President Donald Trump for keeping interest rates steady. Money markets are betting the US Fed will hold interest rates in a 4.25% to 4.5% range next week, according to swaps tied to policy-meeting dates. However, traders expect at least on quarter-point reduction by October with an 80% chance of a second by year-end. See Also: Click here to stay updated with the Latest Business & Investment News in Singapore US stocks 'astronomically complacent' about trade war, CLSA says Standard Chartered's take on trade, tariffs, and tactics UBS's top strategist sees consumer slowdown hitting S&P 500 Read more stories about where the money flows, and analysis of the biggest market stories from Singapore and around the World Get in-depth insights from our expert contributors, and dive into financial and economic trends Follow the market issue situation with our daily updates Or want more Lifestyle and Passion stories? Click hereError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data