Jeffrey Donaldson case: Judge asks all sides to work towards November trial date
DUP
leader
Jeffrey Donaldson
and his wife Eleanor Donaldson, on charges relating to alleged historical sex offences, goes ahead in November.
A previous court hearing had been told that there had been a
deterioration in the medical condition of Ms Donaldson
.
A brief review of the case at Newry Crown Court on Thursday heard that an assessment over whether she is currently fit to stand trial will take place next month.
The trial had previously been due to start in March, but was delayed because of Ms Donaldson's ill health.
READ MORE
A new trial date has been set for November 3rd.
Mr Donaldson (62), who did not attend the hearing on Thursday, has pleaded not guilty to 18 alleged offences.
The charges include one count of rape as well as allegations of indecent assault and gross indecency.
The charges span a time period between 1985-2008, and there are two alleged victims.
Ms Donaldson (59), of Dublinhill Road, Dromore, who also did not attend court, is facing charges of aiding and abetting, which she denies.
Prosecuting barrister Fiona O'Kane told the court that the hearing had been organised to ensure 'all matters are still on track'.
Ms Donaldson's barrister, Ciara Ennis, said there was a 'firm date' for her client to see a forensic psychiatrist on July 18th.
'There is absolutely no reason I can see at this point that it won't go ahead as planned,' Ms Ennis said.
Judge Paul Ramsey said that the case had already been listed for review again on August 1st in Belfast.
'By that stage you should have the report, or at least a summary of the findings of the report,' the judge said.
'The prosecution will then decide what they want to do.'
Ms O'Kane said the prosecution had been 'proactive' and had instructed their own psychiatrist, pending the results of the report from the forensic psychiatrist.
'The other thing we have to keep in mind, that we are moving towards the anticipated date of the trial, which I am anxious to maintain,' the judge said.
Ms O'Kane said: 'There is a triumvirate of interests going on here, obviously the complainants are very keen that this matter is progressed, we have the public at large who have an interest in the case, and then there are the defendants themselves.'
'I think everybody should work towards that date in any event. Hopefully we will see what matters progress,' the judge said.
Mr Donaldson, the long-standing MP for Lagan Valley, was arrested and charged at the end of March last year.
He resigned as DUP leader and was suspended from the party after the allegations emerged.
Weeks before his arrest, he had led the DUP back into Stormont after a two-year boycott of the powersharing institutions.
Previous deputy leader
Gavin Robinson
was appointed his successor as DUP chief. - PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Two men charged with attempted murder of Northern Ireland detective John Caldwell
Two men have been charged with the attempted murder of Police Service of Northern Ireland Detective Chief Inspector John Caldwell. DCI Caldwell (48) was shot nine times in front of his son while putting footballs into the back of a car following a training session at a youth sports complex in Omagh, Co Tyrone in 2023. He suffered life-changing injuries and subsequently took early retirement on medical grounds. He was known for his role investigating major cases such as the murder of fellow police officer Ronan Kerr and the fatal shooting of journalist Lyra McKee. READ MORE This week's charges follow the arrests of the two men and subsequent detention under the Terrorism Act on Monday. One of the men is 45 and was arrested in the Stewartstown area. The other man, a 25-year-old, was arrested in West Belfast. . They are due to appear at Dungannon Magistrates' Court on Wednesday morning. As is usual procedure, the charges will be reviewed by the Public Prosecution Service.
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Chance to end the scourge of paramilitaries in Northern Ireland cannot be lost again
More than seven years ago, the first collective statement from loyalist paramilitaries since the 1994 ceasefire was read out on their behalf by the former Church of Ireland Archbishop Alan Harper in the Linen Hall Library in Belfast. Dubbed a Loyalist Declaration of Transformation, it received widespread media coverage and was welcomed by the then taoiseach Leo Varadkar as 'a commitment to ensure loyalist communities are at the centre of Northern Ireland's peace and political transformation'. No such support was offered by the British prime minister or the secretary of state for Northern Ireland of the day. Indeed, the British government did nothing then, or since, to build on the declaration's contents or see any value in what it might mean. Perhaps little remembered now, the declaration had come following months of close engagement with a small team of interlocutors and the paramilitary leaderships of the loyalist paramilitary groups – the UDA , the UVF and the Red Hand Commando. READ MORE Finalised and agreed over a day of intense discussion, it offered a basis for change and its intention was to make clear a new direction away from paramilitarism towards communal and social development. Ignored by the British government after it was released, to my knowledge, no British representative ever sought afterwards to meet the interlocutors about what they had done, how they had done it and where it might lead. That was, and remains, a lost opportunity. Those opportunities briefly offered by the declaration were lost in the serious tensions over Brexit and the Northern Ireland protocol and were then compounded by the havoc of the Covid pandemic , while the loyalist leaderships became distracted by internal problems. Momentum was lost. Now that an expert is to be appointed to report on the dismantling of Northern Ireland's paramilitary groups, it would be a mistake not to revisit the 2018 declaration and to talk to those who brought it about. Clearly the leaderships trusted those interlocutors. Paramilitary leaders do not make collective public statements of intent too often. They took the declaration very, very seriously, even if others did not. A large chunk of the declaration addressed ongoing criminality. However, it is understandable that many would dismiss such comments as a cynical ploy to deflect attention from behaviour that had continued unabated, or grown, since 1998. The Loyalist Declaration of Transformation was welcomed by Leo Varadkar, taoiseach at the time it was issued. Photograph:Unfortunately, the scale of criminality today and since, involving loyalist paramilitaries – everything from drugs, to controlling prostitution, to the extortion that too often happens in their own communities – gives only further credence to those doubts. Nevertheless, the best way to isolate, expose and deal with criminals is through changes that isolate them in their own communities, backed and supported by the Police Service of Northern Ireland , from its highest levels to its lowest. Certainly, the absence of such an agreement serves criminals better than if one were in play, where structures and mechanisms could help identify and charge those who wantonly impose coercion and misery on their communities. If a new declaration is to be agreed now, loyalist paramilitary leaders must work hand-in-hand with the police. However, more than that is needed. New measures to improve education within loyalist communities are urgently required, as is more investment. In addition, loyalist communities must be represented politically by their own – an outcome sadly lacking since the Belfast Agreement , even if it began with hope under David Ervine and Gary McMichael . But it is not just about loyalist leaders. Unionist political leaders of all colours, many of whom have long ignored loyalist communities, must work to make such areas more confident, to offer hope of better days. This abdication of social and political responsibility by London – even if the blame has to be shared with unionist political leaders – has contributed significantly to the deprivation, the sense of loss and the growing anxieties and expressions of anger in loyalist areas. This must change. Equally, loyalist paramilitaries, too, must begin the path of honest self-examination about their role in past bloodshed. Such a process must run in parallel to a similar course within republican communities. For both, there is still a long journey to travel. The Civic Forum that was legislated for and ran during the first couple of years after the Belfast Agreement should be reborn, but the idea of bringing communities together in such ways should not be confined to Northern Ireland. Two more should be created, one to bring communities from all parts of the island of Ireland together, and the second to look at an even more neglected relationship, the one between the island of Ireland and Britain. The three-stranded structure of the Belfast Agreement should not just be one for politicians, it should be one for the people they serve, too. In ways that can build ties, share experiences and increase understanding of the other. And it must involve loyalist communities at every turn. Everything must be conditional on paramilitary groups finally disappearing nearly 30 years after the conflict they were involved in was said to have ended. That work will not be easy. The leaderships will require support to achieve it. The difficulties should be underestimated by no one, even if most have long since lost patience with endless debate surrounding the matter. New paramilitary groups will have to be crushed decisively and swiftly. Equally, every funding pledge made by London, or, if that happens, Dublin, must be linked finally with proven changes on the ground, not just promises. There can be no repeat of the endless government grants of the past. When it comes, the report from the soon-to-be appointed expert must be hard-hitting and extensive. Tens of millions will be needed, if not more, over the years to finally eradicate the scourge of paramilitarism. The human cost and all the implications of that, in places long ignored by those in power, will be much greater if, yet again, an opportunity for change is missed and little is achieved. The chance cannot be thrown away again. Graham Spencer is Emeritus Professor of Social and Political Conflict at the University of Portsmouth.
Irish Times
18 hours ago
- Irish Times
Former Premier League referee David Coote given eight-week ban over Jürgen Klopp comments
Former Premier League referee David Coote has been given an eight-week suspension and told to attend an education programme over abusive words he used about ex- Liverpool head coach Jürgen Klopp . Coote was charged by the English Football Association in June after the comments about Klopp came to light in a video circulated on social media last November. The FA said he had subsequently admitted the charge. Coote's misconduct was defined as an aggravated breach under the FA's rules because there was a reference to Klopp's nationality. Coote was sacked by Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) last December, a month after the video filmed in July 2020 came to light. READ MORE PGMOL said in confirming Coote's dismissal last December that his position had become 'untenable'. In it, Coote is heard saying it had been 's**t' to be fourth official at a Liverpool match in the summer of 2020, describing Klopp as a 'German c**t'. He also said Klopp was 'f*****g arrogant'. When the FA charged him over the Klopp comments in June, the governing body said Coote would face no further action in regard to separate allegations of gambling misconduct, which he had strenuously denied. The FA said those allegations had been fully investigated. Coote was banned by European football's governing body Uefa in February until June 30th, 2026 after a different video emerged of him snorting a white powder through a bank note while in Germany for last summer's Euros. In January, Coote came out as gay in an interview with the Sun and said that a lifelong struggle to hide his sexuality had contributed to the rant about Klopp, and to his drug use. 'My sexuality isn't the only reason that led me to be in that position. But I'm not telling an authentic story if I don't say that I'm gay and that I've had real struggles with hiding that,' he said. 'I hid my emotions as a young ref and I hid my sexuality as well – a good quality as a referee but a terrible quality as a human being. And that's led me to a whole course of behaviours.' Coote's formal response to the FA charge was detailed in the regulatory commission's written reasons which were published alongside the confirmation of the sanctions imposed. He accepted his words about Klopp were 'crass, inappropriate and unworthy of the role that he held within the game' and asked the commission to accept that his decision not to attend the hearing was not made out of avoidance, but due to his mental state. Coote said the words did not respect his true view of Klopp, for whom he had always had a deep professional respect. The panel wrote: 'DC [Coote] stated that he felt an immense sense of shame. He had lost a career that formed the very core of his identity. He had lost all his income and the media attention had deepened his sense of humiliation and despair. 'He was trying to piece his life back together, from a place of near total collapse.'
