Jeffrey Donaldson case: Judge asks all sides to work towards November trial date
A judge has said he wants all sides to work towards ensuring the trial of former
DUP
leader
Jeffrey Donaldson
and his wife Eleanor Donaldson, on charges relating to alleged historical sex offences, goes ahead in November.
A previous court hearing had been told that there had been a
deterioration in the medical condition of Ms Donaldson
.
A brief review of the case at Newry Crown Court on Thursday heard that an assessment over whether she is currently fit to stand trial will take place next month.
The trial had previously been due to start in March, but was delayed because of Ms Donaldson's ill health.
READ MORE
A new trial date has been set for November 3rd.
Mr Donaldson (62), who did not attend the hearing on Thursday, has pleaded not guilty to 18 alleged offences.
The charges include one count of rape as well as allegations of indecent assault and gross indecency.
The charges span a time period between 1985-2008, and there are two alleged victims.
Ms Donaldson (59), of Dublinhill Road, Dromore, who also did not attend court, is facing charges of aiding and abetting, which she denies.
Prosecuting barrister Fiona O'Kane told the court that the hearing had been organised to ensure 'all matters are still on track'.
Ms Donaldson's barrister, Ciara Ennis, said there was a 'firm date' for her client to see a forensic psychiatrist on July 18th.
'There is absolutely no reason I can see at this point that it won't go ahead as planned,' Ms Ennis said.
Judge Paul Ramsey said that the case had already been listed for review again on August 1st in Belfast.
'By that stage you should have the report, or at least a summary of the findings of the report,' the judge said.
'The prosecution will then decide what they want to do.'
Ms O'Kane said the prosecution had been 'proactive' and had instructed their own psychiatrist, pending the results of the report from the forensic psychiatrist.
'The other thing we have to keep in mind, that we are moving towards the anticipated date of the trial, which I am anxious to maintain,' the judge said.
Ms O'Kane said: 'There is a triumvirate of interests going on here, obviously the complainants are very keen that this matter is progressed, we have the public at large who have an interest in the case, and then there are the defendants themselves.'
'I think everybody should work towards that date in any event. Hopefully we will see what matters progress,' the judge said.
Mr Donaldson, the long-standing MP for Lagan Valley, was arrested and charged at the end of March last year.
He resigned as DUP leader and was suspended from the party after the allegations emerged.
Weeks before his arrest, he had led the DUP back into Stormont after a two-year boycott of the powersharing institutions.
Previous deputy leader
Gavin Robinson
was appointed his successor as DUP chief. - PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jes Staley fails to overturn ban over Jeffrey Epstein links
Jes Staley has failed to overturn a decision by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that he 'recklessly' misled the regulator about his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein , in a major setback to the former chief executive of Barclays. In a judgment handed down on Thursday by the Upper Tribunal, judge Timothy Herrington said Mr Staley's behaviour represented a 'serious failure of judgment' and he had 'acted without integrity' by approving a misleading letter from the bank to its regulator. The judge, however, ordered that the £1.8 million (€2.1 million) fine imposed on Mr Staley by the regulator be reduced by 40 per cent to reflect the fact that Barclays had not allowed him to receive deferred shares that he was entitled to. The former Barclays boss had mounted a legal challenge against the ban and fine imposed on him by the FCA in 2023, with a high-profile trial taking place in March. READ MORE Mr Herrington found that Mr Staley had approved a Barclays letter to regulators that he knew contained inaccuracies over the nature of his relationship with Epstein, and that Mr Staley's 'conduct was such that it could have resulted in confidence in the financial system being adversely affected'. The judgment also found that Mr Staley had 'shown no remorse for his conduct'. [ Ex Barclays CEO Jes Staley argues bank had 'clear understanding' of his Epstein ties Opens in new window ] At the heart of the dispute were two representations made by Barclays in a letter the bank sent to regulators in October 2019, which stated that Mr Staley 'did not have a close relationship' with Epstein and that they last communicated 'well before he joined Barclays in 2015'. The FCA opened an investigation into Mr Staley two months later, after his former employer JPMorgan Chase told the regulator it had a trove of documents regarding his relationship with Epstein, which the FCA compelled the US bank to hand over. 'We have noted Mr Staley's achievements as chief executive of Barclays, but in our view these do not diminish the seriousness of the misconduct,' the judgment read. 'The loss of his long-standing career is an inevitable consequence of that conduct.' Mr Staley said in a statement on Thursday that he was 'disappointed by the outcome and the time it took for this process to play out'. IATA Director General Willie Walsh on airline profits, air fares and why the Dublin Airport passenger cap makes Ireland a laughing stock Listen | 35:56 He added: 'I have worked tirelessly for my prior employers for the entirety of my career; I am proud of the support I gave to many individuals during that career and the strategy I developed to help Barclays when it faced immense challenges. The Tribunal recognised what they described as 'my long and distinguished career'.' Barclays declined to comment. Therese Chambers, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said Mr Staley had taken 'a calculated risk' and 'hoped that the truth would never come to light and that he would get away with it'. She added: 'Such a serious lack of integrity flies in the face of the requirements we place on those at the top.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tennis chiefs lobby gambling firms to close accounts of punters abusing women players
Tennis authorities are lobbying gambling firms to close the betting accounts of punters found to have sent abusive messages to women players, with one American gaming company this week already warning its customers they will do so. A report from the Women's Tennis Association [WTA] and International Tennis Federation [ITF] published last week revealed that 458 players were direct targets of abuse last year, with the British No 2, Katie Boulter, telling the BBC she has been sent death threats and explicit pictures by online trolls. The report, produced using an AI-led detection system developed by the Signify Group, found that 40 per cent of the social media abuse came from frustrated gamblers, a figure that rose to 77 per cent for direct abuse towards players' personal accounts. More than 8,000 posts sent from 4,200 accounts were identified as abusive, with 26 per cent of the offensive messages directed at five women players. Fifteen of the worst offenders have been reported to the police and other law enforcement agencies, while they have also been banned from buying tickets for Grand Slam tournaments and for ATP and WTA tour events, but there is frustration in tennis at betting companies' apparent reluctance to take action. READ MORE Talks between the WTA, ITF and gambling companies have intensified since the report was published last week however, with some operators indicating a willingness to suspend accounts held by social media abusers. In addition to betting bans, the authorities also want gambling companies to fund industry-wide educational campaigns about online hate. FanDuel, a US-based gambling company, is understood to have altered its terms and conditions earlier this week, giving them the right to suspend customers who harass athletes, as well as broadening the definition of harassment. In an email sent to its database of users on June 24th, FanDuel drew customers' attention to a new clause in its rules, which states: 'We may, in our sole discretion, suspend or terminate your Account and/or exclude you from our services if we determine that you pose a threat to the safety of participants in a sporting event, or discover that you engaged in the harassment of a sports official, coach or any participant in a sporting event.' FanDuel is the WTA's official gaming partner in the United States. Under the terms of that deal the WTA has granted FanDuel use of its official scoring data, giving it a potential timing advantage over competitors, while the gaming company also has the rights to use video highlights on its digital platforms. The British Gambling Commission is also understood to be involved in the discussions on getting more betting companies to ban abusers. One proposal being considered is for the commission's self-exclusion database, a tool designed to ensure operators are not targeting problem gamblers, to be used to list punters who have sent abusive messages to players. A spokesperson for the WTA and ITF said: 'The report has brought about a constructive conversation with the betting industry. We will continue to push for the industry to do more as part of a collective effort to rid tennis of betting-related abuse. We hope the gambling industry responds constructively to our call for more action on their part.' Boulter's revelations last week caused shock and dismay throughout tennis. One message sent to the 28-year-old during the French Open, read: 'Hope you get cancer'. Another told her: 'Go to hell. I lost money my mother sent me'. While a third instructed her to buy 'candles and a coffin for your entire family' and threatened to damage her 'grandmother's grave if she's not dead by tomorrow'. In an interview with the BBC earlier this week the two-times Wimbledon finalist Ons Jabeur called on the betting companies to ban abusers from their platforms for life. 'I feel like we've been talking about this for a long time, but not a lot changes,' she said. 'The big problem is the betting. The betting companies need to vet these people and look at their social media. If they attack players on social media they should be banned from betting for their whole life.' – Guardian
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish jockey Oisín Murphy charged with drink-driving and refusing roadside test in UK
Oisín Murphy, Britain's reigning champion Flat jockey, has been charged in connection with a road traffic collision in Berkshire in April and will appear in court next week. It is alleged Murphy, 29, was over the prescribed alcohol limit and failed to co-operate when asked to give a preliminary test at the scene. The Killarney-born jockey – who rode five winners at Royal Ascot last week – is due to appear at Reading Magistrates' Court on July 3rd. He was charged last Thursday, when he rode at double at the showpiece meeting through Arabian Story and Never So Brave. A statement on the Thames Valley Police website read: 'A man has been charged in connection with an ongoing investigation into a serious road traffic collision in Hermitage, West Berkshire. READ MORE 'Last Thursday (19/6) Oisin Murphy, aged 29 of Beales Farm Road, Lambourn, Hungerford, was charged by postal requisition with one count of driving a motor vehicle while over the prescribed limit of alcohol and one count of failing to cooperate with a preliminary test at the roadside. 'The charge is in connection with a single vehicle road traffic collision around 12.05am on Sunday 27 April this year when a grey Mercedes A Class left the road and crashed into a tree.' It added: 'It is vital that people do not speculate or spread misinformation on social media as this is a live investigation.'
