Russia and Ukraine swap more prisoners of war, Moscow says
The exchange was agreed between the two sides at talks in Istanbul last week, and an initial swap of prisoners under the age of 25 was conducted on Monday.
The defence ministry in Moscow said the Russians freed in the latest handover were currently in Belarus, which borders both the warring countries, and would be returned to Russia for medical treatment and rehabilitation.
Earlier, the Kremlin said it had been ready for several days to start handing over the bodies of Ukrainian soldiers killed in the war, but that Kyiv was still discussing the details.
The planned transfer of thousands of war dead was the other tangible result of the Istanbul talks, which resumed last month after a gap of more than three years but have made no progress towards a ceasefire.
Russia has said it is ready to hand over the bodies of more than 6,000 Ukrainian soldiers and receive any bodies of Russian soldiers which Kyiv is able to return.
But Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky said on Saturday that the Russian side had shown up at the agreed exchange point with the bodies of 1,212 Ukrainian dead soldiers only to find nobody from Ukraine to take them.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has accused Moscow of "trying to play some kind of dirty political and information game" around the issue of the exchanges.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday: "There is no final understanding. Contact is being made, numbers are being compared. As soon as there is a final understanding, then we hope this exchange will take place."
Russian state media has broadcast images of long white refrigerated trucks, containing bodies sealed in individual white bags, parked up near the border.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
9 minutes ago
- Times
Lithuania plans 30-mile ‘Baltic defence line' against Russian invasion
Lithuania has outlined its plan for a 30-mile-deep ribbon of defences along its borders with Russia and Belarus, including minefields and bridges primed for demolition in the event of an invasion. Alongside Poland, the three Baltic states have begun fortifying their frontiers to deter the Kremlin from considering an attack, supplementing existing metal fences with obstacles and redoubts partially inspired by techniques that the Ukrainians have used to fend off Russian assaults. When it is complete, the 'Baltic defence line' will stretch across large sections of the land perimeter of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, from the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad in the west to the mouth of the River Narva in the east. Although critics sometimes disparagingly liken the project to the ill-fated Maginot Line that France laid down along its border with Germany before the Second World War, local commanders and military analysts say the analogy is misplaced. The intent is not to establish a single physical barrier to stop an invasion but rather to slow down any land-based attack and to 'canalise' the enemy force into areas where it is easier to resist. The Baltic states announced the scheme in January last year, and work started on the first ditches, bunkers and embankments a few months after that. Last summer, Lithuania began setting up 27 'engineering parks' with stores of 'counter-mobility' tools such as razor wire, concrete roadblocks and antitank barriers nicknamed 'hedgehogs' (caltrop-like assemblies of crossed metal beams) and 'dragon's teeth' (concrete pyramids). • Edward Lucas: The six Baltic states that could decide the future of Europe However, an update from the Lithuanian defence ministry has sketched out a more ambitious series of layered fortifications that will stretch far enough inland to cover Vilnius, the capital, which is 20 miles from the Belarusian border. It will take the form of three 'echelons'. The first of these, roughly three miles in depth, will start with an anti-tank ditch next to the border fence, followed by an embankment, strips of dragon's teeth and minefields, and then two layers of strongpoints for defending infantry. Dovile Sakaliene, the defence minister, has previously indicated that it is likely to include anti-personnel mines after Lithuania and several other Nato members on the eastern flank withdrew from the Ottawa convention, which prohibits the weapons. Further back, in the second and third echelons, bridges will be prepared for demolition, and there will be further lines of infantry positions. There is also a plan to fell trees along the roads leading to towns and cities, presumably to make it easier to destroy any invading Russian armour. At the same time, Lithuania said it had placed a €10 million order for anti-tank mines, on top of previous deals to buy 85,000 of the mines for a total of €50 million. It has also replenished its stock of 155mm artillery shells, ordered 44 state-of-the-art Leopard 2A8 battle tanks from Germany, and taken delivery of €6 million worth of Israeli-made Spike LR2 anti-tank missiles. Last month, Sakaliene suggested that she would be prepared to ask Nato's international air-policing mission in the Baltic states to destroy drones that encroach on her country's airspace from Belarus after at least two such incidents in the preceding weeks. Lithuania can field about 23,000 professional soldiers and a further 104,000 reservists. It is modernising its equipment with a defence budget that has risen to 5.5 per cent of national GDP, one of the highest levels in Nato. Germany is also upgrading its multinational Nato battlegroup stationed at Rukla, about 40 miles northwest of Vilnius, to a full 5,000-strong armoured brigade. However, war games conducted last year suggested that these forces might struggle to hold their own against a large-scale Russian invasion until the rest of Nato could deliver meaningful reinforcements, particularly if Russia were to seize the Suwalki gap, a section of the Lithuanian-Polish border that is the alliance's only land bridge to the Baltic states. This means that the ability to slow and 'shape' any Russian offensive through the defence line could be decisive in buying more time. Poland and the Baltic states are seeking European Union funding for these projects, arguing that they will serve to protect the entire bloc.
Sky News
9 minutes ago
- Sky News
What would US-backed security guarantees for Ukraine look like?
Promises of security guarantees for Ukraine have been lauded as "game-changing" and "historic" in the hope of bringing an end to the war with Russia. As all eyes moved from Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska to talks with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington, the White House claimed Russia has agreed to the US providing 'NATO-style protection' when the fighting ends. Although there has been no confirmation from the Kremlin, Ukraine, the UK, and other Western allies say details of a post-war security agreement will be finalised in the coming days. What has been said so far? Security guarantees have long been talked about as a way of ensuring peace in Ukraine when fighting comes to an end. Since March, when the UK and France spearheaded a largely European 'coalition of the willing' and potential peacekeeping force, many have claimed it would be ineffective without American backing. The US has repeatedly refused to be drawn on its involvement - until now. Two days after Mr Putin travelled to Alaska for talks with the Trump team, US special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed Russia had agreed to Ukrainian security guarantees. He claimed that during the summit, the Kremlin had conceded the US "could offer Article-5 like protection", which he described as "game-changing". Article 5 is one of the founding principles of NATO and states that an attack on any of its 32 member states is considered an attack on them all. This was bolstered by the US president himself after he met his Ukrainian counterpart in Washington on Monday. He said the pair had "discussed security guarantees", which would be "provided by the various European countries" - "with coordination with the United States of America". Writing on X the following day, the Ukrainian leader said the "concrete content" of the security agreement would be "formalised on paper within the next 10 days". US reports say security agreement talks will be headed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 5:57 What would security guarantees look like? Very few details have emerged so far, despite the series of high-profile meetings. Speaking to Fox News on Tuesday, Mr Trump said European nations are going to "frontload" the security agreement with soldiers. "They want to have boots on the ground", he told the broadcaster, referring to the UK, France, and Germany in particular. He insisted the US would not send ground troops, adding: "You have my assurance and I'm president." Sir Keir Starmer said the coalition of the willing is "preparing for the deployment of a reassurance force" in the event of "hostilities ending". This was the original basis for the coalition - soldiers from various European and allied nations placed strategically across Ukraine to deter Russia from launching future attacks. But troops alone are unlikely to be enough of a deterrent for Vladimir Putin, military analyst Sean Bell says. "This is all about credibility and I don't think boots on the ground is a credible answer," he tells Sky News. Stationing soldiers along Ukraine's 1,000-mile border with Russia would require around 100,000 soldiers at a time, which would have to be trained, deployed, and rotated, requiring 300,000 in total. The entire UK Army would only make up 10% of that, with France likely able to contribute a further 10%, Bell says. Several European nations would feel unable to sacrifice any troops for an umbrella force due to their proximity to Ukraine and risk of further Russian aggression. "You're not even close to getting the numbers you need," Bell adds. "And even if you could, putting all of NATO's frontline forces in one country facing Russia would be really dangerous - and leave China, North Korea, Iran, or Russia free to do whatever they wanted." History of failed security agreements in Ukraine Current proposals for Ukrainian security guarantees are far from the first. In December 1994, Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum alongside the UK, US, and Russia. The Ukrainians agreed to give up their Soviet-inherited nuclear weapons in exchange for recognition of their sovereignty and a place on the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Twenty years later in 2014, however, Russia violated the terms with its illegal annexation of Crimea and the war between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian in the Donbas region. Similarly, the Minsk Agreements of 2014 and 2015 were designed to bring an end to the Donbas war. Mediated by France and Germany, they promised a ceasefire, withdrawal of weapons, and local elections in the separatist-occupied Donbas, but were repeatedly violated and failed to result in lasting peace. 'Article 5-like protection' When Mr Witkoff first mentioned security guarantees again, he described them as "Article 5-like" or "NATO-style". Article 5 is one of the founding principles of NATO and states that an attack on any of its 32 member states is considered an attack on them all. It has only ever been invoked once since its inception in 1949 - by the US in response to the 9/11 attacks of 2001. Russia has repeatedly insisted Ukraine should not be allowed to join NATO and cited the risk of it happening among its original reasons for attacking Kyiv in 2022. NATO general-secretary Mark Rutte has said Ukrainian membership is not on the table, but that an alternative "Article 5-type" arrangement could be viable. The alliance's military leaders are due to meet on Wednesday to discuss options. It is not clear how such a special security agreement and formal NATO membership would differ. Bell says that negotiations on this - and any surrendering of Ukrainian territory - will be the two most difficult in ending the war. But he stresses they are both key in providing the "flesh on the bones" to what the coalition of the willing has offered so far. "It will be about trying to find things that make the Western commitment to the security of Ukraine enduring," Bell adds. US airpower, intelligence and a better Ukrainian military Other potential options for a security agreement include air support, a no-maritime zone, intelligence sharing, and military supplies. Imposing either a no-fly over Ukraine or no-maritime zone across the Black Sea would "play to NATO's strengths" - as US air and naval capabilities alone far outstrip Russia's, Bell says. Sharing American intelligence with Kyiv to warn of any future Russian aggression would also be a "massive strength" to any potential deterrence force, he adds. Ukraine is already offering to buy an extra $90bn (£66.6bn) in US weapons with the help of European funds, Mr Zelenskyy said this week. And any security agreement would likely extend to other military equipment, logistics, and training to help Ukraine better defend itself years down the line, Bell says. "At first it would need credible Western support, but over time, you would hope the international community makes sure Ukraine can build its own indigenous capability. "Because while there's a lot of focus on Ukraine at the moment, in five years' time, there will be different governments and different priorities - so that has to endure."
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump-Zelensky meeting live: US says no troops on the ground in Ukraine, but doesn't rule out air patrols (cloned)
President Donald Trump said he is considering sending air support to Ukraine as part of security guarantees for the nation. The U.S. will not send troops as part of security guarantees for Ukraine, but Trump told Fox News that his administration could assist in other ways, including with air support. This comes after Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and key European leaders in the White House to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later said that air support is 'an option and a possibility.' While Trump has ruled out sending troops, the UK is preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine as part of a 'reassurance force' if a peace deal with Russia is reached. Trump is now arranging for a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky. 'At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelensky. After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. The U.S. leader also blamed Ukraine for 'taking on a nation that's 10 times your size' on Tuesday, despite Russia enacting the full-scale invasion. Pinned What to know about the Ukraine-Russia peace talks President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several key European leaders met in the White House yesterday to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. Now, Trump says he's arranging for a meeting between Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Here's what you need to know: Trump has started to arrange for a meeting between Putin and Zelensky, he wrote on Truth Social. He then hopes to set up a trilateral meeting between himself, Putin and Zelensky. The U.S. president ruled out sending American troops to Ukraine to enforce a potential peace deal, but said the administration could help in other ways. White House Karoline Leavitt said U.S. air support in Ukraine is 'an option and a possibility.' Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov did not commit to any meetings between Putin and Zelensky while speaking to Russian state media on Tuesday. He also warned that 'any contacts involving top officials must be prepared with the utmost care,' CNN reports. Zelensky called Monday's meetings 'a significant step toward ending the war and ensuring the security of Ukraine and our people.' Katie Hawkinson19 August 2025 17:09 White House addresses reports that Trump called Putin during European leaders meeting White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed reports that President Donald Trump called Russian President Vladimir Putin while European leaders were gathered at the White House. A reporter asked Leavitt why Trump took that call when the European leaders weren't in the room. 'So these leaders, who, this war is in their backyard, are very grateful that the president took that call and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia's thinking on this, something that was not done by the previous administration at all,' Leavitt responded. Katie Hawkinson19 August 2025 18:39 Trump wants Russia and Ukraine to engage in 'direct diplomacy' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Donald Trump wants Russia and Ukraine to engage in 'direct diplomacy.' This comes after Trump said he is arranging a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin. After that meeting, Trump hopes to have a trilateral meeting between himself, Putin and Zelensky. Leavitt's remarks came after a reporter asked: 'Can you explain how this went from a trilateral meeting involving President Trump to now the focus being on this bilateral meeting without the president first?' 'The president has spoken to both leaders about this, and both leaders have expressed a willingness to sit down with each other, and so our national security team will help both countries do that,' Leavitt responded. 'Ultimately, the president has always said that there are areas of disagreement in this war that will have to be discussed and decided upon by these two countries, and so he wants these two countries to engage in direct diplomacy,' she added. Katie Hawkinson19 August 2025 18:31 Watch: Trump blames Ukraine for 'taking on nation that's 10 times your size' despite Russia being the one that invaded Bryony Gooch19 August 2025 18:30 White House reaffirms U.S. troops won't go to Ukraine White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has reaffirmed that U.S. troops won't be sent to Ukraine to enforce any potential peace deal with Russia. However, the U.S. could be involved in other security guarantees, she said. 'The President has definitively stated U.S. boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies,' Leavitt said. Katie Hawkinson19 August 2025 18:27 See it: Trump holds golf club gifted to him by Zelensky Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky gifted President Donald Trump a golf club during their White House meeting on Monday. The golf club was originally given to Zelensky by Kostiantyn Kartavtsev, a junior sergeant in the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Kartavtsev lost his leg in the early months of Russia's invasion, and golf was a part of his 'rehabilitation,' according to a statement from Zelensky's office. The sport 'helped him regain balance — both physical and emotional,' the release said. Katie Hawkinson Watch live: White House holds media briefing after Putin and Zelensky meetings The White House is holding a briefing after President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several key European leaders met in the White House. Watch live: 19 August 2025 17:58 European Commission VP says EU will train Ukraine's soldiers as part of security guarantees European Commission Vice President Kaja Kallas said the European Union will help train and strengthen Ukraine's forces as part of security guarantees for the nation. 'Putin cannot be trusted to honour any promise or commitment,' Kallas wrote on X. 'Therefore, security guarantees must be strong and credible enough to deter Russia from re-grouping and re-attacking.' 'The EU will contribute to these security guarantees, notably by the training of Ukrainian soldiers and strengthening Ukraine's armed forces and defence industry,' she added. The EU will also continue to target Russia with sanctions. 'The next sanctions package against Moscow should be ready by next month,' Kallas wrote. Katie Hawkinson19 August 2025 17:45 UK preparing to send troops to Ukraine as part of 'reassurance force' if peace deal is struck The UK is preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine as part of a 'reassurance force' if a peace deal is reached with Russia – but Donald Trump has ruled out the US doing the same. Keep reading: It comes after Donald Trump said he had spoken directly with Vladimir Putin to begin planning a meeting between the Russian leader and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky Millie Cooke19 August 2025 17:37 What happened the one and only time Zelensky and Putin met? Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelensky may soon meet Russian president Vladimir Putin again, for the first time since 2019. A summit in Paris six years ago was the first and only time the two presidents ever met, flanked by French president Emmanuel Macron and Germany's then-chancellor Angela Merkel. At the time, Putin and Zelensky were looking to hash out a ceasefire deal for war in Donbas in Ukraine's east, where Russia-backed forces were fighting Ukrainian troops. Keep reading: Alex Croft19 August 2025 17:30
