Lawyer issues apology after using AI-generated fake quotes in murder case
Rishi Nathwani, a defence lawyer holding the prestigious title of King's Counsel, accepted "full responsibility" for the incorrect information submitted in the case involving a teenager charged with murder. Court documents, reviewed by The Associated Press on Friday, detailed the admission.
Addressing Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, Mr Nathwani stated on behalf of the defence team: "We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred."
The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment.
'At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday.
'The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice,' Elliott added.
The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and non-existent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court.
The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defense lawyers provide copies.
The lawyers admitted the citations 'do not exist' and that the submission contained 'fictitious quotes,' court documents say.
The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct.
The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who didn't check their accuracy.
The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI.
'It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said.
The court documents do not identify the generative artificial intelligence system used by the lawyers.
In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $5,000 fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim.
Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments.
Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he didn't realize that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Verdict and sentencing for Brazil's Bolsonaro is set for early September
A verdict and sentence in the coup trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro will be delivered early next month, the country's Supreme Court announced Friday. The court said the five-justice panel that heard the right-wing leader's case will deliver verdicts and sentences on the five counts against him from Sept. 2 to 12. Bolsonaro, who has drawn the strong support of U.S. President Donald Trump and who remains under house arrest, is accused of leading a conspiracy to stay in office after his narrow election defeat in 2022 to current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro denies wrongdoing. Prosecutors say Bolsonaro and several of his allies headed a criminal organization that plotted to overturn the election, including plans to kill Lula and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing the criminal case. Prosecutors have presented message exchanges, handwritten notes and other evidence allegedly detailing the plot. Defense attorneys have argued that no coup went forward and that Bolsonaro allowed the presidential transition to Lula to take place, undermining any allegations that he tried to thwart that process. There are two five-justice panels at Brazil's top court, and Justice de Moraes brought the case to the one he sits on. Bolsonaro, who governed from 2019 to 2022, appointed two members of the court, but both sit on the other panel. There are five counts against Bolsonaro issued by the country's prosecutor-general: attempting to stage a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the democratic rule of law and two counts involving destruction of state property. The prosecution finished presenting its case in July and the defense wrapped up its arguments this week. Bolsonaro's trial has gripped a sharply divided Brazilian public. It received even more attention after Trump directly tied a 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to his ally's judicial situation. Trump has called the proceedings a ' witch hunt " against a political opponent, triggering nationalist reactions from many Brazilian politicians. ___
Western Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
JK Rowling compares Nicola Sturgeon to Donald Trump in scathing book review
The Harry Potter author accused Ms Sturgeon of being 'flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts' on issues relating to trans and women's rights. The writer is a long-time critic of the former SNP leader and her views on gender self-ID. The Twilight of Nicola SturgeonMy review of Franklyhttps:// — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) August 14, 2025 In her near-3000-word review, published on her own website, she accuses Ms Sturgeon, who passed gender reform legislation at Holyrood, of holding 'luxury beliefs' that have caused 'real, lasting harm' to women. Rowling published her review on X alongside what appears to be an AI-generated image of Ms Sturgeon in the woods in front of a wolf and a vampire. She said of the politician's memoir, Frankly: 'She remains stubbornly wedded to her belief that it is possible to let some men into women's spaces on the men's say so, without letting any man who fancies it come inside. 'She denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification. 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. 'She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and facts.' Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon at the launch of her memoir 'Frankly', at Edinburgh International Book Festival (Jane Barlow/PA) Rowling, who lives in Edinburgh, said the Glasgow Southside MSP had not been 'remotely humbled' by the Supreme Court ruling that sex in the UK Equality Act referred to biological sex. The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Act, which was passed by MSPs, was ultimately scrapped by Westminster, with the then Tory government saying it contravened equalities law. In her book, Ms Sturgeon said she had never received as much abuse than when Rowling posted a picture of herself on social media with a T-shirt saying 'Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights'. The former first minister said the post made her feel 'more at risk of possible physical harm'. Rowling defended the decision, writing in her review her intention was to encourage journalists to question Ms Sturgeon on the impacts her gender reforms may have. She compares the MSP to Twilight character Bella Swan, saying both were 'monomaniacs', with Mr Sturgeon being 'consumed' by independence. Nicola Sturgeon was compared to Donald Trump in a book review by author JK Rowling (Jane Barlow/PA) She says of them: 'Both shy, insecure teenagers have dates with destiny. 'Nicola Sturgeon will one day become first minister of Scotland. Bella Swan will join the ranks of the undead.' The author said Sturgeon made significant omissions in her memoir, including WhatsApp messages from the Covid pandemic, education standards and the row over delayed and over-budget ferries. 'Perhaps the most disgraceful omission — and I'll admit to a personal interest here, because I'm married to a doctor who used to run a methadone clinic, so saw the national scandal up close — is the fact that Scotland continues to lead the whole of Europe in drug deaths,' she said. Ms Sturgeon has said she stands by the principle of gender self-ID but has expressed regret at not pausing her gender reforms in order to find common ground with opponents. Speaking at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Thursday, Ms Sturgeon said the debate was 'toxic on both sides'. She accepted that 'in all of the tone and tenor of this I am not saying I was blameless at all', saying she 'desperately' wished she had been able to 'find a more collegiate way forward' on the controversial issue. Ms Sturgeon has been approached for comment.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump administration claims judge defied Supreme Court to bar Education Department firings
Aug 15 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is accusing a federal judge in Boston of defying the U.S. Supreme Court's authority by continuing to block it from gutting part of the U.S. Department of Education, after the justices halted a similar order he issued. The U.S. Department of Justice asked, opens new tab the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene on Thursday after U.S. District Judge Myong Joun a day earlier said he would not lift an injunction, opens new tab requiring the administration to reinstate staff members it terminated en masse from the department's Office for Civil Rights. Justice Department attorneys said Joun should have vacated his injunction after the Supreme Court last month paused a broader injunction he issued preventing wide-scale Education Department firings. The administration asked the 1st Circuit to act in order to avoid a second round of litigation at the high court. "The district court's disregard of the Supreme Court's ruling represents an affront to the Supreme Court's authority—and thus to the rule of law in the United States," Justice Department attorneys wrote. The filing came as tensions continue to flare between the judiciary and the Trump administration, which has itself been repeatedly accused of not complying with judicial orders, including in the case before Joun. The lawsuit followed an announcement in March by Secretary of Education Linda McMahon of a mass layoff of more than 1,300 employees. Trump has called for the department's shuttering, which only Congress could ultimately authorize. Joun, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, in May blocked the job cuts at the behest of a group of Democratic-led states, school districts and teachers' unions. At the administration's request, the U.S. Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, on July 14 lifted Joun's injunction. But the court did not address a narrower injunction Joun had issued covering just the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights, which enforces federal civil rights laws in schools and was facing a loss of half of its employees. The civil rights office cuts were challenged by two students and Victim Rights Law Center, which represents sexual assault victims. Citing the Supreme Court's order, the Justice Department said the injunction they won could no longer stand. Joun declined, calling the Supreme Court's brief order "unreasoned." He said the administration had also "not substantially complied with the preliminary injunction order," as employees in the civil rights office have still not returned to work following his injunction. A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not respond to a request for comment. The case is Victim Rights Law Center v. United States Department of Education, 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 25-1787. For the plaintiffs: Sean Ouellette of Public Justice and Reid Skibell of Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes For the United States: Melissa Patterson and Steven Myers of the U.S. Department of Justice
