
GPT-5 explained: What it can do and why it matters for ChatGPT users in 5 points
advertisementHere's what makes GPT-5 stand out, explained in five simple points.A unified system that can adaptOpenAI says that one of GPT-5's biggest shifts is how it thinks. Instead of choosing between different models manually, GPT-5 blends them into one unified system. It uses a smart router that decides in real time whether to give a quick reply or think longer for a more complex answer.
The router looks at the type of conversation, its complexity, the tools required, and even explicit instructions, so if you say 'think hard about this,' it will spend more time reasoning before responding. This system keeps learning from how people use it, switching models when needed and improving over time.When usage limits are reached, GPT-5 automatically moves to a smaller but still capable 'mini' version so the conversation doesn't stop. OpenAI says it plans to integrate all these capabilities into a single model in the future.Smarter, more accurate, and better for real-world questionsGPT-5 has been trained to be more reliable. It is less likely to make factual errors, about 45 per cent fewer than GPT-4o, according to OpenAI. And when in 'thinking' mode, its accuracy jumps even higher. This matters for open-ended questions, where earlier models sometimes guessed or over-confidently made things up.It has also learned to be honest about its limits. In tests with impossible or underspecified tasks, GPT-5 was less likely to bluff an answer compared to older models. For example, when images were removed from a visual reasoning test, GPT-5 admitted it could not see them, while other models invented details.Alongside factuality, GPT-5 is less sycophantic. Basically, OpenAI says that the new model doesn't just agree with you to keep you happy. OpenAI cut overly flattering responses by more than half compared to a previous update that accidentally made models too agreeable.Big leaps in coding, writing, and health adviceOpenAI has targeted improvements in three areas where people most often use ChatGPT: coding, writing, and health.In coding, GPT-5 is the company's strongest model yet. It can design and debug larger codebases, build attractive websites and apps in one go, and make smart design choices in layout, spacing, and typography. Developers have found it especially good at handling complex front-end work.advertisementFor writing, GPT-5 is a more capable collaborator. It can turn rough ideas into polished prose, sustain complex styles like unrhymed iambic pentameter, and handle structural ambiguity better than before. That means better help for everyday tasks such as drafting reports, editing emails, or creating creative pieces.In health, GPT-5 scores higher than all previous models on HealthBench, a benchmark created with physician input. It can flag potential concerns, ask clarifying questions, and give more precise, context-aware information. Importantly, OpenAI stresses that ChatGPT is not a medical professional but a partner to help users understand their options and prepare for discussions with doctors.GPT-5 is here.Rolling out to everyone starting today.https://t.co/rOcZ8J2btI pic.twitter.com/dk6zLTe04s— OpenAI (@OpenAI) August 7, 2025More personalisation and safer responsesGPT-5 follows instructions more accurately, making it easier to shape how it responds. It also introduces four preset 'personalities', which includes Cynic, Robot, Listener, and Nerd, so that users can quickly adjust ChatGPT's tone without having to type detailed prompts.On safety, GPT-5 uses a 'safe completions' method instead of simply refusing risky questions. If a request could be used in harmful ways, the model tries to give a helpful, safe-to-share answer rather than shutting down the conversation completely. If it must refuse, it explains why and suggests safe alternatives.advertisementThis approach is especially important for 'dual-use' topics like biology, where information could be misused. OpenAI tested GPT-5 extensively for biological and chemical safety, running 5,000 hours of risk assessment with expert partners in the UK and US.GPT-5 Pro for the most complex tasksFor users who need the deepest reasoning, GPT-5 Pro is available to Pro subscribers. It takes longer to think and uses advanced parallel computing to produce the most detailed answers possible.On challenging benchmarks like GPQA, which contains extremely difficult science questions, GPT-5 Pro achieved state-of-the-art performance, as per OpenAI's blog. In tests with over 1,000 real-world prompts, experts apparently preferred GPT-5 Pro's answers nearly 68 per cent of the time over the standard 'GPT-5 thinking' mode, noting its strength in science, health, mathematics, and coding. This version is aimed at people and organisations who need the highest accuracy, whether for research, technical work, or decision-making.
advertisementGPT-5 is now available to all ChatGPT users, with Plus and Pro subscribers getting higher usage limits and extra features. Free users will gradually get access to its reasoning capabilities, and when they hit their limits, GPT-5 Mini will take over.For everyday users, the biggest change may not be in its scores or benchmarks but in how it feels to use. With fewer mistakes, less flattery, and more thoughtful follow-ups, GPT-5 is designed to feel less like 'talking to AI' and more like working with a well-informed, patient colleague, one who is ready to help whether you're coding an app, drafting a speech, or preparing questions for your doctor.- Ends

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Qualifications that techies Mark Zuckerberg has hired personally at $100 million-plus pay packages have: Degree in ...
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, is aggressively recruiting top AI talent for his new superintelligence lab, using a curated document known as 'The List' to target the industry's brightest minds. According to the Wall Street Journal, "The recruits on 'The List' typically have PhDs from elite schools like Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon. As a report in WSJ said, "The recruits on 'The List' typically have Ph.D.s from elite schools like Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon. They have experience at places like OpenAI in San Francisco and Google DeepMind in London. They are usually in their 20s and 30s—and they all know each other. They spend their days staring at screens to solve the kinds of inscrutable problems that require spectacular amounts of computing power." Zuckerberg has personally spearheaded the recruitment, diving into technical papers and strategizing with two Meta executives in a group chat dubbed 'Recruiting Party' to discuss hundreds of candidates and outreach methods, such as email, text, or WhatsApp. The List prioritizes candidates with PhDs in AI-related fields, experience at leading labs, and significant contributions to AI breakthroughs. Meta's recent hire, an algorithm design enthusiast, exemplifies the profile. The people who get notes from Zuckerberg reportedly have a few things in common: They need to know calculus, linear algebra and probability theory, like one of Meta's recent hires, who says he's fascinated by algorithm design. The AI community is tight-knit, with researchers forming Slack and Discord groups to share and discuss job offers, often leveraging competing offers to boost their value. Two sources familiar with these groups confirmed this practice. Meta has targeted dozens of OpenAI researchers, intensifying the Silicon Valley talent race. Leading Zuckerberg's superintelligence team is 28-year-old Alexandr Wang, a New Mexico native and son of Chinese immigrant physicists. Meta recently invested $14 billion in Wang's company, Scale AI, making him one of the most expensive hires in history. Meta has also reportedly made offers to dozens of researchers at OpenAI. This is said to have forced OPenAI to change its compensation structure. Not just this, the company's CTO also sent an open letter to employees asking them not to fall for Zuckerberg's offer. The company also shut down for almost a week. OpenAI's ex-CTO Mira Murati too has said that Mark Zuckerberg has also offered engineers in her company multi-million-dollar packages, but not even a single employee has so far accepted the offer. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Traders are fleeing stocks feared to be under threat from Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence's imprint on US financial markets is unmistakable. Nvidia Corp. is the most valuable company in the world at nearly $4.5 trillion. Startups from OpenAI to Anthropic have raised tens of billions of dollars. But there's a downside to the new technology that investors are increasingly taking note of: It threatens to upend industries much like the internet did before it. And investors have started placing bets on just where that disruption will occur next, ditching shares in companies some strategists expect will see falloffs in demand as AI applications become more widely adopted. Among them are web-development firms like Ltd., digital-image company Shutterstock Inc. and software maker Adobe Inc. The trio are part of a basket of 26 companies Bank of America strategists identified as most at risk from AI. The group has underperformed the S&P 500 Index by about 22 percentage points since mid-May after more or less keeping pace with the market since ChatGPT's debut in late 2022. 'The disruption is real,' said Daniel Newman, chief executive officer of the Futurum Group. 'We thought it would happen over five years. It seems like it is going to happen over two. Service-based businesses with a high headcount, those are going to be really vulnerable, even if they have robust businesses from the last era of tech.' So far, few companies have failed as a result of the proliferation of chatbots and so-called agents that can write software code, answer complex questions and produce photos and videos. But with tech giants like Microsoft Corp. and Meta Platforms Inc. pouring hundreds of billions into AI, investors have started to get more defensive. and Shutterstock are down at least 33% in 2025, compared with a 8.6% advance for the broad benchmark. Adobe has fallen 23% amid concerns clients will look to AI platforms that can generate images and videos, as Coca-Cola has already done with an AI-generated ad. ManpowerGroup Inc., whose staffing services could be hurt by rising automation, is down 30% this year, while peer Robert Half Inc. has shed more than half its value, dropping to its lowest in more than five years. The souring sentiment among investors comes as AI is changing everything from the way people get information from the internet to how colleges function. Even companies at the vanguard of the technology's development like Microsoft have been slashing jobs as productivity improves and to make way for more AI investments. To many tech-industry watchers, the time is nearing when AI becomes so pervasive that companies start going out of business. Anxiety about AI's impact on existing companies was on display last week when Gartner Inc. shares were routed after the market-research company cut its revenue forecast for the year. The stock fell 30% in the five days, its biggest one-week drop on record. While the company blamed US government policies including spending cuts and tariffs, analysts were quick to point the finger at AI, which investors fear could provide cheaper alternatives to Gartner's research and analysis even though the company is deploying its own AI-powered tools. Morgan Stanley said the results 'added fuel to the AI disruption case,' while Baird was left 'incrementally concerned AI risks are having an impact.' Gartner representatives didn't respond to a request for comment. Historical precedents abound for new technology wiping out industries. The telegraph gave way to telephones, horsewhips and buggies were toppled by the automobile, and Blockbuster's eradication by Netflix Inc. exemplified the internet's disruption. 'There are a lot of pockets of the market that could be basically annihilated by AI, or at least the industry will see extreme disruption, and companies will be rendered irrelevant,' said Adam Sarhan, chief executive officer at 50 Park Investments. 'Any company where you're paying someone to do something that AI can do faster and cheaper will be wiped out. Think graphic design, administrative work, data-analysis.' Of course, plenty of companies that were expected to be hammered by AI are thriving. Even though many AI companies offer instant translation services, Duolingo Inc., the owner of a language-learning app, soared after raising its outlook for 2025 sales, in part because of how it has implemented AI into its own strategy. The stock has roughly doubled over the past year — but concerns linger that the next generation of AI will be a threat. The defensive moves from investors come as AI has re-emerged as the dominant theme between winners and losers in the stock market this year. It's been a stark reversal from earlier in 2025 when AI models developed on the cheap in China called into question US dominance in the field and raised concerns that spending on computing gear was set to slow. Instead, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet Inc. and Inc. have doubled down on spending. The four companies are expected to pour roughly $350 billion into combined capital expenditures in their current fiscal years, up nearly 50% from the previous year, according to analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Much of that is funding the build out of AI infrastructure, which is benefiting companies like Nvidia, whose chips dominate the market for AI computing. Figuring out which companies are vulnerable to the technology takes a bit more nuance. Alphabet is widely seen as one of the best-positioned companies, with cutting edge features and top-tier talent and data. However, it is a component of Bank of America's AI risk basket, and the sense that it is playing defense — protecting its huge share of the lucrative internet search market — has long dogged the stock. For other companies, the risk seems more clear. Advertising agency Omnicom Group Inc. has dropped 15% this year, as it faces a future where Meta is reportedly looking to fully automate ad creation through AI. Peer WPP Plc is down more than 50%. 'The traditional advertising agency model is under intense pressure and that is before GenAI starts to really scale,' Michael Nathanson, senior analyst at MoffettNathanson, wrote in a research note. With so many companies facing AI risks, it's an investment theme that is poised to intensify, according to Phil Fersht, chief executive officer of HFS Research. 'Wall Street clearly has the jitters,' Fersht said. 'This is going to be a tough, unforgiving market.'


Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Anand Mahindra shares wisdom on curiosity, leadership and failure: ‘Don't try to be…'
Anand Mahindra, Chairman of the Mahindra Group, recently had an insightful conversation with Ananda Sarkar, last year's Mahindra Rise Challenge winner. Shared on X, the discussion touched upon key values like curiosity, humility, and the importance of embracing failure. Along with the video, Anand Mahindra wrote, 'Who asks tougher questions—investors or students? No prizes for guessing the right answer…' When asked about a college habit he still maintains, Mahindra said, 'I grew up without easy access to information--no internet or ChatGPT. That made me extremely curious, and luckily, that curiosity has stayed with me. It's the real driver behind innovation.' Advising those entering the professional world, he emphasised, 'Don't try to be the loudest person in the room. Listen carefully, find your own voice, stay humble, and never stop learning. Remember, you're rarely the smartest person in the room. Teams win, egos don't.' Talking about campus rules he disliked, Mahindra pointed to the 'Keep off the grass' signs on beautiful lawns. 'If you build something beautiful, why stop people from enjoying it? That rule should be thrown out.' When questioned about who asks tougher questions—investors or students--he was clear: 'Students ask deeper, existential questions. Investors can be handled with presentations, but students want to know who you truly are and why you do what you do.' On what business schools don't teach, Mahindra offered a crucial insight: 'Failure is not a footnote in your journey—it's a chapter. Learning to fail fast and fail forward is the real MBA.' The conversation, marked by Mahindra's trademark wisdom, is a reminder of the power of curiosity, humility, and resilience in achieving success.