Govt basks in two-thirds glory
Finally, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) on Friday emerged as the single largest party, with the party and its allies simultaneously securing two-thirds majority in the National Assembly after the Supreme Court allotted reserved seats to the ruling coalition.
The current parliamentary as well as political equation in the country changed after the top court turned down the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)-turned Sunni-Ittehad Council (SIC)'s request for the allotment of the reserved seats after hearing a review petition.
On July 12, 2024, the Supreme Court had declared PTI a parliamentary party and held that PTI was eligible to get reserved seats that were earlier distributing among other parties in the national and other assemblies by the Election Commission of Pakistan. However, the SC ruling in the review petitions has now reversed the same.
At the moment, the total number of seats of the ruling alliance stands at 237, including 125 of the PML-N, 74 of PPPP, 22 of Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P), five of Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q), four of Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP), one each of Balochistan Awami Party (BAP), National Party (NP) and Pakistan Muslim League-Zia PML-Z) and four independents.
On the contrary, the opposition alliance has total 99 seats, including 80 of SIC & independents – primarily PTI – 11 of the Jamiat-e-Ulmae-e-Islam-Fazl (JUIF) and one each of the Balochistan National Party-Mengal (BNP-M), Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP) and Majlis Wahdat-e-Muslimeen (MWM).
After the results of the Senate elections in April 2024, the PMLN-led ruling alliance has a dominating position in the upper house of the parliament with 61 seats, including independents, as opposed to the opposition parties' 24 seats.
The majority of the coalition government has put it in a commanding position in both the National Assembly and Senate as it can now even go for constitutional amendments without facing any hindrance from the opposition parties in both the houses. For any government to obtain a two-thirds majority in the 336-member National Assembly, the backing of 224 lawmakers is required.
Previously, when the government had fell short of passing the 26th constitutional amendment, it had managed to win support from an opposition party JUI-F. Now, the ruling alliance won't need support from the opposition benches to pass any constitutional amendment, which requires two-third votes from the Parliament.
The reserved seats had also led to a face-off between the Parliament and the Supreme Court as Speaker National Assembly, Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, had written a letter to the ECP, urging it to respect parliamentary sovereignty in the allocation of reserved seats to PTI.
The letter had come after the SC had ruled that independent candidates, after winning elections, could join political parties and alter their political allegiance followed up by a note released by eight SC judges directing ECP to implement the judgment at the earliest.
Through his letter, the Speaker had pointed out that Parliament passed an amendment to the election law, saying it prohibited independent candidates who join a party post-election from switching their affiliation.
He had emphasized the amendments to the elections act must be applied when the ECP allocates contested seats, highlighting that the SC judgment was rendered before the new law was passed and thus become outdated in light of the legislative changes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
SC new transport policy defines vehicle, driver, security entitlements
The Supreme Court has issued a policy regarding the use of official vehicles by judges. The policy, called the Transport Entitlement Policy for the Judges of the Supreme Court 2025, will apply to incumbent and retired judges of the apex court. According to the Supreme Court Judges (Leave, Pension, Privileges) Order 1997, read with the Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights Division's letter dated 07.06.2007, on elevation, a Supreme Court judge is entitled to use two official cars up to 1800cc. "One vehicle shall be used as the 'primary car' (for official purposes), whereas the other one as the 'secondary/family car'. The vehicles so provided shall be maintained at government expense through the budgetary allocation of the Court with POL in both the cars up to 600 litres per month (as prescribed monthly ceiling or actual use) on production of a certificate by the respective Private Secretary of the Hon'ble Judge, as decided by the Full Court on 20.01.2010." Each judge shall also be entitled to the provision of two drivers: one provided by the Court from regular strength and the other appointed on a contingent basis. In exceptional circumstances or on an urgent-need basis, if requisitioned, a third car may be provided—subject to availability—after the approval of the Registrar for a maximum period of two weeks. If such a period requires further extension, it shall be allowed only with the approval of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), on payment of the prescribed charges. In any case, a third car shall not be retained beyond eight weeks in a year. Provision of Security (Escort) Vehicles The policy states that the CJP is entitled to security (escort vehicles) as per the Blue Book under the supervision of the Chief Security Officer (CSO). "Each Hon'ble Judge shall be entitled to the provision of a well-trained gunman with one security (escort) vehicle on a 1/4 ratio, provided by the Islamabad Police at the Principal Seat and by the Provincial Police Officers in case any Hon'ble Judge is in provincial jurisdiction. Where an Hon'ble Judge requires additional security given any threat, the Hon'ble Chief Justice of Pakistan shall approve a second escort." Post-Retirement Transport Entitlement The policy states that each regular judge of the Court, on retirement, may retain the primary car for a maximum period of one month, after which the vehicle shall be retrieved and returned to the Court's pool. "Each Hon'ble regular Judge of the Court, on retirement, shall be entitled to purchase a primary or secondary car at depreciated value as per existing government policy, provided that the Hon'ble Judge has not availed the facility previously." It further states that each retired judge of the Court, on demand during their stay in Islamabad or provincial capitals, as the case may be, shall be entitled to the provision of an official vehicle, subject to availability, on prescribed charges as determined by the Full Court, along with a complementary pick-and-drop facility to/from the airport. Disposal of Vehicles "According to the relevant Rules for the Use of Staff Cars, 1980, upon reaching the prescribed age/mileage limit, official vehicles shall be disposed of by prevailing law/rules. The procedure for disposal shall be transparent and in compliance with the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) guidelines or other applicable laws for the time being enforced." It is also clarified that all costs incurred in connection with the procurement, maintenance, fuelling and operation of the official vehicles, as well as the employment of drivers, shall be met from the sanctioned budget of the Court under the respective heads. It is further clarified that in the event of any ambiguity or uncertainty regarding the interpretation of this policy, the matter shall be placed before the CJP for appropriate orders. Funeral arrangements policies SC has issued new guidelines to manage arrangements on the demise of former judges, appointing focal persons to assist with funerals, transportation, and placement of floral wreaths. According to the office order, the Deputy Registrar (Miscellaneous) — or in his absence, the Assistant Registrar (Misc.), Senior Protocol Officer, or designated staff, will serve as focal person in Islamabad. Officers in charge of branch registries in Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar, and Quetta will perform similar duties at the provincial level. The focal person will represent the court, assist with transportation of the deceased to the funeral site, and place a floral wreath on behalf of the Chief Justice of Pakistan and sitting judges.
Express Tribune
13 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Delay often 'extinguishes justice': SC
The Supreme Court has noted that it cannot remain indifferent to the systemic malaise of delay in the adjudication of cases, adding that justice delayed is not merely justice deniedit is often justice extinguished. In a four-page verdict on an appeal filed against a high court order in an auction case, the SC lamented that the appeal of the petitioner in the case remained pending before the high court for ten years while it took three years for the SC to take up the matter. The verdict authored by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah said the question that engaged the attention of the court was not limited to the validity of the auction; rather it extended to whether any meaningful relief could now be granted after the passage of fourteen years. "Even if the petitioner's claim had merit, the sands of time have all but eroded its potency," it stated. The verdict said it is beyond cavil that delay in adjudicating cases by the courts at any tier of the justice system corrodes public confidence in the judiciary, undermines the rule of law, and disproportionately harms the weak and vulnerable who cannot afford the cost of prolonged litigation. "Delay in adjudication carries severe macroeconomic and societal consequences: it deters investment, renders contracts illusory, and weakens the institutional legitimacy of the judiciary. "A justice system's credibility rests not only in the fairness of its decisions but also in the timeliness with which those decisions are rendered. The issue is not merely administrative, it is constitutional". It stated that the right to access to justice is guaranteed by Articles 4, 9 and 10A of the Constitution and it encompasses within it the right to a fair and timely trial. Delay that renders a remedy ineffective or a right illusory amount to a denial of due process. Justice, to be real, must be both just and timely. The verdict said over 2.2 million cases are currently pending before courts across Pakistan, including approximately 55,941 cases before the SC alone despite enhancing the number of judges. These figures, he said, are not abstractthey represent disputes suspended in time. It said delay in adjudication is not merely a by-product of docket congestion or branch-level inefficiencies; it is a deeper, structural challenge of judicial governance.
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bajaur pays the price again
EDITORIAL: Days after Minister of State for Interior Talal Chaudhary had declared on the floor of the National Assembly that no military operation would be launched in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), the authorities have done exactly that, proceeding with one in the province's Bajaur district. The operation, it must be noted, had initially begun last month but was paused amid hopes that talks between the Bajaur Amn Jirga and militant commanders may bear fruit, making armed action in the area avoidable. But with negotiations collapsing, August 11 saw security forces launch what is being termed a 'targeted' operation, striking militant hideouts in several tehsils of the district. Parts of Bajaur will now face a three-month curfew, signalling that the security situation may remain volatile for an extended period. As with operations past, this latest armed action will also likely displace the local population from their homes and upend their lives, with the authorities having already asked residents to move into relief camps. Such experiences have long fuelled opposition to military operations, which have repeatedly brought mass displacements, destruction of infrastructure and property, followed by entirely lacklustre rehabilitation efforts. Nevertheless, with the terror threat emanating from KP's erstwhile tribal districts mounting by the day – militants targeting civilians and security personnel alike, and terrorising the people of Bajaur – doing nothing was never going to solve matters either. The question does arise, however: why were such elements allowed to re-entrench themselves in parts of KP over a prolonged period, facing little meaningful resistance from the law enforcement and intelligence apparatus, while civilian authorities – both federal and provincial – were also caught napping? The hard-won gains of past operations, which had driven these groups out at great cost have been recklessly squandered, and now the hapless people of Bajaur will once again pay the price of this lax attitude to the terror menace. Their opposition to armed action must not be misconstrued as sympathy for militants; it is the natural response of communities that have spent decades as victims in a war that never seems to end. This latest operation must also serve as a sobering reminder that the fight against terror cannot be waged in silos. The threat is national, and so must be the resolve to confront it, with an unambiguous consensus on denying terror groups and extremist ideologies any physical or ideological space within society. History shows that while armed actions against these forces may become unavoidable after a certain point, they cannot be the sole answer. Without a united political front and sustained societal efforts to tackle the roots of radicalisation, Pakistan will remain trapped in a cycle of perpetual instability and violence. In this context, the prime minister's Independence Day call for national unity and invitation to all political parties to join the 'Misaq-i-Istehkam-i-Pakistan' – yet another bid to forge national solidarity in the face of domestic and external threats – may sound promising on paper. But too often such initiatives prove to be heavy on rhetoric, but devoid of follow-through. The government has repeatedly shown that it has little appetite for forging genuine unity, as demonstrated by its clampdown on political dissent, muzzling of the media and hounding of opponents. When political rivals are routinely convicted under anti-terror clauses, it cheapens the gravity of laws meant to protect the public from genuine threats, while also deepening societal fault lines, breeding resentment and diverting resources away from the task of tackling forces that pose existential dangers to the country. This erodes the collective resolve needed to confront terrorism in all its forms. Our rulers must realise that calls for national unity ring hollow when they prioritise their own political survival over the hard work required to build a united front against threats that endanger us all. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
