MSNBC Taps Washington Post's Jackie Alemany as ‘Weekend' Co-Host
Jackie Alemany, who has logged stints covering politics at both CBS News and The Washington Post, will move to MSNBC, where she will serve as co-host of one of its 'The Weekend' panel programs and as a Washington correspondent. Alemany will anchor a morning version of 'The Weekend' alongside Jonathan Capehart, who has worked Saturdays and Sundays for MSNBC for the past few years, and Eugene Daniels, the Politico correspondent whose move to MSNBC was confirmed Monday.
More from Variety
MSNBC Layoffs Target 99 Union Staffers, WGA East Claims
Keith Olbermann Slams MSNBC for Cutting Ties With Joy Reid and Other POC Hosts: 'A Purge So Brutally Racist It Makes You Think It Was Done by Musk'
Rachel Maddow Sounds Off on Major MSNBC Line-Up Changes and Exit of Joy Reid: 'I Think It Is a Bad Mistake to Let Her Walk Out the Door'
The new host unveiled her new role Tuesday on 'Morning Joe.'
'Jackie has built a reputation of accountability journalism covering the nation's capital from both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue,' said Rebecca Kutler, MSNBC's president, in a statement. 'Her addition as a co-host of 'The Weekend' in the mornings, alongside Eugene Daniels and Jonathan Capehart, solidifies this trio as a trusted roundtable of experts and insiders our audience is looking forward to waking up with every Saturday and Sunday.'
Alemany's hire is just the latest personnel move by Kutler, who has wasted little time in overhauling the network as it grapples with being a progressive monitor of an era when conservative politics hold considerable sway and as MSNBC prepares to be spun off along with other cable networks into a new publicly-traded entity, sundering its long-held ties with NBC News. The network has, like rival CNN, had to contend with a downturn in viewership following the 2024 election. Both outlets have overhauled their TV lineups in response.
The executive, who decided to replace Joy Reid at 7 p.m. with the trio of Symone Sanders-Townsend, Michael Steele and Alicia Menendez and Alex Wagner at 9 p.m. with Jen Psaki, has vowed to establish a separate newsgathering apparatus for MSNBC. Alemany will have a focus on fact-finding. 'I'm thrilled to join MSNBC's cohort of exceptional reporters and journalists in covering Washington during this critical period for fair and unflinching journalism,' she said in a statement. 'MSNBC continues to provide much needed context and insight to consequential stories, and the network's investment in original reporting and its rapidly expanding Washington bureau signals its ambitions and commitment to viewers and agenda-setting journalism as a whole.'
MSNBC is expanding its use of panel shows in tandem with its two main competitors. At Fox News Channel, the roundtable program 'The Five' is typically the most-watched hour on the schedule, and the network's grid also has room for 'The Big Weekend Show' and 'Outnumbered.' CNN has gained some traction with the 10 p.m. panel program 'NewsNight,' anchored by Abby Phillip.
News executives like the format because it's not reliant on a single personality and allows networks to showcase many different correspondents, who, if they grow popular enough, might be moved into a program all their own.
In some ways, MSNBC is coming full circle on roundtables. In the middle of last decade, MSNBC launched a mid-afternoon hour called 'The Cycle,' which relied on co-hosts including at the time relative unknowns such as Ari Melber, S.E. Cupp, Steve Kornacki, Touré, Krystal Ball and Abby Huntsman. Many members of that group went on to bigger cable-news assignments.
MSNBC is also creating an evening edition of 'The Weekend' that will be led by Ayman Mohyeldin, who had been anchoring weekend primetime hours. Co-hosts have yet to be named.
Alemany had recently been assigned to the White House for the Washington Post, and has contributed to coverage of the second Trump administration's efforts to restructure the federal government. She has also covered the January 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol, and founded and led the early-morning Post newsletter now known as the Early Brief. She was a member of a Washington Post team that received the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the January 6 attack.
Best of Variety
What's Coming to Disney+ in March 2025
What's Coming to Netflix in March 2025
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The U.S. May Experience Negative Net Migration For The First Time In 50 Years. Here's What That Means For The Economy.
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. It was just a year ago when immigrants were entering the country in droves. The narrative has quickly shifted, and the White House recently featured a CNN report on its site touting that the country is on track toward negative net migration for the first time in at least 50 years. CNN Politics Senior Analyst Harry Enten said it's possible that we see a 2.8 million year-over-year negative net migration when it's all said and done. President Donald Trump campaigned on a tight border and has delivered on that promise, but this dramatic shift will affect the economy. It's not all good, but it's not all bad, either. These are some of the realistic ways negative net migration will affect the economy. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. A Shrinking Workforce Removing able-bodied workers from an economy will reduce the workforce and reduce economic output. Fewer people in the workforce result in fewer products being produced and fewer services being fulfilled. However, not everyone loses from a shrinking workforce. Fewer workers give the remaining workers more leverage, which can translate into wage growth. Businesses will have to pay higher prices for workers, which can be a boon for people who feel like their salaries haven't kept up with inflation. Continuing to bring in new migrants would put downward pressure on wages due to a higher supply of workers. Some businesses may raise prices since they have to pay higher labor costs, contributing to inflation in the process. American workers should see nominal wage growth due to negative net migration, but real, inflation-adjusted wages show whether these changes will be a net benefit or setback for the typical worker's purchasing power. Trending: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Uncertainty Around Housing Costs The U.S. Census Bureau's population clock shows that there are approximately 342 million people in the country. A negative net migration of 2.8 million individuals represents a 0.1% decrease in the population. Any population decrease will reduce housing costs since fewer people are trying to buy and rent the same number of housing units. For instance, Japan housing prices have been dropping in tandem with its population decline, according to Business Insider. Negative net migration isn't the only way to address housing costs, but it can have an unintended effect. In this case, it won't be life-changing for Americans who want to become homeowners. Although housing demand decreases as populations decline, negative net migration may increase construction costs. The construction companies that hired illegal immigrants will have to turn to more expensive American workers, who will suddenly have more leverage in negotiations. Undocumented workers tend to have lower wages, according to Econofact, so American workers represent higher costs for companies. It's exactly what Trump and his advocates envisioned, but more American workers in construction may come with higher construction costs, which can lead to higher housing prices. Can negative net migrations and higher wages for Americans offset rising construction costs? We will have to wait and Taxpayers Governments rely on tax revenue to fund social programs and other initiatives for the country's welfare. When illegal immigrants are forced out of the country, it reduces the number of taxpayers. For instance, undocumented immigrants paid $96.7 billion in federal, state, and local taxes in 2022, according to a report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. The same report said that they paid $25.7 billion in Social Security taxes. However, a negative net migration may not be detrimental to social programs like Social Security. While the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy report indicates that illegal immigrants contributed $25.7 billion to the program in 2022, Social Security collected more than $1 trillion that year. That means the contribution from illegal immigrants was less than 2.5%. Fewer undocumented immigrants also lets social programs allocate more of their existing time and resources toward U.S. citizens. The impacts of negative net migration – positive or negative – ultimately depend on who ends up leaving the country. Getting rid of productive workers will hurt the economy, but advocates for deportation claim that taxpayer funds went toward housing illegal immigrants. This rationale asserts that the savings from no longer having to house illegal immigrants can offset losses in productivity. Negative net migration isn't a clear positive or negative for the economy. There are meaningful pros and cons to the approach, and its impact on the economy and Americans will become more apparent over time. Read Next: , which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. Image: Shutterstock This article The U.S. May Experience Negative Net Migration For The First Time In 50 Years. Here's What That Means For The Economy. originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
ICE standoff in Trenton, New Jersey, immigrant neighborhood sparks outrage
Tensions were high Thursday morning in Trenton's Chambersburg neighborhood as ICE agents surrounded a home in an attempt to detain a man without a warrant, sparking a standoff that lasted nearly five hours and drew emotional protests from the local community. According to Trenton Mayor Reed Gusciora, ICE agents arrived around 7 a.m. in unmarked vehicles with blacked-out windows. They attempted to detain a man but failed to produce a judicial warrant. When the man fled into his home, the standoff began. "Trenton Police are here just strictly to keep the peace in the neighborhood," Gusciora told CBS News Philadelphia. "We're not here to assist ICE. Shame on ICE for not having the warrant to begin with." Outside the home, dozens of neighbors, including members of a local "rapid response team," gathered behind police tape, demanding transparency and accountability. Ana Puello, a resident of Chambersburg for more than a decade, said the neighborhood is home to families from Guatemala, Honduras, the Dominican Republic and beyond. "They don't have the paperwork," Puello said of ICE. "This is a sanctuary community," she said about the neighborhood. Pastor Erich Kussman, of St. Bartholomew Lutheran Church, said he knows the family well. The man ICE was seeking is a day laborer. His wife works at a cleaning company. They have five children, ranging in age from 1 to 10. "There's a whole family inside," Kussman said. He added, "We welcome Jesus when we welcome the people that are immigrants in our neighborhood." The agents wearing vests marked "POLICE U.S. BORDER PATROL" and "POLICE HSI" (Homeland Security Investigations) remained outside the home until about 11:45 a.m., eventually leaving without making an arrest. "ICE should be acting responsible. They should have a warrant, they should tell us when they're here, and they should tell us the reasons why they're picking up the person. Again, if it's a gang member or somebody who's in a drug cartel, we'll support that," Gusciora said. One protester was briefly arrested for crossing police tape but was later released. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, a Democrat from New Jersey, condemned the operation. "To come and to be masked, to not identify yourself, to not show your badge, that's something that you see in other countries. You don't see that in the United States of America. It's very un-American," Coleman said. In a statement, Trenton Police emphasized their limited role in the situation: "We are not involved in the ICE action nor are we assisting them. We are only there to maintain safety and respond if necessary." The community, though relieved the standoff ended without violence, remains shaken. "They are not in fear," Puello said. "They are very angry." CBS News Philadelphia has reached out to ICE for more details on the operation but has yet to receive a response.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Virginia candidates spared over possible debates. Here's what they finally agreed to.
The gloves tend to come off quickly in political debates. But while candidates running for office in Virginia's statewide races have yet to square up this year, they aren't holding back. Several have traded early jabs over debate participation, including which events they will or won't attend. When Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee for governor, declined to participate in a debate hosted by CNN, her opponent's campaign called the decision 'absurd' and 'proof (Spanberger's) terrified of facing voters in an unscripted setting.' Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican candidate, had previously declined to participate in AARP Virginia's 'People's Debate,' held every gubernatorial election since 2006 and scheduled this year at Virginia State University. Spanberger's campaign made note of that too. 'After months of negotiations, Winsome Earle-Sears refused to participate' in the traditional debate, while Spanberger accepted the invitation a month prior, one press release read. Last month, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, Jay Jones, declined to participate in a debate hosted by the news station WJLA-TV in Northern Virginia. His Republican opponent's campaign called that decision a failure. 'It's the right call — I wouldn't want to defend his record either,' said a spokesperson for Attorney General Jason Miyares's campaign. Jones's campaign at the time said they had already agreed to participate in the Virginia State Bar debate. The squabbling has made it difficult to pin down if and when candidates running for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general will face off. But now candidates in two races say they've finally reached agreements for debates this fall. Spanberger and Earle-Sears are slated to debate Oct. 9 at Norfolk State University, moderated by WAVY-TV. Miyares and Jones will participate in the Virginia State Bar debate in Richmond Oct. 16. Choosing to debate at all can be risky, particularly for frontrunners, said Karen Hult, a professor of political science at Virginia Tech. Candidates lose control over what they're asked and how their message is framed by viewers. And for Democrats, that risk might be painfully fresh. 'Everyone running for governor in Virginia has to be remembering what happened to the one-time frontrunner for the governorship in 2021, and that was former Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who had, one could argue, a disastrous debate appearance,' Hult said. 'What he had to say about public schooling in response to a question in many ways helped Gov. Youngkin not only get the momentum, keep momentum and then ultimately win the governorship.' In Hampton Roads, a recent poll from Old Dominion University found that nearly 48% of respondents said they planned to vote Spanberger compared with 27% who said they favored Earle-Sears. Statewide, a poll from Roanoke College found Spanberger ahead by seven points, a narrower lead than in previous months. When it came to a gubernatorial debate, Spanberger, a former congresswoman, cited a preference for Virginia broadcasters and issues over a national outlet like CNN. Earle-Sears, the state's lieutenant governor, said she had a scheduling conflict for the People's Debate. 'I also think perhaps Spanberger was a bit concerned that a national interviewer would keep trying to put the race in a national partisan context and try to highlight that when Spanberger was in the US House, she was one of the more conservative Democrats,' said Hult of the former Congresswoman's decision not to participate in the CNN debate. 'I think she didn't want to be put in the position of having to contrast herself over and over again with, for example, AOC or some of the other really visible national Democrats that might be brought up in a national debate-sponsored kind of setting.' That shift, and more success with fundraising, might be why Earle-Sears is more inclined to accept a debate invitation now, Hult said. 'Those things have changed pretty dramatically, so they now are on a little bit more equal footing arguably,' she said. 'Moreover, (Earle-Sears) has gotten a nod that the Republican president is supporting her running for office, and she also has the support of the entire statewide Republican party and a quite popular — by comparison to the president — Republican governor of the state of Virginia. I think all of those things make Earle-Sears think, well, now may be the time to accept a debate, but only in a particular location, and only at a particular time.' Meanwhile, the candidates for lieutenant governor, Democratic state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi and Republican former radio host John Reid, have no debates scheduled so far. Reid previously challenged Hashmi to 10 debates across the state. Hashmi's campaign said they would consider any formal debate invitations as they come in and as her schedule permits, but that they have yet to receive any official invitations from nonpartisan news outlets. Both campaigns said they were asked to participate together in a candidate forum on The Politics Hour, a weekly program on Washington, D.C. radio station station WAMU. Given all the candidates' arguments about debates, are they still relevant? 'We don't really have much evidence that they change many people's views on who to vote for,' Hult said. What they can do, she said, is mobilize people to turn out to vote — or to stay home. Early voting begins Sept.19. Election Day is Nov. 4. Kate Seltzer, (757)713-7881
