Congressional subcommittee to hold hearing about overregulation in California following devastating wildfires
The "California Fires and the Consequences of Overregulation" hearing will examine the real impacts of regulatory policy on the prevention of natural disasters, particularly in the case of California's wildfires, according to a statement obtained by Fox News Digital.
It will also address how excessive regulation on insurance and permitting serves as a roadblock to those recovering from disasters.
Cal Fire reported more than 12,000 homes, businesses and schools were lost to the fires and more than 100,000 people have had to leave their homes.
Kelsey Grammer Says California Lawmakers 'Took Their Eye Off The Ball' In Wildfires Catastrophe
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, described current disaster regulations as a "nightmare."
Read On The Fox News App
"Democrat-run California's excessive regulations make preventing and recovering from natural disasters a nightmare," he said.
Los Angeles Wildfires: Second California Real Estate Agent Charged With Price Gouging Victims
Jordan added that California needs a streamlined process, as suggested by President Donald Trump, to remove regulation and ensure citizens can rebuild and prevent similar tragedies in the future.
Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wis., said the wildfires were a preventable tragedy, and Congress must examine whether California's "onerous regulatory regime" worsened the disaster.
"For years, California's liberal government has prioritized environmental activism over effective forest management and disaster mitigation. Meanwhile, the politicization of their state insurance regulator has driven insurers out of the state and forced taxpayers to foot the bill," Fitzgerald said.
Witnesses will include Steve Hilton, founder of Golden Together; Steven Greenhut, resident senior fellow and western region director of state affairs for the R Street Institute; and Edward Ring, director of water and energy policy for the California Policy Center, according to the statement.
The hearing is scheduled for Feb. 6 at 10 a.m.Original article source: Congressional subcommittee to hold hearing about overregulation in California following devastating wildfires
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown
Three Republican-led states will be deploying hundreds of National Guard members to Washington, DC, to bolster President Trump's crackdown on crime and homelessness in the nation's capital. West Virginia will be sending up to 400 troops, South Carolina has pledged 200 and Ohio will dispatch 150 in the coming days, the three states announced on Saturday. 'We stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region and contribute to the collective effort of making our nation's capital a clean and safe environment,' Maj. Gen. Jim Seward of the West Virginia National Guard said. The Mountain State's governor, Patrick Morrisey, added: 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital,' adding that the mission 'reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America.' Three Republican-run states are sending an additional 750 National Guard personnel to Washington DC. AP South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster announced the deployment of 200 National Guard personnel from the Palmetto State to DC, but said the troops could be recalled in the event of a major national disaster such as a hurricane. He said the deployment was part of Trump's efforts to restore law and order in Washington, and in response to a request from the National Guard Bureau at the Pentagon. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, meanwhile, said he was sending 150 military police officers to support the DC National Guard. It follows protests in the capital on Saturday. Getty Images 'These Ohio National Guard members will carry out presence patrols and serve as added security,' he said in a statement. None of the members — who are expected to arrive in DC within the coming days — are currently serving as law enforcement officers within the Buckeye State, DeWine said. The deployments of 750 troops from the three states would bring the total number of National Guard personnel within the capital to over 1,450. So far, National Guard members have played a limited role in the federal intervention. Troops have been spotted patrolling landmarks such as the National Mall and Union Station, as well as assisting law enforcement with tasks such as crowd control. With Post wires
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration presses Boston to ditch ‘sanctuary' policies
'We know where this is coming from and we know why. Unlike the Trump administration, Boston follows the law and it's as simple as that,' Wu said Friday night in East Boston, according to a recording of her remarks provided by her staff. Bondi outlined her demands to Wu and the leaders of other jurisdictions that the Trump administration believes are impeding his immigration enforcement efforts in letters dated Wednesday. Related : Advertisement 'This ends now,' Bondi wrote, according to a copy of the letter shared with the Globe. US Senator Edward Markey, a Malden Democrat, on Saturday accused Bondi of picking a fight to score political points. 'I know Mayor Wu and Boston leaders are working hard to keep Boston one of the safest big cities in the country, to uphold state and local laws, and to treat all residents with dignity and respect,' he said in a statement. Advertisement US Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Cambridge, said Boston is 'Instead of dividing and distracting, he should be focused on lowering costs and making life better for people across the country,' she said in a statement. US Representative Ayanna Pressley, a former Boston city councilor and Democrat, said Boston is welcoming and expressed support for Wu. 'This authoritarian Administration does not care about keeping our communities safe - their strategy is to divide, fear monger, and target vulnerable people as they distract from the fact that they're ripping away healthcare and giving taxpayers' cash to billionaires,' she said in a statement. Related : In March, Related : The city's Nearly 80 percent of Boston voters said they have at least a somewhat favorable view of that policy, and more than 62 percent said they have a 'strongly favorable' opinion of the Trust Act, the poll found. Josh Kraft, a Democrat who is challenging Wu in this year's mayor's race, said Bondi's demands are 'just another unhinged and bigoted attack targeting our nation's immigrants.' 'We cannot yield to Donald Trump and his band of thugs,' he said in a statement Saturday. Advertisement City Councilor Ed Flynn of South Boston said the city is proud of its immigrant roots, but he supports the prosecution of people engaged in criminal behavior regardless of whether they're in the country legally. 'Boston is an international city, and we must have a close working relationship with state and federal law enforcement partners and necessary resources to address any and all public safety issues,' he said in a text message. Boston This is the second time Trump officials have included Boston on such a list. In May, the US Department of Homeland Security published a The New England states of Rhode Island, Vermont, and Connecticut made the list, as well as the state of New York, New York City, and Rochester, N.Y. In revealing the new list on Aug. 5, the Justice Department pointed to an array of policies that it sees as impeding the federal government's efforts to enforce immigration law. The examples include local governments declining to cooperate with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, establishing offices to advise 'illegal alien communities' on evading federal law enforcement, and public declarations that seek to undermine immigration enforcement. In statements on Friday, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont and Attorney General William Tong, both Democrats, accused Bondi of falsely identifying the state as a 'sanctuary' jurisdiction. Advertisement 'Connecticut is not a 'sanctuary' state,' Lamont said. 'That term has no legal definition, and it is not an accurate description of our laws and practices.' 'This generic, non-specific form letter lacks any meaningful detail and does not merit a response,' said McKee in a statement to the Globe. Bondi's letter to Wu doesn't specify the potential consequences the city could face if it doesn't comply, but signals the administration's willingness to consider funding cuts, criminal prosecution, or civil litigation. Trump outlined possible sanctions in an April Wu told reporters that legal challenges to Trump's threats to cut off funding have been successful. 'Boston does not back down in the face of threats, certainly when the threats and the tactics cross the line and seem to be against the law as well,' she said. A In February, Advertisement This year, Globe correspondent Emily Spatz contributed. Laura Crimaldi can be reached at
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
MAGA eager for D.C. patrols to spread to other cities
President Trump 's MAGA movement sees his D.C. crackdown as being about more than just crime — it's an opportunity to deal another setback to liberals by expanding the movement in urban areas. Why it matters: Despite the protests over Trump's stunning show of force on D.C.'s streets, MAGA's most vocal voices believe that if the anti-crime push is successful — and Trump is certain to declare it so — it could win converts in cities and help expand the movement's rural base. "We have an opportunity to show city folks that life doesn't have to be this way," one senior MAGA media figure told Axios. "There are things you can do to control crime. This definitely could spread to other cities, simply by demand." Reality check: Trump's D.C. crime claims don't match the data. Violent crime is falling in the city, not rising, Axios D.C.'s Anna Spiegel reports. Plus, D.C.'s status as a federal city gives the president unique powers with the National Guard and federal law enforcement there. Any attempt by Trump to impose similar federal patrols in other Democrat-run cities likely would be met with the type of protests that Trump's immigration crackdown sparked in Los Angeles. Such a move against local control — which historically has been a top cause for Republicans — also could fuel a political backlash against Trump and MAGA at a time when the president is desperate to maintain GOP control of Congress in the 2026 midterms. And even in D.C., Trump's efforts are facing legal hurdles. A federal judge on Friday got the administration to back off replacing the head of city's police department with the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration. Driving the news: For now, MAGA is celebrating. Videos of homeless people's encampments being razed in D.C. and federal officers on patrol in the city are spreading like wildfire across right-wing social media accounts. MAGA-friendly podcasters are gleefully speculating about what other blue cities could get the same treatment. Cities Trump has slapped with the "high-crime" stereotype — Baltimore, Chicago, San Francisco and more — are being cited as logical next steps for federal intervention. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on how effective the crackdown has been so far, but Trump administration officials are releasing their own stats as part of a PR blitz. The big picture: Trump's movement is dominant across rural America. Now MAGA thought leaders want to activate "citycons," as podcaster Jack Posobiec said on his show Thursday — urban Americans supposedly pushed to the right by crime concerns, widespread homelessness, locked-up CVS shelves and local governments' struggles to stop crimes affecting the quality of life. "The Trump administration is showing that every part of urban decay that the public hates is a choice," MAGA activist Charlie Kirk posted on X. "If D.C. is clearly better, cleaner, safer, and more pleasant a month from now, what excuse will the left have for every other city in the country?" Between the lines: With or without the federal crackdown, crime rates are likely to be lower a month from now in D.C. and other cities. Zoom out: In the meantime, MAGA media is enjoying scenes from the D.C. crackdown.
