Fringe White Afrikaners See How Lobbying of Trump Can Work
The fringe group that planted the seed for some of Donald Trump's unsubstantiated claims that South Africa is persecuting White farmers saw years of lobbying US politicians pay off.
At a meeting in the Oval Office, the US president lambasted his South African counterpart, Cyril Ramaphosa, in what the foreign delegation called a 'well-orchestrated, well-planned' ambush. It all began with Trump asking for a video to be played that echoed the output of Afriforum, a White Afrikaners rights group that met with his allies during his first term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump pushes a July 4th deadline for big tax bill as senators dig in
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump wants his 'big, beautiful' bill of tax breaks and spending cuts on his desk to be signed into law by the Fourth of July, and he's pushing the slow-rolling Senate to make it happen sooner rather than later. Trump met with Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the White House early this week and has been dialing senators for one-on-one chats, using both the carrot and stick to nudge, badger and encourage them to act. But it's still a long road ahead for the 1,000-page-plus package .
Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
SUPPORT Act's rocky road ahead
WASHINGTON WATCH The House plans to try again soon to reauthorize the landmark opioid-fighting law President Donald Trump signed during his first term. The SUPPORT Act expired nearly two years ago, though Congress has continued to fund the programs it authorized. The original act authorized billions of dollars in treatment, prevention and recovery funding, including programs for opioid abuse and expanded access to addiction medicines such as buprenorphine. More than 30 amendments were submitted to it in preparation for a floor vote. Why it matters: The House passed the original law in 2018 by a vote of 393-8, but it's unlikely to go so well this time. When the House Energy and Commerce Committee considered the bill in April, 13 Democrats voted no. The committee had approved the same bill unanimously in July 2023. But Democrats at the April vote said they weren't willing to work with the GOP because of the Trump administration's moves to downsize agencies, including the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, that oversee funding the SUPPORT Act provides. 'I am confused [that] we are working on the SUPPORT Act while [the] administration is working independent of Congress to undermine its aims,' said Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, the top Democrat on the panel's Health Subcommittee. The panel's chair, Republican Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, said the committee would conduct oversight to ensure the law's implementation is done effectively, but he also said he's open to the administration's ideas to do so more efficiently. The debate is expected to continue on the House floor Wednesday. New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the ranking Democrat on Energy and Commerce, explained in a letter to colleagues ahead of the vote that he would vote against the bill because the Trump administration is proceeding 'with its unauthorized and illegal plans to eliminate SAMHSA altogether and combine mental health and substance use programs with unrelated programs in a new 'Administration for a Healthy America.' Pallone also accused Republicans of 'trying to have it both ways.' The backstory: Roughly half of the nearly 900 employees at SAMHSA were let go earlier in April. And the Trump administration has requested $1.5 billion less for mental health services, suicide prevention programs and programs to prevent and treat substance use for fiscal 2026 compared with the $7.3 billion SAMHSA managed in 2024. Last year, overdose deaths fell dramatically from highs that exceeded 110,000 a year during the Covid pandemic, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Still, more than 80,000 Americans died from an overdose during the 12 months ending last November. The SUPPORT Act reauthorization was part of a major bipartisan, bicameral health care package that lawmakers intended to append to government funding legislation in December before Trump scuttled it. Trump argued that the funding bill shouldn't include extraneous provisions. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Pesticides applied to golf courses might be associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease for people living within one to three miles from golf courses, a study published in JAMA Network Open finds. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. DANGER ZONE Poorer neighborhoods are more likely to have cannabis dispensaries in the states that have legalized recreational use of the substance, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. How so: Researchers analyzed nearly 5,600 cannabis retailers in 18 states with legal recreational markets in 2023 and found 11 percent of census tracts had at least one dispensary, POLITICO's Mona Zhang reports. Neighborhoods that scored higher for socioeconomic deprivation — based on an index by the U.S. Census Bureau — were associated with a higher likelihood of having a dispensary. Predominantly Black neighborhoods were more than 50 percent as likely to have a dispensary, while predominantly Hispanic neighborhoods had more than double the odds of having a dispensary, concluded the researchers, from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Medicine, the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies and the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Why it matters: 'This kind of spatial patterning may not always be intentional, but it can contribute to disproportionate substance use exposure among communities that are already marginalized,' lead investigator Lindsay Kephart said in a statement. The findings provide new evidence of the link between socioeconomic disadvantage and cannabis dispensary concentration, contributing to prior research that has found similar associations. The researchers point to several factors that could lead to the concentration of cannabis dispensaries in disadvantaged areas, including lower property values, which could attract cannabis businesses, and an increased likelihood of bans on cannabis sales in communities with more resources. Additionally, local zoning regulations can restrict cannabis businesses to commercial and industrial zones, which often overlap with lower-income or more racially diverse populations. The caveats: The researchers caution that the study doesn't establish a causal link between socioeconomic status and dispensary concentration. It's also important to note that the study is a pre-proof and not the final version, and it hasn't yet undergone the rigorous peer review process required before a study's publication to ensure its accuracy. What's next: 'Policymakers must be mindful of unintended consequences these regulations may have on historically marginalized communities, emphasizing the need for equitable policy design in collaboration with those affected,' the researchers wrote.
E&E News
40 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump budget could open the door to selling wild horses for slaughter
President Donald Trump's fiscal 2026 budget request proposes addressing the skyrocketing costs of wild horse and burro management by striking a provision designed to protect them. The Bureau of Land Management budget request, details of which were released by the White House late Friday, would dramatically cut funding for the wild horse and burro program — and remove previous safeguards mandated by Congress that forbid the bureau from selling or transferring any of the federally protected animals to places where they could be slaughtered. Overall, it would slash the program's budget by 25 percent — to $106 million from $143 million — raising questions about what the bureau plans to do with the more than 64,000 animals it has removed from federal rangelands over the past few years and is caring for in off-range corrals and pastures. Advertisement The proposed cut to the wild horse and burro program comes as the White House has proposed slashing BLM's overall budget by more than $500 million as part of the Trump administration's ongoing efforts to cut costs and reshape the federal workforce. Caring for the captured wild horses and burros cost BLM more than $100 million a year, or roughly two-thirds of the program's annual budget, and the bureau said in March they expect that trend to continue this year.
