logo
UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest £15bn in warheads

UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest £15bn in warheads

Significant investment in the UK nuclear warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the Government is expected to accept in full.
But questions were also raised about its commitment to defence spending after the Defence Secretary could not confirm the Treasury had guaranteed funding to bring it up to 3% of GDP by 2034.
Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said.
Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression.
'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly skilled jobs across the country.'
The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the Government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades.
From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven astute class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating.
In response to the strategic defence review, the Government will also commit to:
– Getting the armed forces to a stage where it would be ready to fight a war
– Boosting weapons and equipment stockpiles and making sure there is capacity to scale up production if needed in a crisis or war
– Buying up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in a move due to support 800 defence jobs
– Setting up a new cyber command and investing £1 billion in digital capabilities
– More than £1.5 billion of additional funding to repair and renew armed forces housing.
Sir Keir Starmer will say: 'From the supply lines to the front lines, this Government is foursquare behind the men and women upholding our nation's freedom and security.
'National security is the foundation of my Plan for Change, and this plan will ensure Britain is secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering a defence dividend of well-paid jobs up and down the country.
'This strategic defence review will ensure the UK rises to the challenge and our armed forces have the equipment they need that keeps us safe at home while driving greater opportunity for our engineers, shipbuilders and technicians of the future.'
The Conservatives and Lib Dems questioned Labour's commitment to funding the promises it was making.
The Government has previously set out its 'ambition to reach 3% in the next parliament', after meeting its pledge to ratchet up defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027.
Mr Healey had said there was 'no doubt' the UK would reach 3% in an interview with The Times.
But on Sunday, he sidestepped questions about whether he had any guarantee from the Treasury to provide the funding when asked on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme.
He said he does not expect to increase the number of people in the armed forces until the next Parliament amid a recruitment and retention crisis.
Asked when the Army would reach the target of 73,000, Mr Healey said: 'We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining.
'The first job is to reverse that trend and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number.'
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'All of Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises will be taken with a pinch of salt unless they can show there will actually be enough money to pay for them.
'Whereas, far from guaranteeing the funding, John Healey has been hung out to dry by Rachel Reeves.
'As recently as Thursday, Healey promised that defence spending would definitely hit 3%, but today he's completely backtracked.
'These submarines are not due to enter service till the late 2030s, so how can we have any confidence Labour will actually deliver them when they can't even sustain a policy on defence spending for more than 48 hours?'
Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire said: 'This signals absolutely the right intent about the need to bolster the UK's defences in the face of Putin's imperialism and Trump's unreliability.
'But this must come with a concrete commitment and detail on full funding.
'Labour's mere 'ambition' rather than commitment to reach 3% of GDP on defence leaves serious questions about whether the money for these projects will actually be forthcoming.
'The 2034 timeline suggests a worrying lack of urgency from the Government.
'Unless Labour commits to holding cross-party talks on how to reach 3% much more rapidly than the mid-2030s, this announcement risks becoming a damp squib.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It will take more than 3% to make Britain ‘battle ready'
It will take more than 3% to make Britain ‘battle ready'

Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Spectator

It will take more than 3% to make Britain ‘battle ready'

Does anyone really think that spending 3 per cent of GDP on defence would make Britain 'battle-ready', as Keir Starmer claims? (Assuming, that is, that he really did spend all that money rather than merely have an aspiration to do so). Here is the statistic of the day, to remind us of what a wartime economy really looks like. In 2023, according to the World Bank, Ukraine spent 36.7 per cent of its GDP on defence. And no, the reason that percentage is so high is not because Ukraine's GDP collapsed: on the contrary, Ukraine's GDP in 2023 was higher than in any year except the Covid rebound year of 2021, plus 2008 and 2013. Russia, in trying to roll over a smaller neighbour, spent 7 per cent of GDP on defence – or rather, on offence in its case. No one is suggesting that it would be a sensible strategy for Britain to emulate Ukraine and spend a third or more of national output on defence at the moment.

Calm weather and fuller boats leading to more Channel arrivals, Home Office says
Calm weather and fuller boats leading to more Channel arrivals, Home Office says

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Calm weather and fuller boats leading to more Channel arrivals, Home Office says

The record numbers of people arriving in the UK via small boats should be blamed on favourable weather and greater numbers being crammed into vessels, Home Office analysis has claimed. Figures show there were twice as many 'red days' – when there are calmer conditions in the Channel, meaning crossings are more likely – in the first four months of this year as there were in the same period in 2024. In the year ending April 2025, 47% of boats crossing the Channel had 60 or more people onboard, compared with 2% in the year to April 2022. The Migration Observatory at Oxford University challenged the Home Office analysis, saying there was no evidence that weather was a major factor in long-term increases in boat arrivals. Charities said the analysis ignored the fact that most people attempting to come to the UK were found to be legitimate asylum seekers driven by war, famine and climate change. The analysis has been released as Keir Starmer attempts to fight off a growing challenge from Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Labour party officials are convinced that rising irregular immigration numbers will be a key issue in future elections. On Saturday, more than 1,100 migrants and refugees arrived in the UK, bringing the annual total to 14,812, up 42% on this time last year. According to the figures released on Tuesday, there were 60 red days in the first four months of 2025, compared with 27 over the same period in 2024 and 23 in the first part of 2023. There were 93.5% more red days during the first 10 months of Starmer's government than in the same period a year earlier. In that time, there was a 34.5% increase in the number of arrivals, from 25,571 between July 2023 to April 2024, to 34,401 in the 10 months to April 2025. The number of people travelling in each dinghy has increased, the figures show. In April 2023, there was only, one boat carrying more than 80 people. In April this year, there were 33 boats carrying 80 or more people. Assessments of the likelihood of Channel crossings are prepared for the Home Office by the Met Office. The assessments are colour-coded red, amber or green according to likelihood of activity based on environmental and other factors, including wave height, surf conditions on beaches, wind speed and direction, the chance of rain, and recent trends in conditions. Peter Walsh, a senior researcher at the Migration Observatory, said: 'There's no evidence to suggest that the weather is a major factor explaining long-term increases in small boat arrivals such as the one we've seen over the past eight months. 'It seems unlikely that the weather is much more than a short-term constraint on small boat crossings. Other factors, such as the number of people wanting to reach the UK and the number and professionalisation of smuggling gangs, are likely to be more important.' Enver Solomon, the chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: 'It's obviously correct to acknowledge that there are more crossings when there are good weather days, but it is also important to recognise that enforcement measures alone are so far not achieving the intended outcome. 'Many men, women and children taking these journeys are fleeing countries like Sudan, where war is forcing them from their homes. People do not risk their lives on a flimsy boat in the Channel unless they are running from horrors more frightening than they face in the sea.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'This government is restoring grip to the broken asylum system it inherited that saw a whole criminal smuggling enterprise allowed to develop, where gangs have been able to exploit periods of good weather to increase the rate of crossings for too long.'

Nato ‘will force Starmer to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence' to keep Trump happy
Nato ‘will force Starmer to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence' to keep Trump happy

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Nato ‘will force Starmer to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence' to keep Trump happy

Britain will be forced to sign up to a target to hike defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035 at a Nato summit later this month in a bid to appease Donald Trump, defence sources believe. On Monday Keir Starmer's bold plans to transform the UK's defences were overshadowed by a row over money after the prime minister failed to commit to a firm date to raise spending to 3% of GDP. The Labour leader was warned Britain may not be moving quickly enough to counter the rapidly growing threats from countries such as Russia. Sir Keir and other Nato leaders are also under pressure from US president Donald Trump to rapidly increase spending, to wean Europe off a dependence on Washington for military support. Now amid attempts by Nato's secretary general Mark Rutte to woo President Trump, senior defence sources say said Britain will 'without a doubt' sign up to a proposal for member countries to boost defence spending. It would involve countries agreeing to spend 3.5% on hard defence with another 1.5% on areas such as cyber, intelligence and military-related infrastructure, at a summit in the Hague in a few weeks. One senior insider said Britain would 'without a doubt' sign up, The Guardian reported. Last week Mr Rutte said: 'I assume that in The Hague we will agree on a high defence spend target of in total 5%.' He added that it would be 'considerably north' of '3% when it comes to the hard spending'. On Tuesday the defence secretary failed to rule out tax rises to make Britain 'war ready', amid concerns that the government does not have enough money to fund the plans outlined in the defence review. John Healey said the government would 'set out how we'll pay for future increases in the future' when quizzed over how Britain can afford to boost its military funding to 3 per cent. A day after Sir Keir Starmer unveiled the long-awaited defence strategic defence review, Mr Healey said he is '100 per cent confident' the target would be met — but he struggled to say how it would be paid for after economists warned that significant tax rises would be needed. The PM's official spokesman said the UK's 'commitment to Nato is unshakeable, we've always put Nato at the heart of our approach to defence.' He added: "As the prime minister said yesterday, there will always be discussions about the contribution going into Nato in the lead up to the conference." The UK is already the third highest spender in Nato in cash terms, behind just the US and Germany.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store