logo
US lawmaker question top US universities over Chinese nationals in sensitive STEM research

US lawmaker question top US universities over Chinese nationals in sensitive STEM research

Time of Indiaa day ago

Chairman John Moolenaar of the
House Select Committee
on China has sent a letter to the leaders of Carnegie Mellon, Purdue University, Stanford University, the University of Illinois, the University of Maryland, and the University of Southern California, asking for details about their policies and practices related to the enrollment of Chinese national students in advanced
STEM
programs and their engagement in federally funded research, as reported by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (SCCCP).
The letter underscores the growing dangers associated with China's deliberate attempts to leverage American universities for technological and military gains.
Intelligence officials have indicated that American campuses are vulnerable targets for espionage and intellectual property theft; however, prestigious universities continue to enroll significant numbers of Chinese nationals in crucial research programs, prioritising financial gain over the long-term national security and education of
American students
in vital fields, as stated in the SCCCP release.
Also Read:
Turbulence ahead: Elon Musk exits from DOGE, but now trouble awaits him at Tesla, SpaceX, and X
"The Chinese Communist Party has established a well-documented, systematic pipeline to embed researchers in leading US institutions, providing them direct exposure to sensitive technologies with dual-use military applications," said Chairman Moolenaar.
Live Events
"America's student visa system has become a Trojan horse for Beijing, providing unrestricted access to our top research institutions and posing a direct threat to our national security. If left unaddressed, this trend will continue to displace American talent, compromise research integrity, and fuel China's technological ambitions at our expense," as quoted by the SCCCP release.
"The United States is at a dangerous crossroads where the pursuit of short-term financial gains by academic institutions jeopardises long-term global technological leadership and national security. Our nation's universities, long regarded as the global standard for excellence and innovation, are increasingly used as conduits for foreign adversaries to illegally gain access to critical research and advanced technology. Nonetheless, too many
US universities
continue to prioritise financial incentives over the education of American students, domestic workforce development and national security," he said.
Also read:
TACO Trump: Jimmy Kimmel brutally trolls President on his show, asks 'How does it feel?'
"They do so by admitting large numbers of Chinese nationals into advanced STEM programs, potentially at the expense of qualified Americans. Accordingly, we write to request information regarding your university's policies and oversight mechanisms concerning the enrollment of Chinese national undergraduate, graduate, and PhD students, their involvement in federally funded research, and the security of sensitive technologies developed on campus," the release said.
The House Select Committee on the CCP will persist in examining how US educational institutions might be aiding the CCP's worldwide objectives and will seek policy measures to protect American technological supremacy, the announcement stated.
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why we go bonkers for fancy brands – even when it makes no sense
Why we go bonkers for fancy brands – even when it makes no sense

Economic Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Why we go bonkers for fancy brands – even when it makes no sense

Juliet's famous lament - 'What's in a name?' - questioning the value placed on names and lineage, found new relevance recently. Social media posts from Chinese manufacturers showcasing the production of high-end luxury goods in their factories - and urging consumers to buy directly from them, although without the brand label - once again highlighted the powerful psychological grip brands hold over us. Perceived value has been alluring to humans for as long as the species has existed. Things are coveted for the single and simple reason that they are coveted by others. Possession of such items gives one pleasure because of the thought that others now think they have reached some standing. Earlier, this covetousness was limited to precious metals and stones. This has now extended to brands. The dictionary defines a brand as 'a type of product made by a particular company and sold under a particular name'. This simple definition, however, only encapsulates the making and the selling - it does not touch the psychological dimension of emotions that a 'brand' generates for the brand's owners, and for those who want to be owners. For example, a wristwatch is not an object needed to tell time anymore. It is used to signal that one has arrived. If one brand signals status, then two must signal a higher one? Except if they are on the same product. I recently came across a real example. I saw a Maruti Omni mini-van sporting a Toyota logo - quite a jarring sight. It took me back to my school days in Pune, where on a 'Chor Bazaar' street in the cantonment area, you could find shoes bearing a Nike logo on one side and Adidas on the other. Now imagine a BMW with Jaguar's leaping cat gracing the hood, or a Louis Vuitton bag adorned with Chanel's interlocked area where dual brands don't cause cognitive confusion is academia. There are joint programmes offered by universities, and one can imagine a certificate with the logo of two universities. In fact, a degree that has the logo of two high-ranking colleges would be highly sought after. A similar psychological reaction is expected to an endorsement from multiple companies - say, as part of a joint training programme, especially if the entrance criteria are multiple brands don't make sense when they are on the same manufactured product. But they are coveted when they signal learning, or acquisition of complex calculus underlies our interaction with brands. An alien species studying human choices would reach these conclusions for our decision-making rules related to brands:1. Covet what others have and want.2. There's no constraint on items that can be pursued. Only rule 1 should be satisfied. These can be anything from tulip bulbs to colours on paper.3. Sometimes, one's own needs are superseded by Rule #2. 4. Show it off once it is acquired.5. Protect the label more than the product. The item loses its value if the label gets damaged - even if the product is functioning at full efficiency.6. One brand is good, two are super - but not in all instances (see above).6. Sometimes, ownership is not the goal. Acquire now to sell later at a higher value.7. Sometimes, showing off is not the goal. A concealed display is required to protect it. Just knowledge within the community that one owns it, is satisfying.8. Even though brand and label acquisition signals wealth, a direct demonstration of wealth -- such as displaying one's net worth -- is aliens might have to scratch their heads to make a logical framework that accommodates these behaviours. Even if they managed this task, they would be dumbstruck by learning what we think differentiates us from other species - that we consider ourselves rational. The writer is MD, Resonance Laboratories, Bengaluru (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. What's slowing Indian IT's AI deals? The answer is hidden in just two words. Jolt to Çelebi could turn a big gain for this Indian firm that once had deep Turkish ties Nestlé India's outgoing CEO Narayanan weathered the Maggi storm; Tiwary must tackle slowing growth Uncle Sam vs. Microsoft: Which is a safer bet to park money? ONGC squandered its future once. Can it be different this time? Will revised economic capital framework lead to higher RBI dividend to govt? These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 30% return in 1 year, according to analysts Buy, Sell or Hold: Emkay Global upgrades SAIL to buy; YES Securities sees 13% upside in VA Tech Wabag Railways stocks: Time to be contrarian; will bearish analysts go wrong again? 6 stocks, 2 with buy recos, 4 with sell recos

Tariff troubles: Voters say Donald Trump's gone too far on trade as approval rating takes a serious hit
Tariff troubles: Voters say Donald Trump's gone too far on trade as approval rating takes a serious hit

Economic Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Tariff troubles: Voters say Donald Trump's gone too far on trade as approval rating takes a serious hit

Donald Trump's approval rating is declining amid economic turmoil caused by his policies. Increased tariffs, trade wars, and rising prices have led to public frustration, particularly regarding the economy. Polls indicate significant disapproval of Trump's handling of trade, cost of living, and the overall economic situation, with a majority feeling he has gone too far with tariffs. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Rocky Return to Office Economic Challenges Sparks Public Frustration Poll Numbers Show Deepening Disapproval of Donald Trump Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tariffs Emerge as Major Pain Point FAQs After months of economic chaos in the United States , triggered by steep tariffs, trade wars, and rising prices, more and more Americans are showing resistance against US president Donald Trump as his approval rating is slipping fast, especially when it comes to the economy, according to a return to office has been rocky, since March, approval for his job performance has steadily dropped, reported Yahoo News. In March, 50% of Americans disapproved of the job he was doing, compared to 44% who approved, as per Yahoo News/YouGov poll. By April, that gap widened to 11 points. Now, in late May, only 41% of Americans approve of how Trump is handling his role, while 54% disapprove, as per Yahoo News. It's one of the lowest ratings he's seen since the end of his first term, as per the READ: Is Tesla's robotaxi a long-term threat to Uber's business model? Wedbush Securities weighs in The economic fallout appears to be a major reason. Over the past few months, Trump has made headlines with tariffs as high as 145%, sparking retaliatory moves from global allies, confusing markets, and stressing small businesses, and for Americans, it's meant rising prices on the things they buy, according to Yahoo frustrations are showing up clearly in the numbers as Trump is now 19 points underwater on the economy overall, just 37% approve of how he's handling it, while 56% disapprove, as per the poll. On trade and tariffs specifically, only 35% approve, while 57% disapprove, a 22-point gap, reported Yahoo News. On the cost of living aspect, just 32% approve of how Trump is managing it, while 59% disapprove, putting him 27 points underwater on what matters most to many households, according to the compare, back in mid-2020, during the height of the COVID-19 crisis, Trump's economic approval averaged 49%, with 45% disapproving, reported Yahoo READ: Donald Trump's next targets for immigration crackdowns revealed—here's the list Americans are feeling the impact of his trade moves as 57% say Trump has 'gone too far' in raising tariffs on imported goods, while 51% say he's gone too far in cutting the federal workforce, 49% feel he's gone too far in arresting and deporting immigrants, as per the report. The poll also found that 45% think he has gone too far in investigating his political opponents, according to the report. While, only 4% of Americans say Trump's approach to raising tariffs has 'not gone far enough,' reported Yahoo sentiment is shifting how people see the economy, in April, 35% of independents rated the economy as 'poor,' as per the poll. Now, that number has jumped to 45% and while, overall, 72% of Americans now say the economy is either 'fair' or 'poor', just 25% call it 'excellent' or 'good', reported Yahoo 41% approve of his performance, while 54% disapprove, his worst numbers since late in his first most of the frustration is focused on rising costs, trade policy, and the general economic outlook, as per the survey.

Bono's appearance on Joe Rogan show sparks outrage as Elon Musk calls him ‘liar' over shocking ‘300,000 deaths' claim
Bono's appearance on Joe Rogan show sparks outrage as Elon Musk calls him ‘liar' over shocking ‘300,000 deaths' claim

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Bono's appearance on Joe Rogan show sparks outrage as Elon Musk calls him ‘liar' over shocking ‘300,000 deaths' claim

Irish music star Bono has drawn criticism from proponents of President Donald Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) campaign after quoting an expert who suggested that 300,000 fatalities may have been caused by the administration's cuts to USAID. Elon Musk, the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), called Bono 'a liar/idiot' after he made the assertion during an interview on Joe Rogan's well-liked podcast broadcast on Friday. The second Trump administration, which came to power in January, directed to shut down USAID and even placed a halt to most international aid payments, but this move was halted in court. Critics warned the changes would affect some of the world's most disadvantaged, while supporters claimed they saved American taxpayers money that was being wasted. Also Read: Elon Musk's viral 'hallucinating' video sparks buzz on social media; 'Somebody clocked him' Bono, a founding member of U2, recently appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience and stated: 'Just recent report, it's not proven, but there's surveillance enough [to] suggest 300,000 people have already died from just this cut off, this hard cut, of USAID so there's food rotting in boats, in warehouses, this will f*** you off.' 'There is 50,000 tons of food that are stored in Djibouti, South Africa, Dubai, and wait for it Houston, Texas, that is rotting rather than going to Gaza, rather than going to Sudan, because the people who know the codes for the warehouse are fired, they're done,' he added. Bono seemed to be referring to a study by Brooke Nichols, a quantitative modeler of infectious diseases at Boston University, who found that USAID cuts could have caused 300,000 fatalities, including 200,000 children, that could have been avoided. Trump fans took to social media to express their outrage at Bono's allegation, including Elon Musk, who on Friday received a big key from the president as a token of gratitude as he resigned from the daily operations of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Regarding Bono, Musk wrote on X, 'He's such a liar/idiot. Zero people have died!' In addition, well-known conservative X pundit Catturd said: 'Elon Musk calls out low IQ moron Bono for being an idiot and a liar.' Mike Benz, executive director of the Foundation For Freedom Online advocacy group, posted a video of Bono's comments and stated, 'These USAID numbers are f***** faker than their COVID numbers.' In addition, well-known conservative X pundit Catturd said: 'Elon Musk calls out low IQ moron Bono for being an idiot and a liar.' 'Bono wants taxpayers to fund the world's problems while he ducks his own bill in Ireland. A textbook hypocrite,' one more stated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store