Cheltenham Playhouse: 'High risk' theatre will close without urgent funds
Mr Burge added: "We are trying to rebuild after a number of tough trading years."The huge gestures of financial support we have received from our community since our publicity earlier in the year have kept us going this far and allowed us to rebuild a level of financial reserve."We know that we would have had to encounter this decision a lot earlier without it. "However, we are reaching a point where we simply don't have the depth of funds to keep the doors open, particularly looking after an old building which is expensive to run and maintain."
Mr Burge said they felt there was hope for a "long-term future" for the theatre but there were more immediate money problems."The societies and groups using the theatre are regular and loyal and we can see a scenario where, with robust management going forward, we survive."What we can't get over is the short-term cash flow problem and this is leaving us in a critical situation," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Calm down, homeowners – Rachel Reeves' property tax might be an improvement
Another day, another idea that Rachel Reeves is said to be considering. It's as if the chancellor is putting suggestions out there to see what sticks. Either that, or she just wants to be seen to be busy and to let it be known she has considered all options before delivering her autumn Budget, which is when we will discover for certain. What is clear is that Reeves has a funding gap to fill, and the backdrop – of stretched national and local public services and a flatlining economy – isn't pretty. Nor too is a regime of anachronistic, complex and often unfair taxes, especially regarding homes. The latest possibility for dissection and reaction then, is a new property tax, to replace stamp duty and council tax. First up would be an annual tax to replace stamp duty on homes worth more than £500,000, to be paid by owner-occupiers. The amount charged would be based on the value of the property according to a rate set by the government; HMRC would collect payment. The annual levy would not apply to second homes because they would still be subject to stamp duty, including the 5 per cent second home surcharge. The aim of this new national property tax would be the creation of a revenue source that is more reliable and not so prone to fluctuations in the housing market as stamp duty. It would be more efficient and practical, reflective of a current Britain (stamp duty, the oldest of all taxes, was born in 1694) and, crucially, would not be such a drag on home sales. Properties in the bracket below £500,000, upwards of £250,000, would be freed. Given that the average price of a home in the UK was £272,664 according to Nationwide, most homes would be liberated, including starter homes. It would prove easier and cheaper to move house and encourage greater mobility. Inevitably, the new tax will, and is, already being criticised as another 'wealth tax'. Quickest out of the traps was Location, Location, Location presenter Kirstie Allsopp who decried the suggestion of a property tax as 'really destabilising for the property market – and when I say the property market, I mean people's homes. This government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes.' Reeves and her advisers are letting it be known that they are following a report from the centre-right (so not leftist) think tank, Onward. It was Onward that came up with the £250,000-to-£500,000 net. Under the Onward plan, the suggested annual rate above £500,000 would be 0.54 per cent, and a home worth more than £1m would pay 0.81 per cent on the portion over that limit. Important, given the state of the nation's finances, is the possibility it will not actually raise more than stamp duty. Onward's recommendation that it should not be retrospective would mean stamp duty would not be scrapped in one go, the substitute being phased in gradually. So, it is no fiscal panacea, rather a nice thing to have. Onward also recommended ditching council tax, also loathed by left and right, and introducing a local proportional property tax. It would be charged yearly to homeowners, not residents, on properties up to £500,000. Like council tax, the rate would be set by local authorities, but Onward's guide of 0.44 per cent would mean a maximum bill of £2,196 a year, payable to the council. With properties worth more than £500,000, the government will step in and take an additional 0.54 per cent, also annually, on the portion above £500,000. Out would go the outdated and flawed council tax banding system assessed on property values from 1991. It would be fairer and would allow councils to retain a strong lever over their own finances. It could head off some of the council bankruptcies that are brewing. Unfortunately, though, it too is unlikely to prove a quick fix – experts are predicting it will take a while to implement. A test for Reeves and for Sir Keir Starmer would be, given their talk of wanting to go 'further and faster' and their commitment to removing bureaucracy, is just how soon any of these changes could come on-stream. The new local tax is also not especially redistributive – poor areas would still remain disadvantaged, affluent ones would still be able to bask in their good fortune. The new, national and local property tax would enjoy another advantage, in that Britain would operate under one structure. At present, stamp duty exists in England and Northern Ireland – Wales and Scotland do it their way. This would cut across, and while it might not be popular with nationalists it would be uniform. Above all, what is under discussion, if it is Onward, bearing in mind that other think tanks have their own ideas, is more appealing than the current mess. It is true that it is not hard, that anything would be better, but this does begin to feel like genuine reform and modernisation.
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
O2 hands out FREE speed upgrade in 22 locations across UK & it's already live in four holiday hotspots
HOLIDAYING O2 customers will be able to bag a free speed upgrade at 22 locations across the UK. They're all holiday hotspots – and four of the speed boosts have already gone live. 2 O2 has vowed to upgrade 22 Haven holiday sites across the UK. It's part of what the network is calling its "Mobile Transformation Plan", promising better signal in "high-demand areas". Four sites already have O2's "improved 5G", including Thornwick Bay Holiday Park in Yorkshire and Skegness Holiday Park in Lincolnshire. And O2 says that more sites will be upgraded "this summer and early next year". "With more people choosing to holiday in the UK, we are working to improve our mobile network in some of the most popular staycation destinations," said O2's mobile access director, Dr Robert Joyce. "This work with Haven is a great example of our Mobile Transformation Plan in action. "Bringing more reliable connectivity to the places people need it most. "So whether our customers are off to Skegness, Berwick, or Cleethorpes, they can stay connected this summer." O2 is working with network giant Freshwave to upgrade the sites. Network bosses have vowed to pour £700 million into infrastructure this year to boost connectivity. Sun's tech editor shows NEW 4mm thin folding Samsung – & teases 'flip iPhone' too And O2 is upgrading Haven holiday parks due to higher demand. "Our guests and owners expect to stay connected," said Haven tech boss James Bromley. "Whether it's sharing memories, streaming entertainment, or working remotely. "I'm delighted that our investment in our parks has attracted O2 to ensure we're delivering the best possible experience to families choosing to holiday or own at our parks." Haven has 38 holiday parks across the UK, but not all of them are being upgraded – only 22 sites are getting the speed boost. Here's the full list, as sent to The Sun: Haggerston Castle Berwick Primrose Valley Blue Dolphin Thornwick Skegness Seashore Orchards Golden Sands Seton Sands Hopton Combe Haven Allhallows Thorpe Park Cleethorpes Reighton Sands Hafan y Mor Rockley Park Marton Mere Burnham Perran Sands Craig Tara Devon Cliffs Littlesea The upgrade comes just days after Vodafone and Three confirmed that they had jointly upgraded over 600 mast sites across the UK. And earlier this year, EE upgraded its speeds across 50 towns and cities. 2 O2 merged with Virgin Media back in 2021, absorbing its Virgin Mobile customers. And O2 also secured a deal with Vodafone to acquire a large 78.8MHz chunk of spectrum. That means the company holds just under a third of UK mobile spectrum, making it one of the nation's biggest network providers.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Aberdeen Raac demolition set to progress after purchase offers
Aberdeen City Council is set to push ahead with its plan to demolish dozens of homes found to have potentially dangerous had paused its proposal to knock down the majority of about 500 homes in the Balnagask area to allow residents to explore options for the future of their option, which involves replacing roofs, has had no people have accepted offers to buy their privately-owned homes, while others are still considering their valuations. Most of the affected properties are council-owned. A new Aberdeen City Council report said out of the 138 private owners - 28 had not yet engaged with the local authority. It said 76 people had asked for a valuation of their home and 70 had received offers, with two rejections so report said 34 residents were still considering the offer they had received, or have the option of swapping their home for a council property. The purchasing process, known as a voluntary acquisition, could be extended to January next year due to the level of meeting next Tuesday will be asked to agree to the resumption of planning and preparation for demolition. One resident John Meiklejohn told BBC Scotland News he was not considering voluntary described the value he had received for his property as "unfair", and is considering potential legal action against the Meiklejohn said: "The value they were giving was deducting the cost of replacing Raac in the properties."He claimed some residents would be left thousands of pounds worse off if they accepted their City Council has been approached for comment.
