
'New cotton bud'. Plastic hygiene product should be banned
Flossers join a long list of personal hygiene and other products that have littered Scotland's coastlines, including not only cotton buds, but wipes, plastic cutlery, sanitary towels, pharmaceutical blister packs, Covid masks, interdental brushes and straws.
Some, like cotton buds and straws, have been banned. But others continue to make their way into waterways, landfill and sewage systems, contributing to the rising deluge of global plastic pollution that is showing no signs of slowing.
The call comes in the run up to the final round of talks for the UN global plastics treaty, which is looking at how to tackle both plastic waste and plastic at source. This new form of waste is just one element in the rising tide of pollution driven by production levels are set to triple by 2060.
'The dental flosser may be a small, innocuous-looking item,' the letter observes, 'but single use dental flossers are being sold in multi-packs by most supermarkets and pharmacies, and they are littering our streets, parks and beaches. We have collated photo evidence of these items across Scotland, from the pristine beach of the island of Colonsay, to the city streets of Edinburgh and Glasgow, to the east coast by St Abbs."
A move like this, the authors point out, would align with the [[Scottish Government]]'s forthcoming Circular Economy Strategy, which has targets to reduce plastic production and waste, as well as the New Plastics [[Economy]] Global Commitment, which the [[Scottish Government]] signed in 2018.
A dental flosser found on the Isle of Colonsay (Image: Rachael Revesz) Concerned signatories include campaigner and social media influencer Laura Young, also known as 'Less Waste Laura', who led the campaign against disposable electric vapes and Don MacNeish, a founder of the Community of Arran Seabed Trust (COAST), one of the voices in David Attenborough's recent Ocean documentary.
Some of the signatories are clean up groups who have noticed the rise in dental flossers in litter picks. Marion Montgomery of Paws on Plastic said: 'They are something that our members find regularly on walks, in parks, on streets. Not only are they an example of unnecessary single use plastic but they also pose a potential risk to animals and an environmental hazard for generations.'
Waste from Arrochar litter sink (Image: The GRAB Trust) Beach cleaners from Scottish Coastal Clean Up observed that the flossers tended to be found "wherever we find wipes".
The letter points out that while dental flossers, also called, 'dental harps', 'may be more accessible for some people to maintain dental hygiene', there are alternative products. Even so-called 'eco flossers', it notes, are problematic since they are made from 'equally harmful bioplastics'.
'We urge policy makers to turn the tide against our throw-away culture by banning the sale of an item that is barely used for a few seconds before it spends decades, if not centuries, in landfill," the letter said.
In recent years Scotland has banned plastic straws, drink stirrers and polystyrene food containers. "We've charged a fee on plastic bags," says the letter, "and we've banned single use vapes. These have been bold moves, and they've had a remarkable impact.
READ MORE:
Scottish scientists discover new threat to marine life: sunscreen meeting plastic
'The beach crunched': Scotland's extreme beach cleans
Less than 10% of plastic produced globally comes from recycled materials – study
The problem, Ms Young pointed out, is that the flosser is just one of many single-use items contributing to wider plastic pollution, with ever more new items entering the market.
'Plastic dental flossers are yet another example of unnecessary single-use waste polluting our environment. I've seen them in towns and cities, littering streets and clogging gutters, and on our beaches, alongside other toiletry-related waste like plastic cotton buds, tampon applicators, and wet wipes.'
Progress, she noted, has already been made on some items, with bans like plastic cotton buds and straws. 'But the rest? Still polluting our environment and wasting resources.'
"It's frustrating that we continue to act only after these plastics become a visible problem. We need upstream solutions, not piecemeal bans. The United Nations Global Plastics Treaty meeting this month is a chance for us collectively to go beyond voluntary pledges and weak commitments. We need binding global action that holds corporations accountable, enforces plastic reduction targets, and redesigns the systems driving overconsumption.
"Individuals can choose better, businesses must do better, and governments must act faster and smarter. The planet can't wait."
Kat Jones, director of Action to Protect Rural Scotland, said that the ban would be a "start" but that laws are needed "to encourage and incentivise producers make responsible products."
"Producers are constantly inventing new types of throw-away item while persuading us that we can't live without them. The one-use flosser is an absolute prime example.
"Until producers can turn their skills in innovation and technical knowhow to the service of sustainability, rather than thinking of the next throw-away gimmick, we are always going to be battling waste, litter and the pollution of our seas item by item."
Personal hygiene litter collected by beach clean artist Lil Vischer (Image: Vicky Allan) The letter is also not the only one to be issued as the UN Global Plastic Treaty talks begin in Geneva, calling for action and commitment from the Scottish Government.
Another open letter to the first minister, from 18 groups including Friends of the Earth Scotland and Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, has outline the damage created by plastic, and called for the Scottish Government to act now to prevent further harm.
Kim Pratt, circular economy campaigner for Friends of the Earth Scotland said: 'We all want a future free from plastic pollution, but the Scottish Government is failing to take the actions needed to protect people and nature from the growing harms of the plastics crisis.
"Promises at an international level will only be meaningful if they are backed up with action at a local level. Industry-backed solutions, such as recycling, do not address the underlying cause of the plastics crisis – that there is too much plastic to begin with and more is being made every day.
'It doesn't have to be this way. The Global Plastics Treaty is an incredible opportunity internationally, and a chance for the Scottish Government to reset the way plastics are used in Scotland too.
'There are practical steps the Scottish Government should be taking today to halt the plastics crisis. These include immediately banning the burning of plastic waste, forcing companies to be responsible for cleaning the products they sell, and investing in reuse services.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Scotland was the first part of the UK to implement a ban on some of the most problematic single-use plastic products and we continue to work with our partners to reduce many sources of plastic pollution as possible and also to support the removal of rubbish from our seas and coastline.
'In addition, the Circular Economy (Scotland) Act 2024 increases the powers available to the Government to take action on waste in Scotland, and we are also progressing with international efforts to address major pollution sources such as plastic pellets, as well as supporting the removal of rubbish from our seas and beaches.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Clinics to need licences for Botox fillers in cosmetics crackdown
The government has announced plans to crack down on dodgy cosmetic practitioners who it says are exploiting people and causing the new proposals, only qualified health professionals will be able to carry out risky non-surgical Brazilian butt lifts (BBLs) and clinics will need to meet strict rules to obtain licences to offer fillers and will also be protected from potentially dangerous beauty trends on social media with age restrictions on certain industry has welcomed the plans, although the government says it now needs to consult further to figure out exactly how this will work in practice. There has been concern over the lack of rules in parts of the non-surgical cosmetic industry for some procedures, such as liquid BBLs, are marketed as non-surgical but are invasive and carry serious risks, experts BBLs are one of the most high-risk procedures which involve filler being injected into the buttocks to make them bigger, more rounded or lifted. Women have told the BBC of dangerous complications, pain and permanent scarring after treatment by rogue operators. In September 2024, Alice Webb is believed to have become the first person to die in the UK after receiving this unregulated government says it will bring in regulations for the most dangerous procedures first - such as breast fillers and BBLs - which means only some qualified health professionals will be able to perform on who can offer lower-risk treatments such as lip fillers, Botox and facial dermal fillers will also change. A licensing scheme run by local authorities will require practitioners to meet strict safety, training and insurance standards before they can it could still be several years before any of these measures comes into force. The plans will be subject to public consultation and must go through Parliament before they are introduced. 'Wild west' Health Minister Karin Smyth said the industry had been plagued by "a Wild West" of "cosmetic cowboys causing serious, catastrophic damage".She said the government was taking action to protect people, support honest practitioners and root out the unqualified, dangerous ones, while also reducing the costs to the NHS of fixing botched procedures."This isn't about stopping anyone from getting treatments. It's about preventing rogue operators from exploiting people at the expense of their safety." A public consultation in 2023 demonstrated widespread support for tighter regulation across the Collins, director of Save Face, a register of approved clinics and practitioners, said she had seen first hand "the devastating impact these procedures can have on the lives of victims and their families"."I am delighted that the government has recognised the significant and potentially fatal risks posed by highly dangerous procedures like liquid BBLs, and has made it a priority to implement restrictions to protect public safety."There are thought to be around 16,000 businesses involved in non-surgical cosmetic procedures, which have seen a huge boom in popularity in recent Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners (JCCP) said ensuring all cosmetic practitioners were regulated and licensed, appropriately insured and worked from safe premises had become "imperative"."These proposals have our full support and we welcome the opportunity to engage in further consultation," says JCCP executive chair Prof David Sines. Health officials are currently investigating 38 cases of poisoning following suspected fake Botox public is reminded to make sure they only use registered and qualified practitioners and use products licensed for use in Scottish government recently set out measures to improve the safety and standards of the non-surgical cosmetic procedures industry, following a consultation.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Could RFK Jr's move to pull mRNA vaccine funding be a huge miscalculation?
mRNA vaccines were heralded as a medical marvel that saved lives during the Covid pandemic, but now the US is pulling back from researching them. US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has cancelled 22 projects - worth $500m (£376m) in funding – for tackling infections such as Covid and flu. So does Kennedy - probably the country's most famous vaccine sceptic – have a point, or is he making a monumental miscalculation? Prof Adam Finn, vaccine researcher at the University of Bristol, says "it's a bit of both" but ditching mRNA technology is "stupid" and potentially a "catastrophic error". Let's unpick why. Kennedy says he has reviewed the science on mRNA vaccines, concluding that the "data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu". Instead, he says, he would shift funding to "safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate". So are mRNA vaccines safe? Are they effective? Would other vaccine technologies be better? And another question is where should mRNA vaccines fit into the pantheon of other vaccine technologies - because there are many: Inactivated vaccines use the original virus or bacterium, kill it, and use that to train the immune system - such as the annual flu shot Attenuated vaccines do not kill the infectious agent, but make it weaker so it causes a mild infection - such as the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine Conjugate vaccines use bits of protein or sugar from a bug, so it triggers an immune response without causing an infection - like for types of meningitis mRNA vaccines use a fragment of genetic code that temporarily instructs the body to make parts of a virus, and the immune system reacts to that Each has advantages and disadvantages, but Prof Finn argues we "overhyped" mRNA vaccines during the pandemic to the exclusion of other approaches, and now there is a process of adjusting. "But to swing the pendulum so far that mRNA is useless and has no value and should not be developed or understood better is equally stupid, it did do remarkable things," he says.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Nearly half of doctors in Scotland witness care failings every week
Almost half of Scotland's doctors witness patient safety being compromised at least once a week, the medical regulator has said. The General Medical Council (GMC) found that 46 per cent of clinicians north of the border see care failings weekly, a higher proportion than elsewhere in the UK. Backlogs in accident and emergency departments, resulting in thousands of patients stuck on trolleys for hours queueing for beds, are thought to be one of the issues driving potential errors. Dr Iain Kennedy, chair of the British Medical Association in Scotland, described the findings as extremely alarming and said that the doctor workforce was operating at 'dangerously low levels'. The latest GMC survey showed a reduction in the number of doctors noting safety incidents weekly in England, Wales and Northern Ireland since 2023 — but an increase in Scotland. Its report, published on Thursday, said: 'In 2024, Scotland fared worse than the UK average in some areas — most notably on patient safety.' Dr Sandesh Gulhane, a GP and health spokesman for the Scottish Conservative Party, said emergency measures such as treating patients in corridors had become routine. He added that staff did not always have access to the life-saving equipment they needed and were more prone to making mistakes because of the pressures, compromising patient safety. 'Nearly two decades of chronic SNP mismanagement has brought our health service to its knees and patients are being put in danger as a result,' he said. The GMC, which serves to protect the public by ensuring high standards of medical training and practice UK-wide, analyses staff experiences on the frontline of the NHS every year. Last year 450 doctors in Scotland participated in the survey and a total of 4,700 were involved UK-wide. Asked if they found it difficult to provide sufficient care for a patient at least once a week, 42 per cent in Scotland said they did, compared with 39 per cent in England. Across the UK 40 per cent of doctors said they had witnessed patient safety or care being compromised at least once a week — 6 per cent less than in Scotland. Clinicians in Scotland also felt less empowered to bring about improvements with 40 per cent saying they could not influence change, compared with 35 per cent for the UK as a whole. Just 37 per cent felt supported by non-medical managers, while the figure was 42 per cent UK-wide. Kennedy said: 'BMA Scotland has been warning for some time that doctor workforce provision in Scotland's NHS is at dangerously low levels, which leads to patients having to wait far too long for treatment and doctors who are stretched to breaking point.' 'There is a major question over how waiting lists can be tackled and how any extra capacity in the health service can be delivered when there are not enough consultants to keep up with current demand and while GP practices are struggling to deliver the services their patients deserve. This is a result of the devastating impact of years of underinvestment which has left many GP practices unable to take on more GPs due to a lack of funding.' He added that it was alarming to see from the survey that 22 per cent of doctors in Scotland were likely to consider moving overseas. This was compared with 27 per cent in the UK as a whole. Dame Jackie Baillie, a health spokeswoman for Scottish Labour, said: 'There are exceptional staff in our NHS who work diligently to care for patients. They are the ones raising the alarm about patient safety, so this is a wake-up call for the Scottish government who are far too complacent.' Fiona Hunter, vice-president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine Scotland, said: 'This survey is a barometer of how clinicians are feeling, and what they are experiencing at work — and it reveals a saddening and shocking reality. She said the failures were not the fault of the clinicians. 'They are battling in a struggling system, and despite their best efforts, sadly some patients are being put at risk,' she said. 'The Scottish government must listen to the voices of those in this report — and heed the alarm bells so clearly sounding. Our members, their colleagues, and our patients across the country deserve so much better.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'Patient safety is paramount and we will ensure any concerns raised by the GMC are fully considered and addressed. 'We want doctors to feel their voices are heard — our Future Medical Workforce project will collect direct feedback from physicians in the coming months to help shape future reforms in training and recruitment and ensure being a doctor is a sustainable and fulfilling career path.'