Dirco reviewing ministerial report on Hajj and Umrah for SA pilgrims
The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) is reviewing the recommendations contained in a report about the annual Hajj and Umrah pilgrimages to Saudi Arabia for South African citizens.
Dirco referred to its previous media statement dated 10 February 2023, 'Establishment of the Ministerial Committee on the Efficient Management of the Annual Hajj and Umrah Pilgrimages'.
Ministerial committee
In that statement, former international relations minister Naledi Pandor said the mandate and role of the ministerial committee was to provide strategic direction to support the efficient management of the annual Hajj and Umrah pilgrimages.
Pandor said it was also to ensure that the South African pilgrims may enjoy a well-organised pilgrimage in an appropriate system under the auspices of the relevant ministry of Hajj and Umrah in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
ALSO READ: King Salman invites Ramaphosa for state visit to Saudi Arabia
Ramaphosa and MBS
Pandor also informed the ministerial committee that President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the issue of the annual quota during his state visit to Saudi Arabia on 15-16 October 2022 with Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammad bin Salman al Saud.
Pandor also followed up with her counterpart, Faisal bin Farhan, Minister of Foreign Affairs.
The ministerial committee at the time was chaired by ambassador Ebrahim Rasool and members included Fatima Chohan, professor Mathole Motshekga, professor Anil Sooklal, ambassador Ashraf Suliman and Zeenat Adam.
Final Report
Dirco spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said the ministerial committee submitted its final report to Dirco on 30 June 2025.
'The department is currently reviewing the recommendations contained in the report and is engaging with the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities (CRL Rights Commission) to ensure alignment with constitutional and community-based principles,' he said.
New framework
The Ministry of Hajj and Umrah of Saudi Arabia recently announced a new operational framework for the facilitation of Hajj from South Africa, effective from 2026.
'Under this new model, the traditional use of licensed tour operators will be discontinued. Instead, all service contracts will be signed directly with Saudi service providers, who will assume full responsibility for service delivery within the kingdom. Coordination will be managed through the Nusuk Masar electronic platform, under the oversight of the Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah,' Phiri said.
Phiri said Dirco remains committed to providing consular support to South African nationals undertaking their religious obligations, including Hajj and Umrah and to 'maintaining the positive reputation of the Republic of South Africa in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia'.
ALSO READ: More than a million pilgrims prepare for start of Hajj on 4 June
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
9 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Pace of gender equality at tertiary education institutions painfully slow
A 2024 study at a South African university found female staff are concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. Photo: File This year, 2025, marks the 30th anniversary of International Women's Day, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, an agenda for women's empowerment. On 8 March, International Women's Day was observed under the theme 'For All Women and Girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment'. Sorry to burst the celebration bubble but, with the deadline to achieve the UN sustainable development goals just under five years away, true emancipation of women seems a distant goal. An Concerning women leaders at institutions of higher learning, the Without taking anything away from both women's achievements, it is perplexing that it took the institutions 167 and 148 years to have a woman at the helm. Several scholars have published articles about problems facing academic and support personnel in both traditional universities and universities of technology. The battle to attain gender equality at institutions of higher learning, even beyond 30 years of democracy in South Africa, is there for everyone to see. Delving into some of the scientific evidence, in their 2024 study Reforming Higher Education in South Africa by Addressing Gender Inequalities, researchers Anri Wheeler and Laurika Wiese identified the absence of ' Their research article, published in the Journal of Adult and Continuing Education , shows that the policy vacuum perpetuates the marginalisation of female students and personnel. The study was conducted with female employees from varied staff components at a university of technology and they applied the Gender and Development Theory, which asserts that 'genuine economic and social progress is hindered as long as gender inequalities endure'. Some of the study's key findings highlight the preference of some males for working only with colleagues of the same gender. Meanwhile, female staff remained concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. The results also highlight that the selection of female staff into higher positions often serves only to comply with filling of quotas — a tick-box exercise. Even more disturbing, some participants confirmed the existence of a 'band of brothers' mentality in institutions — a group of male colleagues indifferent to working with females and, in many instances, treating them with disrespect based on gender. Furthermore, one of the themes emanating from the study is female stereotyping, where female colleagues are undermined by labels such as 'emotional' because of their gender. The study indicates that universities can help to reduce inequities and create a more inclusive and diverse learning and working environment by addressing gender discrepancies in academic and professional contexts. Wheeler and Wiese affirm that by espousing sustainable development goal 5, higher learning institutions can simultaneously contribute to attainment of other goals such as poverty eradication; quality education; decent work and economic growth reduced inequalities. A 2022 study, Workplace Bullying and Its Implications for Gender Transformation in the South African Higher Education Sector: An Intersectional Perspective by Brightness Mangolothi and Professor Peliwe Mnguni is relevant in helping us find ways to fasttrack gender transformation. They employed qualitative semi-structured interviews wherein they targeted a sample of 25 women academics from three universities. Their research article, published in the International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies , makes a link between Mangolothi and Mnguni listed bullying behaviours directed at women such as excessive workload allocation, removal of key areas of responsibility and being given trivial tasks to replace their core duties. The researchers summarise women's academic journey through a model anchored in the elements of access, retention, development, performance, progression and exit through resignation. The authors' research findings are aligned to identified themes and point to bullying mostly affecting African, coloured and Indian women academics. Key findings include access being denied and resources withheld; not being seen or heard; shifting goalposts; recognition withheld and authorisation denied for women at institutions of higher learning. Mangolothi and Mnguni's study shows that there is a 'boys club' culture, where men support each other in bullying women, undermining and excluding them from decision-making structures. South Africa continues to grapple with the triple developmental challenges of poverty, inequality and unemployment, with women seemingly the most negatively affected. Amid the research concluding there is gender inequality, the question is whether there is a will to address the patriarchy's negative impact across society and the workplace — or will women emancipation remain an elusive dream? Shalate Davhana & Malesela Maubane are Tshwane University of Technology alumni, with the former a staff member at the university. They write in their personal capacities.
The Citizen
39 minutes ago
- The Citizen
National Dialogue has big gaps in it
A properly managed national dialogue, which could be an inclusive participatory exercise for all groups, would be beneficial. With so many top leaders and prominent South Africans boycotting the National Dialogue, it risks losing credibility if it continues in its current form, says an expert. He added that President Cyril Ramaphosa should listen to the dissatisfied leaders and review the process. Mbeki's vision: Civil society at the helm Political economy analyst Daniel Silke said instead of forging ahead, President Cyril Ramaphosa should review or reconstitute it to bring everybody on board. He said at the core of it all was widespread dissatisfaction with President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership – both within and outside of the ANC. Former president Thabo Mbeki, who first floated the idea of a National Dialogue, indicated during a special congress of the SA Communist Party in December last year that he expected Ramaphosa would merely announce the process, while civil society would occupy the front seat 'for the first time'. Mbeki said the process would be different to the Convention for a Democratic South Africa, which was initiated and dominated by political parties and the elite. ALSO READ: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans Foundations and key players boycott National Dialogue The multi-stakeholder two-day national convention, which kicked off the National Dialogue, commenced on Friday in Pretoria, despite a stay away by six legacy foundations belonging to prominent anti-apartheid stalwarts, along with the FW de Klerk Foundation. The foundations, which cited rushing and centralising of the process by Ramaphosa, demanded that it should be led by civil society or citizens themselves. They were later joined by the Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation, which pulled out but cited that its mandate had nothing to do with pursuing political projects. Motlanthe was quoted by the Sunday Times as saying: 'We work in accordance with the deed of trust and the foundation's work.' Among other boycotters were the DA and Freedom Front Plus. Non-participation by these parties meant most whites have no voice in a dialogue on their country's future. Several other parties were not at the event. ALSO READ: Still no confirmation on cost of controversial National Dialogue Ramaphosa unshaken by absentees At the gathering, Ramaphosa seemed unperturbed by the senior leaders' absence, emphasising the significance of his role in the process, saying he has to be 'allowed to be the president'. This was seen as a broadside against Mbeki, whom some accused of trying to outshine Ramaphosa. Silke, said the credibility of dialogue is bound to be undermined since it was being boycotted by to crucial players in the political setup. 'This is a botched attempt at something that could have been beneficial to SA,' Silke said. ALSO READ: The credibility of the National Dialogue is at stake Dialogue perceived as ANC-controlled A properly managed national dialogue, which could be a 'listening exercise' for the government and an inclusive participatory exercise for all groups, would be beneficial. But the process had clearly been seen as an attempt by the ANC to steer the discourse. Silke added: 'What is astonishing is that ANC-linked organisations are increasingly frustrated with the style of leadership of Ramaphosa and the way his ANC is steering South Africa. 'It seems the ANC cannot rely on the veterans any more to provide it with support. It seems it's free for all on all sides of the ANC in terms of self-criticism and very publicly so.' Political analyst Dr George Tsibani backed the view that Mbeki should give Ramaphosa a chance as president to lead the process. READ NEXT: National Dialogue: Concerns about financial transparency and hotel bookings for delegates
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
SACP defends SANDF chief Maphwanya over his Iran comments
JOHANNESBURG - The South African Communist Party(SACP) has hit back at critics of defence force chief, Rudzani Maphwanya, for his remarks during a recent visit in Iran. Maphwanya was at the centre of a diplomatic storm last week, when Iranian media reported that he appeared to publicly co-sign South Africa to stronger political and military ties with Tehran. It's understood that he said that Iran's military had significant capabilities that could be used in cooperation with the South African armed forces to serve mutual national interests and enhance regional and international security. READ: Presidency says action will be taken against SANDF's Maphwanya over his Iran comments Despite mounting pressure to account for his comments, the SACP has come to out in defence of Maphwanya. A few months ahead of his retirement, South African National Defence Force chief, Maphwanya, is now facing calls to step down over his comments. The SACP has since come out batting for him in what the party labelled as anti-Iran hysteria and geopolitical hypocrisy. In a statement released at the weekend, the SACP said that South Africa's ties with Iran were not out of the ordinary. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) distanced itself from Maphwanya's comments, saying they did not reflect South Africa's foreign policy. President Cyril Ramaphosa called Maphwanya's comments ill-advised. The SACP said thats government's muddled response was concerning, accusing government of scapegoating the SANDF chief. It said that giving into the whims of Iran's foes to appease other countries sets a bad precedent.
