Punjab and Haryana HC slams delay in parole case, says prisoners are not ‘second-class citizens'
Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, who passed the order on July 9, said, 'It is deeply concerning that state agencies display such laxity in dealing with applications for temporary release. The administration cannot truly comprehend the value of liberty as perceived by a prisoner, who lives its absence every single day.'
The petitioner, Jaspal Singh alias Jassa, is serving a 10-year sentence under the NDPS Act for a 2020 case in Ferozepur. He applied for eight weeks of parole in September last year to care for his mother, who suffers from age-related illnesses, and to reunite briefly with his two children. But despite nearly 10 months passing, the application remained undecided, prompting him to move the High Court.
Justice Brar said the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, was humanitarian in spirit and must not be reduced to a 'paper ritual.' Citing the Supreme Court's landmark 1978 ruling in Sunil Batra vs. Delhi Administration, he noted, 'Convicts are not, by mere reason of the conviction, denuded of all the fundamental rights which they otherwise possess.'
The judge also pointed to earlier High Court judgments that fixed timelines for such decisions, including Joginder Singh vs. State of Punjab and Mahammad Shehbaz vs. State of Punjab.
Appearing for Singh, Advocate Lakhwinder Singh Lakhanpal argued that the inaction had caused mental agony to the prisoner and his family. The state, represented by Additional Advocate General Subhash Godara, admitted the parole file was still awaiting a police report before the District Magistrate could act.
Disposing of the petition, the court not only ordered the DM to take a final call on Singh's application within two weeks but also laid down a broader rule: all parole pleas must be decided within four months. Failure to do so without valid reasons could invite contempt proceedings, the judge warned.
The High Court has also directed that a copy of the order be sent to the legal representatives of Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to ensure compliance across the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Former Auroville chairman reviews progress of development projects in international township
Karan Singh, former chairman of the Auroville Foundation, has commended the progress made on the Crown Road project and the Matrimandir lake redevelopment during a recent visit to the international township. According to a press note from Auroville, Mr. Singh during his visit noted that these developments were 'milestones in Auroville's continued evolution' in the tenure of Jayanti S. Ravi, Secretary, Auroville Foundation and Gujarat Additional Chief Secretary. The former chairman also held meetings with a range of key stakeholders during which Ms. Ravi elaborated on the efforts taken to strengthen the relationship between Auroville and Sri Aurobindo Ashram through the newly-introduced 'Honorary Aurovillians' programme. Currently, four individuals from Sri Aurobindo Ashram have been inducted, with plans to expand the initiative in the months ahead. The gathering featured meaningful discussions centered on Sri Aurobindo's philosophy, with participants sharing insights through question-and-answer sessions. In his message to the youth of Auroville and the bio-region, Mr. Singh urged them to move beyond enjoyment of freedom to take up active responsibility in nation-building. As a goodwill gesture, Mr. Singh presented a book to the Auroville Foundation Secretary. The meeting also included readings from 'Savitri,' Sri Aurobindo's epic spiritual poem, fostering deeper connections between Auroville's mission and its foundational principles. G. Seetharaman, OSD (Officer on Special Duty), Auroville Foundation, Lalit Verma, founder of Aurodhan art gallery, members of Auroville bodies and devotees from Sri Aurobindo Ashram participated, the press note said.
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Navi Mumbai land scam allegations: Shirsat claims innocence, calls it a publicity stunt by Rohit Pawar
Two days after Opposition Nationalist Congress Party (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar alleged land scam worth Rs 5,000 crore by Social Justice minister and Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Shirsat, the minister claimed innocence, calling it a 'publicity stunt'. 'Some people make allegations to remain in the limelight. They lack evidence to back their claims. They expect reaction to their allegations so that a controversy is created,' Shirsat said, without naming anyone. He claimed that the officials of CIDCO have already answered to the allegations and no wrongdoing has been committed. Pawar accused Shirsat of illegally handing over 15 acres of prime land in Navi Mumbai worth Rs 5,000 crore to a particular family during his tenure as the chairman of City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) in the previous government led by Shinde. On Wednesday, an all-party protest was held at CIDCO office in Navi Mumbai, demanding the rollback of land transfer decision. According to CIDCO officials, the decision was taken as per the directions of urban development department (UDD), which was led by then CM Eknath Shinde. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has already said that the Opposition should make the allegations backed by evidence. 'I never speak anything without evidence. I request CM Fadnavis to give me an appointment where I will submit all the evidence to him. I am sure that after going through the documents, the CM himself will throw him out of the cabinet,' said Pawar. He said that since Shirsat has replied to the allegations and says that there is no evidence, he was ready to give papers to Shirsat as well. According to Pawar, the story dates back to the British era when one Bivalkar family was awarded more than 4,000 acres of land for helping the British against the Maratha Empire in 15 villages of present day Roha, Panvel, Alibaug and Uran tehsils. 'By claiming it as a personal gift, the lands were first saved from Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952 and later prior to land ceiling act in 1961, registering lands as reserved forest. However, in 1975, the Maharashtra Private Forest Acquisition Act came, in which their entire land went to the government. In 1985, the Bivalkar family objected to the Private Forest Acquisition Act, which the collector rejected in 1989. In 1990, they went to the High Court. In 2010, another appeal was filed, which was clubbed. In October 2014, the High Court ruled in favour of the Bivalkar family. After coming to know about it in 2015, the government appealed in the Supreme Court and the order was stayed,' Pawar had explained. 'Despite CIDCO reports against giving 12.5 per cent land to the family, Sanjay Shirsat cleared the file in his first meeting as CIDCO chairman whereby giving 61,000 square metre land with market value of Rs 5,000 crore and a tripartite agreement on 8,000-square metre land has already been signed,' Pawar had alleged.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Bureaucracy that forgets the people forgets its purpose, says Kerala High Court
Reminding that a humane touch is necessary in every administrative act of bureaucrats and that 'the bureaucracy that forgets the people forgets its purpose', the Kerala High Court has discharged a person who had been charged under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code with 'assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty'. The case pertains to an alleged incident in which the son-in-law (the revision petitioner in the case) of a 76-year-old man was charged by a Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Kollam. His father-in-law had contacted the office of the tahsildar to have three cents of property mutated in his name in the revenue records. The tahsildar was reportedly reluctant to do so, citing technical reasons. At a hearing was scheduled in the office of the tahsildar, the revision petitioner and his father-in-law requested action on the file, which was pending for about one-and-a-half years. A quarrel with the tahsildar resulted. A criminal case was registered against the revision petitioner and he was charged with entering the cabin and uttering obscene words, snatching the office file from the section clerk, and throwing the file and plastic chairs in the room, thereby obstructing the tahsildar's duty. The magistrate ordered that the petitioner had to face trial under Section 353 of the IPC, following which he filed the criminal revision petition before the High Court. His lawyer submitted that, even if the entire allegations are accepted, the offence under Section 353 of IPC is not made out. The public prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the ingredients of Section 353 IPC are made out. 'No criminal offence' Passing the order discharging the revision petitioner, Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan observed that his actions ought to have been avoided. However, it seemed that his actions could be attributed to the plight of his aged father-in law. It was a sudden reaction and no criminal offence was made out. 'Red tape creates unpleasant situations. In the present case, if the officials had adopted a pragmatic approach, the incident could have been avoided. That is why it is often said that bureaucracy should serve democracy, not be its master. It is often said that every file has a face, and every decision has a consequence. Every decision made in an office affects a life outside of it,' the court said.
