This will ‘devastate scientific research': 16 states sue the Trump administration over National Science Foundation directive
Attorneys general from 16 mostly Democrat-controlled US states filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration Wednesday, arguing that some of the federal government's attempts to gut National Science Foundation research programs are illegal.
The suit, filed in federal court Wednesday afternoon, asks a judge to put a stop to NSF policies that are halting millions of dollars' worth of research spending.
The move comes after the NSF announced in April that it would do away with hundreds of grants — mostly related to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA) and misinformation research — that amounted to more than $230 million. The cancellations have mounted since then, so far affecting a total of 1,753 grants worth nearly $1.4 billion across numerous areas of research, according to NSF data.
Neither the National Science Foundation nor the White House responded to a request for comment.
The agency also announced a new policy in May that caps how much researchers can spend on 'indirect costs,' which include operating expenses such as the use of laboratories, safety programs and equipment, at 15%. (The cap is currently on hold through June 13, pending a legal hearing.)
The attorneys general argue such a policy would 'slash millions of dollars for groundbreaking scientific research across the country, jeopardizing national security, the economy, and public health,' according to a news release from New York State Attorney General Letitia James.
The coalition's lawsuit also argues that the Trump administration's efforts to shutter research related to diversity is illegal. The NSF 'has a Congressionally-mandated focus on improving diversity in STEM fields,' according to the news release from James' office. 'Congress has instructed in law that a 'core strategy' of NSF's work must be to increase the participation of people who have historically been left out of STEM occupations.'
A federal law states that the National Science Foundation should work to increase the 'participation of women and individuals from underrepresented groups in STEM.'
The new lawsuit argues that recent NSF directives 'violate the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution by unlawfully changing NSF policy and ignoring Congress's intent for how NSF should function,' according to the news release. 'The lawsuit seeks a court order ruling NSF's new policies are illegal and blocking them from being implemented.'
The National Science Foundation is a $9 billion agency charged with advancing discoveries across the scientific spectrum, largely by evaluating the scientific merit of grant requests and doling out dollars, mostly to universities and other research institutions.
The agency's staff has been asked in recent weeks to ensure funding requests comply with Trump's executive orders that have sought to dismantle DEIA-related activities and a 'free speech' directive that argues efforts to combat misinformation can be 'used to infringe on the constitutionally protected speech rights of American citizens across the United States.'
Many researchers, stakeholders, and institutions that work with the NSF have decried the new policies.
The Federation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences, for example, said in an April 24 statement that the Trump administration's directives have put scientists in the 'middle of a political tug-of-war, wasting valuable time and resources.'
Former NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan, who was tapped to lead the agency during Trump's first term, also resigned in late April — 16 months before his term was set to end.
'I believe I have done all I can to advance the critical mission of the agency and feel that it is time for me to pass the baton to new leadership,' Panchanathan said on April 24 in parting remarks, which were provided to CNN by an agency spokesperson.
The White House has proposed a sweeping 55% budget cut for the NSF, and the agency could face sweeping layoffs.
The coalition of states suing the Trump administration over NSF changes include New York, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Wisconsin and Washington.
The lawsuit mirrors another filed May 5 by 19 states and Washington, DC, against the Trump administration for allegedly taking 'a wrecking ball to the Department of Health and Human Services.'
The Trump administration had in late March announced plans to cut some discretionary federal health spending and transform several health agencies. The restructuring plans include consolidating the 28 agencies of HHS into 15 new divisions, including the Administration for a Healthy America.
The lawsuit over the HHS changes alleges that the impacts of the restructuring already have been harmful, leading to the shutdown of some regional HHS offices that provide services to low-income families, children with disabilities, youth experiencing homelessness and preschool development programs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
21 minutes ago
- CBS News
State Department cable instructs embassies worldwide to relay U.S. is "not involved" in "unilateral" Israeli strikes on Iran
The U.S. State Department has issued a directive to all of its embassies and consular posts to, "at their discretion," relay or reiterate to their host governments that the United States "is not involved in Israel's unilateral action against targets in Iran and did not provide tanker support," according to a source familiar with its contents. In a communication known as an ALDAC cable — referring to All Diplomatic and Consular Posts — that the source described to CBS News, the department also noted that the United States "remains committed to a diplomatic resolution to the Iran nuclear issue." The cable stressed embassies should communicate to their international counterparts that the "safety and security of all American citizens remains the top priority for the U.S. government," and that "no government, proxy or independent actor should target American citizens, bases, or infrastructure," also adding, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon." "The U.S. military remains in a defensive posture to protect U.S. personnel, forces, and infrastructure in the region and to minimize casualties, particularly amid the persistent threat posed by Iranian ballistic missiles," excerpts of the cable said, according to the source. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The internal directive comes amid intensifying waves of assaults by Israel and Iran, whose capital city of Tehran was bombarded on Sunday as the fighting began entering a fourth day. More than 220 Iranians and at least 14 Israelis have been killed in the clashes since they began, according to local authorities. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday that the United States "is a partner in these attacks and must take responsibility." In a security alert issued Sunday, the U.S. State Department announced that its embassies and consulates in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv would remain closed on Monday, in compliance with Israel Home Front Command Guidance. It urged all U.S. government employees and their family members to continue sheltering in place until further notice. Asked as he was departing Washington, D.C., for the Group of 7, or G7, Summit in Canada how the U.S. was working to de-escalate the conflict, President Trump told reporters on Sunday, "I think it's time for a deal, and we'll see what happens." He said the U.S. would continue to support Israel in its defense, with American officials confirming military forces have been operating by land, sea and air to intercept Iranian missiles. In an earlier social media post, Mr. Trump said if U.S. interests were attacked by Iran, "the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before." Mr. Trump's statements came as previously announced nuclear talks between the United States and Iran were called off. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff had been slated to travel to Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of direct and indirect negotiations. Iran told mediators in Qatar and Oman it would not negotiate "while under attack," a source with knowledge of the communication told CBS News. —Claire Day contributed reporting
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Early voting election guide, key dates, hours
The Brief Early voting in the 2025 New York City primary elections is already showing strong participation across all five boroughs. NYC uses ranked choice voting: You can rank up to five candidates instead of picking just one. Primary Day is June 24: Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. with early voting running daily until June 22. NEW YORK CITY - Early voting in the 2025 New York City primary elections is already showing strong participation across all five boroughs. According to unofficial data from the NYC Board of Elections, as of the close of polls on day two (Sunday) of early voting, a total of 66,361 voters had checked in. Skip to: How to vote | Key dates | Ranked choice | Results The breakdown by borough is as follows: Manhattan 21,565 Brooklyn 23,637 Queens 13,823. The Bronx 5,170. Staten Island 2,166 These numbers reflect cumulative check-ins and underscore the critical role early voting plays in the city's election process. Here's everything you need to know about voting in New York City this election cycle. You can vote in person during early voting or on Primary Day. You can also vote by absentee ballot. Absentee ballots must be postmarked by June 24 and received by July 1. June 22: Last day to vote early. June 23: Final day to register to vote in person at your local board of elections. June 24: Primary Election Day. Polls open 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. Vote at your assigned site. This is also the deadline to return early voting or absentee ballots. Mail ballots must be postmarked by June 24. You can check your registration status or register to vote online here. To find your local poll site, click here. Saturday, June 14: 9 a.m. to 5 June 15: 9 a.m. to 5 June 16: 9 a.m. to 5 June 17: 10 a.m. to 8 June 18: 10 a.m. to 8 June 19: 9 a.m. to 5 June 20: 8 a.m. to 4 June 21: 9 a.m. to 5 June 22: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Ranked choice voting is used in primary and special elections for mayor, public advocate, comptroller, borough president and City Council. Voters approved this system in 2019. Here's how it works You can rank up to five candidates in order of preference. Your first-choice vote is counted first. If a candidate gets more than 50 percent of first-choice votes, they win. If no one reaches that threshold, the last-place candidate is eliminated and those votes are redistributed to the next highest-ranked candidate on each ballot. This process continues until only two candidates remain and the one with the most votes wins. You may rank up to five candidates, but you are not required to rank all five. Only rank candidates you support. You can vote for just one person if you want. Do not rank the same candidate more than once. Only select one candidate per column, for first choice, second choice, and so on. For example, your first choice is your top pick. Your second choice is your backup. Then follow with third, fourth and fifth if desired. On election night, results will only show first-choice votes from early voting, in-person voting and processed absentee ballots. Preliminary ranked choice tabulations will be released one week after election day. Updates will be shared weekly as absentees, affidavits and cured ballots are counted. Final results will be certified after all ballots have been processed. The general election is Tuesday, Nov. 4, this year. Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. Early voting runs from Oct. 25 through Nov. 2. Saturday, Oct. 25, is the last day to register to vote in person. Mail-in registration applications must also be received by Oct. 25. Make sure to register on time, know your polling location and understand how your ballot works.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Australia's Albanese says he will press AUKUS, Indo Pacific security in Trump meeting
By Kirsty Needham SYDNEY (Reuters) -Increasing the number of nuclear powered submarines operated by Australia, Britain and the United States will make the Indo Pacific more secure and was in the United States' interests, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Monday. Albanese will meet U.S. President Donald Trump for the first time on Tuesday in Calgary on the sidelines of the G7 meeting, with tariffs and Washington's snap review of the AUKUS treaty to transfer nuclear submarines to Australia weighing on the talks. "Having Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States all having increased nuclear-powered submarines, in our case conventionally armed, is something that will make the Indo Pacific area more secure," Albanese told reporters in Calgary. "That is in the interests of the United States," he added. Albanese said he will highlight to Trump the financial support Australia is providing to the U.S. industrial capacity to build new submarines under AUKUS, the access the U.S. submarine fleet will gain to maintenance yards in Australia, and the existing U.S. military presence in Australia's northern city of Darwin. Australia was a trusted U.S. partner in the Pacific region to promote peace and security, he said. Albanese has rebuffed a U.S. request to commit to lifting defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product, saying instead Australia would spend what was needed for its defence capability. Around 10% of Australia's steel and aluminium is exported to the United States, and Albanese said he would also raise the issue of Trump's tariffs on the sector, which Australia views as "acts of economic self harm". "Exports are still going in there, they are just paying more for them," he told reporters. Albanese met with Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney on Monday, and said they had discussed Canada's interest in joining AUKUS's so-called Pillar Two to develop advanced defence technology. Australia wants to increase its defence relationships, including with Canada which was a long-term ally with shared values, Albanese said. "In an uncertain world what people are looking for is certainty, relationships, trusted relationships, Australia and Canada are just such partners," he said. Albanese will also hold talks with the EU on a proposed defence pact, and seek progress on EU free trade talks. An annual poll by the Lowy Institute think-tank released on Monday showed falling public sentiment in Australia towards the United States, with 36 per cent of people surveyed saying they trust the United States to act responsibly, a 20-point drop since last year. The poll showed two-thirds of respondents supported AUKUS.
