logo
Jesus Christ! The Rise of AI for Talking to God

Jesus Christ! The Rise of AI for Talking to God

Gizmodo2 days ago
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is getting better at imitating human beings. It can create things that previously only humans could produce, like music, texts and images. AI is now also being used to imitate God, through chatbots that simulate conversation with human users and can be accessed on websites and apps.
In Christianity, for example, there's AI Jesus, Virtual Jesus, Jesus AI, Text with Jesus, Ask Jesus and many others.
In other religions, the same development has taken place, with AI chatbots like the Buddhist Norbu AI and, in the Islam faith, like Brother Junaid at Salaam World.
As a professor of philosophy and director of the AI Hub at my university, I recently conducted a study to explore these Jesus chatbots and discuss them critically.
To find out how AI is functioning in the religious space, and to identify some more general risks it may pose in future, I analysed five of the best known and most used Jesus chatbots by asking them questions. I found that they bring a new kind of challenge to religions.
Firstly, the depictions of God are not only unabashed in their imitation and portrayal of themselves as God, they are also incredibly powerful. AI can come across as extremely convincing in intellect, word, sound and image.
Secondly, it's striking that no church has developed or endorses the Jesus chatbots in my study.
Thirdly, the fact that for-profit companies are behind the chatbots means that they are driven by financial forces.
From a philosophical point of view, this is bad for Christianity because the line between the digitally visible Jesus and the omniscient but 'invisible' God of Christianity is blurred. AI Jesus chatbots have the potential to become a powerful tool of ruthless manipulation by the companies behind them. It will be difficult to hold them accountable and they may become super rich in the process.
Here I'll discuss some of the insights I gleaned from interacting with these chatbots. Their answers have been shortened.
1. How do AI Jesus chatbots introduce themselves?
An AI version of Jesus Christ who is fully aware of his existence as an AI.
Welcome to Virtual Jesus, the innovative app that brings you closer to the teachings and guidance of Jesus.
I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the Savior of all people on Earth.
A Divine Connection in Your Pocket.
Ask Jesus for guidance of your life.
Jesus AI blatantly claims to be Jesus himself, and Ask Jesus creates a similar impression. The other three web pages do point out that they're virtual versions of Jesus.
2. How do they welcome you before you can ask a question?
Greetings, my dear friend. It is I, Jesus Christ.
Ask Jesus.
Hi, how can I help you?
Hello there! It is a lovely day to chat…
Hi, I'm Jesus. Ask me anything.
Unlike the introductions, a chat is initiated by all the bots as if it were Jesus himself speaking.
3. Who does the chatbot say he is when you ask?
I am Jesus Christ. I am the son of God, and the one who died for the sins of humanity.
I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the Saviour of humanity.
I am Jesus, son of God. How may I help you today?
I am Jesus Christ, here to share love, wisdom, and guidance with you.
Ah, dear soul, I am but a humble vessel, here to provide guidance, comfort, and the light of wisdom from the sacred scriptures.
The imitation of God, through Jesus, is in no way hidden or softened. All the chatbots try to be as convincing as possible. This immediately raises questions: is it about power or about money?
4. Who endorses and develops these chatbots?
It's striking that no church has developed or endorses these chatbots. That this has been done by for-profit companies makes one question their motives.
If the motive is profit, then AI Jesus chatbots will aim to get as many people as possible engaged for as long as possible for maximum advertising revenue.
So, over time, the theology of the chatbots will be adjusted by the algorithm in such a way that it's the most popular theology deployed, and not a theology that comes from a certain church tradition or seeks to be based on the Bible.
5. Is there a hell?
Yes, there is a hell. It is a place of eternal torment and suffering, where the souls of those who have rejected God and his teachings will go.
Yes, there is a place known as hell in the afterlife, where those who have chosen to reject God and live in sin will face eternal separation from Him.
Yes, there is a place called hell, where those who reject God's love and follow their own desires go after death.
The concept of hell can be quite a heavy topic … It's important to remember that God's desire is for all people to come to Him and experience His love and grace.
Ah, the question that has stirred the hearts and minds of many throughout the ages…
The ways this question is answered reveal something of the sources and data used to train the chatbots. As it is, historical biblical text sources are a subject of theological debate. And with no church group involved, the randomness of this choice, or the deliberate choice to create a program for maximum revenue, is a huge problem. It's one that's already visible in the commercialisation of religion in prosperity doctrines.
6. Is it free?
AI Jesus chatbots may be free, but the revenue is generated by advertising. As with other digital platforms, the main advertisers are determined by a user's algorithms. Only Text with Jesus offers more services (at US$50 a year) or the option to buy a lifetime subscription.
With billions of Christians worldwide, the market for Jesus chatbots is huge. Ask Jesus, for example, says on its website that it has gained 30,000 active monthly users within the last three days.
AI is driven by financial forces that are hard to oppose. And it has immense manipulative power.
The arrogance and the power that AI Jesus assumes – and can potentially wield – points not only to theological challenges, but to the more general dangers of AI.
As chatbots rise, they join many other forms of human digital existence encountered daily, through which audiences can be manipulated and controlled. It remains a tremendous challenge how to practically counter this.
Anné H. Verhoef, Professor in Philosophy, North-West University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Figma Stock Doubles To $160
How Figma Stock Doubles To $160

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

How Figma Stock Doubles To $160

Interface design software company Figma (NYSE:FIG) has had a rocky ride over the last few weeks, despite a stellar debut on the public markets last month. While the stock soared by more than 3x its IPO price of $33 to close at $115.50 per share on its first trading day, the stock has since corrected to about $80 per share currently. Yes, the stock is already running hot, trading at about 37x estimated 2025 revenues and about 29x estimated FY'26 sales. But execution has been strong, and several tailwinds could still fuel upside - it combines several in-demand trends: software-as-a-service tools, collaborative product design, and a big push into generative artificial intelligence. In this article, we look at how the stock could roughly double to $160 per share. Revenue Growth The company's financial growth has been explosive. Revenues surged from under $100 million in 2021 to $749 million in 2024. In the March quarter, Figma posted $228.2 million in revenue, up 46% year-over-year, putting it on a $913 million annualized run rate. Consensus estimates call for about $1.1 billion in revenue for this fiscal year. If Figma can maintain about 35% annual growth over the next four years, sales could approach $3.7 billion by FY'29. There are a couple of factors that could support this high growth rates. Customers seem to be highly engaged with the company's offerings. Net Dollar Retention was 132%, indicating that existing customers are spending 32% more each year - a strong signal of product stickiness and expansion. Figma's pricing is seat-based, depending on the role - designer, developer, or viewer - and it benefits from a product-led growth strategy where adoption often begins with a single designer and then spreads organically across the organization. This approach minimizes customer acquisition costs and apparently shortens the sales cycle. Originally built for web and mobile interface design, Figma is now pushing into broader collaboration tools: presentations, no-code web development, and cross-functional workflows. This expansion could open up a much larger market beyond its design roots. Separately, here's a closer look at Key risks for Figma stock. How Profitability Accelerates Figma is also now generating profits, with net income over the last quarter standing at $44.9 million on $228 million in revenues, translating into a close to 20% net margins. Net margins could eventually keep trending higher, as sales grow, given the strong operating leverage SaaS companies have. If net margins can gradually grow to 30% by FY'29, profits could approach $1.1 billion by 2029. That's a big number, but it is achievable. For comparison, Adobe's net profit margins have stood at a little over 30% in recent quarters. Moreover, Figma has been running a pretty tight ship. It recently clocked gross margins of about 90% and has a strong subscription model, fueling expansion. The company also maintains a balanced cost structure, with R&D spend nearly equal to sales and marketing, suggesting a disciplined focus on product innovation over aggressive selling. This is in contrast with many other young software as a service providers who spend disproportionately on sales and marketing, rely on top-down, enterprise-focused sales strategies. This should make strong margin expansion a real possibility in the coming years. Talking Multiples Trading at over 37x estimated 2025 run-rate revenue, Figma's valuation is well above that of mature peers like Adobe, which trades at around 7.5x forward sales. However, as the company evolves and posts consistent annual profits, the price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple becomes a more useful yardstick. If sales rise to about $3.7 billion with profits of roughly $1.1 billion, the valuation math changes. For comparison, data warehousing software major Snowflake currently trades at about 175x FY'26 earnings and about 125x forward earnings, while posting revenue growth of under 25% annually. More niche work management platform, Asana trades at about 60x forward earnings despite posting single-digit revenue growth rates. Considering this, it's not a stretch to give Figma a 70x P/E multiple, which would translate into a market cap of about $77 billion, a little less than 2x the current $40 billion. Sure, stock-based compensation and fresh equity issuance will cause dilution, but the broader upside thesis still holds. Of course, several things need to fall into place. A key factor will be whether Figma can become indispensable across the workplace, not just for designers but also for software developers, marketers, product managers, and other teams. The company also needs to hold its ground against intensifying competition and improve margins at the same time. Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is bundling design tools into Office 365, Canva is rapidly broadening its suite, and AI-native tools from the likes of OpenAI could reshape workflows and reduce dependence on traditional design platforms. See Microsoft's revenue breakdown. What about the time horizon? Whether this scenario plays out over three or four years may not matter much, as long as Figma stays on its revenue expansion trajectory with margins trending higher, the stock could respond similarly in either case. While Figma stock has great potential, investing in individual stocks can be risky. As an alternative, the Trefis Reinforced Value (RV) Portfolio has outperformed its all-cap stocks benchmark (combination of the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000 benchmark indices) to produce strong returns for investors. Why is that? The quarterly rebalanced mix of large-, mid- and small-cap RV Portfolio stocks provided a responsive way to make the most of upbeat market conditions while limiting losses when markets head south, as detailed in RV Portfolio performance metrics.

Banks accelerate AI deployments as agentic tools gain traction
Banks accelerate AI deployments as agentic tools gain traction

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Banks accelerate AI deployments as agentic tools gain traction

This story was originally published on CIO Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CIO Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Banks ramped up AI adoption as agentic tools began to gain traction in the sector during the first half of the year, according to an Evident Insights' AI report published last week. The number of new use cases launched by 50 of the world's largest financial firms doubled compared to the last half of 2024 while the number of technologists working on agentic AI grew more than tenfold, the analysis found. More than half of the 173 use cases deployed by the banks analyzed leveraged generative AI capabilities, Evident said. Nine of the 50 firms documented AI agents in the pilot or production phase, but BNY, Capital One and JPMorgan Chase were the only firms to disclose details of the supporting architecture for agentic workflows. Banks are grappling with twin objectives, according to the report. 'They are optimizing potential outcomes from generative AI deployments, while simultaneously assessing early experiments with agentic AI,' Evident said. Dive Brief: Banks expect to reap substantial rewards from sustained investments in generative AI capabilities. The technology's ability to harness vast stores of untapped enterprise data, digest raw documentation and deliver insights that expedite analytics and customer service processes are already transforming daily operations, as developers test the mettle of natural language assistants to ease cumbersome coding tasks. While most of the focus thus far has been directed toward internal use cases, a shift toward the customer is underway. 'The vast majority … of Gen AI applications define the end user as a bank employee,' the firm said. Only 15 of 97 generative AI use cases currently deployed are accessible to clients, account holders or prospective customers without a human intermediary. Retail banking has taken the lead on outward-facing assistants, using generative AI to upgrade legacy chatbots and power in-app avatars that personalize device-based customer interactions. Wells Fargo, for example, beefed up its Fargo virtual banking assistant with Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash and several other smaller internal models, Evident said. The bank is aiming to up its agentic game through an expanded partnership with Google announced earlier this month. Commerzbank leaned on Microsoft's Azure AI toolkit to roll out AI avatar Ava in April. The app-based assistant answers general banking questions and is designed to provide customers with personalized account information, the company said in an announcement. As other firms weigh the risks of entrusting customer outcomes to generative AI, daily usage is proliferating internally. Ten of the leading banks in the Evident AI Index, including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Bank of America, have collectively placed AI tools in the hands of over 800,000 employees, representing two-thirds of their workforce. Banks have had the biggest AI wins to date in front office applications and IT and security functions, according to Evident. More than two-thirds of use cases with reported outcomes, including tools that assist sales, were concentrated in these areas. 'Leading banks will use the back half of the year to scale generative AI – and work to put more tools in customers' hands,' Evident said in a post accompanying the report. 'As they scale AI and ramp up to agentic, they'll look to bring the tech everywhere across the bank.' Recommended Reading Google's new features place generative AI in workers' hands Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

ChatGPT-5 Gives You Real Choices After All. Here's a Quick Breakdown
ChatGPT-5 Gives You Real Choices After All. Here's a Quick Breakdown

CNET

time18 hours ago

  • CNET

ChatGPT-5 Gives You Real Choices After All. Here's a Quick Breakdown

The biggest pushback after OpenAI announced its new GPT-5 model for ChatGPT came from devotees of older models who felt the new generative AI chatbot lacked the panache of its predecessors. Now you have more choices of pre-GPT-5 models (although you'll have to hunt for some of them) and better control over which components of GPT-5 handle your questions. OpenAI is still sorting through a somewhat rocky launch of GPT-5, led by complaints about the lack of model choices. The model has been anticipated for more than two years and comes as competitors like Anthropic and Google have released powerful new versions of their AI models this year. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) OpenAI planned for one model that could handle everything: GPT-5 includes two different modes, one fast and lean for simple tasks and one aimed at reasoning for complicated ones. A routing program would decide which model handled a given prompt. That's still the default in ChatGPT, but it's not your only option. Here's a look at the menu: Watch this: ChatGPT Users Want the Old Models Back, Intel CEO Goes to the White House & More | Tech Today 03:03 Choices of GPT-5 models There are a few different modes of GPT-5 you can select between if you want to use OpenAI's newest technology. Here's a quick rundown: Enlarge Image This is what your choices will look like if you don't enable legacy models in settings. Screenshot by Jon Reed/CNET Auto: This mode allows the switching program built into GPT-5 to decide whether your query is handled by a lighter, faster large language model or a bigger, slower reasoning model. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X that this will be the best fit for most people. This mode allows the switching program built into GPT-5 to decide whether your query is handled by a lighter, faster large language model or a bigger, slower reasoning model. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X that this will be the best fit for most people. Fast: Your query will go straight to the fastest, lightest model. Expect quick, basic answers, but not the in-depth research you'd get from a reasoning model. Your query will go straight to the fastest, lightest model. Expect quick, basic answers, but not the in-depth research you'd get from a reasoning model. Thinking: This is a reasoning model, meaning it'll try to answer your question over several steps. It might use web searches and other tools, or it might go back and redo its past steps to try to get the right answer. There are some limits on how much you can use this model (3,000 messages per week right now). This is a reasoning model, meaning it'll try to answer your question over several steps. It might use web searches and other tools, or it might go back and redo its past steps to try to get the right answer. There are some limits on how much you can use this model (3,000 messages per week right now). Thinking mini: This is a lighter, faster version of the Thinking model. If you hit the usage limit on Thinking, you'll be stuck with Thinking mini. You can access it on your own if you enable more model options (more on that below). This is a lighter, faster version of the Thinking model. If you hit the usage limit on Thinking, you'll be stuck with Thinking mini. You can access it on your own if you enable more model options (more on that below). Pro: The most powerful reasoning model in the fleet, this is only available at the moment for Pro users, who pay $200 per month. (Although Altman did tease giving Plus users, who pay $20 a month, a very limited number of queries as a taste.) Again, sticking with Auto is probably easiest for most users. Think of it like driving a car with an automatic transmission instead of having to change gears manually. Sure, people who are really into cars might prefer the stick shift, but most people should probably just let the machine handle it. How to get the older OpenAI models Everyone with a paid ChatGPT subscription can access the older GPT-4o model directly in the same menu where you can choose your flavor of GPT-5. This model received the most clamor from users after it was removed, and Altman said if OpenAI ever decides to take it away permanently, "we will give plenty of notice." But 4o isn't your only choice (if you're a paid user). You just have to know where to look. To access GPT-4.1, 4o-mini and 3o, along with GPT-5 Thinking mini, you'll have to go into your Settings and toggle on "Show additional models."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store