logo
7 CT office-to-apartment conversions that made a difference. A big challenge looms on the horizon.

7 CT office-to-apartment conversions that made a difference. A big challenge looms on the horizon.

Yahoo19-05-2025
The recent launch of the conversion of two historic — but difficult to redevelop — office buildings in downtown was hailed by city and state leaders as making way for apartments that are very much in demand in a city where there is a glut of office space.
In marking the $52 million conversion of former state office buildings on Hartford's Trinity Street into more than 100 residential rentals, Hartford Mayor Arunan Arulampalam struck an upbeat vision for the city in the coming years.
'Brick by brick, development by development, this city is becoming one larger city in which every neighborhood feels a part of where we are going and this is an incredible centerpiece for that,' Arulampalam said, at last week's event. 'We are so proud of where the city is going. I hope you are so proud of what you see today and what the future looks like.'
Indeed, the conversion of older office buildings in and around downtown in the last decade have helped absorb obsolete office space. The projects, many of them supported with public financing, have added thousands of rentals to strike a better — but still emerging — balance with the historical dominance of the office towers.
But a big worry looms on the horizon: what to do with space in modern office towers downtown that were battered by corporate downsizings in the aftermath of the pandemic?
'The challenge now is do we take on the 'A' buildings and/or some of the corporate campuses (Aetna)?' Michael W. Freimuth, executive director of the Capital Region Development Authority, said in an email.
How the low occupancies in some of the city's most recognizable office towers are dealt with will have far-reaching consequences. For the downtown economic ecosystem, there are far fewer office workers to regularly help support shops, restaurants and bars. And declining office building values will mean a hit to property taxes collected by the city that pay for municipal services and running its school system.
Class A space is considered the most prime, marquee space. In downtown Hartford, there are five major office towers — two on Constitution Plaza — either in foreclosure or receivership, some the casualty of lenders unwilling to refinance mortgages in a shaky office leasing market both in Hartford and nationally.
Receivership means building owners have lost day-to-day control of their buildings because they haven't been able to make loan payments or refinance.
CityPlace I — the tallest office building in Hartford — fell into receivership after its main tenant, UnitedHealthcare, slashed its leased space as more of its employees in the city worked from home after COVID-19.
Of the roughly 885,000 square feet in the 38-story tower, just 45%, or about 400,000 square feet is occupied, according to CoStar, the commercial real estate analytics firm.
A new analysis by Cushman & Wakefield of the 14 Class A, or prime, office buildings in Hartford's business district showed that overall availabilities were 35.5% as of Mar. 31. That up a full percentage point from 34.5% compared to a year earlier, the analysis by the commercial real estate services firm found.
By the numbers, that's 2 million square feet available out of about 5.7 million.
Nationally, the move to convert idle office space into residential rentals has gained considerable momentum in the past several years, according to a recent report from rentcafe.com, which tracks trends involving apartments.
The report found that the number of apartments set to be converted from office space has skyrocketed from 23,100 in 2022 to a record-breaking 70,700 expected in 2025.
CityPlace and other office towers in the downtown Hartford area may not be necessarily be suitable for apartment conversions. But older, smaller buildings may well be, with their tenants potentially moving into Class A space where lower, attractive rents could be negotiated and owners are hungry for tenants.
For developers, rising construction costs — potentially affected by new tariffs — remain a concern when assessing the viability of projects and whether public funding needs to be increased.
In the legislature, a half-dozen bills — some proposing tax credits — sought at the beginning of the session to encourage office-to-residential conversions. And Gov. Ned Lamont proposed $50 million in his capital budget to support such projects.
In the last decade, Hartford got a jump on converting office space, well before anyone had heard of COVID-19. But the stakes still remain high because the city has more office space than New Haven, Waterbury and Bridgeport combined.
Original use: Office tower
Built: 1967
Conversion cost: $84.5 million, with public funding
# of apartments: 285
Market-rate/Affordable: 80%/20%
Developer: Bruce Becker, Westport
Conversion completed: 2015
Current Occupancy: 98%
Why it Matters: The 26-story office tower once stood out in the city's nighttime skyline, dark and empty — a highly visible reminder of the city's struggle with revitalization. The project was one of the earliest and largest office-to-apartment conversions in the last decade, and provided a crucial test for housing demand in downtown Hartford.
Original use: Masonic Hall
Built: 1894
Conversion cost: $4.5 million, with public funding
# of apartments: 26
Market-rate/Affordable: 100% Market-rate
Developer: Yisroel Rabinowitz, Brooklyn, NY
Conversion completed: 2014
Current Occupancy: 86%
Why it Matters: The former Masonic Hall had struggled to accommodate offices, but was successfully converted into The Grand on Ann apartments. The project, the first to be completed using low-cost financing through the Capital Region Development Authority, established housing on the eastern end of downtown's Allyn Street corridor. CRDA sought to strengthen the residential presence between the XL Center and Union Station. It is uncertain how that vision will unfold now that the federal government has all but chosen an Allyn Street parking lot for a new federal courthouse.
Original use: Offices for wool merchants
Built: 1883
Conversion cost: $14.9 million, with public financing
# of apartments: 63
Market-rate/Affordable: 80%/20%
Developer: Dakota Partners, Waltham, MA
Conversion completed: 2015
Current Occupancy: 84%
Why it Matters: The renovation revived the use of an office building considered an architectural gem, but was in decline with few tenants. The conversion to rental housing added more apartments around Union Station on the west end of Allyn Street. Leasing helped build a track record for downtown rental demand.
Original use: office tower
Built: 1965
Conversion cost: $28.4 million, with public funding
# of apartments: 157
Market-rate/Affordable: 100% Market-rate
Developers: Wonder Works Construction Corp. and Girona Ventures, both of New York
Conversion completed: 2020
Current Occupancy: 97%
Why it Matters: The 12-story office tower at the corner of Pearl and Lewis streets was once a bank headquarters and later, a police substation. Until converted to apartments in 2020, a string of attempts to redevelop the structure into office space, apartments and condominiums failed, leaving the building largely vacant and decaying for years.
Original use: office building
Built: 1950
Conversion cost: $21.5 million, with public funding
# of apartments: 101
Market-rate/Affordable: 100% Market-rate
Developers: Wonder Works Construction Corp. and Girona Ventures, both of New York
Conversion completed: 2019
Current Occupancy: 96%
Why it Matters: The 7-story building was vacant for more than a decade and like the neighboring 101 Pearl occupied a prominent corner in downtown, diagonally across from the XL Center arena, The two structures are now joined internally to create one apartment building.
Original use: department store
Built: 1928
Conversion cost: $30 million, with public funding
# of apartments: 97
Market-rate/Affordable: 100% Market-rate
Developer: Brooklyn, N.Y.-based Shelbourne Global Solutions LLC, of Brooklyn, N.Y.; and Lexington Partners and LAZ Investments, both of Hartford.
Conversion completed: 2023
Current Occupancy: 100%
Why it Matters: The L-shaped building that anchors the southern side of the corner of Pratt and Trumbull streets was long past its heyday. After the Steiger's Department Store closed in 1962, the upper floors became office space. The new apartments formed a cornerstone for the Pratt Street corridor which aspires to be both a place to live and a visitor destination.
Original use: office building
Built: 1981
Conversion cost: $20 million, with public funding
Apartments: 60
Market-rate/Affordable: 70%/30%
Developer: RBH Group, Newark, N.J
Conversion completed: 2019
Current Occupancy: 98%
Why it Matters: Teacher's Village Hartford converted office space facing Bushnell Park that had been vacant for two decades. The vision was to create a residential community for teachers and other educators who can collaborate and support each other in their professional endeavors. While an estimated 40% of the units are occupied by educators, below the initial leasing of 60-70%, the apartments remain nearly fully leased.
SOURCES: Capital Region Development Authority; Courant reporting
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CPI report reveals inflation held steady in July as tariffs threatened wider impact
CPI report reveals inflation held steady in July as tariffs threatened wider impact

USA Today

time8 minutes ago

  • USA Today

CPI report reveals inflation held steady in July as tariffs threatened wider impact

Inflation held steady in July as President Donald Trump's sweeping import tariffs took a widening toll on U.S. consumer prices. An underlying inflation measure accelerated more than expected. Prices overall increased 2.7% from a year earlier, similar to June, according to the Labor Department's consumer price index, a measure of average changes in goods and services costs. On a monthly basis, costs increased 0.2% after rising 0.3% the previous month. What is the meaning of core inflation? But core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy items and is watched closely by the Federal Reserve because it better reflects longer-term trends, increased 0.3% after rising 0.2% in June. That nudged the annual increase from 2.9% to 3.1%. Do tariffs increase inflation? Inflation has been pulled by conflicting forces this year. On the one hand, services prices that soared following the COVID-19 pandemic have climbed more modestly or drifted lower. Rent hikes, for example, have softened. Wage increases have slowed as pandemic-related labor shortages eased. And Americans grappling with higher inflation have reined in their spending on travel and recreational activities, lowering airfares and hotel rates. Absent the tariffs, yearly inflation likely would already be at the Fed's 2% goal, economists have said. But the tariffs, which had minimal effects on consumer prices through the first five months of 2025, began delivering a bigger blow in June and forecasters expect a growing impact on the cost of goods over the next few months. Duties already in effect for weeks or months include a 30% tax on Chinese imports, 50% on steel and aluminum and 25% on foreign cars. The average U.S. tariff rate has jumped from less than 3% in January to 15% to 20%. Retailers and manufacturers have cushioned the hit to consumers by stocking up on inventory before the fees took effect and absorbing some cost increases themselves, among other strategies. But economists say those tactics largely have played out. Meanwhile, the White House has reached deals with trading partners such as Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and UK that set tariffs at 10% to 20%. On Aug. 7, Trump imposed levies of 10% to 50% on dozens of countries that didn't reach agreements with the U.S. In other words, the most far-reaching charges are looming. By year's end, Barclays expects overall inflation to reach 3.4% while the core reading hits 3.7%.

He left fine dining to make sandwiches. Now, his popular Bay Area shop is expanding
He left fine dining to make sandwiches. Now, his popular Bay Area shop is expanding

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

He left fine dining to make sandwiches. Now, his popular Bay Area shop is expanding

Since leaving the fine dining world behind, an alum of San Francisco's Michelin-starred Californios and Lazy Bear has quietly made a name for himself with a surprising specialty in an unlikely location: deli sandwiches in a gym. Raul Lopez's sandwich counter, the Local, has thrived since opening three years ago in Wine Country — despite being difficult to find. Sandwich seekers must drive through a maze of Petaluma office parks and past Lagunitas Brewing to the Active Wellness Center. There's no signage indicating that the Local is inside, tucked between the check-in desk and the pool deck. 'You gotta know,' said Chris Osborne, co-owner of the Local. 'It's as far north and as far east as Petaluma gets. You have to cross many barriers to find us.' Location notwithstanding, the Local has grown into one of Sonoma County's hottest fast-casual lunch spots, and now, it's growing. Set to open Aug. 18, the Local's second Petaluma location (229 N. McDowell Blvd.) will offer more space, an expanded menu and, most notably, convenience. A Petaluma native, Lopez was working at Californios when the COVID-19 pandemic forced the restaurant to temporarily close. 'For about a year and a half, I was out of the industry,' he said. 'I never thought I'd go back to it unless I owned my own space.' A cousin told him that the gym was leasing a spot, but it was tiny — just 160 square feet — and the kitchen was extremely basic. The only pieces of cooking equipment were a panini press and a countertop oven. Sandwiches seemed like the best option, said Lopez, who was adamant that he'd still apply his fine dining training to his menu by, for example, vacuum sealing fruits and vegetables in their juices to 'give them more flavor.' In his view, most Petaluma sandwich shops use 'mass-produced' ingredients, while Lopez has established close relationships with local farmers and only uses what's in season, making do without common sandwich ingredients, like tomatoes and pesto, during certain times of the year. For the first couple of months, the Local 'relied on gym traffic,' said Osborne, who met Lopez years ago when they were both working at a restaurant in Petaluma. But word of Lopez's sandwiches — often named after Sonoma County geographical landmarks, like the Petaluma, the 101 and Adobe Road — quickly spread. The Local's clientele grew beyond red-faced gym rats and hungry kids in bathing suits, dripping a trail of water from the pool. By the time the shop hit the five-month mark, a majority of its traffic was coming from outside the gym. 'We're a trek to get to, but people still find us six days a week, and we're busy all six days,' Osborne said. Lopez has made his corner of the gym work, but the new location — at a busy shopping center alongside a Starbucks, a bagel shop and a frozen yogurt spot — brings new possibilities. The space is nearly 10 times the size of the original. It has a full kitchen, including dry storage and a walk-in freezer. A new bread station will enable the Local to make sandwich breads in-house, though it will still source some from Petaluma's famed Della Fattoria bakery. Lopez said he'll finally have the tools to experiment with more high-end techniques, like water baths for a precise cook and foams to add new textures and flavors. 'Everything we've done we've had to do under these extreme conditions,' Osborne said of the original space. '(Raul) will now have all the equipment and toys that his heart can desire.' The expanded menu will break the sandwiches (also available as wraps) into two tiers: classic ($13) and specialty ($17). The classics all have a fancy twist, like a BLT with Havarti, avocado and Carolina barbecue aioli, or the pastrami sandwich with chimichurri, Fresno chile hot sauce and pickled mustard seed aioli. New specialty sandwiches include the Bodega Bay, a soft roll topped with braised chicken thigh, pickled vegetables, pepper jack and chile lime aioli. The Gold Coast, another newcomer, integrates bacon jam and Carolina barbecue aioli with chicken breast. Lopez said he's 'big on using the whole animal and having minimal waste,' which means using parts of a whole chicken for multiple sandwiches, including roasting the bones for sauces. The Local offers an unusually robust selection of vegetarian options, like the Helen Putnam; named after Petaluma's first female mayor, it features roasted beet hummus and artichoke hearts. 'When I thought about opening a sandwich shop, I ate at a bunch, and every time I got to the vegetarian menu, I realized there were only one or two options,' Lopez said. 'I was vegetarian for (a few) years, and working in fine dining, I learned a lot of cool techniques when it comes to vegetables.' The shop can accommodate most dietary restrictions — another takeaway from Lopez's years spent in Michelin-starred kitchens. The Local sources gluten-free bread from Mama Mel's in Petaluma and makes pestos without nuts or dairy. Like the gym counter, the new location will offer smoothies ($10-$12) and salads (from $13). Lopez has added a new section for seasonal bowls ($15), like a polenta bowl with braised chicken, fermented carrots, roasted broccolini and salsa verde. Drinks include specialty sodas, aguas frescas and shrubs. The menu will continue to grow over time, Lopez said, as he envisions adding flatbreads and sides, such as housemade potato chips and potato salad. The Local will be open Monday-Friday from 10:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., but Lopez has ambitions for a future dinner concept after hours that's closer to his fine dining roots. The new spot's interior is also a major upgrade from the gym's inconspicuous counter: Bright and minimalist, it features wood paneling, a classic sandwich board menu and fancy picnic tables, plus plants and flowers for decor. Windows provide a view into the kitchen and a side patio has additional seating. 'We're trying to make everything a little more elevated,' said Osborne. 'We wanted the dining area to match the food.' The Local. Opens Aug. 18. 229 N. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma.

Joe Ferguson and Daniel Anello: Chicago Public Schools can't afford to bail out City Hall
Joe Ferguson and Daniel Anello: Chicago Public Schools can't afford to bail out City Hall

Chicago Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Joe Ferguson and Daniel Anello: Chicago Public Schools can't afford to bail out City Hall

This month marks yet another turning point in the checkered financial history of Chicago Public Schools. With a projected $734 million deficit, as estimated by the interim CEO, the Board of Education must pass a budget by the end of August. The decisions made in the coming days will determine whether CPS begins a path to fiscal stability — or plunges into a tailspin that will make recovery brutally painful. Closing the gap was already a herculean task when it stood at $529 million, before the interim CEO added $175 million in the form of a pension reimbursement that City Hall has been attempting to strong-arm CPS into over the last year. Now, at $734 million, a solution is all but impossible without cuts to critical programs. The Municipal Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago (MEABF) pension fund, created in 1921, covers both city workers and CPS non-teaching staff. Yet two-thirds of this cost belongs to the city, and the city controls the tax levy designated to cover this pension fund. The law clearly states that it is the city's sole responsibility to fund MEABF, not CPS. The district did make partial reimbursements under an intergovernmental agreement during the COVID era, when it was flush with $3 billion in federal relief. That relief is now gone, but the mayor is insisting that CPS continue to pay. Let's be clear: There is no good way for CPS to pay this $175 million reimbursement. Revenue options are nearly nonexistent. Property taxes have already been raised to the legal limit, and CPS can raise money only through a referendum, which there is no time for. Even without the pension charge, CPS is being forced to make painful choices. Adding $175 million to the burden is like tossing a cinderblock to someone on the verge of drowning. It pushes any necessary cuts from difficult to catastrophic. City Hall's suggested solution for paying the pension reimbursement? CPS should just borrow the money. But a short-term, high-interest loan is a deeply risky move that simply kicks an even heavier can down the road. Borrowing to plug this year's hole may feel like an easy fix, but it's no fix at all. It would saddle CPS with increased interest payments and deepen the district's future budget deficits, just as the district faces yet another financial cliff next year. CPS is still paying nearly $200 million per year in interest on short-term borrowing from its last crisis, between 2016 and 2018. Those payments will last until 2048. Had the district avoided borrowing then, this year's deficit would be smaller. Repeating past mistakes now will only guarantee deeper harm to students and schools tomorrow. Even in the short term, borrowing poses major risks. Using debt to cover operating costs would likely trigger a credit downgrade, dropping CPS even further into junk bond territory. That downgrade would raise borrowing costs across the board, deepening the deficit and limiting future options. The consequences are real. First, higher interest rates would make CPS' debt more expensive, worsening future budget gaps. Second, most CPS borrowing supports capital needs, especially building maintenance. If borrowing becomes more costly, even less will be done to fix the district's $14 billion repair backlog. Third, CPS is banking on saving $100 million by refinancing existing debt at better rates. A downgrade risks erasing those savings and creating a new $100 million gap this year alone. And while these numbers may feel abstract, the impacts are not. Rising borrowing costs divert dollars away from classrooms, counselors and student supports. The true cost isn't just felt by taxpayers; it's paid by children, who lose access to the education resources they deserve. CPS is painting itself into a corner by attempting to cover the city's MEABF pension bill. It all but guarantees the district's only exit is through borrowing. But any loan is a dangerous gamble with the futures of hundreds of thousands of students. Editorial: State control of Chicago Public Schools grows likelier as budget crisis intensifiesA loan now could trigger a spiral of rising deficits, interest payments and more borrowing, culminating in CPS being locked out of credit markets entirely. That's exactly what happened in 1980, when the state had to step in and take over. That kind of crisis could undo the hard-won authority of Chicago's newly elected school board before it even begins. Importantly, when engaged, the public has been clear: Chicagoans overwhelmingly oppose CPS paying the city's pension bill, and they oppose borrowing to cover the current gap with or without the pension expense. The Board of Education should reject this shortsighted proposal. CPS exists to educate students, not to subsidize city pensions. Chicago's children, families and taxpayers deserve better. They deserve a school budget that protects the classroom, preserves fiscal integrity, and puts kids first.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store