Trump optimistic Gaza ceasefire may come 'some time next week'
Mr Trump said he will discuss the situations in Gaza and Iran in a White House meeting with Mr Netanyahu next week. A senior Israeli official, Ron Dermer, has been in Washington holding talks ahead of the meeting as the US, Egypt and Qatar push for a truce.
"We hope it's going to happen. And we're looking forward to it happening sometime next week," Mr Trump told reporters as he departed the White House for a trip to Florida. "We want to get the hostages out."
Later, during a tour of the migrant detention centre in Florida, Mr Trump was asked how tough he would be with Mr Netanyahu on ending the war. "Very firm," he replied. "But he wants it too ... he wants to end it too," Mr Trump said.
Hamas officials have said the group is engaging positively with mediators but the fate of a Gaza ceasefire lies in talks between the US and Israel. "What matters to us is stopping the aggression and the massacres. We hope something positive will happen on this front," a Beirut-based Hamas official said.
"The problem lies with Netanyahu and his government, which does not respond to the mediators' calls to halt the aggression, release the prisoners, allow aid into Gaza, and withdraw."
A second Hamas official said "the Israelis and Americans are discussing matters among themselves. We are waiting for what will come out of those discussions".
"There are positive signals from the Israelis and Americans, but there is no reliance on Mr Trump given his historical positions on Hamas, which are far from promising," he added.
In Washington, Mr Trump is expected to tell Mr Netanyahu that the war, now more than 20 months old, can no longer continue, sources in the US said on Monday.
Mr Trump this week said a deal could be reached within a week. "Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back," he later wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform. Mr Netanyahu said new opportunities had opened up for recovering the hostages held in Gaza.
However, Israel and Hamas remain far apart on the terms of a possible truce and hostage deal in Gaza, further sources said on Tuesday. Mr Trump's upbeat comments on the prospect of an agreement were premature, they said.
"The mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US don't see that a deal can be reached any time soon," one of the sources said. "You only need to listen to Hamas and Israeli negotiators talking about their conditions to realise that no way a deal will be reached within in a week."
Contact between Hamas and Israel on one side and mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US on the other has increased over the past week in Cairo, with the objective of finding enough common ground to hold another round of talks, said the sources.
They said Israel, with US backing, has rigidly stood by its long-standing demands that Hamas surrender its arms and dismantle its military capabilities, including its network of underground tunnels and hardware manufacturing sites.
Hamas has categorically refused to give up its arms but signalled it was open to discuss laying down its weapons and not be part of the post-war government or reconstruction of the enclave.
It has also suggested it was prepared to agree to a demand that its leaders leave Gaza to live in exile abroad but only on condition that Israel does not target them.
Israel, said the sources, has meanwhile been threatening to pursue Hamas leaders in Gaza if the group does not accept a temporary ceasefire during which it releases the remaining hostages.
"Israel and the US have made it clear they don't want another Lebanon in Gaza," said another source, alluding to decades of the Iranian-backed Hezbollah operating in that Arab country as a "resistance" group outside state authority.
"Hamas is in a tenuous position. It has lost much in this war, with its top-tier military and political leaders eliminated. Yet it continues to try to maintain a presence in Gaza as a resistance group fighting an illegal occupation."
Under discussion is a 60-day truce during which Hamas is expected to release 10 living hostages and half the remains of others who died in captivity. In return, Israel is expected to free hundreds of Palestinians detained in Israeli prisons.
Of the estimated 50 hostages Hamas still holds, only 20 are believed to be alive, according to Israel's military.
The proposal also includes the resumption of humanitarian assistance into Gaza and the start of Hamas-Israel negotiations on an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war.
Hamas wants the US to guarantee that these negotiations continue until Israel pulls out and ends the hostilities.
The war in Gaza started after a Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, that killed about 1,200 people, according to Israeli figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed more than 56,600 Palestinians in Gaza and reduced most of the coastal strip to rubble.
food aid and supplies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UAE Moments
23 minutes ago
- UAE Moments
Trump Threatens to Deport Elon Musk as Their Feud Escalates
Things just got more intense between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. During a press event on Tuesday, the U.S. President hinted he might consider deporting Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX. 'I don't know, we'll have to take a look,' Trump said when asked directly, keeping things vague but serious. EV cuts may have sparked the fallout The tension appears to be over Trump's controversial 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which slashes subsidies for electric vehicles—a move that Musk has publicly criticized. Trump responded by saying Musk was 'very upset' over the loss of the EV mandate, warning that 'Elon can lose a lot more than that.' 'Doge is a monster that might eat Elon' In one of his more colorful threats, Trump suggested that Doge —the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly led by Musk—might be turned against the companies Musk runs. 'Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,' Trump said. Musk had resigned from Doge in May after leading a high-profile crackdown on government spending. Musk replied on X (formerly Twitter), teasing escalation: 'So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now.' From biggest donor to public enemy? Musk was once a close Trump ally—his top donor in the last election—and even held a key advisory role. But the two had a very public falling out last month over the tax and spending bill, with most of the drama unfolding online.
The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps kill two and arrest more than 50 suspected Mossad affiliates
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) killed two people and arrested more than 50 suspected "terrorists and mercenaries" it accused of collaborating with Israel's Mossad, Iranian media reported. The IRGC said on Tuesday that the operations had taken place over the past two weeks in the Sistan and Baluchestan province in the southeast of the country. Iran suffered significant blows to its nuclear programme during the war and Israel boasted about its use of Mossad agents on the ground to carry out covert operations. Since then, Tehran has announced several executions related to spying for Israel. Tehran has put to death many people convicted of having links with Mossad and enabling its operations. Iran has long accused Israeli intelligence of carrying out sabotage operations against its nuclear sites and assassinating its scientists. Security troops have intensified their crackdown on people suspected to have collaborated with Israel and its spy agency since the 12-day war with Israel, despite a ceasefire in place. "Significant amounts of weapons and ammunition, including American weapons, have been discovered and confiscated from these individuals," semi-official Tasnim news agency said. However, even before the war, incidents between security forces or IRGC with local armed groups in Sistan and Baluchestan are frequent. Armed Baluchi groups, particularly Jaish Al Adl, operate in the province that borders Afghanistan and Pakistan. The armed groups have been waging an insurgency against the authorities in Iran for years and have carried out several attacks against regime forces. Baluchis are a predominantly Sunni ethnic minority in Iran and were active in the nationwide protests in 2022. Hundreds were killed in the heavy IRGC crackdown that came afterwards.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel's war may have weakened the hold of Iran-aligned groups on Iraqi politics
The Middle East has been in turmoil since October 2023. Missiles have flown in just about every direction, and there is significant concern about what the future might hold. One of the surprises, however, is that Iraq has managed to stay out of the conflict. For years, many analysts have argued that Iraq has fallen completely under Iran's shadow partially through control that proxy groups exercise in the country. And yet, these groups have been almost entirely inactive since October 2023, leading to questions as to where exactly the balance of powers lies in Iraq. The Popular Mobilisation Forces were established following ISIS's 2014 invasion and occupation of Iraq's north-west. After the terror group's defeat, the PMF and affiliated groups sought and obtained direct representation in Parliament and in government. Like all other parties, they used those positions to extract rents and to exercise influence over policy and financial matters. The difference, however, is that the PMF used its status as a paramilitary organisation to impose outcomes in ways that many other groups could not. Many factions within the PMF were also plainly anti-western in their rhetoric. On occasion, their leaders could be seen directing marches of (relatively small numbers of) followers and openly declaring that their ultimate source of authority was the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. However, since 2003, Iraq has lost its monolithic status and has become a more complicated society. The PMF may have been pushing a specific political line, but much of the state and society have had little to no interest in being involved in regional struggles of any kind. Formally, the Iraqi government's position has been to seek to de-escalate tensions in the region and internally. Politically, however, the government is made up of myriad forces, including groups affiliated to the PMF, each of which has its own set of interests and the means to act upon it. The quietist groups have long been at a disadvantage, however, given that they favour a moderate and dialogue-based approach that shies away from confrontation no matter the circumstances, which more aggressive groups have consistently used to push the limits on a range of issues. The contrast can most obviously be seen after arriving at Baghdad International Airport, the road to which has been co-opted by the PMF's efforts to construct a narrative of struggle and resistance. But visitors to Baghdad who drive along that road can look immediately to the left and see the enormous campus of the newly established American University of Baghdad and the thousands of students who now visit every day. English business schools and language academies can be found almost everywhere in the capital, including on streets that sometimes bear the names and faces of Iranian officers and their Iraqi allies who were killed in action by the American military. Recent developments will probably have an impact on that delicate balance. Iraqis and outside observers will all have noticed that the PMF did not get involved at all during the recent fighting between Iran and Israel. Analysts have offered different explanations for what was happening in the background. Some have said that Iran was opposed to any involvement by the PMF for fear that this could lead to greater escalation. Others have argued that Iran's main priority in Iraq is not to seek military support from the PMF but rather to keep the flow of dollars from Baghdad open. According to that narrative, any direct military involvement by the PMF could threaten that financial lifeline. Others still have noted that the Iraqi government – mainly Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani and the security forces – worked tirelessly behind the scenes to keep the country out of the conflict, which has been bearing fruit. Now that the conflict is over, however, a number of consequences will probably flow. Regardless of which narrative is the most accurate, the fact that the PMF did not take any action whatsoever will be interpreted by many as a sign of weakness and vulnerability. Political forces that have always been antagonistic to the PMF will seek at least partial realignment on a number of fronts, much of which the PMF will find hard to resist given that it will all be coming at the same time. Within the Iraqi government itself, and within governing coalitions – including but not limited to the Co-ordination Framework (of which the PMF is a part) – the quietist camp will necessarily feel emboldened. It could be that Iraqi politics will be entering a non-confrontation stage, in which armed skirmishes of any kind will be eschewed in favour of business as usual (including the continued and uninterrupted extraction of rents). Clearly, however, Iraq's relationship with Iran will not break entirely. All that is likely to happen is that Iraqi groups will feel less compelled to consult or to defer to Tehran in as many matters as before. Iraqi political groups' relentless rent-seeking for the past 20 years has always meant that they are economically independent, and many now will feel less politically tethered to Iran as well. If that does happen, it is altogether unclear whether this will translate into any concrete improvements for ordinary Iraqis. It will probably only mean that political power will gradually slip away from the confrontation camp – not with a bang, but with a whimper – with nothing much to replace it other than Iraq's decrepit political system. Iraqi politics is too fractious to coalesce around a concrete strategy, particularly in relation to foreign policy, given the country's limited regional influence. Thus, it is not that a new strategy is being developed. It is that the previous status quo will probably fray without collapsing altogether.
