Social care focus as Lib Dems control council
A council has been formally handed over to the Liberal Democrats after 16 years of Conservative control.
Shropshire Council held its first full council meeting on Thursday at the Guildhall in Shrewsbury and the Lib Dems took charge as they have 42 councillors following victory in the local elections.
The Conservative group, which was previously in control ever since the council became a unitary authority in 2009, now only has seven councillors.
Two-thirds of the councillors elected are new to their roles, including the 15 representing Reform UK which is the main opposition group.
Heather Kidd is the council's new leader, with Alex Wagner as deputy.
"We've got to have the enthusiasm and the innovation to use our offices to find ways through," Ms Kidd said.
She added that the council must "not be afraid to shout at government when we need help."
"That is not a [Section] 114 notice - the help we need is around funding social care."
Such notices are admissions by councils that they can no longer balance the books, for example in Birmingham.
Shropshire Council was given extra support earlier this year after the previous administration declared itself "unbelievably close" to bankruptcy.
For the council, social care funding takes nearly four in every five pounds which the local authority spends.
The care includes things like fostering children, residential care placements, homelessness and special educational needs.
"It really is the big issue for the Labour government," Ms Kidd said.
Duncan Borrowman, who won the Llanymynech seat, was elected chairman of the council in Thursday's meeting.
He is known for being the landlord of the Bailey Head in Oswestry, which was named the Campaign for Real Ale's (Camra)'s UK pub of the year in January.
"I moved to Shropshire just under 10 years ago and had given up this local government lark and now all of a sudden I find myself chairing Shropshire Council," he said.
Mr Borrowman added that, as chairman, he had to be "fairly neutral" and "ensure all voices are heard".
"I'm very keen that the council operates as a centre for a debating forum about the policies and not like some sort of reality TV show where people are trying to score points off each other," he added.
Meanwhile, a coalition of climate and nature and anti-racism groups welcomed the councillors to their first meeting.
The groups called for the new administration to use its power to tackle the climate crisis and build a more sustainable future.
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Council looks for way out of relief road scheme
Five takeaways from Shropshire Council elections
Lib Dems choose leadership team for authority
Shropshire Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves threatens Roman Abramovich over frozen £2.35bn Chelsea sale funds
Rachel Reeves is preparing to haul Roman Abramovich to court to finally break the three-year deadlock around the frozen £2.35 billion Chelsea sale fund. In a dramatic hardening of the UK's position, the Chancellor is taking a personal lead in attempting to force the fund's release for Ukraine aid. The fund has remained in limbo as Abramovich remains at loggerheads with ministers over how it is spent on war victims. The Labour Government has been holding the same line as the previous Tory administration in insisting the huge sum is spent only on Ukraine. As talks continue to stall, Reeves and David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, have now resorted to threatening court action. 'We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far,' a statement from the pair read. Senior ministers have been debating for years how best to deal with Abramovich, who has maintained throughout that his initial agreement with the Government was to release the fund for 'all victims' of the war. The possibility of action via the courts was previously toyed with by the Conservative government, sources close to talks say. With Labour making no progress since coming to power, however, Reeves is understood to have played a key role in pursuing a new tougher on-the-record position. 'The Government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion,' the new statement said, before later adding: 'While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible.' No final decision has been made on taking Abramovich through the courts to seize the asset. Such action against the oligarch would inevitably be lengthy and messy. The former Chelsea owner first promised proceeds for 'all Ukraine war victims' after putting the west-London club up for sale on March 2, 2022, eight days before facing action over alleged links to Vladimir Putin, the Russia president. Abramovich is still under UK Government sanction. The proceeds have been frozen in a UK bank account since the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) issued a licence to permit Abramovich to sell the club. The fund will have generated a significant amount of interest while in the account, potentially taking the total value beyond £2.5 billion. The Foreign Office had repeatedly promised in recent months that the new Government would 'double down' on efforts to reach a solution. Humanitarian charities have grown increasingly desperate for a breakthrough, fearful that discussions will be thrown further into chaos if UK sanction arrangements against Russia were to change. Despite the sale of the club taking place entirely within UK jurisdiction, ministers signed a unilateral declaration in May with the European Commission, stating the money would be spent 'exclusively' within Ukraine. That move bemused the humanitarian sector as Mike Penrose, a former UK chief executive of Unicef, was brought in to create an independent foundation on the basis that it would be spent on 'Ukraine and its consequences'. Penrose has been taking a neutral position in discussions between the Government and Abramovich's lawyers. He has set up legal undertakings to make sure the money cannot fall back into the hands of the Russian. The Government will have board input and Jan Egeland, a senior Norwegian diplomat who once advised Kofi Annan at the United Nations, was brought in as interim chairman of the foundation. James Deneslow, head of the conflict team at Save the Children, is among leading figures in the sector to call on ministers to release the funds to support the full 'humanitarian consequences of the war in Ukraine'. The difference of opinion on the purposes of the foundation predates the Chelsea sale to a consortium led by American businessman Todd Boehly, which was completed on May 30, 2022. A representative of Abramovich has been contacted by Telegraph Sport for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
John F. Kennedy the latest lawmaker to announce run for Georgia's lieutenant governor
The race for lieutenant governor got a little more crowded on Monday as Macon Republican state Sen. John Kennedy announced he's a candidate. So far, one Democrat and two Republicans have thrown their hat into the race, but that number will probably change. Kennedy is currently the president pro tem of the Senate and told Channel 2's Richard Elliot that he's concerned about the economy, public safety, and education. He thinks he can stand out from other republican candidates. 'The difference though, I think how I distinguish myself, is that I want to make sure that folks understand that it's not just been about rhetoric. It's about results, and that I have not been one to shy away from a tough fight,' Kennedy said. Dahlonega Republican state Sen. Steve Gooch is also running for lieutenant governor. TRENDING STORIES: Governor's office said it will start issuing special tax refund checks this week 'Real Housewives of Atlanta' star Dwight Eubanks diagnosed with stage 4 prostate cancer 'Nursing imposters': Man impersonating healthcare worker arrested, officials say 'My record has been one of the most Conservative senators in the state Senate,' Gooch said. He wants to eliminate state income tax and crack down on illegal immigration. He thinks he can differentiate himself from other Republicans. 'Quite frankly, I'm going to differentiate myself from him and any other candidate in the race just simply by running on my record,' Gooch told Elliot. Atlanta state Sen. Josh McLaurin is the lone Democrat in the race. 'I think that's what's happening now, is we're having a crisis of confidence,' McLaurin said. He wants to expand Medicaid and restore reproductive rights. He also believes voters are exhausted by red-hot political rhetoric and want something else. 'I think what voters really want to see is political courage. People want leaders who will stand with saying what's right even if it's unpopular, to live the courage of their convictions,' McLaurin said. We are still 11 months away from the primaries and more than a year from the general election, so expect to see more candidates throw their hats into the ring.
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Liberals pressed to reveal how much revenue U.S. tariff response has raised
OTTAWA - The Conservatives pushed the federal government on Monday to disclose how much revenue its counter-tariffs have generated so far — and accused the Liberals of putting their 'elbows down' as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens to ramp up his trade war. Conservative members of Parliament asked at least 10 questions of the government in the House of Commons on Monday about the revenue raised so far from the counter-tariffs. Kyle Seeback, Conservative MP for Dufferin—Caledon, accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of putting his 'elbows down' through exemptions that limit the impact of Canada's counter-tariff response as Trump threatens to double existing tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent. Carney was in Saskatoon meeting with Canada's premiers on Monday. Responding to Seeback on the government's behalf, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne insisted that Canada will 'fight against unjustified and illegal tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum.' He did not answer questions about the amount of revenue raised by counter-tariffs. However, the federal government's latest fiscal monitor, published May 30, showed Canada collected an extra $617 million in import duties in March, compared to a year earlier. Revenues from customs import duties topped $1 billion in March, more than double the $427 million recorded a year earlier. 'This one-off bump seems pretty directly linked to the retaliatory tariff action taken by the Government of Canada,' said Randall Bartlett, deputy chief economist at Desjardins. Figures have not been published on how much revenue was generated by import duties in April or May. But Bartlett warned that, at the current pace, the revenues will fall short of the Liberals' projections. The United States' stop-and-go tariff dispute kicked off against Canada in March after Trump declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. In response, the federal government slapped retaliatory tariffs on billions of dollars in U.S. goods entering Canada — costs that are paid by Canadian businesses importing the items. The federal government announced some exemptions to Canada's counter-tariffs on April 15 related to certain inputs for manufacturing sectors, as well as for goods critical to public health and safety or national security. The Liberal party election platform, released four days later, projected that counter-tariffs on the United States would raise an estimated $20 billion over 12 months. Speaking on March 12 after Canada imposed retaliatory tariffs in response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, Carney said the government would 'make sure that all the proceeds from our tariffs go back to support workers in the affected industries.' Bartlett said the fiscal monitor shows the tariff response in March offered some 'windfall' revenue for Ottawa that improved the federal government's fiscal position heading into the thick of the trade dispute. But those single-month levels, if repeated through the current fiscal year, would leave the government well short of the revenue estimates in its platform. 'You need to really double or triple that pace of tariff revenue collection to hit the $20 billion in additional revenues,' Bartlett said. The trade dispute also threatens to hold back Canada's economic growth, Bartlett said, which would in turn throttle revenues paid into Ottawa's coffers through corporate and personal income taxes. Counter-tariffs, as a source of government revenue, are unlikely to offset the overall hit to the Canadian economy, he said. 'What might be a very near-term boost to overall revenues is really something that's going to fade gradually ... as it gets offset by weaker overall incomes in the broader Canadian economy,' Bartlett said. The Canadian Press reached out to Champagne's office Monday to ask if the Liberals are still banking on $20 billion in counter-tariff revenues in the current fiscal year. His press secretary pointed to an interview the minister gave to CBC's Power & Politics program last Thursday. Champagne said then that the figure in the Liberal platform was 'a projection at a moment in time' and noted the tariff situation has been changing rapidly. 'Obviously we'll have to see where we end up,' he said. 'The scenario we want is to have no tariffs, so there would be no counter-tariffs.' The Liberals are forgoing publishing a spring budget but have promised a fiscal update in the fall. Champagne told the CBC last week that the Liberals want to present a fiscal projection when they have 'a level of certainty.' That argument doesn't satisfy Bartlett, who said the federal government feels 'rudderless' at the moment. He pointed out that the Liberals were able to publish at minimum an economic and fiscal 'snapshot' in July 2020, a few months after deploying 'enormous' stimulus in response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No government ever has perfect clarity about its fiscal projections, Bartlett said, but tabling some kind of update sends important signals to Canadians and financial markets about the government's policy agenda. He said that a lack of fiscal transparency has real life consequences for households — failing to provide clarity on the level of debt the government plans to issue can drive interest rates higher, for example. Bartlett argued a fiscal update is particularly important as the government promises increased infrastructure and defence spending and a broad-based income tax cut taking effect July 1 — measures that will simultaneously ramp up spending and structurally reduce tax revenues. 'It's very difficult to have certainty as to what direction fiscal policy is going in, except that it is toward larger deficits and higher debt,' he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 2, 2025.
