
Harvey Weinsteins sexual assault case moves toward conclusion as key testimony looms
Washington [US], May 30 (ANI): Former filmmaker Harvey Weinstein, currently facing charges of rape and sexual assault, is reportedly "seriously contemplating" testifying in his ongoing trial.
As per The Hollywood Reporter, the decision comes as his defence team carefully evaluated the pros and cons of putting the former film producer on the stand as the case approaches its final stages.
Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, confirmed the uncertainty surrounding this choice and said, "We're going to make a game time, more or less, decision," as quoted by The Hollywood Reporter.
Aidala emphasised that the decision to testify is ultimately in the hands of the defendant himself, and revealed that one of his legal partners had spent Memorial Day weekend preparing Weinstein for the possibility.
"Weinstein is considering the emotional and strategic aspects of a 'he-said, she-said' case," Aidala said, adding, "There is a part of him that is seriously contemplating whether human beings feel obligated to hear the other side of the story."
Weinstein's decision to testify comes in the wake of a recent interview, in which he asserted his innocence, further fueling media attention surrounding the trial.
As per The Hollywood Reporter, this trial marks a new chapter for Weinstein, who had previously chosen not to testify during his 2020 trial in New York or his California case on similar charges.
Weinstein, who has remained present throughout the proceedings, is being retried on charges related to allegations from three women.
The most notable of these claims come from former production assistant Miriam Haley, who alleges that Weinstein forced oral sex on her in his Manhattan apartment in 2006, and aspiring actress Jessica Mann, who claims she was raped by Weinstein in a Manhattan hotel in 2013.
These allegations were central to Weinstein's original conviction in 2020, which was later overturned in April 2024.
In addition to these charges, Weinstein is facing new accusations from a third woman, Kaja Sokola, who alleges that he forcibly performed oral sex on her in a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
All three women have taken the stand over the past few weeks, providing testimony that the defence team has fiercely contested, as per The Hollywood Reporter.
As the trial continued, the prosecution rested its case on Wednesday, having called a series of witnesses to testify about the encounters between Weinstein and the women involved.
Weinstein's defence team began its case shortly after, calling upon medical professionals to discuss erectile dysfunction medications and their relevance to the accusations.
On Thursday, the defence team brought in Helga Rose Samuelson, a former roommate of Kaja Sokola, to question the nature of the relationship between Sokola and Weinstein.
Samuelson claimed that Weinstein had visited their apartment in 2005 and entered a bedroom with Sokola. However, according to The Hollywood Reporter, Sokola denied this encounter when she testified.
The defence has also considered calling conservative pundit Candace Owens as a witness, citing potential communications between Owens and Jessica Mann regarding whether Mann viewed her encounter with Weinstein as rape.
However, this line of questioning was swiftly struck from the record, with the judge instructing the jury to disregard it as having "no factual basis," as quoted by The Hollywood Reporter.
Despite the potential for additional witnesses, Aidala has clarified that they do not expect to call Owens to testify, given her recent childbirth and the lack of significant evidence to justify her appearance in court.
As the defence continues to present its case, the question of whether Weinstein will testify remains one of the most significant decisions in the trial.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, if Weinstein ultimately chooses not to take the stand, closing arguments are expected to take place on Tuesday, signalling the nearing conclusion of the high-profile case.
In a final twist, Weinstein's legal team has issued subpoenas for attorney Gloria Allred, who represents Miriam Haley, but Aidala noted that they have not pursued the subpoena aggressively. (ANI)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Gazette
40 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Roadies Double Cross finale: Kushal Tanwar from Elvish Yadav's gang emerges as winner
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 2 (ANI): Rannvijay Singha hosted Roadies Double Cross has finally come to an end with Elvish Yadav's gang member Kushal Tanwar emerging as the winner. Kushal Tanwar, popularly known as Gullu, returned to the show as a wild card entry and won it with his intense performance. Gullu was a part of Elvish's gang from the beginning and was eliminated. He returned to the show as a wildcard in Gautam Gulati's gang and when Gullu was given a choice to double-cross his gang leader after winning the ticket to the finale, he went back to Elvish's gang, leaving Gautam. Hartaaj Singh Gill from Prince Narula's gang finished as the first runner-up. Expressing his happiness, Gullu said in a statement, 'Winning MTV Roadies Double Cross wasn't just a title, it was a silent scream finally heard. There was no support, no guiding hand, no one to lift me when I was down. I went through it all alone. ' 'This win is more than a trophy. It's a symbol for every person who's ever felt alone, who's ever been told they're not enough. I walked this path by myself, but I never gave up. And that's what this victory is: not fame, not glory -- but proof that even when you have nothing, you can still become everything, ' he added. Gang leader Elvish Yadav praised Tanwar's journey, he stated, 'From Day 1, I saw fire in Gullu. He didn't just win tasks, he won hearts. His journey defines.' Rannvijay talked about the current season and shared, 'This season had it all - drama, betrayal, redemption, and a finale that kept us on the edge. Gullu's journey reminded everyone why Roadies isn't just a show, it's a battleground of transformation. ' The 20th season of MTV Roadies witnessed the return of Prince Narula and Rhea Chakraborty as gang Leaders, while Neha Dhupia made her much-awaited comeback, Elvish Yadav debut as a gang leader, and for the first time, there was a wildcard gang Leader entry with Gautam Gulati MTV Roadies Double Cross streamed on MTV India and JioHotstar. (ANI)


India Gazette
40 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Double-engine government was negligent": Rahul Gandhi slams NDA over Dalit girl's death at PMCH
New Delhi [India], June 2 (ANI): Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Sunday lashed out at the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government, led by Nitish Kumar, over the death of a minor Dalit girl, alleging negligence in her treatment at the Patna Medical College and Hospital (PMCH). In a post on social media website X, LoP Gandhi alleged that the 'double-engine' government's negligence led to the dalit girl's death. 'The brutality against a minor Dalit girl in Muzaffarpur and the subsequent negligence in her treatment is extremely shameful. If she had received timely treatment, her life could have been saved. But the double-engine government was negligent not only in providing security but also in saving his life,' he said. The Congress leader further in his post assured that justice would be served to the victim's family. 'We will not sit quietly until the victim's family gets justice. Strict action should be taken against the culprits and negligent officers,' the post read. Earlier on Sunday, several Congress workers held a protest demanding justice in the case. Speaking at the protest, Bihar Congress Chief Rajesh Ram said, 'There are two aspects to this case. First, that she was raped. After the rape, there was a brutal attempt to murder her. And second, the government left no stone unturned in its negligence. Due to the delay in treatment, that girl is no longer alive. For this, the government is directly responsible for the failure of the healthcare system. Go see for yourself.' This comes after a minor girl from Muzaffarpur's Kundli, who was brought to the PMCH four days after she was denied treatment by AIIMS, PATNA. The minor girl was a victim of rape, as per officials. However, PMCH Incharge Superintendent Abhijit Singh denied the claims made by the victim's family on the delay of treatment and stated that the girl who was brought to PMCH in a severely injured condition had been given proper medical care. 'When she was admitted here, we provided complete medical care from our side. The claims made by the family that there was a delay in treatment are baseless. We did everything we could. We consulted all the departments that needed to be involved and ensured she received treatment in the ICU as well,' he told ANI. (ANI)


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Who is liable if a friendly chatbot ‘abets' suicide?
A US judge has admitted a case against American firm over charges that its chatbot drove a teenager to suicide. The ruling will be closely watched for its potential to establish developer and corporate liability for 'friendly" but 'addictive" chatbots. Also Read | YouTubers vs ANI: Fair-use in the spotlight What's this case all about? In May, a US judge allowed a wrongful death lawsuit against and Google to proceed, rejecting claims that chatbot conversations were protected by the First Amendment, which guarantees free speech but not when it causes harm. The judge noted that the companies 'fail to articulate why words strung together by an LLM (large language model) are speech". The judge added that the chatbot could be considered a 'product" under liability law. and Google must respond by 10 June. Google was made party as it has licensing rights to the startup's technology. Also Read | Dr AI is here, but will the human touch go away? Why exactly is this app being sued? allows users to interact with life-like AI 'characters", including fictional and celebrity personas that mimic human traits like stuttering. On 14 April 2023, 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III began using the app, mainly engaging with Game of Thrones bots like Daenerys and Rhaenyra Targaryen. He became obsessed, expressing his love for Daenerys. He withdrew socially, quit basketball, and upgraded to the premium version. A therapist diagnosed him with anxiety and mood disorder, unaware of his chatbot use. On 28 February 2024, days after his phone was confiscated, he died by suicide. Also Read | Can dissenters aid shareholder democracy? Is this the first legal suit against an AI chatbot? In March 2023, a Belgian man died by suicide after prolonged conversations with an AI chatbot named Eliza on the Chai AI app, but no case was filed. The National Eating Disorders Association also shut down its chatbot after it began offering harmful weight loss advice. Separately, tech ethics groups have filed a complaint against an AI companion app, Replika. Don't AI chatbots help users cope with stress? AI chatbots are being increasingly used as mental health tools, with apps like Wysa (India), Woebot, Replika and Youper offering support based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). These bots aid in mood tracking and coping, and include disclaimers that they are not substitutes for professional care. Yet, as experts note, bots can fake intimacy but don't have real feelings. Although users value their availability and human-like interactions, this can foster over-attachment and blur reality. Are there regulatory safeguards? claims that its language model version for users under 18 aims to reduce exposure to sensitive or suggestive content. The EU's AI Act classifies certain AI systems as 'high risk" when used in sensitive areas like mental health. China enforces platform accountability for AI-generated content. The US and India rely on case law and product liability, but have no regulator. As AI becomes more autonomous and mental health bots avoid oversight by using disclaimers, new legal frameworks will be essential.