Parents left furious after school says doctor's note will no longer be an excuse for absences
In a change that has been branded 'ridiculous' and 'appalling' by some, kids in Lawrence County will now simply be marked as either absent or present.
After three no-shows, 'intervention' will start, while eight would result in a referral to juvenile court.
The policy purportedly aims to improve attendance, but many are against it, with some suggesting that they would now consider home-schooling their offspring.
Rebecca Sanchez told WSMV 4, a local news station in Nashville, Tennessee, how her daughter ended up missing up lots of classes due to health issues.
'Between the strep throat and the flu, I can say she missed about 17 days,' the mother said.
Disappointed by the new directive, she explained that having 'never been for or against homeschool,' the policy 'has definitely changed' her mind.
The outlet also reported that during the area's June school board meeting, the Director of Schools for Lawrence County, Michael Adkins, laid out the policy, explaining that a child could 'fail the grade' for missing school days.
Some were incensed by the new directive, with one person on social media branding it 'a ridiculous idea
Michael said: 'You can fail the grade. You can fail the course. You are going to be petitioned to court. You are not going to participate in graduation, get your driver's license or permit.'
'We are going to take control of the attendance of our students,' he continued. 'You can bring all the doctor's notes you want, but it is still unexcused.'
Although certain exemptions will exist - for example, for chronic illnesses - Michael emphasized that the new policy would help children develop a strong work ethic.
He said: 'If you have the sniffles, that is fine. You are going to have them when you go to work one day. We have all gone to work sick and hurt and beat up.'
At the same time, Lawrence County allegedly told local medical providers to 'emphasize the importance of regular school attendance while treating school-aged patients.'
In the case that a child goes to school when they are feeling unwell and is sent home by the school nurse, they will also be marked as having missed some of the school day.
Parents including Lauren argued that parents are being stripped of their parental responsibility.
She said: 'As a parent, how can we give someone else the right to say what is wrong with our child?'
The new policy has also been heavily criticized online, particularly on Reddit, where the changes were posted earlier this week.
Writing in a subreddit called 'ZeroCovidCommunity', which appears to have been set up during the Covid-19 pandemic as a place for people to advocate for 'reducing transmission' through concrete measures, one person said: 'Well this sounds like a ridiculous idea. People love to focus on anything but the actual issue.'
Another person argued: 'Said district needs to be sued for its incompetence.'
A third Reddit user wrote: 'Their announcement said it all...They're training kids to sacrifice their health so someone else can make money.
'If I were a parent in the district, I would be tempted to bring a lawsuit. That is literally inhumane.'
A fourth weighed in on the policy, writing: 'As someone with a severe chronic illness that would've caused a LOT of absences if I'd had it as a kid. This is terrifying.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
FDA's top vaccine official leaves post after less than four months
The top vaccine official at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Vinay Prasad, has left the federal agency less than four months after being appointed as the head of the division overseeing biological products like blood, vaccines, and cellular and gene therapies, a government spokesperson has said. Prasad, an oncologist and a professor of epidemiology, biostatistics and medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, had previously criticized the FDA. He was a fierce critic of US Covid-19 vaccine and mask mandates and, in the second Trump administration, he was controversially appointed as the director of the FDA's center for biologics evaluation and research in May. 'Dr Prasad did not want to be a distraction to the great work of the FDA in the Trump administration and has decided to return to California and spend more time with his family,' a spokesperson from the Department of Health and Human Services told Reuters in an emailed statement on Tuesday evening. Endpoints News first reported Prasad's departure. The government gave no details about the reason for his departure but he had fierce critics on both sides of the political aisle and the Washington Post reported, citing unnamed sources, that he had been ousted amid protests by conservative voices, with no response from Prasad to requests for comment. His exit came after a number of unusual regulatory actions, including those taken recently by the agency on Sarepta Therapeutics' gene therapy, Elevidys. 'Unprecedentedly, there were multiple press leaks from the FDA, negatively impacting [the drug's] credibility,' said Kostas Bilouris, BMO Capital Markets analyst. During Prasad's short stint in post, the FDA limited the use of Covid-19 vaccines and declined to approve therapies from biotech companies Replimune, which sought the green light for a treatment for advanced melanomas, and Capricor Therapeutics' treatment for a form of muscular dystrophy. The regulator's decisions under Prasad raised concerns that he was anti-patient choice, Jefferies analyst Roger Song said, adding that investors will see his departure as a positive for gene therapy and vaccine makers. Biotech stocks had plunged at the news of Prasad's appointment in May. The Nasdaq Biotechnology Index had declined 7% then, but later recovered. Shares of Replimmune rose 58%, Sarepta was up 11.2% and Capricor added 21.2% in premarket trading on Wednesday. Prasad also held the additional role of the agency's chief medical and science officer, to which he was appointed last month, according to STAT News. Nominating a more seasoned official to replace him could help the FDA rebuild its credibility, Bilouris said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
West Virginia scrambles to strip artificial dyes from school meals before classes start
When school starts in West Virginia next month, 240,000 students in districts large and small will notice something missing from their cafeteria trays. Gone will be red Jell-O fruit cups, yogurt topped with brightly hued sprinkles and Cool Ranch Doritos — all foods made with synthetic dyes. In their place will be foods that contain colors made only from natural sources — such as vegetables, spices and seeds — after West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey signed a sweeping new law in March banning seven artificial dyes from school meals. Other states have enacted similar laws that would strip artificial dyes from school meals, but West Virginia's action is the first to take effect, starting Aug. 1. It triggered a four-month sprint that that left state and local nutrition directors reeling. 'I think the initial reaction was like, 'Wow, what are we going to do?'" said Tony Crago, director of child nutrition for the West Virginia Department of Education. 'Where do we start?' Across the state, managers of school food programs scoured district grocery lists for dozens of products that contained any trace of petroleum-based synthetic dyes including Red 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2 and Green 3. 'When it went into law, it was shocking,' said Diane Miller, who leads child nutrition and food services for Kanawha County Schools in the state's central region. 'We began to realize that these dyes were in much more than just your cereals.' West Virginia's ban on synthetic dyes was cheered by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has successfully pressured food makers to agree to remove artificial colors from their products. The law focuses first on dyes in school foods, followed by a second action that will ban the colors plus two preservatives from all foods sold in the state starting in 2028. The move is aimed at halting potential health effects from the dyes, which have been linked to neurobehavioral problems, such as hyperactivity and attention problems, in some children. It's part of a larger focus on limiting artificial ingredients in food, Morrisey said in March. 'By eliminating harmful chemicals from our food, we're taking steps toward improving the health of our residents and protecting our children from significant long-term health and learning challenges,' he said. Health advocates have long called for the removal of the dyes, citing mixed evidence of potential harm. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has said the color additives are safe when 'used properly,' in the amounts and products approved by the agency. Most children have no problems when consuming the dyes, the agency adds, 'but some evidence suggests that certain children may be sensitive to them.' More recently, however, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has joined Kennedy in the push to get artificial dyes out of food, despite limited proof of health effects. 'When you get rid of petroleum-based dyes, kids aren't gonna all suddenly be healthy,' Makary said on a recent podcast. 'We're not going to address the fact that 30% of our nation's kids have prediabetes by simply removing petroleum-based food dyes. But these are steps in the right direction.' Nutrition experts agree that removing artificial colors from foods doesn't address the main drivers of America's chronic health problems. Those stem largely from ingredients such as added sugars, sodium and saturated fat. But dyes are 'hallmarks of ultraprocessed food,' said Jerold Mande, a Harvard University nutrition expert and former federal food policy adviser. Targeting them could be a way of letting companies know 'that the way they're making food is unacceptable,' he said. Some suppliers had already removed artificial dyes from some school foods, swapping them for products colored with beet juice or turmeric, said Hollie Best, food service director for Wood County Schools in Parkersburg, which has 11,000 children in 27 schools. Overall, Best said she removed just five foods from her menus. General Mills said 98% of its products for schools were already made without the banned colors. The company 'will be compliant' with West Virginia's law immediately and plans to remove the dyes from school foods nationwide by next summer, said Mollie Wulff, a company spokesperson. In Miller's district, with 23,000 students in 67 schools, the new law affects about 10% of the foods served, she estimated. She expected some foods to contain artificial colors, like strawberry milk and Pop-Tarts. Others were surprising, such as pickles, salad dressing and certain snack chips. 'People were like, 'Oh my gosh, no more Doritos?'" Miller said. The popular Cool Ranch flavor contains dyes Red 40, Blue 1 and Yellow 5. The challenge is finding substitutes that will still appeal to children, Miller said. 'Because the last thing we need them to do is to choose not to participate in our school lunch program,' she said, adding that schools provide many students their healthiest meals of the day. Parents of children with sensitivities or allergies to artificial dyes had already raised concerns, according to school food directors. But for others, the presence of synthetic colors in school meals hasn't been an issue. Chris DeRico, nutrition director of Barbour County Schools, with 2,000 students, said few parents seemed worried about dyes. 'They'd be in the minority, I believe," he said. 'In rural West Virginia, I don't think it's really on radar screens.' In Best's district, dyes were already out of the food dished up during the summer session in July. That didn't make much difference to Lilith Wilson, 9, who said her meal of a meatball sub sandwich, sweet potato fries and ice cream was 'really good.' Asked whether she likes school lunches in general, the incoming fourth-grader echoed the sentiments of picky kids everywhere: 'Sometimes I don't, sometimes I do. It just depends on what it is.' ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
CTE: Why the NYC gunman asked doctors to ‘study my brain'
The man who killed four people in the New York skyscraper that houses the NFL headquarters carried a note about chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, the brain disease that has afflicted professional American football players. Shane Tamura seemed to think that he had it. 'Study my brain please,' the note said, according to the police. Tamura, 27, who took his own life after killing four others, never played in the NFL, but he had been a star player in his California high school. A full page of his note, obtained by the New York Post, mentioned the authors of League of Denial: The NFL's Concussion Crisis. Shane Tamura in high school PREPSPORTS • Who is Shane Tamura? NYC gunman's suicide note attacked NFL It also mentioned CTE researchers, including Dr Ann McKee, who runs a laboratory in Boston known as the Brain Bank, which receives, every year, the brains of about 150 sportsmen, women and former military personnel whose families had reason to believe that they had the disease. In the more serious cases, 'these guys are getting into trouble with disordered thinking and behaviours', McKee told The Times last year. 'They tend to isolate themselves from a family, so it can be difficult to detect by other people because they've limited their interactions with other people.' In a few cases patients have turned violent. In 2021 Phillip Adams, a former NFL player, shot and killed six people in South Carolina and then took his own life during a stand-off with the police. Aaron Hernandez, a former NFL player jailed for murder, took his own life in prison at the age of 27. He had the worst case of CTE that McKee had ever seen in a patient his age. Aaron Hernandez in court in 2013 MATT STONE/THE BOSTON HERALD/AP 'Some of the people have been accused of violent crime,' McKee said. 'But in any particular person, we aren't able to draw a direct line from the pathology to violence … We see many, many cases of CTE in people that weren't violent and weren't aggressive. So it doesn't affect all people in the same way.' Some who were suffering with the disease have taken their own life while appearing to take care not to damage their brains in the process, allowing them to be studied. Tamura's note mentioned Terry Long, a former NFL player who took his own life in 2005. Another former player, Dave Duerson, took his own life in 2011, asking his family to donate his brain to McKee's centre. Ann McKee said her research showed that football players on all levels can suffer from CTE JOHN TLUMACKI/THE BOSTON GLOBE/GETTY IMAGES 'I am honored by their trust,' McKee said last year. 'And I like to think of myself as reporting the truth and the truth that's uncomfortable to hear, and certainly not something I wanted for a sport that I used to love.' Her research shows that it is not merely professional players who can suffer from CTE. 'The game is dangerous, and it's dangerous really at all levels,' she said. 'For every 2.6 years of American football played, you double your chances of CTE.' She declined to comment on Tuesday.
