Apple partners with a brain-computer startup to turn thoughts into device control
Apple is partnering with brain-computer interface company Synchron to develop technology that lets users control devices using neural signals.
Still in the early stages, the technology could significantly expand accessibility for users who are unable to operate devices with their hands, Synchron said in a press release. The partnership was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
'This marks a defining moment for human-device interaction,' Synchron CEO Tom Oxley said in a statement. 'Apple is helping to pioneer a new interface paradigm, where brain signals are formally recognized alongside touch, voice and typing.'
Historically, users have interacted with tech devices through keyboards, mice, and more recently, touch and voice. But these interfaces remain limiting for people with certain impairments.
Apple and Synchron are now working to translate specific brain signals into actions like selecting icons on a screen. Synchron's implantable device, called the Stentrode, uses electrodes to read brain activity. It integrates with Apple's 'Switch Control' feature, which allows users to operate devices via alternative input methods.
'When we ask our clinical trial participants what they want to do, it's always about communication and creativity,' Synchron Chief Commercial Officer Kurt Haggstrom said in a statement. 'And to most people, that means using their Apple devices. For Apple to recognize that need, and respond to it, demonstrates how much they value accessibility for their users.'
The technology likely remains years away from FDA approval and widespread use. Synchron said limited trials with patients are expected to begin later this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
24 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Image Playground on your iPhone is getting a major boost — thanks to ChatGPT
Last year, Apple unveiled Image Playground — a tool to turn your descriptions or people from your photo library into AI images. It was plagued with issues, complaints, and users feeling it was lagging behind the best AI image generators. But now Apple is bringing it back — with a little help. The company announced at WWDC 2025 it is integrating ChatGPT into Image Playground in order to turn things around. This should allow for better, more advanced AI image generation while using the software. Previously, Image Playground was limited to fairly generic emoji-style images. Now, through the integration of a ChatGPT setting, users can choose to generate an image in any art style or, they can drill down to oil painting, watercolour, vector, anime or print. Whenever a user tries to generate an image through Image Playground like this, Apple will send the request off to ChatGPT to generate the image. However, Apple has made it clear that it won't share any personal information with ChatGPT without the user's permission. Apple is making a clear effort to push Image Playground further. Not only does it have integration with ChatGPT, but the feature is being made more accessible throughout iOS. Users can generate unique images that fit a conversation in Messages and set that as their background. It can also be accessed through Apple's Shortcuts update. Apple Intelligence may be lagging behind its competition, but the company's deepening relationship with OpenAI could help make up ground. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Apple is making a clear effort to push Image Playground further. Apple announced it was bringing ChatGPT to Siri last year and has continued to cram ChatGPT features into a various parts of its apps, like Notes and Mail. This is a direction other companies have used successfully, piggy-backing on the success of the largest AI models to boost an ecosystem without having to produce a competitive AI model — something both expensive and time-consuming. The feature isn't quite here yet. ChatGPT integration in Apple Playground will launch alongside iOS 26, which is expected to drop in September alongside the iPhone 17 family. You can find the biggest announcements from WWDC 2025 here and, if you haven't seen it yet, check out our interview with Apple's Craig Fedreghi and Greg Joswiak discussing Apple Intelligence (among other things) below.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
In precarious times, an old restaurant idea makes new sense
Back in the 1980s, the norm-busting adman Jay Chiat liked to pose the question, 'How big can we get before we get bad?' as his Los Angeles-based boutique agency attracted clients like Apple and Nike. It is all too easy, he figured, to do more and accomplish less. He might as well have been talking about restaurants. For a long time, the industry has embraced replication as the holy grail: If we build it, and then we build a lot more of it, they will come, and we will make lots of money. But big is no guarantee. Sometimes it fails for reasons that have less to do with the food than with exponential reality — impatient investors, ego battles between the money people and the chef, and the challenge of managing employees owners have never met in cities they rarely visit. Or if all that works just fine, maybe the chef gets cautious about the menu to protect success, and jaded restaurant-chasers move on. Restaurants are not financial institutions. There's no such thing as too big to fail. Lately, a new generation of restaurateurs has embraced a more modest model, one that harks back to the era before social media and competitive food TV: the old-school one and done; maybe two, but not 10, and not a nationwide restaurant empire. These independent owner-operators want a career defined by a ZIP Code rather than by cloned outlets and corporate memos, one where they're on a first-name basis with their customers, their employees and their suppliers. Their notion of success sounds suspiciously, and delightfully, like what it was before a marquee sensibility inflated everyone's dreams. Owners get real-time gratification. We get just what we need right now — good food with side orders of comfort and connection. L.A.'s Café Telegrama and Ètra were early arrivals in what's about to become a colony of little independent restaurants near the intersection of Melrose and Western avenues. Jyan Isaac Bread and its sibling, Ghisallo, have helped turn a block in Santa Monica's Ocean Park neighborhood into what one regular happily calls 'carb alley.' And De La Nonna combines a pizza joint, take-out slice window and a disco bar called the Let's Go! at the intersection of Little Tokyo, Skid Row and the Arts District. Look around your neighborhood and I expect you'll find examples of your own. To improve their odds, these restaurateurs avoid spaces with destination-dining rents, run multiple operations out of a shared space to decrease downtime and work the room in person. 'We gravitated toward small,' said Andrew Lawson, an owner of Café Telegramma and Ètra. 'The chef and the partners are on the floor five nights a week, we touch the tables, we know what the regulars like.' These doubled-up operations improve the odds of what Lawson calls the 'crossover customers' who show up for morning coffee, check out the more expensive dinner menu and are inclined to give it a try because they already like the cafe. Jyan Isaac Bread spreads the word with a wholesale operation, generating profits from outlets someone else operates, and De La Nonna has opened an outpost in Big Bear. That's as big as small gets. Let's not kid ourselves; there's no magic survival formula. The National Restaurant Assn. reports 'pent-up demand' across all dining sectors but notes that millennials and Gen Xers prefer to get their food to-go, which puts a crimp in profitable alcohol sales and tips. Here in L.A., restaurants barely caught their breath post-pandemic before fires and the entertainment industry exodus wiped them out, along with their customer base; now the threat of tariffs and higher food costs looms. Business is off from 30% to 'empty' in many parts of the city, depending on whom you ask. And that sorry appraisal predates the arrival this week of ICE and federal troops, which means employees and customers may not be showing up at restaurants at all. If it seems frivolous to worry about the restaurant business amid everything else that's going on, think again, because their reach extends far beyond their front doors: Fewer customers means fewer employee shifts, fewer orders for farmers and suppliers, fewer places for you to unwind at the end of a tough day. That kind of reality check rarely stops someone who's passionate about feeding people, though. Instead, owners downsize, partner up, work the room, sell their wares wholesale. Small may be the only dream that makes any kind of sense right now. As for the flip side, I recently conducted an utterly limited and personal investigation on a trip to New York, where the excellent cappuccino at my first stop had morphed into watery coffee topped by something like Styrofoam, and the lunchtime salmon bowl at the second location involved a tired slab of fish retrieved from a warming drawer. And yet both places are so popular they're opening outlets nationwide — which might be where the focus has shifted to, rather than the food. Give me little and local anytime. My first morning back in Santa Monica, I went straight to Jyan Isaac Bread, although I could've made coffee at home. Yes, I missed the food; there's a reason the owner is referred to as the Dough Whisperer. But I also missed the experience: employees who are not cogs in a wheel but individuals with personalities, interests, questions about where I'd been — and answers about what they'd been up to during our communications gap. When the equivalent experience comes to a vacant storefront near you, count yourself lucky. The big thing now is small: upstart indies that are strategizing to reclaim what a restaurant is supposed to be. Karen Stabiner's most recent book is 'Generation Chef: Risking It All for a New American Dream.'
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Big Tech Is Finally Losing
It's easy to miss it amid the nonstop avalanche of news, but we are on the cusp of a technology revolution — one that could usher in an entirely new information landscape. After 30 years of shockingly few regulatory restraints, America's tech giants were beginning to operate almost like wrecking balls, slamming their weight into industry after industry and taking them out one after another. Boom. Uber crushed the taxi limousine business. Boom. Facebook toppled the news business. Boom. Amazon wiped out numerous small retailers. Finally, our courts are beginning to push back. In the past two months, courts have forced Apple to end its usurious tax on purchases made through apps on its phones, ruled that Google had abused its online ad monopoly and considered what consequences to impose on Google for what they concluded was an illegal dominance of the search market. A court has heard arguments about why Meta, which runs Facebook, should be forced to spin off popular rivals Instagram and WhatsApp, and allowed a case to proceed that alleges Amazon has abused its monopoly. Reining in Big Tech appears to be one of the few bipartisan policies that has spanned the Biden and Trump administrations, despite the tech titans' attempts to curry favor with the new president. Taken together, these developments could end years of stagnation and usher in more competition, smaller companies and better services. I personally can't wait for competition in the search market — as Google results have been getting worse, by many estimates, including my own. I'm tired of sifting through Google's increasingly cluttered and irrelevant search results, searching in vain for the latest news and instead finding only Reddit posts. I want a search engine for shopping that trawls the web for the best merchandise rather than just pulling from the sites that list items with Google. I want a search engine that doesn't allow ads to masquerade as reviews. I want a search engine that lets me control the amount of artificial intelligence summaries in my results. And there are probably even cooler search products that a new generation of search entrepreneurs will dream up. Google argues that A.I. search engines like Perplexity are already providing competition in the market. That is a mirage. As the judge in the Google antitrust case has described, none of Google's rivals can compete with it, given how much Google knows about what websites users click and stay on versus those they click and bounce from. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
