
EXCLUSIVE The moment Jeffrey Epstein's twisted love affair with Ghislaine Maxwell was captured for the first time, as starry-eyed couple are seen at Trump's Plaza Hotel gala
Ghislaine Maxwell 's affair with the pedophile wasn't just love - it was also wealth, power and security. And for Epstein, it meant access to her elite network of royalty, billionaires and influential figures.
And it appears it all began in 1991 at then real estate magnate Donald Trump 's Plaza Hotel, when the starry-eyed couple, Epstein, 38, and Maxwell, 30, sat side-by-side at a gala event honoring socialite Maxwell's scion father Robert and his wife Elisabeth DailyMail.com can exclusively reveal.
That was the first of many intimate photos of the couple, many released by prosecutors during her 2021 child sex trafficking trial showed them arm in arm as they lived a glamorous, jet-setting lifestyle.
But other photos hinted at the darker undercurrents to their relationship: in one Maxwell holds Epstein's foot and massages it while her top is open, exposing much of her breasts.
In another shot, taken on Epstein's plane known as the 'Lolita Express', Maxwell grins at the camera with his foot in her hand while he looks bored and chats with a friend.
Foot massages were how Maxwell and Epstein would start their victims down their path that led to sexual abuse and rape.
And the fact that Maxwell was giving them to her boyfriend illustrates the complicated dynamics that brought them together.
The Epstein case has returned to the headlines after the bombshell July 7 memo by the Trump administration claiming there was no signs of him blackmailing anyone and that nobody else would be investigated.
The memo, from the Department of Justice and the FBI, also said that there was no 'client list' and no further evidence would be released.
Future disclosures could shed fresh light on Maxwell, 63, and Epstein, who was 66 when he died, but the public record already gives us plenty of insight into how they created an international sex trafficking operation.
They appear to have met at a time when Epstein was still making a name for himself.
In 1987, Epstein was hired to work at Towers Financial which would collapse six years later after being exposed as a $450million Ponzi scheme.
Epstein would walk away unscathed and fabulously wealthy. The co-founder of the company, Steven Hoffenberg, went to prison for 18 years.
By Hoffenberg's account - he died in 2022 but gave numerous interviews before his death - Epstein and Maxwell were introduced by her father, Robert, the late publishing baron, as early as 1988.
A BBC documentary, House of Maxwell, alleged that Epstein helped Robert Maxwell hide hundreds of millions of dollars he had stolen from his company's pension funds.
Maxwell and Epstein were an unlikely pair: he was rough around the edges, having grown up in South Brooklyn and dropped out of college.
She was a British socialite who attended Oxford University and grew up in extreme privilege in a 56-room mansion.
But as Robert Maxwell's biographer Tom Bower has put it, when Maxwell met Epstein her 'fate was sealed'.
He has said: 'She worshipped rich, domineering men.'
Whatever bond the couple had been cemented in 1991 when tragedy struck: Robert Maxwell died after falling off his yacht in the Canary Islands under mysterious circumstances.
Ghislaine was bereft: she was his father's favorite, and he was said to be 'unusually close' to her, even naming his yacht, Lady Ghislaine, after her.
Public disgrace soon followed when it emerged $500million had been looted from the pensions of Robert Maxwell's companies, which included numerous British newspapers and the New York Daily News.
Maxwell needed an escape, and she needed a protector - she needed Epstein.
As journalist and Epstein chronicler Vicky Ward has put it: 'He saved her. When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that - and never will.'
Just 19 days after Maxwell's father's death, she was photographed at the Plaza Hotel in New York at a memorial for him - with hungry eyes locked on Epstein.
Few others in the room seemed to matter to Maxwell, who was in a blue silk jacket while Epstein was in a white bow tie and with a large grin on his face.
What followed was a romance that allowed Maxwell to retain her life of privilege and luxury and, through her contacts, gave Epstein access to the world's elite.
She and Epstein traveled around on his fleet of private jets to his lavish homes in Palm Beach, Florida, New Mexico, New York and later his private island in the US Virgin Islands.
During Maxwell's later trial for sex trafficking, Juan Alessi, the house manager at Epstein's Palm Beach home from 1992 to 2002, called Maxwell the 'lady of the house'.
He said: 'From the day she came to the house, she right away took over, and she mentioned to me she was going to be the lady of the house. Also, she was in charge of other homes, other properties.'
From the outside, their life must have seemed impossibly glamorous.
Photos from this time show them partying with the likes of Donald Trump: a video from 1992 shows Epstein doubling over while the President says something about a woman while the pair were at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida estate.
Bill Clinton flew numerous times on Epstein's planes including a bizarre trip to Africa 2002 for humanitarian work with Maxwell on board, along with Kevin Spacey and the comedian Chris Tucker.
Britain's Prince Andrew visited Epstein multiple times including visits in 2010 when he allegedly had sex with 17-year-old victim Virginia Giuffre.
The photos released during Maxwell's trial showed the couple photographed together at Balmoral, the late Queen Elizabeth II's residence in Scotland, in 1999, after being invited there by Andrew.
Others showed them on what appeared to be a ski holiday: he is in a red jumpsuit while she is in a thick sweater.
In one such photo, Epstein appears to put his hand on Maxwell's belly, which during her trial prompted speculation she had become pregnant.
Another photo could - with a different set of models - be a Ralph Lauren advert as it shows Epstein in a tweed jacket and Maxwell sitting next to him, a large dog between them.
Other photos show Maxwell sitting on the back of a 4x4 with Epstein driving and another showing her nuzzling her nose into the cheek of Epstein, who is wearing a black tie.
In October 2002, Maxwell wrote a love letter about their relationship which was used as evidence by prosecutors.
Speaking in the third person, she wrote: 'Jeffrey and Ghislaine have been together, a couple for the last 11 years. They are, contrary to what many people think, rarely apart – I almost always see them together.
'Jeffrey and Ghislaine share many mutual interests and they have a lot of fun together. They both have keen searching and inquisitive minds.
'She grew up amongst scientists and in an academic and business environment. Jeffrey and Ghislaine complement each other really well and I cannot imagine one without the other. On top of being great partners, they are also the best of friends.'
During this time, the sky, it seemed, was the limit - but there were no limits to Epstein's appetite for underage girls.
Maxwell's job was to find them for him.
Speaking in 2020, Epstein survivor Maria Farmer, described how Maxwell would hunt for children while driving through the streets of New York.
Farmer said: 'Who would think this woman would be a British witch? She was so nice.
'I'd seen her drive up half of Central Park, tell the driver to stop the car, she would jump out. She would get a phone number, write it down, and give it to the kids. Everybody always loved her because she seemed so trustworthy.'
Giuffre, who tragically committed suicide in April aged 41, had said that Maxwell 'had a knack for it', referring to recruiting girls.
She said: 'She would be able to figure out what that possible victim wanted or needed.
'Because she looked like a nice Mary Poppins figure you had to trust her.'
At one point, Maxwell even berated Giuffre for not doing a good enough job.
According to Giuffre, Maxwell told her: 'I just can't believe how bad you are at it. Pick any girl in the square.'
Giuffre said: 'There was no sorrow or even you're doing something wrong you shouldn't do it, there was nothing like that, it was just a game to her.'
Part of what made Maxwell able to do it was that she viewed Epstein's victims as beneath her, as one report put it, that they were 'trash'.
Maxwell's devotion to the deceased pedophile extended so far that she would drive by Central Park and pick out girls for him to satiate his desire to have sex at least three times a day
During Maxwell's trial 'Kate', one of the four women who testified against her, said that Maxwell asked her to find others to give oral sex to Epstein 'because it was a lot for her (Maxwell) to do'.
Kate said Maxwell told her: 'You know what he likes: cute, young, pretty, like you.'
According to Maxwell, Epstein needed to have sex three times a day, hence the need to schedule dozens of 'massages' every week.
The stress appears to have gotten to her at times and Epstein's former housekeeper in Palm Beach, Juan Alessi, has claimed that Maxwell once told him: 'I hate him (Epstein) but I can't leave.'
Not that Maxwell was suffering - or broke.
She was living in a Manhattan mansion with 12 rooms, eight fireplaces and 7,000 square feet of space that Epstein bought in 2000 for just under $5million.
Maxwell later took ownership of the property, which was six blocks from Epstein's home, and sold it in 2016 for $15million.
During Maxwell's trial the jury was shown financial records which showed Epstein moved more than $30million to Maxwell's accounts from 1999 to 2007.
For Maxwell, crime certainly paid.
Epstein and Maxwell appear to have sought distance from each other in 2006 when he was investigated by police in Palm Beach, Florida.
That led to his sweetheart plea deal in 2008 where he admitted soliciting a minor for prostitution and served 15 months in prison.
Maxwell began dating Ted Waitt, the billionaire co-founder of Gateway Computers but Epstein kept her close and he helped to found her do nothing ocean conservation nonprofit, TerraMar, in 2012.
By 2013, Maxwell had moved on to Scott Borgerson, a dashing former US Coast Guard officer, whom she would later marry.
In the first known and only photo of them together, Maxwell, who was 14 years Borgerson's senior, smiles broadly.
Her future husband's wedding ring from his first marriage was clearly visible.
By all accounts, Maxwell lived what appeared to be a normal life, becoming a stepmother of sorts to Borgerson's two children while she fought off a growing wave of civil lawsuits from her victims.
They lived in a $2.4million waterfront home in Manchester-by-the-Sea in Massachusetts where Maxwell, a keen jogger, would go for runs and enjoy swimming in the Atlantic Ocean.
All of that changed in August 2019 when Epstein was arrested.
Inexplicably, Maxwell, who has citizenship in France, a country that does not have an extradition treaty with the US, decided to stay put in America.
That meant she became target number one for the FBI after Epstein's suicide in September 2019.
Maxwell went on trial in 2021 and was found guilty of conspiracy to entice and transport minors for sex acts, as well as sex trafficking of a minor.
She is currently serving her 20 year sentence at a federal prison in Florida, where she reportedly has become friends with a double murderer.
In hindsight, Epstein's final act wasn't just a middle finger to his victims, it also sealed the fate of the woman who had once deeply loved him.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
US-China talks to restart as hopes grow for trade war truce extension
The US and China are due to start a fresh round of talks on Monday as expectations grow that the world's two biggest economies could agree a 90-day extension to their trade war meetings in Sweden - led on Washington's side by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and for Beijing by Vice Premier He Lifeng - come hours after US President Donald Trump announced a framework tariffs deal with the European current 90-day truce between the US and China - which saw the two countries temporarily lowering tariffs on each other - is set to end on 12 Trump returned to the White House in January, the US and China had raised import levies on each other to more than 100%. The current 90-day tariffs pause came after top officials from the US and China met in Geneva and London earlier this week, Bessent said talks with China were in "a very good place" and suggested the new round of talks could result in a second Monday, citing sources on both sides, the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported that the US and China are expected to extend the truce by another three BBC has contacted the Chinese embassy in the US and the US Treasury Department for latest US-China talks come after Washington struck deals with both the EU and Japan in the last Sunday, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade agreement ended a months-long standoff between two of the world's biggest economic week, Trump said Washington had agreed a "massive" trade deal with the agreement, Japan would invest $550bn (£407bn) in the US while its goods sold to America would be taxed at 15% when they reach the country - below the 25% tariff Trump had US has also struck tariffs deals with the UK, Indonesia and 10%, Britain has negotiated the lowest US tariff rate so similar breakthrough is expected from the US-China talks this week but, with expectations of an extension to their truce, there are hopes that global trade will not be hit by fresh tariffs disruption.

The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
It's hard to see new left party cutting through in Scotland
The first thing to say is that if it is able to break out of the factions and abbreviations which abound in the terrain to the left of Labour – and with 300,000 claimed sign-ups and a poll rating of 10% it just might – then it marks a very big change in socialist thinking. For more than a century, socialists who wanted to change capitalism have rubbed along in the Labour Party with those who just wanted a bit more from it. Now large sections of the Labour left look set to give up the ghost. For me, that ship sailed long ago. It's more than two decades since I became convinced that using the powers that Scotland would get with political independence offered a much better prospect of changing the world than trying to reform a British state run by people still steeped in the mindset of empire. READ MORE: Man arrested for 'carrying a placard calling Donald Trump an offensive word' Nonetheless it's an important debate. The political character of England should matter greatly to Scotland and this new party might even play a role here. In one sense the Labour left has nowhere to go. Those now in control of the party have made it perfectly clear radical views are no longer welcome within it. They have been demonised and purged. Labour is manifesting every bit as much intolerance and authoritarianism in its internal structures as it does in government. But how did it come to this? A short time ago the Labour left had more power than at any point in the party's history. Corbyn was leader and commanded the considerable resources provided to the parliamentary opposition by the state. The left controlled the conference and the NEC. And the mobilisation of the grassroots through Momentum was impressive in its day. Yet within a few short years it had all evaporated. Corbyn and others left or were expelled, policy was abandoned wholesale, and the Labour conference would sing the national anthem with no visible dissent. It has been a remarkable transition both in speed and scale. In part this is because the Corbyn project failed abjectly (Image: Getty) in its own terms. Jeremy became leader by accident. And he wasn't very good at it. I watched for years in the House of Commons the breathtaking disloyalty of the right-wing Labour parliamentarians towards the Corbyn front bench. It was embarrassing. Never have I seen such hostility and hate between political parties, never mind within one. But no-one got suspended, or expelled or deselected. They were ignored, left alone to operate as a party within a party. Despite his strength in the wider party organisation, Corbyn never moved against his enemy within. Too naïve, or too nice. Either way, a fatal mistake. Corbyn also never got out of his silo, unwilling or incapable of moving beyond his natural support. He should have developed a narrative about Brexit or constitutional reform that would have galvanised a wider alliance which the left could lead. He didn't. Once defeated, his opponents lost no time in eradicating any possible legacy. These right-wing parliamentarians had been busy making plans. There were organised by a ruthless and clever Irishman called Morgan McSweeney under the banner Labour Together. McSweeney built a strategy for power inspired by Odysseus. Seeing the popularity of left policies in the party, and among the electorate, he argued for 'Corbynism without Corbyn'. But he needed someone to front it who couldn't immediately be outed as a right-wing hack. Step forward the hapless Keir Starmer. You'll cringe to look now at the ten-point platform McSweeney drew up for Starmer's leadership bid. Common ownership, higher income tax on top earners, improving welfare, and more. It worked at the time. Those Labour members who hadn't left after their leader fell lapped it up. Once in position, McSweeney and his acolytes didn't show any hesitation that might have come from wanting to be nice or fair. At breakneck speed and with ruthless efficiency they brushed aside anyone in their way, including many on the soft left, which they saw as a gateway for extremists. They won through deceit, but at the price of the party itself. Which is why we've got a new one. So, what does this mean for us? We've just got used to Scotland being a plurality in which six parties compete. Are we now to have seven? It's hard to see. Certainly, there's plenty of discontent within Labour ranks, but not nearly as much as in places like London. Besides, there's already plenty of options where the disenchanted could escape to. And across it all lies the independence question. Not really something you can avoid. Is it plausible, or possible, for a new party to say we're really radical and want a complete overhaul of the system, but we are agnostic on whether Scotland should be an independent country or remain in the UK? Especially when they would, by definition, be living proof of the failure of the latter option.

The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
Sign of a bright energy future – but for whom?
I saw John Swinney visiting Eyemouth last week and singing the praises of the Neart na Gaoithe wind farm in the Firth of Forth. For sure, the First Minister was right, it is a wonder of engineering and a sign of a bright energy future. But for whom? Almost all the benefits are passing Scotland by, just as they did in the first great energy bounty, when oil was discovered in the North Sea. Oil's still there and still being drilled for, though not as much as it should be, and it's only weeks since the Grangemouth oil refinery closed. Of course, there's a nice shiny new office block on Eyemouth pier for NnG, as it is referred to. The jobs there are few but welcome all the same. But where's the real work going – and, more importantly, who owns and profits? READ MORE: Man arrested for 'carrying a placard calling Donald Trump an offensive word' NnG might lie between Lothians and Fife but ownership lies abroad and a clue's in the name. Neart na Gaoithe is Gaelic but the Irish version, the reason being that the wind farm is owned not just by EDF, the state energy company of France but also ESB, the Republic of Ireland's state electricity company. The Irish consul general told me it is the single biggest investment ESB has ever made outwith the island of Ireland. All this means that profits from the wonder Swinney saw are going to Paris and Dublin and not to Edinburgh. But it's far worse than that: not one turbine for it is being manufactured in Scotland, despite Methil being visible from it, never mind other ports and yards in Scotland being available which are crying out for work. Even if the excuse is a lack of capacity here in turbine manufacturing – which itself is lamentable and indicative of a shameful lack of an industrial strategy – what about other works such as subsea cabling, the laying of pipeline and the assembly of the units, along with the ship contracts? As with ownership, they've gone abroad, with firms from Italy, Belgium and far beyond winning out and Scotland languishing without. Even the jobs that are coming to Scotland are limited. Beyond the smaller vessels at Eyemouth, there was hope for work for maritime crews providing for the major construction and cabling work from Montrose. So thought a former constituent of mine who left the deep-sea tankers for a job closer to home. Within a few days he and the rest of the UK crew had been laid off and replaced by South Asian labour. When you're working beyond territorial waters – and that's where NnG lies – UK employment law doesn't apply. What a rip-off. And the NnG tragedy won't be alone as it's not the only Scottish offshore wind farm owned by foreign state companies; China, Norway, Sweden and the UAE also have sites. There's a double whammy here, and not just in the work and contracts being frittered away. When the ScotWind auction took place – under the auspices and control of the Scottish not UK Government – offshore sites were sold off for a song. The £800 million raised was trumpeted as a triumph by the then first minister Nicola Sturgeon. Yet within a matter of weeks that was shown to be a paltry sum. Less than 25% of what had been auctioned off in Scotland was sold in the US by New York State for a site off Long Island and for somewhere in the region of $4.3 billion. And believe me, the European energy market, of which Scotland is a critical part, is larger than the US's. But we were told all's well as we'd be getting the supply jobs. Well, where are they? A few jobs at Eyemouth and a few ribs going out of that port aren't what we were led to believe we'd get, and are probably less that Ireland will have from just NnG alone. What a waste and what a letdown. The Scottish tragedy is being repeated but when it was oil and gas we had no Parliament. Now we have Holyrood and, shamefully, it is being complicit as well as supine. Yes, energy is largely reserved but the ScotWind sell-off was wholly down to [[Holyrood]]. This is our great opportunity, as the First Minister said, but it has to actually happen, not just be empty rhetoric. While Swinney was at Eyemouth harbour, I was at the funeral of an independence stalwart and was reminded by the eulogy of his role in the anti-poll tax campaign. Back then, he and his compadre, who sat next to me in the chapel, painted 'Pay No Poll Tax' on the bridges along the M8. No easy task but much appreciated by many. Things should be better and easier for us now, but as well as failures there's been a dampening of the spirit. Radicalism, let alone political actions, have been decried, as shown over the genocide in Palestine. We need some competency in our Government, but we also require some fire back in our movement.