logo
Waste-handler in court over Bradford cemetery fly-tipping

Waste-handler in court over Bradford cemetery fly-tipping

BBC News7 days ago
"Major errors" by a licensed waste-handler led to a huge pile of rubbish being dumped in a Bradford cemetery, a court has heard.Imran Khan, 38, appeared at Bradford Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, where he admitted responsibility for fly-tipping at Scholemoor Cemetery last September.Khan, of Hartman Place, also admitted to another act of fly-tipping on Munby Street some six weeks earlier.He is due to be sentenced on 21 August at Bradford Crown Court.
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Khan denied being the person who dumped the waste, claiming he had lent his vehicle to a colleague who fly-tipped the rubbish without his knowledge.Waseem Raja, prosecuting on behalf of Bradford Council, told the court Environmental Enforcement officers had been called to a report of fly-tipping on 6 August.CCTV showed a Ford transit dumping a "substantial amount" of waste, including general litter, building materials and garden waste, on Munby Street, off Thornton Road, at 06:28 BST.Mr Raja said waste had subsequently been dumped at Scholemoor Cemetery on 16 September, with the same vehicle was found to have been involved.The enforcement team searched through the waste and found the address of a woman, who they went on to interview.Mr Raja said: "She informed officers that she had paid Imran Khan to dispose of the waste."She said Khan had shown her documentation to prove he was a licensed waste-carrier."It just so happens the vehicle was later involved in an unrelated road traffic stop, on 4 November," Mr Raja explained."Police carried out checks, and the keeper was found to be Khan."
'Disrespectful act'
The defendant argued that, although he had received payment to remove the waste and the vehicle was his, he did not dump the rubbish."We can't disprove that, but the council argues that he failed to take measures to ensure the correct transfer of waste," said Mr Raja.He added: "Allowing someone else to deposit the waste in the cemetery is, in my submission, just as bad as if he did it himself."The prosecutor said Khan had "flagrantly disregarded the law", calling the dumping of waste in a cemetery a "disrespectful act".Mr Arshad, defending Khan, said he had been operating as a legitimate waste-carrier, with the relevant licence in place."The reality is there were major errors by him relating to how he conducted aspects of his business," he said."Through his guilty pleas, he acknowledges his wrongdoing."He has expressed great remorse for what he has allowed to happen through his own actions and inactions."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Symbolic gestures won't prevent illegal working
Symbolic gestures won't prevent illegal working

Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Times

Symbolic gestures won't prevent illegal working

T he Home Office's latest move to crack down on illegal working in the gig economy feels more like political theatre than a serious solution. Announcing a plan to share data with food delivery businesses such as Deliveroo, Just Eat, and Uber Eats, specifically around asylum hotel locations, sounds bold on paper. But in reality, it is unlikely to achieve much. The government wants these companies to flag and cancel accounts repeatedly active in 'high-risk' areas. But this relies on the flawed assumption that such monitoring will deter or even detect illegal workers. It won't. The simple fact is that account sharing is incredibly easy to get around. More information will be shared with food delivery companies such as Just Eat, Uber Eats and Deliveroo ALAMY And the reality is that these companies do not have a genuine incentive to stop it. Unlike traditional employers, they are not subject to a penalty of up to £60,000 per illegal worker. So why would they invest in better checks or policing their own systems? The simple fact is that gig economy companies do not know who is using their apps, and who is engaging with their customers under their brand name, making illegal work easy, effortless and undetectable. If ministers were serious about tackling this issue, they would demand more — facial recognition or real-time identity verification every time a job is accepted could make a real difference. Illegal workers simply would not be able to operate. But until that's mandated, and until companies face real consequences, nothing will change. Worryingly, the issue does not end with gig economy firms. There is a troubling lack of understanding among traditional employers about their own compliance risks. Since 2022, businesses have been allowed to use digital verification services for right to work checks on British and Irish nationals. But many are using the same checks for foreign workers without realising that doing so leaves them legally exposed. Employers are surprised to learn that they are not establishing the all-important statutory excuse for their foreign workers. Large organisations — including NHS trusts, local authorities, universities and household organisations — are unknowingly putting themselves at risk. They believe using digital verification is enough — but it does not give them the legal protection they think it does. When foreign workers lose their right to work, or even exceed their permitted hours, employers are shocked to be slapped with penalties from the Home Office. Both the gig economy and traditional employment are riddled with loopholes. And while the government focuses on symbolic gestures such as data sharing, illegal work will continue, unchecked and undetected. If this crackdown is to mean anything, there needs to be more enforcement, starting with the government holding the platforms and third-party providers accountable. Emma Brooksbank is a partner at the law firm Freeths

Samantha Yelland prosecuted Constance Marten and Mark Gordon
Samantha Yelland prosecuted Constance Marten and Mark Gordon

Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Times

Samantha Yelland prosecuted Constance Marten and Mark Gordon

Samantha Yelland, a solicitor, was the senior crown prosecutor and reviewing lawyer in the prosecution of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon, who were convicted of the manslaughter of their baby daughter after a lengthy and chaotic retrial at the Old Bailey, which the judge accused them of trying to 'sabotage' and 'derail'. The first time this case was tried, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the most serious charge of manslaughter. Given there was no definitive cause of death or much of the usual evidence we rely on in homicide cases, we had to think creatively about what alternative evidence we could use. At the retrial, we were able to combine witness testimony and expert evidence, including analysis of weather data at the time of the offence. Becoming a trainee supervisor. I've experienced first-hand how the training you receive early on shapes your future career. It's important to me to help to give lawyers starting out in their careers the best start possible. All my fellow females striving to ensure equality in our profession. When I started there were hardly any female judges. Now, they make up half of all the judges at the Central Criminal Court. And most of my colleagues in the homicide unit are female. Read everything. I was once providing telephone advice to someone arrested for shoplifting. She was somewhat inebriated and, forgetting who she was speaking to, ended the call with 'bye, love you'. Ultimately this job is about victims of crime and their loved ones. The best and the worst bits of my day depend on whether they feel that justice has been achieved. A power for judges to impose extra time on top of a defendant's sentence if they were deemed to have unnecessarily wasted the court's time. • Read more law stories and insights from our experts I love a musical so it would have to be Times Law is taking a three-week break and returns on September 4

Sheep pushed off cliff at popular tourist location
Sheep pushed off cliff at popular tourist location

The Independent

time5 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Sheep pushed off cliff at popular tourist location

Police are investigating the death of a sheep that was allegedly chased over a cliff edge in Cornwall. The incident took place on 27 July in the Polly Joke area near Newquay. A man and two teenage children are suspected of being involved in chasing the animal. Members of the public confronted a suspect, who was reported to be aggressive. Devon and Cornwall Police are appealing for witnesses to come forward with any information regarding the incident.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store