
ECI says 'large number' of foreigners found during Bihar voter list revision
According to a PTI report, the names of illegal migrants will not be included in the final electoral roll to be published on September 30 after a proper enquiry into such people is conducted after August 1.
Citing ground reports, ECI officials said that booth-level officers found "a large number" of people from Nepal, Bangladesh, and Myanmar during house-to-house visits.
The Election Commission will eventually carry out a special intensive revision of electoral rolls across India to weed out foreign illegal migrants by checking their place of birth, the PTI report added.
Meanwhile, the ECI said that as of Saturday evening, 80.11 percent of electors in Bihar had submitted their forms. The commission is moving ahead to complete the collection of Enumeration Forms (EFs) before the stipulated time, July 25.
The Bihar assembly polls are due in October or November this year, and the voter list revision has already become a major topic in state politics.
Assembly polls in five other states—Assam, Kerala, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal—are due in 2026.
The move assumes significance in the wake of a crackdown in various states on illegal foreign migrants, including from Bangladesh and Myanmar.
Opposition flags Bihar voter list revision
The opposition parties have campaigned against the voter list revision in Bihar, with the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, recently joining RJD leader Tejaswi Yadav in a rally in Purnea.
Congress has called the exercise 'dangerous and bizarre'. Party leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi said EC's plan to consider voters who were added after 2003 as 'suspects' was an 'arbitrary and legally questionable move.' He made the remarks while addressing a press conference at Indira Bhavan, the Congress headquarters, on Saturday.
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the ECI to also consider Aadhaar cards, voter IDs and ration cards, as acceptable proof of eligibility for inclusion in electoral rolls in its ongoing revision of the list, even as it agreed to examine whether the poll body's exercise violated legal provisions or could potentially lead to mass disenfranchisement ahead of assembly elections due later this year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Case registered against Sanjay Kumar for posting ‘misleading information' of voters: District Election Office, Nashik
Sanjay Kumar from CSDS, has posted misleading information of voters of 126-Devlali AC for LS-2024 and MH LA-2024, case is registered against him. It is requested to all citizens to verify the info only from ECI website (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)


Deccan Herald
12 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
BJP's R Ashoka says e-Khata could be Rs 10,000 crore scam, accuses Karnataka govt of 'not delivering development'
Ashoka launched a broadside against the Congress government, accusing it of not delivering development despite imposing levies worth Rs 56,422 crore on citizens.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Should leaders run govt from jail?': Shah defends PM, CM removal bills
Shah said the bills were introduced "on account of the Modi government's commitment to restoring moral standards in politics and in view of the public resentment towards the menace" Rahul Goreja New Delhi Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday defended three bills tabled by the Centre seeking to bar arrested politicians from holding constitutional posts, saying the public must decide whether leaders should be allowed to run governments from jail. 'Now the people of the country need to decide: Is it right for a minister, chief minister, or prime minister to run a government from jail?' Shah asked in a series of posts on X. The bills include: The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 In his posts, Shah said the bills were introduced 'on account of the Modi government's commitment to restoring moral standards in politics and in view of the public resentment towards the menace'. 'When the Constitution was framed, its makers could not have imagined that political leaders in future would refuse to resign on moral grounds even after being arrested. In recent years, the country has witnessed shocking instances where chief ministers or ministers continued to run governments from jail without resigning,' Shah said. He noted that the proposals would prevent anyone from functioning as Prime Minister (PM), Chief Minister (CM), or Union or State Minister while in jail. The bills stipulate that an arrested politician must secure bail within 30 days. If not, they would be removed from office on the 31st day. Leaders may be reinstated once granted bail through due legal process. Opposition criticism Shah criticised the Opposition for opposing the bills, saying, 'On one hand, PM Narendra Modi has introduced a Constitutional amendment to bring himself into the ambit of law. On the other hand, under the leadership of Congress, the entire Opposition has opposed it in order to remain above the law, run governments from jail, and cling to power.' 'The nation also remembers the time when, in this very House, then PM Indira Gandhi granted special privilege to the prime minister, ensuring that no legal action could be taken against her,' he added, arguing that Congress's policy has been to place the prime minister above the law through amendments. 'I resigned': Shah's rebuttal Earlier in the day, Congress leader KC Venugopal alleged that the bills sabotaged the federal system, questioning Shah: 'When he was the home minister of Gujarat, he was arrested. Did he uphold morality at that time?' Shah replied: 'Today in the House, a Congress leader made a personal remark against me, saying that when the Congress trapped me in a fabricated case and had me arrested, I did not resign. I want to remind Congress that I had resigned even before being arrested. I did not hold any constitutional position, even after being released on bail, until the court fully acquitted me.' He added that the court eventually dismissed the case against him, observing that it was politically motivated. What the bills propose The legislation states that if a PM, CM, or other minister is arrested on charges carrying a potential jail term of five years or more, and remains in custody for 30 days, they would automatically lose their position on the 31st day. The responsibility for formal removal would rest with the President in the case of the PM, the governor for CMs, the CM for state ministers, and the lieutenant governor in Union Territories. The Lok Sabha has referred all three bills to a parliamentary joint committee for scrutiny.