Seven soldiers martyred in Balochistan IED attack: ISPR
Seven soldiers, including an army subedar, were martyred in a improvised explosive device attack in Balochistan's Kachhi district on Tuesday, with the military accusing India-backed militants of carrying out the 'cowardly' attack, according to a statement from the military's media wing.
The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) identified the fallen soldiers as 'Subedar Umar Farooq (age 42 years; resident of Karachi), Naik Asif Khan (age 28 years; resident of District Karak), Naik Mashkoor Ali (age 28 years; resident of District Orakzai), Sepoy Tariq Nawaz (age 26 years; resident of District Lakki Marwat), Sepoy Wajid Ahmed Faiz (age 28 years; resident of District Bagh), Sepoy Muhammad Asim (age 22 years; resident of District Karak) and Sepoy Muhammad Kashif Khan (age 28 years; resident of District Kohat).'
The military's media wing said that sanitization of the area is being carried out to eliminate any terrorist present in the area, and perpetrators of this heinous and cowardly act will be brought to justice.
It added that security forces 'remain determined to thwart attempts at sabotaging peace, stability and progress of Balochistan.'
The ISPR directly implicated India in the attack, asserting: 'Nefarious designs of India and its proxies operating on Pakistani soil will be defeated by the valiant security forces, LEAs and the brave nation of Pakistan, InshaAllah.'
The attack comes amid heightened Pakistan-India tensions following the Pahalgam attack, suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty suspension and border skirmishes.
Balochistan has seen increased violence in recent months, with Islamabad repeatedly accusing New Delhi of supporting separatist groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
39 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan says no decision yet to scrap bilateral agreements with India
Listen to article No decision has yet been taken to scrap bilateral agreements with India, Pakistan's foreign ministry said on Thursday – a day after Defence Minister Khawaja Asif claimed that the 1972 Simla Agreement between the two hostile neighbours was a 'dead' document. Responding to media queries, a senior Foreign Office official said that while India's recent actions and statements prompted internal discussions, Pakistan had made no formal or conclusive move to annul any of its bilateral accords with New Delhi. 'At present, there is no formal decision to terminate any bilateral accord,' the official stated, indicating that the existing bilateral agreements, including the Simla Agreement, remain in effect. Read more: Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document' The clarification came a day after Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, during an interview with a private television channel, said the Simla Agreement had lost its relevance and validity due to India's recent unilateral actions. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the Line of Control a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions,' Asif said. He argued that the bilateral framework agreed upon in 1972 had collapsed, and future disputes would have to be addressed through multilateral or international channels. Referring to the first Indo-Pak war and the resulting UN-mediated ceasefire, the minister asserted that India's steps — particularly the revocation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 — had undermined the foundations of bilateral engagement. He also questioned the current status of other key agreements, saying: 'Whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over.' In a pointed warning, the defence minister commented on the broader security situation, saying the threat of conflict with India was still there. 'Pakistan does not desire war, but if it is imposed on us, our response will be even stronger than before,' he warned. Read more: Simla Agreement 1972: Key points and exit implications The Simla Agreement, signed in 1972 in the aftermath of the 1971 Indo-Pak war, committed both countries to resolving their disputes through peaceful and bilateral means. The accord converted the ceasefire line in Jammu and Kashmir into the Line of Control (LoC) and obligated both sides to refrain from the threat or use of force, while respecting each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Khawaja Asif's remarks came against the backdrop of New Delhi's recent announcement to unilaterally suspend the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), followed by unprovoked strikes inside Pakistani territory last month—developments that triggered heightened military tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. In the wake of India's move, Pakistani authorities reported a sharp decline of 91,000 cusecs in water flows from India into the Chenab River as the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, has continued to issue hawkish statements, suggesting the use of water as a strategic weapon against Pakistan. Days after announcing the suspension of the treaty, PM Modi declared that water previously flowing to Pakistan would now be retained for domestic use, asserting that Pakistan would no longer receive water from rivers over which India claims rights.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Only ceasefire between Pakistan, India represents true victory, says Bilawal
Only a lasting ceasefire between Pakistan and India represents true victory, said former Foreign Minister of Pakistan Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Monday. On May 7, India launched airstrikes on Pakistani targets to 'avenge last month's killing of 26 people by gunmen in Pahalgam town', about 89km east of Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). Pakistan denied any involvement in the attack. In an interview with China Central Television (CCTV) at the United Nations headquarters, Zardari, also the chairman of Pakistan People's Party, said that there is no 'real victory' until the final ceasefire. 'I think the very easy answer to who won this war is who's lying to their people? Whose media was lying to their people? Whose government was lying to their people during the conflict and after the conflict? It took one month for the Indian government to admit that we downed their planes. Why were they hiding this fact from their people? Because the truth is they lost. As our initial self-defense for their unilateral violation of our sovereignty, we downed six Indian jets and they refused to admit it up until literally yesterday. We've achieved a ceasefire. That's important. I think that's the true victory,' said Zardari. IMF warns Pakistan-India tensions could threaten reform, fiscal goals Pakistan and India announced on May 10 that they had agreed on an immediate ceasefire, but Zardari admitted that it is a fragile ceasefire. 'This is, I think, a fragile ceasefire. In order for this to be a lasting ceasefire, we appeal to the international community to play its role because Pakistan has said that they're willing to talk. There's only one country that says they're not willing to talk and that's India. So obviously that's not a sustainable situation. And therefore, it is our effort to engage the international community for them to play their role to establish peace, which must include resolving the issue of Kashmir, resolving India's water dispute that India has now started illegally and having a proper conversation about terrorism,' said the former foreign minister. Zardari stated that both parties are most likely to resolve their disputes through dialogue. 'I think the most important and the most sort of possible achievement would be for us to start a dialogue. Dialogue and diplomacy has to be the start for us to address any and all issues. So Pakistan is willing to talk with India. We want peace, but peace is not possible, as you say, until we engage in a dialogue. Of course, I believe as we relied or there was the international community's involvement in achieving our ceasefire. Therefore, it's reasonable to believe that if the international community plays its role in a similar way, perhaps, we will able to establish perpetual peace, at least in South Asia,' he said.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Credit Suisse, SoftBank fight over Greensill losses in $440mn London lawsuit
LONDON: Credit Suisse's $440 million London lawsuit against Japan's SoftBank Group Corp kicked off on Thursday over losses linked to Greensill Capital, with the collapsed finance firm's founder Lex Greensill expected to give evidence next week. The case, which centres on funds Greensill lent to Katerra, a SoftBank-backed U.S. construction group, is the latest concerning Greensill's demise, which caused heavy losses for investors and prompted lawsuits and regulatory probes. Greensill's collapse made Credit Suisse close $10 billion of funds linked to the financial firm and, along with other scandals, led to the 2023 state-backed rescue of the 167-year-old Swiss bank by rival UBS Group. UBS is now pursuing the case against SoftBank, with Lex Greensill and Eric Varvel, former chairman of Credit Suisse's investment bank, among the key witnesses at the trial. The lender alleges that Greensill, at SoftBank's behest, gave up rights to Katerra's debts in return for shares which it then passed on to a SoftBank Group entity, leaving Credit Suisse out of pocket in relation to $440 million of notes. UBS completes merger of Credit Suisse service units in India Lawyer Sonia Tolaney, representing the Credit Suisse fund that held the notes, said SoftBank was heavily exposed to both Greensill and Katerra, to a total of around $3.5 billion, and 'needed to protect the value of its investments'. SoftBank, however, says the lawsuit lacks merit and is simply an attempt by Credit Suisse to 'pin blame (on SoftBank) for a loss caused by their own negligence and risk-taking'. Tom Smith, a lawyer for SoftBank, said in court filings that SoftBank paid $440 million to Greensill 'on the agreement and understanding that this was to be used to repurchase or redeem' the notes and pay back Credit Suisse in full. 'Far from seeking to harm (Credit Suisse), the (SoftBank defendants) and (Lex Greensill) acted to protect (Credit Suisse) because of its importance to Greensill's business model,' he said.
