Climate change could be threatening satellites as they orbit in space: Study
The ongoing surge of greenhouse gas emissions in the near-Earth environment could cause dramatic declines in the number of satellites orbiting the planet by the end of the century, a new study has found.
By the year 2100, the 'satellite carrying capacity' of the most popular low-orbit regions could decline by 50 to 66 percent due to the impacts of these emissions, according to the study, published on Monday in Nature Sustainability.
'Our behavior with greenhouse gases here on Earth over the past 100 years is having an effect on how we operate satellites over the next 100 years,' senior author Richard Linares, an associate professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), said in a statement.
Linares and his colleagues determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases can cause the upper atmosphere to shrink.
The researchers found that the contraction of the thermosphere — the atmospheric layer where the International Space Station orbits today — causes a plunge in density, leading to ripple effects.
Specifically, that decrease in density reduces 'atmospheric drag,' or a force that pulls old satellites and other debris down to altitudes where they will combust from interactions with air molecules.
Less drag, therefore, means longer lives for 'space junk,' which the researchers said would litter popular orbital regions for decades and raise the risk of collisions.
'The upper atmosphere is in a fragile state as climate change disrupts the status quo,' lead author William Parker, an MIT graduate student, said in a statement.
Despite this fragility, there has been a significant surge in the number of satellites launched in recent years, particularly for delivering broadband Internet from space, Parker explained.
'If we don't manage this activity carefully and work to reduce our emissions, space could become too crowded, leading to more collisions and debris,' he added.
The thermosphere naturally contracts and expands every 11 years in response to the sun's routine activity cycle, the scientists noted. When that activity is low, the Earth receives less radiation, and the outermost atmospheric layer cools and contracts before expanding again.
While modeling from the 1990s already showed that greenhouse gases trap heat in the lower atmosphere, more recent research determined that the same gases also radiate heat at much higher altitudes — thereby cooling the thermosphere.
Yet only in the past decade have scientists been able to measure shifts in satellite drag, indicating that the thermosphere could be contracting in response to influences other than the sun's natural cycle, the authors explained.
'The sky is quite literally falling,' Parker said.
Today, more than 10,000 satellites are in low orbit, or up to 1,200 miles from the Earth's surface, per the study. And while these satellites deliver essential services to humans, collisions among them can generate debris that stays in orbit for decades or centuries, the authors warned.
Aiming to understand whether the current trajectory is sustainable in the long term, the scientists simulated different greenhouse gas emissions scenarios over the next century.
For each altitude range of interest, they modeled the orbital dynamics and the threat of satellite collisions, based on the number of objects floating in that area. Through this approach, the researchers could identify each range's 'carrying capacity,' or the number of satellites that could be supported.
Ultimately, they estimated that the number of satellites that could be safely accommodated within the altitudes of 124 to 621 miles might plunge by 50 to 66 percent — if emissions remain at year-2000 levels.
If satellite capacity were to be exceeded, the researchers forecast that a given area could experience what's known as a 'runaway instability,' or a cascade of collisions that would close the range to safe satellite operations.
'We rely on the atmosphere to clean up our debris. If the atmosphere is changing, then the debris environment will change too,' Parker said. 'We show the long-term outlook on orbital debris is critically dependent on curbing our greenhouse gas emissions.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mysteriously Magnetic Moon Rocks Might Have an Explosive Origin Story
Unlike Earth, the Moon doesn't have much of a magnetic field – and yet, a strange pile of rocks on the far side seems mysteriously magnetized. A new study suggests that a major cataclysm, over and done in under an hour, left a lasting imprint. A team led by researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has found that a massive impact may have generated a huge amount of plasma that temporarily strengthened the Moon's tiny, ancient magnetic field. According to lead author Isaac Narrett, a planetary scientist at MIT, this theory could explain the presence of highly magnetic rocks detected on the Moon's far side in a region near the south pole. "There are large parts of lunar magnetism that are still unexplained," he says. "But the majority of the strong magnetic fields that are measured by orbiting spacecraft can be explained by this process – especially on the far side of the Moon." In 1959, the Soviet Luna 1 spacecraft conducted the first magnetic measurements of the Moon and found that unlike Earth, it did not have a strong, intrinsic magnetic field. Later research showed that the Moon had weak fields largely confined to the lunar crust, which seem to be created by interaction with charged solar particles. However, the analysis of samples brought back by astronauts on the Apollo missions showed that some rocks formed in magnetic fields that were much stronger. This led to the general consensus that while the Moon does not have an intrinsic magnetic field today, it once did. In a previous study, MIT planetary scientists simulated how a giant impact could have amplified solar-generated magnetic fields on the Moon. However, their results indicated that this would not generate a field strong enough to explain the highly magnetic measurements of surface rocks. In the new study, Narrett and associates took a different approach and assumed the Moon once had a dynamo that produced a weak lunar magnetic field. Given the size of the Moon's core, they estimated that such a field would have been about one-50th the strength of Earth's field today. They then simulated a large impact and the cloud of plasma that would result as the force of the impact vaporized material on the surface. They also ran simulations on how the resulting plasma would flow and interact with the Moon's existing magnetic field. This entire process would have been incredibly fast, lasting around 40 minutes from when the field was amplified to when it decayed back to baseline. This is consistent with the fact that one of the Moon's largest impact basins, Mare Imbrium, is located exactly opposite the far side southern polar region. According to their simulations, an impact powerful enough to create the Imbrium basin would have sent a pressure wave through the Moon that converged on the other side. The researchers suspect that this shock coincided with the plasma cloud amplifying the Moon's magnetic field. Rocks can contain records of the magnetic fields they formed under, thanks to the orientation of the electrons inside them. In this case, the shock waves could have temporarily disrupted electrons in the rocks at the point of convergence, and as they settled back down they could have taken a snapshot of the short-lived, strong magnetic field. "It's as if you throw a 52-card deck in the air, in a magnetic field, and each card has a compass needle," says study co-author and planetary scientist Benjamin Weiss at MIT. "When the cards settle back to the ground, they do so in a new orientation. That's essentially the magnetization process." According to the researchers, these findings have effectively settled the debate between the competing schools of thought. Instead of the Moon's magnetic field being the result of a dynamo or a massive impact, their results show that a combination of a dynamo and a large impact with a resulting shockwave could be responsible for the Moon's highly magnetized rocks, especially on the far side. This theory could be tested in the coming years as astronauts travel to the lunar south pole and collect rock samples, as part of the Artemis Program. The paper detailing their findings was published in Science Advances. Fiery Orange Gems From The Moon Reveal Secrets of Its Violent Past A Giant Hole Just Opened in The Sun – And It's Blasting Earth With Solar Wind The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
New research reveals an unexpected remedy for anxiety and stress: 'Can improve mental health'
Feeling stressed or anxious? Research suggests a walk in the woods might be just what the doctor ordered. An international study co-led by the University of Surrey and the University of Ghent has outlined how forests provide mental health benefits. The institutions examined 164 forests across five European countries and detailed how different forest characteristics, such as canopy density and tree species diversity, can affect various health outcomes. Specific features like a dense canopy were both good and bad. A high density offers shade and better air quality, but it can also increase the risk of ticks and the disease they carry. While the type of forest has mixed effects, one clear takeaway emerged: forests benefit the mind. The study, published in the journal Nature Sustainability, showed that a forest setting reduces anxiety and stress. Being in a forest also increases positive emotions. If people thought a forest was more biodiverse and natural, it was more beneficial for mental health. The findings suggest our connection to nature plays a major role in our well-being, and it reinforces an intuitive truth: spending time in nature is restorative. The study also covers physical health benefits. Dense canopies can reduce heat stress, and they can also improve air quality by trapping particulate matter, which is especially important in cities. Increasing tree species diversity had a limited effect on health, but adding a variety of trees is still considered a beneficial practice for ecosystem health. Dr. Melissa Marselle, an environmental psychology lecturer at the University of Surrey, described nature's medicine. How often do you worry about toxic chemicals getting into your home? Always Often Sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "Our study shows that forests generally provide a mental health benefit, reducing anxiety and stress, regardless of their biodiversity or structure," she said. "As one in six people in England experience anxiety and depression each week, this research suggests that simply being in a forest can improve mental health." She noted that the United Kingdom should preserve urban forests for the benefit of its citizens, and she also suggested that time spent in green spaces should be prescribed by the country's National Health Service for people with mental health issues. Telling someone to "touch grass" isn't just a meme anymore. The idea of "nature prescriptions" is gaining traction globally. The profound impact natural environments have on our health is a bare necessity. When you need a mental reset, don't go doom-scrolling. Visit your nearest forest — science says it could do you a world of good. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Bloomberg
18 hours ago
- Bloomberg
We Should Worry About These Fungi Spores From Near the Edge of Space
Life keeps showing up in the harshest places on our planet and, according to recent discoveries, far above it. Scientists who sent improvised probes attached to weather balloons into the frigid upper reaches of Earth's stratosphere discovered hundreds of rieties of fungal spores floating — and thriving — in air too rarified for even planes to fly. The finding is both exciting and unnerving. Some of the species can be fatal to people and destroy crops. Researchers say the spores most likely reach the stratosphere during extreme weather or environmental events such as severe storms and wildfires. Once there, they can survive for centuries, occasionally falling back to Earth during intense rainstorms.
