Mysteriously Magnetic Moon Rocks Might Have an Explosive Origin Story
Unlike Earth, the Moon doesn't have much of a magnetic field – and yet, a strange pile of rocks on the far side seems mysteriously magnetized.
A new study suggests that a major cataclysm, over and done in under an hour, left a lasting imprint.
A team led by researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has found that a massive impact may have generated a huge amount of plasma that temporarily strengthened the Moon's tiny, ancient magnetic field.
According to lead author Isaac Narrett, a planetary scientist at MIT, this theory could explain the presence of highly magnetic rocks detected on the Moon's far side in a region near the south pole.
"There are large parts of lunar magnetism that are still unexplained," he says. "But the majority of the strong magnetic fields that are measured by orbiting spacecraft can be explained by this process – especially on the far side of the Moon."
In 1959, the Soviet Luna 1 spacecraft conducted the first magnetic measurements of the Moon and found that unlike Earth, it did not have a strong, intrinsic magnetic field. Later research showed that the Moon had weak fields largely confined to the lunar crust, which seem to be created by interaction with charged solar particles.
However, the analysis of samples brought back by astronauts on the Apollo missions showed that some rocks formed in magnetic fields that were much stronger. This led to the general consensus that while the Moon does not have an intrinsic magnetic field today, it once did.
In a previous study, MIT planetary scientists simulated how a giant impact could have amplified solar-generated magnetic fields on the Moon. However, their results indicated that this would not generate a field strong enough to explain the highly magnetic measurements of surface rocks.
In the new study, Narrett and associates took a different approach and assumed the Moon once had a dynamo that produced a weak lunar magnetic field. Given the size of the Moon's core, they estimated that such a field would have been about one-50th the strength of Earth's field today.
They then simulated a large impact and the cloud of plasma that would result as the force of the impact vaporized material on the surface. They also ran simulations on how the resulting plasma would flow and interact with the Moon's existing magnetic field.
This entire process would have been incredibly fast, lasting around 40 minutes from when the field was amplified to when it decayed back to baseline.
This is consistent with the fact that one of the Moon's largest impact basins, Mare Imbrium, is located exactly opposite the far side southern polar region. According to their simulations, an impact powerful enough to create the Imbrium basin would have sent a pressure wave through the Moon that converged on the other side.
The researchers suspect that this shock coincided with the plasma cloud amplifying the Moon's magnetic field.
Rocks can contain records of the magnetic fields they formed under, thanks to the orientation of the electrons inside them. In this case, the shock waves could have temporarily disrupted electrons in the rocks at the point of convergence, and as they settled back down they could have taken a snapshot of the short-lived, strong magnetic field.
"It's as if you throw a 52-card deck in the air, in a magnetic field, and each card has a compass needle," says study co-author and planetary scientist Benjamin Weiss at MIT. "When the cards settle back to the ground, they do so in a new orientation. That's essentially the magnetization process."
According to the researchers, these findings have effectively settled the debate between the competing schools of thought. Instead of the Moon's magnetic field being the result of a dynamo or a massive impact, their results show that a combination of a dynamo and a large impact with a resulting shockwave could be responsible for the Moon's highly magnetized rocks, especially on the far side.
This theory could be tested in the coming years as astronauts travel to the lunar south pole and collect rock samples, as part of the Artemis Program.
The paper detailing their findings was published in Science Advances.
Fiery Orange Gems From The Moon Reveal Secrets of Its Violent Past
A Giant Hole Just Opened in The Sun – And It's Blasting Earth With Solar Wind
The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Spectacular' temple dedicated to Ancient Greek God uncovered by archaeologists: 2,700-year-old treasures found
Archaeologists have unearthed a 'spectacular' ancient temple housing hundreds of statues dedicated to the Greek God Apollo. The site, known as the Sanctuary of Apollo, is located in a remote valley in Cyprus, and the uncovered artifacts are believed to date back 2,700 years. A team of German experts initially began excavating in the area in 2021, with the finds of their four-year dig disclosed in a statement from the Cyprus Department of Antiquities. '[The sanctuary] was furnished with a lavish abundance of votive statues numbering in the hundreds, some of which were of colossal dimensions,' the statement, translated from Greek to English, read. 'In addition, evidence of other previously unknown types of votive objects was also found, such as marbled glass beads or Egyptian amulets made of faience [tin-glazed pottery].' The site, known as the Sanctuary of Apollo, is located in a remote valley in Cyprus, and the uncovered artifacts are believed to date back 2,700 years. Department of Antiquities Cyprus Three ancient statues from the Apollo sanctuary at Frangissa. Department of Antiquities Cyprus Apollo, the Greek god of archery and the son of Zeus, was a prominent deity in ancient Greek and Roman mythology. The Sanctuary of Apollo was first discovered by German archaeologist Max Ohnefalsch-Richter in 1885, and was 'considered one of the most spectacular finds of its time.' However, following his 'inadequate' excavations, Ohnefalsch-Richter reburied the site, causing its precise whereabouts to be forgotten for over a century. In 2021, the new team of German archaeologists rediscovered the long-lost temple in the remote valley of Frangrissa, near the ancient city-kingdom of Tamassos. After conducting a more extensive examination of the site, they uncovered treasures that were initially overlooked, including fragments of colossal statues, parts of which appeared to be feet. 'Apparently in 1885 [the votive statues] were not recognized as artifacts in the rush,' the new statement from the Cyprus Department of Antiquities declared. Thus, the new finds 'fundamentally expand our knowledge of this sacred place.' 'Μany statues in the Cyprus Museum and the Royal Ontario Museum at Toronto can be completed with newly found fragments and thus restored to their original appearance,' the statement continued. 'Completely new types of statues have also been documented that were previously unknown from Frangissa. The discovery of clearly larger-than-life feet, for example, means that the existence of colossal male limestone figures from archaic times can now be proven.' 'Such larger-than-life figures were previously only known here in Frangissa made from terracotta, including the famous 'Colossus of Tamassos' in the Cyprus Museum exhibition.' Meanwhile, the discovery of two inscriptions on the bases of the figures dates them to the 6th and 7th centuries BC. 'The discovery of two bases with inscriptions is spectacular,' the statement read. 'One is inscribed with several local Cypro-Syllabic characters, while the other refers in Greek letters to the Ptolemies, the Hellenistic rulers of Egypt who also controlled Cyprus at the time.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Mysteriously Magnetic Moon Rocks Might Have an Explosive Origin Story
Unlike Earth, the Moon doesn't have much of a magnetic field – and yet, a strange pile of rocks on the far side seems mysteriously magnetized. A new study suggests that a major cataclysm, over and done in under an hour, left a lasting imprint. A team led by researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has found that a massive impact may have generated a huge amount of plasma that temporarily strengthened the Moon's tiny, ancient magnetic field. According to lead author Isaac Narrett, a planetary scientist at MIT, this theory could explain the presence of highly magnetic rocks detected on the Moon's far side in a region near the south pole. "There are large parts of lunar magnetism that are still unexplained," he says. "But the majority of the strong magnetic fields that are measured by orbiting spacecraft can be explained by this process – especially on the far side of the Moon." In 1959, the Soviet Luna 1 spacecraft conducted the first magnetic measurements of the Moon and found that unlike Earth, it did not have a strong, intrinsic magnetic field. Later research showed that the Moon had weak fields largely confined to the lunar crust, which seem to be created by interaction with charged solar particles. However, the analysis of samples brought back by astronauts on the Apollo missions showed that some rocks formed in magnetic fields that were much stronger. This led to the general consensus that while the Moon does not have an intrinsic magnetic field today, it once did. In a previous study, MIT planetary scientists simulated how a giant impact could have amplified solar-generated magnetic fields on the Moon. However, their results indicated that this would not generate a field strong enough to explain the highly magnetic measurements of surface rocks. In the new study, Narrett and associates took a different approach and assumed the Moon once had a dynamo that produced a weak lunar magnetic field. Given the size of the Moon's core, they estimated that such a field would have been about one-50th the strength of Earth's field today. They then simulated a large impact and the cloud of plasma that would result as the force of the impact vaporized material on the surface. They also ran simulations on how the resulting plasma would flow and interact with the Moon's existing magnetic field. This entire process would have been incredibly fast, lasting around 40 minutes from when the field was amplified to when it decayed back to baseline. This is consistent with the fact that one of the Moon's largest impact basins, Mare Imbrium, is located exactly opposite the far side southern polar region. According to their simulations, an impact powerful enough to create the Imbrium basin would have sent a pressure wave through the Moon that converged on the other side. The researchers suspect that this shock coincided with the plasma cloud amplifying the Moon's magnetic field. Rocks can contain records of the magnetic fields they formed under, thanks to the orientation of the electrons inside them. In this case, the shock waves could have temporarily disrupted electrons in the rocks at the point of convergence, and as they settled back down they could have taken a snapshot of the short-lived, strong magnetic field. "It's as if you throw a 52-card deck in the air, in a magnetic field, and each card has a compass needle," says study co-author and planetary scientist Benjamin Weiss at MIT. "When the cards settle back to the ground, they do so in a new orientation. That's essentially the magnetization process." According to the researchers, these findings have effectively settled the debate between the competing schools of thought. Instead of the Moon's magnetic field being the result of a dynamo or a massive impact, their results show that a combination of a dynamo and a large impact with a resulting shockwave could be responsible for the Moon's highly magnetized rocks, especially on the far side. This theory could be tested in the coming years as astronauts travel to the lunar south pole and collect rock samples, as part of the Artemis Program. The paper detailing their findings was published in Science Advances. Fiery Orange Gems From The Moon Reveal Secrets of Its Violent Past A Giant Hole Just Opened in The Sun – And It's Blasting Earth With Solar Wind The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Terraforming Mars: Will It Happen? Is It Even Possible?
Last week, the Trump administration released a presidential budget request that would cancel almost all NASA science missions in order to focus on putting humans on Mars. It's mainly a showy, we-can-do-it project. Mere weeks before, the CEO of a small San Francisco non-profit argued in a new paper that we need to start seriously considering terraforming Mars. The priorities of the two groups could not be more different. The lead author of the paper, Erika DeBenedictis, received the prestigious Astera Fellowship to found Pioneer Labs, a small startup dedicated to designing microbes for terraforming. In The Case for Mars Terraforming Research, published last month in Nature Astronomy, she and her co-authors explain why terraforming studies are important. They also address how little we still know about potentially terraforming Mars. The main takeaway: Mars is not ready for humans, and humans are not ready for Mars. For some readers, the question of colonizing Mars isn't why, but how. If that's you, feel free to skip ahead. But others might approach the matter with more skepticism. Space colonization has become a political byword, but opposition is far from new. Perhaps most famously (at least among us science geeks), Gil Scott-Heron's 1970 poem Whitey on the Moon contrasted the poverty conditions of many Black Americans with the perceived excess of the Apollo missions. "I can't pay no doctor bill (but Whitey's on the Moon)," he wrote. "Ten years from now, I'll be paying still (while Whitey's on the Moon)." From this vantage point, is spending billions on terraforming research anything more than a nationalist vanity project? DeBenedictis and her team argue that it is important. "Technologies developed for Mars habitation, such as desiccation-resistant probably benefit Earth," they write. In an older interview with the Astera Institute, DeBenedictis summed up this aspect of the paper's argument. "Researching the possibility of a green Mars involves an infinite number of steps, all of which are in the right direction. How do we make human presence net-positive for the surrounding environment, rather than net-negative?" Unlike the Trump administration, the study doesn't advocate for current human spaceflight to Mars. Instead, it proposes taking the questions of colonization seriously, starting from first principles. Should we? How would we? What would the future of Mars look like? You'd be forgiven for assuming terraforming is just science fiction. But unlike faster-than-light travel, this staple of space adventure has a real scientific basis behind it. The new study lays out a timeline for terraforming Mars, and it's a lot more rapid than you might expect. They propose that careful bioengineering can accelerate the formation of an ecosystem. Instead of the billions of years it took Earth to turn green, Mars could achieve it in a few decades. The key to this rapid progression would be the development of microbes that thrive on Mars. Bypassing the labyrinth of evolution, humans could combine traits of Earth-based microbes such as temperature tolerance (surface temperature on Mars swings from -150°C to +20°C), invulnerability to fierce radiation and toxic gas, and no preference for atmospheric pressure. Such species could lead to an algae-covered Mars within decades. How scientists would prevent such hardy microbes from disrupting ecosystems on Earth, the team doesn't address. According to their estimates, if all the water ice on Mars melted, it could form 10,000,000 km2 of ocean at a depth of 300m. That's far less than the amount of liquid water on Earth, but it's enough to support long-term life on Mars. In turn, the melting of Martian ice caps, which include both water and carbon dioxide ice, would increase atmospheric pressure. A thicker atmosphere would lessen the dramatic temperature swings between Martian night and day, in turn allowing the proliferation of life. Martian soil also includes the necessary components for agriculture. Science fiction author Andy Weir exploited this so his marooned protagonist could grow potatoes in the hit 2017 science-fiction novel The Martian. Such calculations have led planetary scientists to scour Mars for evidence of past life, mostly through remote sensing. (Soil samples are notoriously difficult to return to Earth for testing.) So far, they haven't found any evidence of life, only evidence of conditions necessary for life at some point in the distant past. So, are we missing something? This is where DeBenedictis and Pioneer Labs' vision of Mars colonization research differs most dramatically from that of Elon Musk and SpaceX. The gist of the new paper is not that terraforming should happen now, but that scientists from different disciplines need to consider terraforming when designing future projects. In planetary science, for example, the paper argues for continued research on everything we don't know about Mars. For instance, ice covers one-third of the planet. What's under it? More ice? Networks of caves? Liquid water? The answer could portend wildly different visions of a bioactive Mars. They also call for extensive simulations of dust storms, a notable feature of Martian weather. Right now, planetary scientists understand dust storms on Mars fairly well. But how would dust change the atmosphere in a warmer, wetter Mars? How would the new climate alter the strength of the dust storms? But perhaps the biggest open question for terraforming is whether Mars has enough electron acceptors to support life. Electron acceptors are molecules capable of transferring electrons -- and thereby energy -- down a chemical chain. They include carbon dioxide and nitrates, and are vital not only for photosynthesis, but also for human respiration. Despite their affiliation with Pioneer Labs, which focuses on microbe engineering, the authors don't call for the scientific community to jump on the terraforming bandwagon. "While the possibilities are exciting, anything as big as modification of a planetary climate has major consequences and would require careful thought," they write. "But until we do more research, we do not even know what is physically or biologically possible." In other words: research now, decide later. "Priorities include quantifying H2O, N2, and CO2 sample return, test missions for proof of concept of warming methods, and climate feedback studies," they explain, linking various NASA science directives with terraforming questions. Current NASA goals for Mars already support human exploration, they add. "No abrupt change of course is needed." But an abrupt change of course is in store for NASA. The presidential budget request cancels all Mars research missions except for the Martian Moons eXploration, which is mostly funded by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. It still wants to put colonists on Mars, but without laying the scientific groundwork first. If science takes up Mars terraforming research, it will be without the United States.
