logo
Canadian abortion group says it may have to shutter after losing government funding

Canadian abortion group says it may have to shutter after losing government funding

Yahoo28-01-2025
A national group that helps people who have trouble accessing abortion services says it may be forced to shut down in several months after Health Canada declined to renew its funding for the upcoming year.
Abortion Care Canada says it had sought $1.3 million from the federal government's Sexual and Reproductive Health Fund for the next fiscal year but will get nothing, despite having received about $2.2 million in total since the fund was established in 2021.
It's among several groups that say their financial support from the fund has been denied or decreased for next year, even as demand rises for their services.
The groups also worry that the future of the fund is uncertain amid a prorogation of Parliament and looming election that may see a government change.
TK Pritchard, executive director of Abortion Care Canada, formerly National Abortion Federation Canada, said the annual fund supported 77 per cent of its operations last fiscal year, when it helped 450 people access abortions. Many of them were newcomers, racialized and LGBTQ clients, and those living outside of city centres.
Pritchard said they would have brought their ask down to the $800,000 range they previously received, but didn't have an opportunity to amend their application.
Abortion Care Canada uses the federal funding to cover the cost of flights, hotels and transportation for pregnant people who need to travel far distances to get abortions, and to co-ordinate care with providers across the country.
Until 2021, they were part of the U.S. National Abortion Federation, which helped fund operations until the Canadian branch broke off and started receiving financial support from the government.
'The reality is that unless something big changes, we will likely close. The organization will shut down. We have four to six months of funding that I can kind of piece together,' Pritchard said ahead of a fundraising campaign set to launch Wednesday.
Health Canada says it received a large number of proposals in response to its call for sexual health projects in 2025-26 and 2026-27, and there wasn't enough money to support all of them.
"All proposals were evaluated against merit-based criteria, including criteria related to the specificity and feasibility of proposed project activities and outputs as well as level of stakeholder collaboration," the federal institution said by email in response to questions about why the charity's funding didn't get renewed.
"Abortion Care Canada submitted a proposal under this new call for proposals, but its proposal was not successful."
It's not the only group that saw a funding cut — Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, an amalgamation of several groups that promote sexual and reproductive rights including Planned Parenthood Federation of Canada, said its funding was reduced by nearly 40 per cent.
Both groups say the funding cuts, which they were notified of in December, come as demand for their services has risen exponentially over the last three years. They say many people in precarious positions will not be able to access abortions as a result, and that their entire operations will be scaled back, including the number of people they serve and the level of care they offer.
The Sexual and Reproductive Health Fund started with a $45-million investment in 2021, and was renewed with $36 million in 2023, with the government acknowledging that some communities within Canada face discrimination and don't have equal access to reproductive health care.
Last fall, the Liberals' budget proposed $90 million over six years to expand and make the Sexual and Reproductive Health Fund permanent. But the Prime Minister has since prorogued Parliament while Liberals elect a new leader, and opposition parties have vowed to topple the government.
Frédérique Chabot, acting executive director of Action Canada, said the $36 million that was allocated to the fund in 2023 has to last until March 2027. 'So it's the last of the money that is being distributed,' Chabot said.
The survival of groups backed by this fund depends on the incoming government's priorities, she said, adding she believes it may become an election issue.
Without federal support she predicted, "the disappearance will be devastating to Canadians and to health care systems that are already overwhelmed and overtaxed."
In 2021, Action Canada helped about 100 people access abortions. In 2024, between January and November, it helped more than 600 people, Chabot said.
Like Abortion Care Canada, they work with people facing the most significant barriers to abortion to ensure they can safely make it to appointments. They also work with federal and provincial governments on policies to increase abortion access.
Chabot, who has worked at the organization for 10 years, said patients seem more overwhelmed, in more dire circumstances, and face more financial strain each year.
'The fact that we are going to lose funding when we were already under massive pressure in terms of demands means that a lot of people will be denied abortions moving forward,' Chabot said.
The Canadian Association of Midwives said their application for the next round of funding was also denied entirely after receiving financial support from 2023 to 2025.
"The needs of the communities they serve will be negatively impacted by this decision," the group's executive director Tonia Occhionero said.
Health Canada said it will release the list of projects it is funding in the coming months.
The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada said Health Canada confirmed it will receive $1.2 million from the fund to work on menopause education. Last year, federal funds supported an abortion and contraception access project.
The society's chief executive officer, Dr. Diane Francoeur, said funding that's already been allocated doesn't usually get touched when governments change hands.
'But we'll see. There's a lot of uncertainty,' Francoeur said.
She said funding cuts for sexual and reproductive care would most impact abortion education and support.
"We have to secure what we have because it's so easy to lose," said Francoeur.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 28, 2025.
Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.
Hannah Alberga, The Canadian Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vegetarianism associated with decreased cancer risk
Vegetarianism associated with decreased cancer risk

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Vegetarianism associated with decreased cancer risk

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, accounting for 1 in 6 deaths worldwide in 2018, according to the World Health Organization. Cancer is caused by both genetic and environmental factors, which vary depending on cancer type. Diet is known to be a major risk factor for multiple cancers, with processed and red meat being a risk factor for bowel cancer. Previous studies have explored the association between vegetarianism and multiple common cancers, but associations with less common cancers have yet to be explored, and in research published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Gary Fraser and colleagues used cohort study data from The Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) to assess the relationship between vegetarianism and risk of different uncommon and common cancer types. The study found that vegetarians had a 12% lower risk of developing cancer overall compared to non-vegetarians. To observe the effects of diet and the odds of developing cancer, the study collected baseline data of participants from the AHS-2. This cohort study recruited more than 95,000 US and Canadian participants between 2002 and 2007, all of whom were volunteer members of the Seventh-day Adventist church. Dietary habits were obtained from a validated food frequency questionnaire. Vegetarians included those categorised as vegans (who avoided all animal products, consuming fewer than one such product per month), lacto-ovo-vegetarians (who avoided meat and fish but consumed eggs/dairy once or more per month), and pesco-vegetarians (who avoided meat but consumed eggs/dairy/fish once or more per month). Cancer diagnosis (identified using the International Classification of Diseases version 10 and International Classification of Diseases, Oncology codes) was obtained by matching the AHS-2 data to cancer registries, with follow-up lasting from 2010 to 2013, depending on the US state and Canadian province/territory. In total, 79,468 participants were included in the study. Compared to non-vegetarians, vegetarians had a 12% lower risk of developing cancer overall. Vegetarians were also shown to have decreased risk of bowel cancer development, with a 45% lower risk of developing stomach cancer, a 20% lower risk of developing colon cancer, and a 21% lower risk of developing colorectal cancer. Other than bowel cancers, vegetarians had a lower risk of lymphoma and lymphoproliferative cancers compared to non-vegetarians, both with a 25% decreased risk. The study by Fraser and colleagues provides further evidence of vegetarianism being a protective factor against bowel cancers, and also provides new evidence for vegetarianism being a protective factor against lymphoproliferative cancers. The study therefore provides an incentive to explore what aspects of vegetarianism protect against these cancers specifically. However, it is important to note that information on dietary habits was taken at the beginning of the study, which was subject to change during follow-up. GlobalData epidemiologists forecast that in the 16 major markets (16MM: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, India, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, the UK and the US), five-year diagnosed prevalent cases of colorectal cancer in men and women aged 18 years and over will increase from 4.6 million in 2025 to 5.4 million in 2031. "Vegetarianism associated with decreased cancer risk" was originally created and published by Clinical Trials Arena, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Is cereal good or bad for you? 11 best 'healthy' brands in Canada, ranked on sugar, fibre, protein and more
Is cereal good or bad for you? 11 best 'healthy' brands in Canada, ranked on sugar, fibre, protein and more

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Is cereal good or bad for you? 11 best 'healthy' brands in Canada, ranked on sugar, fibre, protein and more

A dietitian says that regardless of healthiness, it's necessary to start your day by fuelling your body with food. If in the mad-dash morning rush you're managing to put any food in your stomach at all, registered dietitian Janine LaForte wants you to know you're doing all right. She knows breakfast is a challenge for those facing the consequences of the snooze button or racing against the arrival of the school bus. This stress, LaForte says, is particularly felt for families facing food insecurity, an interlocking barrier mounting up on top of regular morning hurley-burley. LaForte, who also owns Real Life Nutrition in Winnipeg, notes her personal ideal morning meal isn't breakfast cereal: 'It would be something like just an oatmeal, right? There's that one ingredient [and] you add in what you'd like.' This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. However, she notes that cereal is an affordable, dependable choice to start the day for many: 'There are a lot of families who are struggling. And there's a lot of kids who don't want to eat breakfast. And cereal — and I will tell you, from my own personal experience — has been the go-to breakfast because it's quick. Kids are often rushing in the morning, and parents [are] as well.' Cereal, she says, is typically an easy, quick meal. 'If it's a matter of eating a bowl of cereal, even if it's something that you may deem not so 'healthy,' it's at least something that they're getting in before they go out the door. Or even as an adult goes out the door.' But with some cereals so laden with sugar that they border on candy, how can you make sure you're pouring yourself a bowl of goodness in those snatched A.M. moments? Here, LaForte guides us through what makes some cereals stack up better than others. Plus, keep scrolling for a nutritional comparison of some of the most popular 'healthy' cereal brands you can find in Canadian grocery stores. Fibre, sugar, balance: What to look for when shopping for cereal 'I think breakfast is a really good opportunity to get fibre in your diet,' LaForte says, adding that choosing higher-fibre cereal is an excellent starting point for a nutritious breakfast. Whole grains, of course, pack more fibre than their refined counterparts, so LaForte suggests checking ingredient lists to ensure what your cereal is made of. A 2015 study (the most recent stats available) from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition shares LaForte's focus on fibre. It indicates that less than 25 per cent of Canadians age 19 and older get enough of the digestion-and-satiety-aiding nutrient daily. Making a bowl of cereal into a balanced meal with staying power also means topping the cereal with things like fruit, seeds, nuts or yogurt, LaForte adds. Think classic options like sliced bananas and blueberries, or even pumpkin seeds and Greek yogurt. She also adds that variety is the key to good nutrition, so switching up the toppings and the cereals themselves — say, trying one made from corn and then one made from wheat — helps ensure you're getting different nutrients into your overall diet. Then there's sugar, an ingredient LaForte says 'people tend to eat more [of] than they need to.' Comparing nutritional labels and going for the lower-sugar option is an effective method to make sure you're pouring a healthier bowl of cereal. But LaForte does note that since cereals are 'fortified with vitamins and minerals in Canada,' the sugary treats could be a source of nutrients for picky eaters and those facing food insecurity. While reducing added sugar where you can in your diet is an important part of healthy eating, so is ensuring that you're getting enough of key nutrients. Are popular 'healthy' cereal brands in Canada actually healthy? In the breakdown below, we've rounded up a variety of healthy cereals to see which ones are your best A.M. bet in terms of nutritional information per a one-cup serving — not including milk. It's worth mentioning that all of the cereals are sources of nutrients like potassium, calcium and iron, with a majority also having several vitamins. It turns out that Shredded Wheat is tough to beat with no sugar and a mere gram of fat alongside a high fibre and protein content. Müslix, meanwhile, packs more sugar and fat than you might expect. Fibre One, on the other hand, lives up to its name with a whopping 27 grams of fibre — just five grams less than an average adult woman needs daily. Shredded Wheat Original Calories: 180 Fat: 1 g Fibre: 6 g Sugar: 0 g Sodium: 0 g Protein: 5 g Fibre One Crunchy Original Calories: 140 Fat: 1 g Fibre: 27 g Sugar: 1 g Sodium: 220 mg Protein: 4 g Multi Grain Cheerios Calories: 120 Fat: 1 g Fibre: 2 g Sugar: 6 g Sodium: 160 mg Protein: 2 g Kellogg's Two Scoops Raisin Bran Calories: 180 Fat: 1 g Fibre: 7 g Sugar: 14 g Sodium: 170 mg Protein: 5 g Nature's Path Smart Bran Calories: 140 Fat: 2 g Fibre: 23 g Sugar: 11 g Sodium: 230 mg Protein: 5 g Nature's Path Multigrain Flakes Calories: 210 Fat: 2 g Fibre: 10 g Sugar: 8 g Sodium: 210 mg Protein: 6 g Kellogg's All-Bran Original Calories: 180 Fat: 3 g Fibre: 18 g Sugar: 10 g Sodium: 320 mg Protein: 8 g Kellogg's Vector Maple Flavour Calories: 160 Fat: 1 g Fibre: 3 g Sugar: 12 g Sodium: 160 mg Protein: 10 g Kashi GoActive Mixed Berry Crunch Calories: 290 Fat: 4.5 g Fibre: 14 g Sugar: 15 g Sodium: 85 mg Protein: 14 g Kashi GoActive Honey Almond Flax Crunch Calories: 300 Fat: 8 g Fibre: 15 g Sugar: 17 g Sodium: 230 mg Protein: 15 g Kellogg's Müslix Almond Raisin Calories: 240 Fat: 2.5 g Fibre: 7 g Sugar: 17 g Sodium: 150 mg Protein: 6 g In the end, no matter if you're eating Shredded Wheat or Coco Puffs, LaForte touts the importance of starting your day with breakfast: 'Food is the fuel for our bodies. If you want to be able to function and do your best during your day, you need to fuel your brain. 'Some people don't like eating breakfast. However, if you can get something in, anything — a yogurt, some fruit, a balanced breakfast is the best. But if you can just get something in within an hour of waking up, that's going to be the best for your body.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store