UK announces plans to extend seabed trawling ban
LONDON : The UK outlined plans today to extend its ban on 'destructive' seabed trawling to more than half of protected English seas, launching a consultation involving marine and fisheries stakeholders.
Under the plans, which environment minister Steve Reed was due to announce at the UN Ocean Conference in France later today, bottom trawling will be banned in another 30,000 square kilometres of English seas in marine protected areas (MPAs).
There are currently 181 MPAs covering 93,000km squared, or 40% of English waters.
Around 18,000km squared of those waters are currently protected from harmful fishing activity, but that would rise to 48,000km squared under the government's plans.
Bottom trawling, in which heavy nets dragged by chains are pulled along the seabed, 'is damaging our precious marine wildlife and habitats', Reed said in a government press release.
'Without urgent action, our oceans will be irreversibly destroyed – depriving us, and generations to come, of the sea life… which we all enjoy.'
'The government is taking decisive action to ban destructive bottom trawling where appropriate,' he added.
World leaders started gathering on the French Riviera yesterday ahead of the high-level summit to tackle a deepening crisis in the oceans driven by overfishing, climate change and pollution.
The United Nations says oceans face an 'emergency' and the leaders gathering in Nice will be under pressure to commit money and stronger protections for the seas and the people that depend on them.
The UK says its bottom trawling plans would help protect rare marine animals and the delicate seabeds on which they rely.
The British consultation will invite marine and fisheries stakeholders to share their views and will run from Monday until September 1.
The measures would affect marine habitats ranging from subtidal sandbanks to gravels to muds, and support species such as lobster, clams, soft corals and langoustines.
'For too long damaging activities have been allowed to continue within many of our MPAs which are supposed to protect the seabed,' said Joan Edwards from the Wildlife Trusts, a federation of charities.
They 'have been campaigning for a long time for better management of our MPAs and therefore welcome the news today of a consultation to ban bottom-towed trawling in over 40 offshore sites', she added.
Elsewhere at the UN conference, the UK was set to pledge a further £4 million to the Global Fund for Coral Reefs, bringing the country's total contribution to the fund up to £40 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Israel approves E1 West Bank settlement threatening two-state solution
JERUSALEM: Israeli authorities have approved a major settlement construction project in the sensitive E1 area of the occupied West Bank. The international community has repeatedly warned that building in this territory threatens the viability of a future Palestinian state. Israel has long pursued ambitions to develop the approximately 12 square kilometres known as E1 located just east of Jerusalem. This controversial plan had remained stalled for years due to widespread international opposition. Critics argue the settlement would destroy hopes for a contiguous Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital. Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich recently endorsed plans to construct approximately 3,400 homes on this ultrasensitive land parcel between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim settlement. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that Israeli construction there would 'put an end to' hopes for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Maale Adumim Mayor Guy Yifrach announced the approval in a statement saying 'I am pleased to announce that just a short while ago, the civil administration approved the planning for the construction of the E1 neighbourhood.' All Israeli settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, remain illegal under international law regardless of Israeli planning permission. Researcher Aviv Tatarsky from Israeli anti-settlement organisation Ir Amim stated 'Today's approval demonstrates how determined Israel is in pursuing what Minister Smotrich has described as a strategic programme to bury the possibility of a Palestinian state and to effectively annex the West Bank.' He added 'This is a conscious Israeli choice to implement an apartheid regime' while calling for urgent international measures against the move. Israeli monitoring group Peace Now indicated last week that infrastructure work in E1 could commence within months with housing construction starting within about one year. The West Bank excluding east Jerusalem contains approximately three million Palestinians alongside about 500,000 Israeli settlers. – AFP
Malay Mail
12 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Asean and the FPDA: Twin anchors of Malaysia's security outlook — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 20 — When Asean was established on August 8, 1967, its founding members envisioned a regional order built on dialogue, cooperation, and resilience. For South-east Asia, still emerging from the shadows of colonial rule and Cold War confrontation, Asean was a bold attempt to craft a zone of stability. Four years later, in 1971, Malaysia and Singapore joined hands with Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand to launch the Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA). This pact was no accident of history; it was a deliberate complement to Asean's vision of regional security. The FPDA was born just a year after Asean declared the Zone of Peace, Freedom, and Neutrality (Zopfan) in Kuala Lumpur in 1970. Zopfan was a political statement of intent: South-east Asia must not become the playground of great power rivalry. But declarations alone could not guarantee safety. The Vietnam War was raging, and the withdrawal of British forces east of Suez left Malaysia and Singapore vulnerable. The FPDA filled this gap. While Zopfan embodied Asean's diplomatic quest for neutrality, the FPDA offered a hard security safety net—anchored not in alliance obligations but in consultation and cooperation. The importance of the FPDA for Malaysia cannot be overstated. Unlike Nato, it does not bind members to collective defence. Instead, it institutionalises regular consultations and joint military exercises, ensuring Malaysia and Singapore are never isolated in the face of aggression. Over the years, exercises such as Bersama Shield and Bersama Lima have done more than sharpen tactics; they have nurtured interoperability, exposed Malaysian forces to advanced operational practices, and prepared them for United Nations peacekeeping deployments. These engagements are Malaysia's only consistent multinational military training opportunities—an invaluable supplement to its limited defense capacity. When Asean was established on August 8, 1967, its founding members envisioned a regional order built on dialogue, cooperation, and resilience. — Picture by Raymond Manuel At the same time, Asean and the FPDA should not be seen as competing pillars of security. They are symbiotic. Asean, with its emphasis on consensus and dialogue, creates the political environment that makes cooperative security possible. The FPDA, in turn, provides a practical mechanism for capacity-building, ensuring that Malaysia and Singapore remain confident participants in Asean's broader vision of regional stability. Together, they reflect Malaysia's dual strategy: embrace neutrality and diplomacy through Asean, while anchoring deterrence and preparedness through the FPDA. Half a century on, both institutions face new tests. The rise of China, the resurgence of US strategic primacy, and tensions in the South China Sea demand careful balancing. Here, Asean continues to serve as the convenor of dialogue through the Asean Regional Forum, East Asia Summit, and the ongoing negotiations on a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea. The FPDA, meanwhile, has adapted to include non-traditional security threats—counterterrorism, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief—broadening its relevance in an era where security is no longer defined solely by state-to-state conflict. Critics often argue that the FPDA is a relic of the Cold War. Yet its enduring value lies in flexibility. It reassures Malaysia and Singapore without constraining them in rigid treaty commitments. Similarly, Asean, though derided as slow-moving, has preserved South-east Asia as one of the least conflict-prone regions in the world. Neither is perfect, but both are indispensable. For Malaysia, the lesson is clear. Asean and the FPDA are not parallel tracks but complementary ones. They represent two sides of the same coin: Asean provides the diplomatic shield, while the FPDA delivers the operational muscle. In a region where great powers jostle for influence, Malaysia's security will continue to rest on the twin anchors laid down in 1967 and 1971. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
Kim slams military drills while inspecting warship
Boost for defence: Kim inspecting the warship 'Choe Hyon' in Nampo, North Korea. — AP Leader Kim Jong-un condemned South Korean-US military drills and vowed a rapid expansion of his nuclear forces to counter rivals, state media said, as he inspected his most advanced warship being fitted with nuclear-capable systems. Kim's visit to the western port of Nampo on Monday came as the South Korean and US militaries kicked off their annual large-scale summertime exercise to bolster readiness against growing North Korean threats. The 11-day Ulchi Freedom Shield, which the allies describe as defensive, will mobilise 21,000 troops, including 18,000 South Koreans. North Korea has long denounced the allies' joint drills as invasion rehearsals and Kim has often used them to justify his own military displays and testing activities aimed at expanding his nuclear weapons programme. While inspecting the warship Choe Hyon, a 5,000-tonne-class destroyer first unveiled in April, Kim said the allies' joint military drills show hostility and their supposed 'will to ignite a war,' the North's Korean Central News Agency said. He claimed that the exercises have grown more provocative than before by incorporating a 'nuclear element,' requiring the North to respond with 'proactive and overwhelming' countermeasures. 'The security environment around the DPRK is getting more serious day by day and the prevailing situation requires us to make a radical and swift change in the existing military theory and practice and rapid expansion of nuclearisation,' KCNA paraphrased Kim as saying, using the initials of North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The government of South Korea's new liberal President Lee Jae-myung, who has expressed a willingness to repair ties and resume dialogue with the North, did not immediately respond to Kim's comments. — AP
